Heart rate variability does not discriminate between different levels of haemodynamic responsiveness during surgical anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Hypnotic depth but not haemodynamic responsiveness is measured with EEG-based monitors. In this study we compared heart rate variability (HRV) in unstimulated patients and stimulation-induced HRV at different levels of anaesthesia. METHODS: A total of 95 ASA I or II patients were randomly assigned to five groups (Group 1: BIS 45(5), remifentanil 1 ng ml(-1); Group 2: BIS 45(5), remifentanil 2 ng ml(-1); Group 3: BIS 45(5), remifentanil 4 ng ml(-1); Group 4: BIS 30(5), remifentanil 2 ng ml(-1); Group 5: BIS 60(5), remifentanil 2 ng ml(-1)). A time- and frequency-domain analysis of the RR interval (RRI) from the electrocardiogram was performed. HRV before induction, before and after a 5 s tetanic stimulus of the ulnar nerve, and before and after tracheal intubation was compared between groups, between stimuli, and between responders to intubation [systolic arterial pressure (SAP) increase >20 mm Hg, a maximal heart rate (HR) after intubation >90 min(-1) or both] and non-responders (anova). RESULTS: Induction of anaesthesia significantly lowered HR and HRV. Mean RRI before stimulation was higher in G3 than in G1, G2, and G4 (P < 0.001), whereas the other HRV parameters were similar. Intubation induced a greater HRV response than tetanic stimulation. The mean RRI after intubation was lower in G3 compared with the other groups and the sd of the RRI after tetanic stimulation was lower in G3 compared with G5. Otherwise, unstimulated HRV and stimulation-induced HRV were similar in responders and non-responders. CONCLUSION: HRV parameters discriminate between awake and general anaesthesia, are different after tracheal intubation and a 5 s ulnar nerve stimulation, but do not discriminate between different levels of haemodynamic responsiveness during surgical anaesthesia.

Stimulation induced variability of pulse plethysmography does not discriminate responsiveness to intubation.

BACKGROUND: Hypnotic depth but not haemodynamic response to painful stimulation can be measured with various EEG-based anaesthesia monitors. We evaluated the variation of pulse plethysmography amplitude induced by an electrical tetanic stimulus (PPG variation) as a potential measure for analgesia and predictor of haemodynamic responsiveness during general anaesthesia. METHODS: Ninety-five patients, ASA I or II, were randomly assigned to five groups [Group 1: bispectral index (BIS) (range) 40-50, effect site remifentanil concentration 1 ng ml(-1);Group 2: BIS 40-50, remifentanil 2 ng ml(-1); Group 3: BIS 40-50, remifentanil 4 ng ml(-1); Group 4: BIS 25-35, remifentanil 2 ng ml(-1); Group 5: BIS 55-65, remifentanil 2 ng ml(-1)]. A 60 mA tetanic stimulus was applied for 5 s on the ulnar nerve. From the digitized pulse oximeter wave recorded on a laptop computer, linear and non-linear parameters of PPG variation during the 60 s period after stimulation were computed. The haemodynamic response to subsequent orotracheal intubation was recorded. The PPG variation was compared between groups and between responders and non-responders to intubation (anova). Variables independently predicting the response were determined by logistic regression. RESULTS: The probability of a response to tracheal intubation was 0.77, 0.47, 0.05, 0.18 and 0.52 in Groups 1-5, respectively (P<0.03). The PPG variability was significantly higher in responders than in non-responders but it did not improve the prediction of the response to tracheal intubation based on BIS level and effect site remifentanil concentration. CONCLUSION: Tetanic stimulation induced PPG variation does not reflect the analgesic state in a wide clinical range of surgical anaesthesia.

