Primary dental care treatment in primary Sjögren's syndrome: a possible role in improving salivary flow rate.

OBJECTIVES: Primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) is an inflammatory chronic disorder that mainly affects exocrine glands. Additionally, oral infections can aggravate the glandular dysfunction. However, data on primary dental care (PDC) treatment in pSS are scarce. This study aimed to appraise the impact of PDC on the Xerostomia Inventory (XI), unstimulated/stimulated salivary flow rates and salivary cytokine profile in pSS. METHODS: Fifty-two pSS patients and 52 sex- and age-matched control participants without systemic autoimmune diseases were included in a prospective study. At inclusion, all participants were assessed through a standardised protocol, measurement of salivary pro-inflammatory cytokines, and underwent PDC. Dental procedures included: oral hygiene guidance, restorative treatment of caries, surgical removal of residual roots and impacted or partially erupted teeth, cysts, supra and subgingival periodontal scaling and treatment of soft tissue disorders (removal of lesions and treatment of opportunistic infections). After 3 months, the clinical/laboratorial assessments were repeated. RESULTS: At inclusion, the Decayed, Missing and Filled Teeth (DMFT) index was higher in the pSS patients than in the control group (13.3±8.2 vs. 8.6±6.2, p=0.002), whereas periodontal parameters were comparable in both groups (p>0.05). After PDC, 26.9% of pSS patients showed a reduction of at least 6 points (clinical improvement) in XI, but mean XI remained unchanged (p=0.285). PDC resulted in an increase in mean unstimulated (p<0.001) and stimulated (p=0.001) salivary flow rates in pSS, with no change in salivary cytokine profile (p≥0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PDC promoted improvement in unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow rates in pSS. This novel finding reinforces the recommendation of this strategy for pSS patients. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (Identifier: NCT03711214).

Periodontopathogenic bacteria in subglottic samples from patients undergoing elective intubation for general anesthesia: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Translocation of periodontal pathogens into the respiratory tract could either cause pneumonia or disrupt local defense mechanisms, predisposing the host to infection by respiratory pathogens. The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate the levels of periodontopathogenic bacteria in subglottic samples of intubated and mechanically ventilated patients and the impact of oral decontamination with chlorhexidine (CHX) on subglottic levels of these microorganisms. METHODS: Patients scheduled to undergo elective surgical procedures requiring endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation for at least 3 hours were included. Following full-mouth periodontal examination, patients were randomly assigned to groups that rinsed preoperatively with 0.12% CHX or 0.9% saline (control). After 3 hours of orotracheal intubation, subglottic contents were collected. Quantification of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (A. actinomycetemcomitans), Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis), and Tannerella forsythia (T. forsythia) in subglottic samples was determined using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Data were analyzed by Fisher Exact Probability, unpaired Student's t and Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: Of the 69 patients included, 43 completed study participation. There were no differences between control and CHX groups in subglottic detection rates and abundance levels of P. gingivalis (P = 0.59), T. forsythia (P = 0.83) and A. actinomycetemcomitans (P = 0.07). Moreover, our data indicate that periodontal health has no impact on subglottic levels of P. gingivalis, T. forsythia, and A. actinomycetemcomitans. CONCLUSIONS: Periodontal pathogens were detected in subglottic samples of intubated and mechanically ventilated patients. Moreover, a single CHX rinse prior to endotracheal intubation may have no effect on subglottic contamination by P. gingivalis, T. forsythia, and A. actinomycetemcomitans.

Comparative analysis of 2 techniques of double-gloving protection during arch bar placement for intermaxillary fixation.

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to comparatively evaluate, in a prospective and randomized manner, 2 techniques for providing double-gloving protection during arch bar placement for intermaxillary fixation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 42 consecutive patients in whom application of an Erich bar was indicated for intermaxillary fixation were equally divided into 2 groups. In group 1, 2 sterile surgical gloves were used; in group 2, a nonsterile disposable inner glove was used under a sterile surgical glove. Wilcoxon, Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, and binomial statistical tests were used to analyze the findings. RESULTS: A total of 103 perforations were found in the outer gloves (47 in group 1 and 56 in group 2), along with 5 perforations in inner gloves in both groups (alpha = .01). No significant statistical difference was found between groups in terms of inner glove perforations (alpha = .05). The nondominant hand presented with 70.9% of the perforations, statistically significant to 1%. CONCLUSIONS: Both double-gloving techniques were found to provide effective clinician protection. The use of a nonsterile disposable glove under the surgical glove is possible for less-invasive procedures, offering the same safety as using 2 sterile surgical gloves while decreasing operational costs. This method does not eliminate the need to change gloves when a perforation is suspected or noted during the surgery, however.