Association between bone microarchitecture and sarcopenia in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes.

Bone microarchitecture, as assessed using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography, is adversely affected in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus having sarcopenia/sarcopenic obesity while areal bone mineral density does not differ between those with and without sarcopenia. PURPOSE: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) increases the risk of sarcopenia, which independently contributes to bone fragility. We aimed to explore the association between sarcopenia/sarcopenic obesity and bone quality using second-generation high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) in T2D. METHODS: We analyzed the baseline participant characteristics of an ongoing randomized clinical pilot trial (CTRI/2022/02/039978). Postmenopausal women (≥ 50 years) with T2D and high risk of fragility fractures were included. Areal BMD (aBMD), trabecular bone score (TBS), and body composition were measured using DXA. Bone microarchitecture was assessed at distal radius/distal tibia using HR-pQCT. Muscle strength was estimated using dominant handgrip strength (HGS). Sarcopenia was defined as low HGS (< 18.0 kg) and low appendicular skeletal muscle index (ASMI) (< 4.61 kg/m2). Probable sarcopenia was defined as low HGS with normal ASMI. Sarcopenic obesity was classified as co-existence of sarcopenia and obesity (BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m2). RESULTS: We recruited 129 postmenopausal women (mean age 64.2 ± 6.7 years). Participants were categorized into four mutually exclusive groups: group A (normal HGS and ASMI, n = 17), group B (probable sarcopenia, n = 77), group C (non-obese sarcopenia, n = 18), and group D (obese sarcopenia, n = 18). The four groups did not differ significantly with regard to baseline characteristics, fracture prevalence, HbA1c, aBMD, and TBS. However, HR-pQCT-derived volumetric BMD and cortical/trabecular microarchitecture were significantly poorer in group C/group D than in group A/group B. CONCLUSIONS: Bone quality rather than bone density (quantity) is adversely affected in T2D postmenopausal women with sarcopenia/sarcopenic obesity, which could increase the fracture risk in this patient sub-population.

Fracture risk and bone health in adrenal adenomas with mild autonomous cortisol secretion/subclinical hypercortisolism: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Adrenal adenomas/incidentalomas with mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS)/subclinical hypercortisolism (SH) are often associated with metabolic syndrome, glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, and fractures. In this background, the present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to collate the available evidence and provide a summary of the effect of MACS/SH on bone health in terms of fractures, osteoporosis/osteopenia, microarchitecture, and bone turnover. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for observational studies reporting prevalence of fractures, osteoporosis/osteopenia or data on bone microarchitecture/bone turnover markers (BTMs). Following literature search, 16 observational studies were included. Pooled prevalence of any fractures (vertebral and non-vertebral), vertebral fractures, and osteoporosis/osteopenia in MACS/SH were 43% [95% confidence intervals (CI): 23%, 62%], 45% (95% CI: 22%, 68%) and 50% (95% CI: 33%, 66%), respectively. On meta-regression, age, sex, 24-hour urinary free cortisol, and dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate did not predict fracture risk. The likelihood of any fractures [odds ratio (OR) 1.61; 95% CI: 1.18, 2.20; P = 0.0026], vertebral fractures (OR 2.10; 95% CI: 1.28, 3.45; P = 0.0035), and osteoporosis/osteopenia (OR 1.46; 95% CI: 1.15, 1.85; P = 0.0018) was significantly higher in adrenal adenomas and MACS/SH than non-functional adrenal adenomas. Subjects with MACS/SH had significantly lower bone mineral density (BMD) at lumbar spine [mean difference (MD) -0.07 g/cm2; 95% CI: -0.11, -0.03; P = 0.0004) and femoral neck (MD -0.05 g/cm2; 95% CI: -0.08, -0.02; P = 0.0045) than their non-functional counterparts. Limited data showed no significant difference in BTMs. Publication bias was observed in the pooled prevalence of any fractures, vertebral fractures and pooled MD of femoral neck BMD. To conclude, people with adrenal adenomas/incidentalomas and MACS/SH are at a 1.5- to 2-fold higher likelihood of fractures and osteoporosis/osteopenia compared to non-functional adrenal adenomas and should routinely be screened for bone disease. Nevertheless, considering the modest sample size of studies and evidence of publication bias, larger and high-quality studies are required (CRD42023471045).

Mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS), often also referred to as subclinical hypercortisolism (SH), is usually associated with an underlying adrenal incidentaloma (AI), an adrenal mass incidentally found during abdomen imaging. Although signs of overt cortisol excess are lacking, subjects with MACS/SH often have features of metabolic syndrome, osteoporosis and fractures. The present systematic review and meta-analysis showed that the pooled prevalence of any fractures (vertebral and non­vertebral), vertebral fractures, and osteoporosis/osteopenia in MACS/SH were 43%, 45%, and 50%, respectively. People with adrenal adenomas/incidentalomas and MACS/SH are at a 1.5- to 2-fold higher likelihood of fractures and osteoporosis/osteopenia compared to non­functional adrenal adenomas. Besides, subjects with MACS/SH had significantly lower bone mineral density at lumbar spine and femoral neck than their non­functional counterparts. It is thus imperative to assess bone health in all subjects with MACS/SH.

Risk of Gallstone Disease in Primary Hyperparathyroidism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Apart from renal stones, primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) has been linked to the occurrence of gallstone disease (GSD). Nevertheless, the association is not consistent across all studies. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aims to collate the hitherto available evidence and provide a pooled estimate of the association between GSD and PHPT. METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched from inception till May 10, 2023 for observational studies reporting the prevalence of GSD (in terms of absolute numbers) in patients with PHPT. The pooled prevalence of GSD and odds ratio with 95% CI of the occurrence of GSD in patients with PHPT as compared to age- and sex-matched controls were calculated. Subgroup analysis was performed based on patient ethnicity (Indian/Caucasian). Statistical analysis was carried out using R version 4.2.2. Random-effects model with Hartung-Knapp adjustment was used for analyses. RESULTS: A total of 7 observational studies were included, pooling data from 15 949 patients with PHPT. The pooled prevalence of GSD in patients with PHPT was 16% (95% CI: 7%, 25%, I2 = 99%), being 13% (95% CI: 0%, 66%, I2 = 76%) in Indians, and 17% (95% CI: 4%, 31%, I2 = 99%) in Caucasians. Data consolidated from 3 studies showed that the pooled odds ratio of occurrence of GSD in patients with PHPT compared to controls was 1.77 (95% CI: 1.60, 1.97, P < .001, I2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: GSD is more prevalent in patients with PHPT than in the general population. Thus, PHPT may be considered an additional risk factor for GSD.

Do vitamin D levels or supplementation play A role in COVID-19 outcomes?-a narrative review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Hypovitaminosis D has been proposed as a risk factor for increased susceptibility to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and severe outcomes in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Likewise, vitamin D supplementation has been proposed as an effective means for preventing and improving clinical outcomes in COVID-19. Nevertheless, available data are markedly inconsistent and contradictory. Considering the heterogeneity in the available clinical evidence, we planned to undertake a narrative review and provide a precise summary of the role of vitamin D in COVID-19. METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE database was searched from inception till September 30, 2023 using appropriate MeSH terms. The initial search revealed 900 results. Thereafter, titles and abstracts were scanned and commentaries, letters, and editorials were excluded. Relevant observational studies and clinical trials/randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were full-text assessed and pertinent data were extracted for this narrative review. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: Data from observational and ecological studies suggest that hypovitaminosis D is associated with a higher risk of acquiring COVID-19. Similarly, evidence support a negative association between 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and COVID-19 severity, nevertheless, causality remains to be established. With regard to vitamin D supplementation and COVID-19-related health outcomes, data from observational studies and RCTs are contradictory. Even in moderate-to-severe/severe COVID-19, vitamin D supplementation has not been shown to be beneficial. Besides, data suggest that vitamin D levels might alter COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and be associated with long COVID. CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D deficiency is linked to an increased risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 infection and poor COVID-19 prognosis, however, available evidence with regard to improved clinical outcomes with vitamin D supplementation is inconsistent.