Different benefit of bispectal index (BIS) in desflurane and propofol anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Bispectal index (BIS) monitoring may reduce drug usage and hasten recovery in propofol and inhalation anesthesia. The faster emergence profile of desflurane may reduce the effect of BIS monitoring on recovery from desflurane compared with propofol. This study compared hypnotic drug usage, recovery, patient satisfaction and incidence of inadequate sedation in BIS monitored and nonmonitored women anesthetized with desflurane or propofol. METHODS: One hundred and sixty patients scheduled for elective gynecological surgery were randomly assigned to desflurane or propofol anesthesia with and without BIS monitoring. Fentanyl, vecuronium and remifentanil were administered according to clinical criteria. The BIS monitor was used in all patients, but the monitor screen was covered in the controls. A BIS level between 45 and 55 was targeted in the BIS monitored patients whereas depth of anesthesia was assessed by clinical criteria in the controls. RESULTS: The mean (SD) desflurane MAC-hours administered with and without BIS were 0.70 (0.15) and 0.76 (0.12), respectively, resulting in extubation times of 6.5 (4.1) and 8.3 (6.1) min. (NS). Bispectal index monitoring was associated with improved patient satisfaction, reduced postoperative nausea and antiemetic drug requirement, and fewer episodes with sustained BIS levels > 60. The mean (SD) propofol infusion rates were 6.0 (1.4) and 6.6 (0.9) mg kg(-1)h(-1) with and without the BIS monitor (P = 0.023), resulting in mean (SD) extubation times of 6.8 (4.6) and 10.5 min (5.9), respectively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Bispectal index monitoring reduced propofol usage and hastened recovery after propofol anesthesia, whereas in desflurane anesthesia it was associated with improved patient satisfaction, probably because of decreased postoperative nausea and fewer episodes of inadequate hypnosis.

Lumbar epidural fentanyl: segmental spread and effect on temporal summation and muscle pain.

BACKGROUND: Despite extensive use, different aspects of the pharmacological action of epidural fentanyl have not been clarified. We applied a multi-modal sensory test procedure to investigate the effect of epidural fentanyl on segmental spread, temporal summation (as a measure for short-lasting central hyperexcitability) and muscle pain. METHODS: Thirty patients received either placebo, 50 or 100 micro g single dose of fentanyl epidurally (L2-3), in a randomized, double-blind fashion. Heat pain tolerance thresholds at eight dermatomes from S1 to fifth cranial nerve (assessment of segmental spread), pain threshold to transcutaneous repeated electrical stimulation of the sural nerve (assessment of temporal summation) and pain intensity after injection of hypertonic saline into the tibialis anterior muscle (assessment of muscle pain) were recorded. RESULTS: Fentanyl 100 micro g, but not 50 micro g, produced analgesia to heat stimulation only at L2. Surprisingly, no effect at S1 was detected. Both fentanyl doses significantly increased temporal summation threshold and decreased muscle pain intensity. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that a single lumbar epidural dose of fentanyl should be injected at the spinal interspace corresponding to the dermatomal site of pain. Increased effect on L2 compared with S1 suggests that drug effect on spinal nerve roots and binding to opioid receptors on the dorsal root ganglia may be more important than traditionally believed for the segmental effect of epidurally injected fentanyl. Epidural fentanyl increases temporal summation threshold and could therefore contribute to prevention and treatment of central hypersensitivity states. I.M. injection of hypertonic saline is a sensitive technique for detecting the analgesic action of epidural opioids.

Prediction of the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation: comparison of laser-Doppler skin vasomotor reflex and pulse wave reflex.

BACKGROUND: The laser-Doppler skin vasomotor reflex (SVmR) caused by tetanic stimulation of the ulnar nerve may be a test that can predict the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation. A decrease in pulse wave amplitude (pulse wave reflex, PWR) may be an alternative index of this response. We compared the abilities of PWR and SVmR to predict the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation and studied how alfentanil, muscle relaxation, stimulation site and stimulation pattern affected the two reflexes. METHODS: Anaesthesia was induced and maintained with 2% sevoflurane and 50% nitrous oxide in two groups of 10 ASA status 1 patients. Tetanic stimuli were applied to the flexor muscles of the forearm and the ulnar nerve before and after administration of vecuronium. The change in skin blood flow (laser-Doppler) and pulse wave amplitude (pulse oximetry) after a 5 and 10 s stimulation was measured on the opposite hand. If skin blood flow (laser-Doppler) decreased by more than 10%, a computer-controlled infusion of alfentanil was started and the target plasma concentration was increased in steps until this response was suppressed (< 10%). The trachea was intubated and arterial pressure and heart rate responses were recorded. Plasma alfentanil concentration was measured. RESULTS: When PWR and SVmR were suppressed, the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation was reduced in 100 and 53% of patients respectively. PWR and SVmR responses decreased with increasing plasma alfentanil concentration. The SVmR response to muscle stimulation was reduced by muscle relaxants. The pulse wave response to both muscle and neural stimulation was reduced by relaxants. The responses to 5 and 10 s stimulations were similar. CONCLUSION: An absent SVmR does not predict a blunted arterial pressure or heart rate response to tracheal intubation. The PWR may be a better predictor.

