Neonatal and Early Childhood Outcomes of Twin and Singleton Infants Born Preterm.

OBJECTIVE: To compare neonatal and early-childhood outcomes of twins and singletons born preterm and explore the association of chorionicity with outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This was a national retrospective cohort study of singleton and twin infants admitted at 230/7-286/7 weeks to level III neonatal intensive care units in Canada (2010-2020). The primary neonatal outcome was a composite of neonatal death or severe neonatal morbidities. The primary early-childhood outcome was a composite of death or significant neurodevelopmental impairment. RESULTS: The study cohort included 3554 twin and 12 815 singleton infants. Twin infants born at 230/7-256/7 weeks had a greater risk of the composite neonatal outcome (adjusted risk ratio 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07). However, these differences were limited to the subgroups of same-sex and monochorionic twin pregnancies. Twin infants of 230/7-256/7 weeks were also at an increased risk of the composite early-childhood outcome (adjusted risk ratio 1.22, 95% CI 1.09-1.37). Twin infants of 260/7-286/7 weeks were not at an increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes or the composite early-childhood outcome compared with singleton infants. CONCLUSIONS: Among infants born at 230/7-256/7 weeks, twins have a greater risk of adverse neonatal outcomes and the composite early-childhood outcome than singleton infants. However, the increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes is mostly limited to monochorionic twins and may thus be driven by complications related to monochorionic placentation.

Gestational Age-Dependent Variations in Effects of Prophylactic Indomethacin on Brain Injury and Intestinal Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of prophylactic indomethacin on early death (<10 days after birth) or severe neurologic injury and on early death or spontaneous intestinal perforation by completed weeks of gestational age in neonates born <29 weeks of gestation. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of neonates (n = 12 515) born at 236/7 weeks of gestational age, admitted to neonatal intensive care units participating in the Canadian Neonatal Network who received prophylactic indomethacin started within the first 12 hours after birth. Univariate and multivariate analysis compared the composite outcomes of early death or severe neurologic injury and early death or spontaneous intestinal perforation. RESULTS: Of 12 515 eligible neonates, 1435 (11.5%) were exposed to prophylactic indomethacin; recipients were of lower gestational age and birth weight and had greater severity of illness (Score of Neonatal Acute Physiology with Perinatal Extension) on admission compared with nonrecipients. After we adjusted for confounders, prophylactic indomethacin was associated with reduced odds of early death or severe neurologic injury and early death or spontaneous intestinal perforation in neonates born at 23-24 weeks of gestational age. However, prophylactic indomethacin was associated with increased odds of early mortality or spontaneous intestinal perforation for neonates born at 26-28 weeks of gestational age. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic indomethacin use was associated with benefit in neonates born at 23-24 weeks of gestational age, but with harm at 26-28 weeks of gestational age. Given the observation of significantly improved survival, a randomized controlled trial is needed to investigate the effect of prophylactic indomethacin in babies born at 23-25 weeks of gestational age.

Variability of the pediatric subspecialty workforce in Canada.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the regional variability of the pediatric subspecialty workforce in the academic health science centers in Canada, because effective and efficient delivery of specialized pediatric health care depends on the pediatrician workforce. STUDY DESIGN: This was an analysis of the pediatric subspecialty workforce database of the Pediatric Chairs of Canada for the surveys obtained between 2003/04 and 2005/06. RESULTS: In 2003/2004, 960 pediatrician specialists who spent a majority of their time supporting clinical, educational, research, and administrative activities within the 16 Canadian medical schools were reported. In 2004/05, this figure was 1044, and in 2005/06, it was 1140. The growth was due predominantly to increases in physician workforce in the fields of emergency medicine, respiratory medicine, and neonatology. The average academic pediatric workforce, excluding general pediatricians, increased from 12.86/100 000 child population in 2003/04 to 13.99 in 2004/05 and 15.27 in 2005/06. Substantial regional variability exists, with 4-fold differences in academic pediatrician workforce among the low-supply provinces (Saskatchewan, British Columbia, and Ontario) and high-supply provinces for both total workforce and subspecialists. CONCLUSIONS: The substantial variability in the supply of pediatric subspecialists across Canada requires additional analysis to determine any relationship to child health outcomes.