DNN-Boost: Somatic mutation identification of tumor-only whole-exome sequencing data using deep neural network and XGBoost.

Detection of somatic mutation in whole-exome sequencing data can help elucidate the mechanism of tumor progression. Most computational approaches require exome sequencing for both tumor and normal samples. However, it is more common to sequence exomes for tumor samples only without the paired normal samples. To include these types of data for extensive studies on the process of tumorigenesis, it is necessary to develop an approach for identifying somatic mutations using tumor exome sequencing data only. In this study, we designed a machine learning approach using Deep Neural Network (DNN) and XGBoost to identify somatic mutations in tumor-only exome sequencing data and we integrated this into a pipeline called DNN-Boost. The XGBoost algorithm is used to extract the features from the results of variant callers and these features are then fed into the DNN model as input. The XGBoost algorithm resolves issues of missing values and overfitting. We evaluated our proposed model and compared its performance with other existing benchmark methods. We noted that the DNN-Boost classification model outperformed the benchmark method in classifying somatic mutations from paired tumor-normal exome data and tumor-only exome data.

Authentication of differential gene expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma using machine learning applications.

BACKGROUND: Recently, the possibility of tumour classification based on genetic data has been investigated. However, genetic datasets are difficult to handle because of their massive size and complexity of manipulation. In the present study, we examined the diagnostic performance of machine learning applications using imaging-based classifications of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) gene sets. METHODS: RNA sequencing data from SCC tissues from various sites, including oral, non-oral head and neck, oesophageal, and cervical regions, were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). The feature genes were extracted through a convolutional neural network (CNN) and machine learning, and the performance of each analysis was compared. RESULTS: The ability of the machine learning analysis to classify OSCC tumours was excellent. However, the tool exhibited poorer performance in discriminating histopathologically dissimilar cancers derived from the same type of tissue than in differentiating cancers of the same histopathologic type with different tissue origins, revealing that the differential gene expression pattern is a more important factor than the histopathologic features for differentiating cancer types. CONCLUSION: The CNN-based diagnostic model and the visualisation methods using RNA sequencing data were useful for correctly categorising OSCC. The analysis showed differentially expressed genes in multiwise comparisons of various types of SCCs, such as KCNA10, FOSL2, and PRDM16, and extracted leader genes from pairwise comparisons were FGF20, DLC1, and ZNF705D.