Comparison of five experimental pain tests to measure analgesic effects of alfentanil.

BACKGROUND: Several experimental pain models have been used to measure opioid effects in humans. The aim of the current study was to compare the qualities of five frequently used experimental pain tests to measure opioid effects. METHODS: The increase of electrical, heat, and pressure pain tolerance and the decrease of ice-water and ischemic pain perception was determined at baseline and at four different plasma concentrations of alfentanil (n = 7) administered as target controlled infusion or placebo (n = 7). A linear mixed-effects modeling (NONMEM) was performed to detect drug, placebo, and time effect as well as interindividual and intraindividual variation of effect. RESULTS: Only the electrical, ice-water, and pressure pain tests are sensitive to assess a concentration-response curve of alfentanil. At a plasma alfentanil concentration of 100 ng/ml, the increase in pain tolerance compared with baseline was 42.0% for electrical pain, 22.2% for pressure pain, and 21.7% for ice-water pain. The slope of the linear concentration-response curve had an interindividual coefficient of variation of 58.3% in electrical pain, 35.6% in pressure pain, and 60.0% in ice-water pain. The residual error including intraindividual variation at an alfentanil concentration of 100 ng/ml was 19.4% for electrical pain, 6.1% for pressure pain, and 13.0% for ice-water pain. Electrical pain was affected by a significant placebo effect, and pressure pain was affected by a significant time effect. CONCLUSION: Electrical, pressure, and ice-water pain, but not ischemic and heat pain, provide significant concentration-response curves in the clinically relevant range of 200 ng/ml alfentanil or lower. The power to detect a clinically relevant shift of the curve is similar in the three tests. The appropriate test(s) for pharmacodynamic studies should be chosen according to the investigated drug(s) and the study design.

Central hypersensitivity in chronic pain after whiplash injury.

OBJECTIVE: The mechanisms underlying chronic pain after whiplash injury are usually unclear. Injuries may cause sensitization of spinal cord neurons in animals (central hypersensitivity), which results in increased responsiveness to peripheral stimuli. In humans, the responsiveness of the central nervous system to peripheral stimulation may be explored by applying sensory tests to healthy tissues. The hypotheses of this study were: (1) chronic whiplash pain is associated with central hypersensitivity; (2) central hypersensitivity is maintained by nociception arising from the painful or tender muscles in the neck. DESIGN: Comparison of patients with healthy controls. SETTING: Pain clinic and laboratory for pain research, university hospital. PATIENTS: Fourteen patients with chronic neck pain after whiplash injury (car accident) and 14 healthy volunteers. OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain thresholds to: single electrical stimulus (intramuscular), repeated electrical stimulation (intramuscular and transcutaneous), and heat (transcutaneous). Each threshold was measured at neck and lower limb, before and after local anesthesia of the painful and tender muscles of the neck. RESULTS: The whiplash group had significantly lower pain thresholds for all tests. except heat, at both neck and lower limb. Local anesthesia of the painful and tender points affected neither intensity of neck pain nor pain thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: The authors found a hypersensitivity to peripheral stimulation in whiplash patients. Hypersensitivity was observed after cutaneous and muscular stimulation, at both neck and lower limb. Because hypersensitivity was observed in healthy tissues, it resulted from alterations in the central processing of sensory stimuli (central hypersensitivity). Central hypersensitivity was not dependent on a nociceptive input arising from the painful and tender muscles.

Unnecessary emergency caesarean section due to silent CTG during anaesthesia?

We present a case of a probably unnecessary Caesarean section due to misinterpretation of the cardiotocography (CTG) trace during general anaesthesia. A 27-yr-old patient in her 30th week of an uneventful, normal first pregnancy presented with a deep venous thrombosis in the pelvic region. She was to undergo an emergency thrombectomy under general anaesthesia. During the operation, the CTG showed a lack of beat-to-beat heart rate variation (silent pattern CTG) with normal fetal heart rate. This silent CTG pattern was probably a result of the effect of general anaesthesia on the fetus. The CTG pattern was interpreted as indicating fetal distress, and an emergency Caesarean section was performed after the thrombectomy. The infant was apnoeic and had to be resuscitated and admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. The pH at delivery was 7.23 and the baby was extubated 2 days later. Mother and child recovered without short-term sequelae. In the absence of alternative explanations, reduced fetal beat-to-beat variability with a normal baseline heart rate during general anaesthesia is probably normal.

