Comparison of prophylaxis and preemptive strategy as cytomegalovirus prevention in liver transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVES: Prophylaxis (P) or pre-emptive strategy (PS) in high-risk liver transplant recipients (LTRs) are either recommended. We compared the results of each strategy. METHODS: Two groups of LTR transplanted during two consecutive periods were compared. Only cytomegalovirus (CMV)-mismatched LTR (Donor +/ Recipient -) were included. The primary endpoints were: the onset of polymerase chain reaction-based DNAemia and the proportion of patients with CMV disease. A number of episodes of CMV infection, antiviral therapy, ganciclovir resistance, infectious or immunological complications, cost of both strategies, and survival (1, 5, and 10 years) were also compared. RESULTS: Forty-eight and 60 patients were respectively included in the P and PS groups. Eighteen (38%) in the P group and 56 (93%) in the PS group had CMV DNAemia (p <.0001) with a similar CMV disease rate (16.7% and 15%). Duration of curative therapy was longer in the PS group: 91 days versus 16 (p <.0001). Acute rejection was less frequent (p = .04) and more patients experienced a ganciclovir-resistant CMV infection in the PS group (10% vs. 0, p = .03). The drug-associated cost of PS was higher (10 004 vs. 4804€) and the median number of rehospitalization days tended to be higher (6 vs. 4, p = .06). Survival at any time was similar. CONCLUSION: We reported more CMV DNAemias and ganciclovir-resistant CMV events with PS. The cost of the PS strategy was higher.

Use of rifampicin and graft removal are associated with better outcomes in prosthetic vascular graft infection.

OBJECTIVES: Prosthetic vascular graft infection (PVGI) is a very severe disease. We aimed to determine the factors associated with treatment failure. METHODS: Patients admitted to two University Hospitals with PVGI were included in this retrospective study. PVGI was classified as possible, probable or proven according to an original set of diagnostic criteria. We defined treatment failure if one of the following events occurred within the first year after PVGI diagnosis: death and infection recurrence due to the same or another pathogen. RESULTS: One hundred and twelve patients were diagnosed with possible (n = 26), probable (n = 22) and proven (n = 64) PVGI. Bacterial documentation was obtained for 81% of patients. The most frequently identified pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus (n = 39). Surgery was performed in 96 patients (86%). Antibiotics were administered for more than 6 weeks in 41% of patients. Treatment failure occurred in 30 patients (27.5%). The factors associated with a lower probability of treatment failure were total removal of the infected graft (OR = 0.2, 95% CI [0.1-0.6]), rifampicin administration (OR = 0.3 [0.1-0.9]) and possible PVGI according to the GRIP criteria (OR = 0.3 [0.1-0.9]). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment failure occurred in 27.5% of patients with PVGI. Total removal of the infected graft and rifampicin administration were associated with better outcomes.