ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The aim of this review was to evaluate the existing evidence for radiotherapy for brain metastases in breast cancer patients and provide recommendations for the use of radiotherapy for brain metastases and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For the current review, a PubMed search was conducted including articles from 01/1985 to 05/2023. The search was performed using the following terms: (brain metastases OR leptomeningeal carcinomatosis) AND (breast cancer OR breast) AND (radiotherapy OR ablative radiotherapy OR radiosurgery OR stereotactic OR radiation). CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Despite the fact that the biological subtype of breast cancer influences both the occurrence and relapse patterns of breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM), for most scenarios, no specific recommendations regarding radiotherapy can be made based on the existing evidence. For a limited number of BCBM (1-4), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is generally recommended irrespective of molecular subtype and concurrent/planned systemic therapy. In patients with 5-10 oligo-brain metastases, these techniques can also be conditionally recommended. For multiple, especially symptomatic BCBM, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), if possible with hippocampal sparing, is recommended. In cases of multiple asymptomatic BCBM (≥â¯5), if SRS/SRT is not feasible or in disseminated brain metastases (>â¯10), postponing WBRT with early reassessment and reevaluation of local treatment options (8-12 weeks) may be discussed if a HER2/Neu-targeting systemic therapy with significant response rates in the central nervous system (CNS) is being used. In symptomatic leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, local radiotherapy (WBRT or local spinal irradiation) should be performed in addition to systemic therapy. In patients with disseminated leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in good clinical condition and with only limited or stable extra-CNS disease, craniospinal irradiation (CSI) may be considered. Data regarding the toxicity of combining systemic therapies with cranial and spinal radiotherapy are sparse. Therefore, no clear recommendations can be given, and each case should be discussed individually in an interdisciplinary setting.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Breast Neoplasms , Meningeal Carcinomatosis , Radiosurgery , Humans , Female , Meningeal Carcinomatosis/radiotherapy , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cranial Irradiation/adverse effects , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/etiology , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Radiosurgery/methodsABSTRACT
Prostate cancer is the most frequent cancer in men. For localized prostate cancer, surgery and radiotherapy are the standard treatment, with active surveillance also used in low-risk cases. For advanced/metastatic disease, androgen deprivation treatment is carried out. Further options include inhibitors of the androgen receptor axis and taxane-based chemotherapy. The avoidance of side effects should be considered, e.g., by dose adjustment. New options include poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, and radioligand treatment. The existing guidelines only provide a few treatment recommendations for older patients; however, the treatment of older patients should primarily consider not only chronological age but also the patient's psychological and physical condition and preferences. In this context, the geriatric assessment represents an important instrument for determining the treatment strategy.
Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Aged , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Androgen Antagonists/adverse effectsABSTRACT
O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) is a widely used amino acid tracer for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of brain tumours. This retrospective study and survey aimed to analyse our extensive database regarding the development of FET PET investigations, indications, and the referring physicians' rating concerning the role of FET PET in the clinical decision-making process. Between 2006 and 2019, we performed 6534 FET PET scans on 3928 different patients against a backdrop of growing demand for FET PET. In 2019, indications for the use of FET PET were as follows: suspected recurrent glioma (46%), unclear brain lesions (20%), treatment monitoring (19%), and suspected recurrent brain metastasis (13%). The referring physicians were neurosurgeons (60%), neurologists (19%), radiation oncologists (11%), general oncologists (3%), and other physicians (7%). Most patients travelled 50 to 75 km, but 9% travelled more than 200 km. The role of FET PET in decision-making in clinical practice was evaluated by a questionnaire consisting of 30 questions, which was filled out by 23 referring physicians with long experience in FET PET. Fifty to seventy per cent rated FET PET as being important for different aspects of the assessment of newly diagnosed gliomas, including differential diagnosis, delineation of tumour extent for biopsy guidance, and treatment planning such as surgery or radiotherapy, 95% for the diagnosis of recurrent glioma, and 68% for the diagnosis of recurrent brain metastases. Approximately 50% of the referring physicians rated FET PET as necessary for treatment monitoring in patients with glioma or brain metastases. All referring physicians stated that the availability of FET PET is essential and that it should be approved for routine use. Although the present analysis is limited by the fact that only physicians who frequently referred patients for FET PET participated in the survey, the results confirm the high relevance of FET PET in the clinical diagnosis of brain tumours and support the need for its approval for routine use.