Remifentanil inhibits muscular more than cutaneous pain in humans.

In experimental studies, drug-induced analgesia is usually assessed by cutaneous stimulation. If analgesics act differently on cutaneous and deep nociception, the results of these studies may not be entirely applicable to clinical pain involving deep structures. We tested the hypothesis that opioids have different abilities to inhibit cutaneous and muscular pain. Either the opioid remifentanil or placebo was infused in 12 healthy volunteers in a cross-over fashion. Repeated electrical stimulation (five impulses at 2 Hz) was applied to both skin and muscle. Pain thresholds were recorded. Remifentanil caused a higher increase in the muscular pain thresholds than in the cutaneous pain thresholds (P = 0.035). We conclude that opioids inhibit muscular pain more strongly than cutaneous pain in humans.

A direct search procedure to optimize combinations of epidural bupivacaine, fentanyl, and clonidine for postoperative analgesia.

BACKGROUND: The authors applied an optimization model (direct search) to find the optimal combination of bupivacaine dose, fentanyl dose, clonidine dose, and infusion rate for continuous postoperative epidural analgesia. METHODS: One hundred ninety patients undergoing 48-h thoracic epidural analgesia after major abdominal surgery were studied. Combinations of the variables of bupivacaine dose, fentanyl dose, clonidine dose, and infusion rate were investigated to optimize the analgesic effect (monitored by verbal descriptor pain score) under restrictions dictated by the incidence and severity of side effects. Six combinations were empirically chosen and investigated. Then a stepwise optimization model was applied to determine subsequent combinations until no decrease in the pain score after three consecutive steps was obtained. RESULTS: Twenty combinations were analyzed. The optimization procedure led to a reduction in the incidence of side effects and in the mean pain scores. The three best combinations of bupivacaine dose (mg/h), fentanyl dose (microg/h), clonidine dose (microg/h), and infusion rate (ml/h) were: 9-21-5-7, 8-30-0-9, and 13-25-0-9, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Given the variables investigated, the aforementioned combinations may be the optimal ones to provide postoperative analgesia after major abdominal surgery. Using the direct search method, the enormous number of possible combinations of a therapeutic strategy can be reduced to a small number of potentially useful ones. This is accomplished using a scientific rather than an arbitrary procedure.

Block of pinprick and cold sensation poorly correlate with relief of postoperative pain during epidural analgesia.

OBJECTIVE: To test the following hypotheses: there is a correlation between spread of epidural analgesia as assessed postoperatively by pinprick/cold test and postoperative pain intensity; block of pinprick/cold sensation is associated with absence of postoperative pain. DESIGN: Correlation analysis on prospectively collected data. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred patients undergoing major surgery. Consecutive sample. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received an epidural infusion of bupivacaine 1 mg/ml, fentanyl 2 microg/ml, and epinephrine 2 microg/ml for at least 48 hours postoperatively. The infusion rate was adjusted according to pain intensity, occurrence of hypotension, or motor block. OUTCOME MEASURES: Assessments were made on three time points: 20-24 hours, 32-36 hours, and 4248 hours after extubation. Assessments included pinprick and cold sensitivity from C2 to S5, pain intensity (visual analogue scale, VAS) at rest, after cough, and after mobilization. Data were analyzed by multiple regression. RESULTS: VAS significantly decreased with increasing spread (number of dermatomes for which hyposensitivity to pinprick or cold was observed). Spread could explain only 2-5% of the variability of VAS. Absence of both pinprick and cold sensation at all dermatomes corresponding to the surgical wound was frequently associated with pain. A high proportion of patients manifesting an upper level of block above T5 had pain after abdominal surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Spread and efficacy of epidural analgesia as assessed by pinprick and cold stimulation correlate poorly with postoperative pain. These methods are of limited value both as clinical indicators of the efficacy of postoperative pain control and for investigating the effect of epidural drugs and techniques.

Epidural fentanyl, adrenaline and clonidine as adjuvants to local anaesthetics for surgical analgesia: meta-analyses of analgesia and side-effects.

