Efficacy of trifluridine and tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo, with supportive care, in a randomized, controlled trial of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer from Spain: results of a subgroup analysis of the phase 3 RECOURSE trial.

PURPOSE: TAS-102 is a combination of the thymidine-based nucleoside analog trifluridine and the thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor tipiracil. Efficacy and safety of TAS-102 in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory or intolerant to standard therapies were evaluated in the phase 3 RECOURSE trial. Results of RECOURSE demonstrated significant improvement in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with TAS-102 versus placebo [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.68 and 0.48 for OS and PFS, respectively; both P < 0.001]. The current analysis evaluates efficacy and safety of TAS-102 in the RECOURSE Spanish subgroup. METHODS: Primary and key secondary endpoints were evaluated in a post hoc analysis of the RECOURSE Spanish subgroup, using univariate and multivariate analyses. Safety and tolerability were reported with descriptive statistics. RESULTS: The RECOURSE Spanish subgroup included 112 patients (mean age 61 years, 62 % male). Median OS was 6.8 months in the TAS-102 group (n = 80) versus 4.6 months in the placebo group (n = 32) [HR = 0.47; 95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.28-0.78; P = 0.0032). Median PFS was 2.0 months in the TAS-102 group and 1.7 months in the placebo group (HR = 0.47; 95 % CI: 0.30-0.74; P = 0.001). Eighty (100 %) TAS-102 versus 31 (96.9 %) placebo patients had adverse events (AEs). The most common drug-related ≥Grade 3 AE was neutropenia (40 % TAS-102 versus 0 % placebo). There was 1 (1.3 %) case of febrile neutropenia in the TAS-102 group versus none in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: In the RECOURSE Spanish subgroup, TAS-102 was associated with significantly improved OS and PFS versus placebo, consistent with the overall RECOURSE population. No new safety signals were identified. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV STUDY NUMBER: NCT01607957.

SEOM Clinical Guideline of localized rectal cancer (2016).

Localized rectal adenocarcinoma is a heterogeneous disease and current treatment recommendations are based on a preoperative multidisciplinary evaluation. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic ultrasound are complementary to do a locoregional accurate staging. Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment and preoperative therapies with chemoradiation (CRT) or short-course radiation (SCRT) must be considered in more locally advanced cases. Novel strategies with induction chemotherapy alone or preceding or after CRT (SCRT) and surgery are in development.

Further evidence for preoperative chemoradiotherapy and transanal endoscopic surgery (TEM) in T2-3s,N0,M0 rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and local excision via transanal endoscopic surgery (TEM) in T2-3s,N0,M0 rectal cancer achieve promising results in selected patients. We describe our long-term follow-up experience with this combination, and evaluate complete clinical and pathological responses, local recurrence and overall survival. METHODS: The prospective observational follow-up study carried out since 2007. Out of 476 consecutive patients treated with TEM, we selected those with adenocarcinoma of low or moderate grade of differentiation, clinical stages T2-superficial T3,N0,M0, who refused radical surgery. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy comprised 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine combined with radiotherapy at a dose of 50.4 Gy. TEM was performed after 8 weeks. Complications were recorded and long-term follow-up was conducted. RESULTS: Fifteen patients undergoing preoperative chemoradiotherapy and TEM (median age 76 years, 95 % CI 70.3-80.4, and median follow-up 38 months, 95 % CI 20-44) were studied. No local recurrence was observed, and only one patient (6.7 %) presented systemic relapse. The overall survival was 76 %. Complete clinical response was achieved in seven patients (46.7 %) and complete pathological response in four (26.7 %). With regard to toxicity associated with neoadjuvant treatment, four patients (26.7 %) developed grade 3 adverse effects; no grade 4 or 5 adverse effects were observed. There was no postoperative mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study, with a response rate of 26.7 % and without local relapse, support the treatment of T2-3s,N0,M0 of rectal cancer with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and local excision (TEM).

Seom guidelines for the treatment of gastric cancer 2015.

Gastric cancer is the fourth cause of death by cancer in Spain and a significant medical problem. Molecular biology results evidence that gastroesophageal junction tumors and gastric cancer should be considered as two independent entities with a different prognosis and treatment approach. Endoscopic resection in very early tumors is feasible. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy in locally advanced resectable tumor increase overall survival and should be considered standard treatments. In stage IV tumors, platinum-fluoropyrimidine-based schedule, with trastuzumab in HER2-overexpressed tumors, is the first-line treatment. Different therapies in second line have demonstrated in randomized studies their clear benefit in survival improvement.

Clinical management of regorafenib in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common tumors worldwide and at least 50 % of patients with this disease develop metastases. In this setting, additional treatment options are needed for patients presenting disease progression after exhausting all standard therapies. Regorafenib is an orally administered multikinase inhibitor which has been shown to provide survival benefits to patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Although most adverse events (AEs) associated with regorafenib may resolve within the first 8 weeks of treatment, some of them may require dose reduction or treatment interruption. Overall, while remaining aware of the safety profile of regorafenib and how to manage the most common toxicities related to its use, this drug should be considered a new standard of care for patients with pretreated mCRC. This review addresses practical aspects of its use, such as dosing, patient monitoring, and management of the most common regorafenib-related AEs.

TTD consensus document on the diagnosis and management of exocrine pancreatic cancer.

Exocrine pancreatic cancer (PC) is a very aggressive and heterogeneous tumor with several cellular signaling pathways implicated in its pathogenesis and maintenance. Several risk factors increase the risk of developing PC. Therapeutic strategies used are dictated by the extent of disease. Supportive treatment is critical because of the high frequency of symptoms. For localized disease, surgery followed by adjuvant gemcitabine is the standard. Neoadjuvant and new adjuvant chemotherapy regimens are being evaluated. Locally advanced disease should respond best guided by a multidisciplinary team. Various treatment options are appropriate such as chemotherapy alone or chemoradiotherapy with integration of rescue surgery if the tumor becomes resectable. In metastatic disease, chemotherapy should be reserved for patients with ECOG 0-1 using Folfirinox or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel as the most recommended options. Several therapeutic strategies targeting unregulated pathways are under evaluation with an unmet need for biomarkers to guide management.

Extravasation of oxaliplatin: an infrequent and irritant toxicity.

Oxaliplatin has been classified as an irritant drug. Less than 10 cases of oxaliplatin extravasation through a central venous access have been described to date. We present a case of extravasation through a central venous access, of the highest dose (165 mg) of oxaliplatin reported to date. We confirmed the irritant effect, and full recovery from toxicity was achieved. We describe the treatment administered and offer a review of literature.