ABSTRACT
Evidence from a few small randomized trials and retrospective cohorts mostly including various tumor entities indicates a prolongation of disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) from local ablative therapies in oligometastatic disease (OMD). However, it is still unclear which patients benefit most from this approach. We give an overview of the several aspects of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in extracranial OMD in breast cancer from a radiation oncology perspective. A PubMed search referring to this was conducted. An attempt was made to relate the therapeutic efficacy of SBRT to various prognostic factors. Data from approximately 500 breast cancer patients treated with SBRT for OMD in mostly in small cohort studies have been published, consistently indicating high local tumor control rates and favorable progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Predictors for a good prognosis after SBRT are favorable biological subtype (hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative), solitary metastasis, bone-only metastasis, and long metastasis-free interval. However, definitive proof that SBRT in OMD breast cancer prolongs DFS or OS is lacking, since, with the exception of one small randomized trial (nâ¯= 22 in the SBRT arm), none of the cohort studies had an adequate control group. Further studies are needed to prove the benefit of SBRT in OMD breast cancer and to define adequate selection criteria. Currently, the use of local ablative SBRT should always be discussed in a multidisciplinary tumor board.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Radiation Oncology , Radiosurgery , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Female , Humans , Radiosurgery/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: It is known that the diagnosis of breast cancer often causes anxiety and depression. Radiotherapy of the breast as an obligatory part of a breast-conserving treatment concept can markedly increase these psychological symptoms in many, but not all patients. In this clinical observational study, we aimed at identifying cognitive, health-related and social factors that may either enhance or reduce the emergence of anxiety and depression. METHODS: Using a longitudinal study design with 25 women (mean age: 52.9 years; SDâ¯= 10.6; age range 29-70 years) with a first diagnosis of nonmetastatic breast cancer, measures of anxiety, depression, situational emotional states, intelligence, and aspects of social frameworks were assessed before, during, and after radiotherapy of the breast. At 4 time-points, standard and self-constructed questionnaires were used to assess the course of anxiety and depressive symptoms across the radiotherapy intervention. RESULTS: We found that anxiety is highest immediately before the start of radiation therapy, while the anxiety level was lowest on the day that therapy was completed. Anxiety and depression were enhanced in women with a lifetime history of chronic diseases at all time points of measurement. Moreover, women with high intelligence and low social support had stronger symptoms of depression than women with low intelligence and a stable family background at some time points of measurement. The degree of anxiety was neither related to intelligence nor to social support. CONCLUSION: For the first time, we demonstrate empirical pilot data on cognitive and social modulators of anxiety and depression in women with breast cancer over the course of radiotherapy. Our results may help to optimize clinical procedures and thereby reduce symptoms of anxiety and depression in these patients.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Adult , Aged , Anxiety/etiology , Anxiety/psychology , Anxiety/therapy , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Depression/etiology , Depression/psychology , Depression/therapy , Female , Humans , Intelligence , Longitudinal Studies , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Social Support , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Background: During the last decade, partial breast irradiation (PBI) has gained traction as a relevant treatment option for patients with early-stage low-risk breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery. The TARGIT-A prospective randomized trial compared a "risk-adapted" intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) approach with 50-kv X-rays (INTRABEAM®) as the PBI followed by optional whole-breast irradiation (WBI) and conventional adjuvant WBI in terms of observed 5-year in-breast recurrence rates. Recently, long-term data were published. Since the first publication of the TARGIT-A trial, a broad debate has been emerged regarding several uncertainties and limitations associated with data analysis and interpretation. Our main objective was to summarize the data, with an emphasis on the updated report and the resulting implications. Summary: From our point of view, the previously unresolved questions still remain and more have been added, especially with regard to the study design, a change in the primary outcome measure, the significant number of patients lost to follow-up, and the lack of a subgroup analysis according to risk factors and treatment specifications. Key Message: Taking into account the abovementioned limitations of the recently published long-term results of the TARGIT-A trial, the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) Breast Cancer Expert Panel adheres to its recently published recommendations on PBI: "the 50-kV system (INTRABEAM) cannot be recommended for routine adjuvant PBI treatment after breast-conserving surgery."