BACKGROUND: The risk/benefit ratio of adding fentanyl, adrenaline and clonidine to epidural local anaesthetics for improving intraoperative analgesia is unclear. This meta-analysis was performed to clarify this issue. METHODS: Trials retrieved by search were considered if they were prospective, controlled, epidural analgesia (without combining general anaesthesia) was planned and occurrence of pain during surgery or side-effects were reported. Papers entered meta-analysis if they reached a predefined minimum quality score. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and confidence intervals (CI) were computed. P < 0.05 was considered as significant. RESULTS: Eighteen trials were included in the analysis for fentanyl. Fentanyl decreased the likelihood of pain (OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.15-0.30, P < 0.001) and increased the incidence of pruritus (OR = 5.59, 95% CI = 3.12-10.05, P < 0.001) and sedation (OR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.19-2.98, P = 0.003), compared to control (local anaesthetic without fentanyl). Fentanyl had no effect on respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting and Apgar score. One case of respiratory depression of a newborn was observed. Because of the very low number of trials selected, evaluation of adrenaline and clonidine was not feasible. CONCLUSION: The analysis of current literature shows that the addition of fentanyl to local anaesthetics for intraoperative epidural analgesia is safe and advantageous. The reduction in the incidence of pain during surgery is quantitatively high and therefore clinically significant. Side-effects are mild. Randomized, controlled trials have to be performed in order to clarify the role of adrenaline and clonidine as epidural adjuvants for surgical analgesia.

Adding sodium bicarbonate to lidocaine enhances the depth of epidural blockade.

UNLABELLED: It is controversial whether adding CO2 or sodium bicarbonate to local anesthetics enhances the depth of epidural blockade. Repeated electrical stimulation is a reliable test for assessing epidural analgesia and evokes temporal summation. We used this test to investigate the analgesic effect of lidocaine, with or without CO2 or bicarbonate. Twenty-four patients undergoing epidural blockade with 20 mL lidocaine 2% at L2-3 were randomly divided into three groups: lidocaine hydrochloride, lidocaine CO2, and lidocaine plus 2 mL sodium bicarbonate 8.4%. Pain threshold after repeated electrical stimulation (five impulses at 2 Hz), pinprick, and cold test were performed at S1 and L4. Motor block was assessed. The addition of bicarbonate resulted in higher pain thresholds (P < 0.0001), faster onset of action (P = 0.009), and higher degree of motor block (P = 0.004) compared with lidocaine hydrochloride. We found no significant differences between lidocaine CO2 and hydrochloride. Most of these results were not confirmed by pinprick and cold tests. We conclude that the addition of sodium bicarbonate to lidocaine enhances the depth of epidural blockade, increases inhibition of temporal summation, and hastens the onset of block. Pinprick and cold are inadequate tests for comparing drugs for epidural anesthesia. IMPLICATIONS: We measured pain perception during epidural anesthesia by delivering electrical stimuli to the knee and foot. We found that the addition of sodium bicarbonate to the local anesthetic lidocaine enhances analgesia. We observed no effect of adding carbon dioxide to lidocaine.

Comparison of the analgesic potency of xenon and nitrous oxide in humans evaluated by experimental pain.

We have compared the analgesic potency of MAC-equivalent concentrations of xenon (10, 20, 30 and 40%) and nitrous oxide (15, 30, 45 and 60%) in humans using a multimodal experimental pain testing and assessment technique. We tested 12 healthy volunteers in a randomized, single-blind, crossover study. The following experimental pain tests were used: nociceptive reflex to repeated stimuli; pain tolerance to maximal effort tourniquet ischaemia; electrical stimulation; mechanical pressure; and cold. Reaction time was also measured. Xenon and nitrous oxide produced analgesia to ischaemic, electrical and mechanical stimulation, but not to cold pain. There was no difference in MAC-equivalent concentrations of xenon and nitrous oxide. Both increased reaction time in a similar manner. Xenon and nitrous oxide evoked nausea and vomiting in a large number of volunteers.

Epidural epinephrine and clonidine: segmental analgesia and effects on different pain modalities.

BACKGROUND: It is not known whether epidural epinephrine has an analgesic effect per se. The segmental distribution of clonidine epidural analgesia and its effects on temporal summation and different types of noxious stimuli are unknown. The aim of this study was to clarify these issues. METHODS: Fifteen healthy volunteers received epidurally (L2-L3 or L3-L4) 20 ml of either epinephrine, 100 microg, in saline; clonidine, 8 microg/kg, in saline; or saline, 0.9%, alone, on three different days in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over fashion. Pain rating after electrical stimulation, pinprick, and cold perception were recorded on the dermatomes S1, L4, L1, T9, T6, T1, and forehead. Pressure pain tolerance threshold was recorded at S1, T6, and ear. Pain thresholds to single and repeated (temporal summation) electrical stimulation of the sural nerve were determined. RESULTS: Epinephrine significantly reduced sensitivity to pinprick at L1-L4-S1. Clonidine significantly decreased pain rating after electrical stimulation at L1-L4 and sensitivity to pinprick and cold at L1-L4-S1, increased pressure pain tolerance threshold at S1, and increased thresholds after single and repeated stimulation of the sural nerve. CONCLUSIONS: Epidural epinephrine and clonidine produce segmental hypoalgesia. Clonidine bolus should be administered at a spinal level corresponding to the painful area. Clonidine inhibits temporal summation elicited by repeated electrical stimulation and may therefore attenuate spinal cord hyperexcitability.

Effects of extradural anesthesia on microcirculatory blood flow in free latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flaps in pigs.

Free musculocutaneous flaps are used frequently in plastic surgery to reconstruct soft-tissue defects after radical cancer surgery and trauma. Despite improved surgical techniques, some of these flaps fail due to insufficient blood supply. Extradural anesthesia causes both sensory (pain relief) and sympathetic (vasodilatation) block that may be advantageous in free-flap surgery. This hypothesis, however, has not yet been studied. An experimental model in pigs was developed in which clinical conditions for anesthesia and microvascular surgery on the lower extremity were simulated as closely as possible. The effects of extradural anesthesia as well as phenylephrine infusion, combined with general anesthesia, on central hemodynamics and on microcirculatory blood flow in skin and muscle of the latissimus dorsi free flap were studied. After surgery, seven animals received extradural anesthesia during stable normovolemic conditions and another seven during mild hypovolemia (10 percent blood loss). The extradural block was objectively evaluated using the temporal summation test. Thirty minutes after induction of extradural anesthesia, the animals received an intravenous infusion of phenylephrine 1 microgram/kg per minute over a period of 15 minutes. Multichannel laser-Doppler flowmetry was used to measure microcirculatory blood flow in skin and muscle of the free flap as well as in control skin and muscle on the same extremity simultaneously. In normovolemic animals, extradural block caused a 10 percent decrease in mean arterial pressure and cardiac output and an approximately 20 percent decrease in microcirculatory blood flow in both the skin and muscle of the flap (all changes were nonsignificant). In slightly hypovolemic animals, however, extradural anesthesia caused a significant decrease in cardiac output (31 percent, p < 0.01), mean arterial pressure (24 percent, p < 0.01), and in mean blood flow in the flap muscle (22 percent, p < 0.05) and skin (20 percent, p < 0.05). During phenylephrine infusion, mean arterial pressure increased significantly (p < 0.05) in both hypovolemic and normovolemic animals, while cardiac output and microcirculatory blood flow in the flap remained almost unchanged. Extradural anesthesia does not improve microcirculatory blood flow in free musculocutaneous flaps in pigs. It causes a significant decrease in cardiac output, mean arterial pressure, and microcirculatory blood flow in slightly hypovolemic animals. During phenylephrine infusion, the microcirculatory blood flow in free flaps slightly improves due to the increase in mean arterial pressure. We suggest that extradural anesthesia for microvascular surgery should be used with great caution until human data are available.

Spinal anaesthesia inhibits central temporal summation.

In a previous investigation we found that extradural anaesthesia did not adequately inhibit temporal summation of repeated electrical stimuli: pain to repeated stimuli was blocked in only one of 10 patients, and pain thresholds to repeated stimuli were significantly lower than pain thresholds to a single stimulus. In this study we have investigated in 10 patients the effect of spinal anaesthesia on temporal summation, assessed by repeated electrical stimulation of the sural nerve. Plain 0.5% bupivacaine 18 mg was injected at L2-3. The pain threshold to a single electrical stimulus, summation threshold (increase in perception during repeated electrical stimuli with five impulses of the same intensity at 2 Hz), pinprick and cold sensation were assessed. After spinal anaesthesia, pain to both single and repeated stimulation, and pinprick and cold sensation, disappeared in all patients. We conclude that spinal anaesthesia inhibits temporal summation elicited by repeated electrical stimulation.