ABSTRACT
Moderate hypofractionation is the standard of care for adjuvant whole-breast radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer. Recently, 10-year results from the FAST and 5year results from the FAST-Forward trial evaluating adjuvant whole-breast radiotherapy in 5 fractions over 5 weeks or 1 week have been published. This article summarizes recent data for moderate hypofractionation and results from the FAST and FAST-Forward trial on ultra-hypofractionation. While the FAST trial was not powered for comparison of local recurrence rates, FAST-Forward demonstrated non-inferiority for two ultra-hypofractionated regimens in terms of local control. In both trials, the higher-dose experimental arms resulted in elevated rates of late toxicity. For the lower dose experimental arms of 28.5â¯Gy over 5 weeks and 26â¯Gy over 1 week, moderate or marked late effects were similar in the majority of documented items compared to the respective standard arms, but significantly worse in some subdomains. The difference between the standard arm and the 26â¯Gy of the FAST-Forward trial concerning moderate or marked late effects increased with longer follow-up in disadvantage of the experimental arm for most items. For now, moderate hypofractionation with 40-42.5â¯Gy over 15-16 fractions remains the standard of care for the majority of patients with breast cancer who undergo whole-breast radiotherapy without regional nodal irradiation after breast-conserving surgery.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiation Dose Hypofractionation , Animals , Breast/radiation effects , Female , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Standard of Care , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer, postoperative systemic therapy, also called post-neoadjuvant treatment, has been established in defined risk settings. We reviewed the evidence for sequencing of postoperative radiation and chemotherapy, with a focus on a capecitabine and trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1)-based regimen. METHODS: A systematic literature search using the PubMed/MEDLINE/Web of Science database was performed. We included prospective and retrospective reports published since 2015 and provided clinical data on toxicity and effectiveness. RESULTS: Six studies were included, five of which investigated capecitabine-containing regimens. Of these, four were prospective investigations and one a retrospective matched comparative analysis. One randomized prospective trial was found for TDM1 and radiotherapy. In the majority of these reports, radiation-associated toxicities were not specifically addressed. CONCLUSION: Regarding oncologic outcome, the influence of sequencing radiation therapy with maintenance capecitabine chemotherapy in the post-neoadjuvant setting is unclear. Synchronous administration of capecitabine is feasible, but reports on possible excess toxicities are partially conflicting. Dose reduction of capecitabine should be considered, especially if normofractionated radiotherapy is used. In terms of tolerance, hypofractionated schedules seem to be superior in terms of toxicity in concurrent settings. TDM1 can safely be administered concurrently with radiotherapy.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine/administration & dosage , Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Capecitabine/administration & dosage , Capecitabine/adverse effects , Cardiomyopathies/chemically induced , Clinical Trials as Topic , Combined Modality Therapy , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Humans , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/drug therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Gene expression assays are increasingly used for decision-making regarding adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. There are some clinical situations in which there is also a need for better prognostic and predictive markers to better estimate the amount of benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy. The rising availability of gene expression analyses prompts the question whether their results can also be used to guide clinical decisions regarding adjuvant radiation. SUMMARY: Multiple studies suggest a correlation between results from gene expression assays and locoregional recurrence rates. Only few publications addressed the predictive value of results from gene expression analysis for the role of adjuvant radiotherapy in different settings. KEY MESSAGES: To date, the available evidence on the possible predictive value of gene expression assays for radiotherapy does not support their inclusion into the decision-making process for adjuvant radiation. This is due to methodological weaknesses and limitations regarding patient selection, the nonrandomized design of all studies in terms of radiotherapy use, and limited availability of tissue from prospective trials. Thus, utilization of the present knowledge for clinical indication of radiotherapy should be very cautious.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Skin-sparing (SSME) and nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSME) were developed to improve the cosmetic results for breast cancer (BC) patients, both allowing for immediate breast reconstruction. Recommendations for post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) are primarily derived from trials where patients were treated by standard mastectomies. Due to their more conservative character, SSME and especially NSME potentially leave more glandular tissue at risk for subclinical disease. METHODS: Rates and sites of locoregional failures following SSME and NSME plus/minus reconstruction were analyzed regarding tumor stage and biological risk factors. In particular, the role of PMRT in "intermediate"-risk and early stage high-risk breast cancer patients was revisited. Implications on targeting and dose delivery of PMRT were critically reviewed. RESULTS: The value of PMRT in stage III BC remains undisputed. For node-negative BC patients, the majority of reports classify clinical and biological features such as tumor size, close surgical margins, premenopausal status, multicentricity, lymphangiosis, triple-negativity, HER2-overexpression, and poor tumor grading as associated with higher rates of locoregional relapse, thus, building an "intermediate" risk group. Surveys revealed that the majority of radiation oncologists use risk-adaptive models also considering the number of coinciding factors for the estimation of recurrence probability following SSME and NSME. Constellations with a 10-year locoregional recurrence risk of >10% are usually triggering the indication for PMRT. There was no common belief that the amount of residual tissue, e.g., tissue thickness over flaps, serves as additional decision aid. Modern treatment planning can ensure optimal dose distribution for PMRT in almost all patients with SSME. There are no reliable data supporting a reduction of the treatment volume from the CTV chest wall, e.g., to the nipple-areola complex, to the dorsal aspect behind the implant volume, the pectoralis muscle, nor the regional interpectoral, axillary, or complete regional lymph nodes only. The omission of a skin bolus in intermediate-risk BC does not compromise oncological safety. CONCLUSIONS: For intermediate-risk as well as early stage high-risk BC patients, the DEGRO Breast Cancer Expert Panel recommends the use of PMRT following SSME and NSME when a 10-year locoregional recurrence risk is likely to be greater than 10%, as estimated by clinical and biological risk factors. Subvolume-only radiation is discouraged outside of trials. The impact of adequate systemic treatment and the value of radiotherapy on optimal locoregional tumor control, with the goal of less than 5% LRR at 10-years follow-up, has to be verified in prospective trials.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Mammaplasty/methods , Mastectomy, Segmental/methods , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Lymphatic Metastasis/radiotherapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/etiology , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The aim of this review was to analyze the respective efficacy of various heart-sparing radiotherapy techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Heart-sparing can be performed in three different ways in breast cancer radiotherapy: by seeking to keep the heart out of treated volumes (i.e. by prone position or specific breathing techniques such as deep inspiration breath-hold [DIBH] and/or gating), by solely irradiating a small volume around the lumpectomy cavity (partial breast irradiation, PBI), or by using modern radiation techniques like intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) or protons. This overview presents the available data on these three approaches. RESULTS: Studies on prone position are heterogeneous and most trials only refer to patients with large breasts; therefore, no definitive conclusion can be drawn for clinical routine. Nonetheless, there seems to be a trend toward better sparing of the left anterior descending artery in supine position even for these selected patients. The data on the use of DIBH for heart-sparing in breast cancer patients is consistent and the benefit compared to free-breathing is supported by several studies. In comparison with whole breast irradiation (WBI), PBI has an advantage in reducing the heart dose. Of note, DIBH and PBI with multicatheter brachytherapy are similar with regard to the dose reduction to heart structures. WBI by IMRT/VMAT techniques without DIBH is not an effective strategy for heart-sparing in breast cancer patients with "standard" anatomy. A combination of DIBH and IMRT may be used for internal mammary radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Based on the available findings, the DEGRO breast cancer expert panel recommends the use of DIBH as the best heart-sparing technique. Nonetheless, depending on the treatment volume and localization, other techniques may be employed or combined with DIBH when appropriate.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Heart/radiation effects , Organ Sparing Treatments/methods , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Radiation Oncology , Societies, Medical , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Breath Holding , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Humans , Mastectomy, Segmental , Professional Competence , Prone Position , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methodsSubject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Selenium , Antioxidants , Dietary Supplements , Female , Humans , Postmenopause , PrognosisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Late cardiac toxicities caused by (particularly left-sided) breast radiotherapy (RT) are now recognized as rare but relevant sequelae, which has prompted research on risk structure identification and definition of threshold doses to heart subvolumes. The aim of the present review was to critically discuss the clinical evidence on late cardiac reactions based on dose-dependent outcome reports for mean heart doses as well as doses to cardiac substructures. METHODS: A literature review was performed to examine clinical evidence on radiation-induced heart toxicities. Mean heart doses and doses to cardiac substructures were focused upon based on dose-dependent outcome reports. Furthermore, an overview of radiation techniques for heart protection is given and non-radiotherapeutic aspects of cardiotoxicity in the multimodal setting of breast cancer treatment are discussed. RESULTS: Based on available findings, the DEGRO breast cancer expert panel recommends the following constraints: mean heart dose <2.5â¯Gy; DmeanLV (mean dose left ventricle)â¯< 3â¯Gy; V5LV (volume of LV receiving ≥5â¯Gy)â¯< 17%; V23LV (volume of LV receiving ≥23â¯Gy)â¯< 5%; DmeanLAD (mean dose left descending artery)â¯< 10â¯Gy; V30LAD (volume of LAD receiving ≥30â¯Gy)â¯< 2%; V40LAD (volume of LAD receiving ≥40â¯Gy)â¯< 1%. CONCLUSION: In addition to mean heart dose, breast cancer RT treatment planning should also include constraints for cardiac subvolumes such as LV and LAD. The given constraints serve as a clinicians' aid for ensuring adequate heart protection. The individual decision between sufficient protection of cardiac structures versus optimal target volume coverage remains in the physician's hand. The risk of breast cancer-specific mortality and a patient's cardiac risk factors must be individually weighed up against the risk of radiation-induced cardiotoxicity.
Subject(s)
Heart/radiation effects , Radiation Injuries/diagnosis , Unilateral Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Coronary Vessels/radiation effects , Female , Heart Ventricles/radiation effects , Humans , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Radiotherapy Dosage , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Amino acid positron emission tomography (PET) using O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) provides important additional information on the extent of viable tumor tissue of glioblastoma compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Especially after radiochemotherapy, progression of contrast enhancement in MRI is equivocal and may represent either tumor progression or treatment-related changes. Here, the first case comparing postmortem whole-brain histology of a patient with pretreated glioblastoma with dynamic in vivo FET PET and MRI is presented. METHODS: A 61-year-old patient with glioblastoma initially underwent partial tumor resection and died 11 weeks after completion of chemoradiation with concurrent temozolomide. Three days before the patient died, a follow-up FET PET and MRI scan indicated tumor progression. Autopsy was performed 48 hours after death. After formalin fixation, a 7-cm bihemispherical segment of the brain containing the entire tumor mass was cut into 3500 consecutive 20µm coronal sections. Representative sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin stain, cresyl violet, and glial fibrillary acidic protein immunohistochemistry. An experienced neuropathologist identified areas of dense and diffuse neoplastic infiltration, astrogliosis, and necrosis. In vivo FET PET, MRI datasets, and postmortem histology were co-registered and compared by 3 experienced physicians. RESULTS: Increased uptake of FET in the area of equivocal contrast enhancement on MRI correlated very well with dense infiltration by vital tumor cells and showed tracer kinetics typical for malignant gliomas. An area of predominantly reactive astrogliosis showed only moderate uptake of FET and tracer kinetics usually observed in benign lesions. CONCLUSIONS: This case report impressively documents the correct imaging of a progressive glioblastoma by FET PET.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Brain/pathology , Glioblastoma/diagnostic imaging , Glioblastoma/pathology , Brain Neoplasms/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Fatal Outcome , Glioblastoma/therapy , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Middle Aged , Neuroimaging , Positron-Emission Tomography , Radiopharmaceuticals , Tyrosine/analogs & derivativesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Cranial irradiation for brain tumours or leukaemias has been related to cognitive, endocrine and psychosocial late effects as well as sleep disturbances and increased daytime sleepiness. Studies suggest that cranial irradiation might impact on pineal melatonin secretion. Melatonin is an important regulator in human circadian rhythms and the sleep-wake cycle. The objective of this study was to investigate melatonin secretion, subjective sleep parameters and their interplay in a cohort of cranially irradiated head and brain tumour and leukaemia survivors at least 3 years after radiotherapy. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PATIENTS: Thirty-eight adults. MEASUREMENTS: Melatonin secretion was evaluated by measuring its metabolite 6-sulphatoxymelatonin in collected overnight urine. Subjective sleep quality and daytime sleepiness were assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. The Beck Depression Inventory II was used to screen for depressive symptoms because of their impact on sleep. RESULTS: Patients irradiated in the brain midline had significantly lower melatonin secretion (P = 0.008). Subjects exhibited a high prevalence of sleeping difficulties, daytime sleepiness and depression, with females and overweight subjects particularly affected. Melatonin values and subjective sleep parameters did not correlate with each other or with treatment and most patient variables. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that radiation exposure to the pineal gland negatively affects melatonin secretion. This lack of pineal melatonin does not influence subjective sleep quality. As melatonin has important antioxidant and cancer-protective effects, further research is necessary to elucidate whether these patients have an increased risk of developing secondary neoplasms and other radiation late effects.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/metabolism , Brain Neoplasms/therapy , Brain/drug effects , Brain/metabolism , Leukemia/metabolism , Leukemia/therapy , Melatonin/metabolism , Sleep Wake Disorders/metabolism , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young AdultABSTRACT
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has been widely adopted into the multidisciplinary management of breast cancer. The prognostic impact of treatment response has been clearly demonstrated. However, the impact of treatment response on the indication for adjuvant radiotherapy is unclear. This review summarizes important implications of NACT and treatment response on the risk of recurrence and locoregional multidisciplinary management from the standpoint of radiation oncology.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Mastectomy , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease-Free Survival , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Intersectoral Collaboration , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplasm, Residual/pathology , Neoplasm, Residual/therapy , Prognosis , Sentinel Lymph Node BiopsySubject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Breast , Heart , Humans , Radiation Dosage , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To review the evidence regarding post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) and regional nodal irradiation (RNI) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for breast cancer, with a special focus on individualization of adjuvant radiotherapy based on treatment response. METHODS: A systematic literature search using the PubMed/Medline database was performed. We included prospective and retrospective reports with a minimum of 10 patients that had been published since 1st January 2000, and provided clinical outcome data analyzed by treatment response and radiotherapy. RESULTS: Out of 763 articles identified via PubMed/Medline and hand search, 68 full text-articles were assessed for eligibility after screening of title and abstract. 13 studies were included in the systematic review, 9 for PMRT and 5 for RNI. All included studies were retrospective reports. CONCLUSIONS: There is a considerable lack of evidence regarding the role of adjuvant radiotherapy and its individualization based on treatment response after NACT. Results of prospective randomized trials such as NSABP B51/RTOG 1304 and Alliance A11202 are eagerly awaited.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Lymphatic Irradiation/methods , Mastectomy , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Precision Medicine , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , HumansABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of a model-based optimisation process for volumetric modulated arc therapy applied to prostate cancer in a multicentric cooperative group. The RapidPlan (RP) knowledge-based engine was tested for the planning of Volumetric modulated arc therapy with RapidArc on prostate cancer patients. The study was conducted in the frame of the German RapidPlan Consortium (GRC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: 43 patients from one institute of the GRC were used to build and train a RP model. This was further shared with all members of the GRC plus an external site from a different country to increase the heterogeneity of the patient's sampling. An in silico multicentric validation of the model was performed at planning level by comparing RP against reference plans optimized according to institutional procedures. A total of 60 patients from 7 institutes were used. RESULTS: On average, the automated RP based plans resulted fully consistent with the manually optimised set with a modest tendency to improvement in the medium-to-high dose region. A per-site stratification allowed to identify different patterns of performance of the model with some organs at risk resulting better spared with the manual or with the automated approach but in all cases the RP data fulfilled the clinical acceptability requirements. Discrepancies in the performance were due to different contouring protocols or to different emphasis put in the optimization of the manual cases. CONCLUSIONS: The multicentric validation demonstrated that it was possible to satisfactorily optimize with the knowledge based model patients from all participating centres. In the presence of possibly significant differences in the contouring protocols, the automated plans, though acceptable and fulfilling the benchmark goals, might benefit from further fine tuning of the constraints. The study demonstrates that, at least for the case of prostate cancer patients, it is possibile to share models among different clinical institutes in a cooperative framework.