Evaluating the Rates of Mortality and Cardiac Catheterization Using High-Sensitivity Troponin and Conventional Troponin Assays.

Non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is an acute coronary syndrome event where myocardial ischemia is present, with an increase of cardiac troponins without an elevation of the ST segment. One of the fundamental measures used to diagnose or rule out acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is troponin levels in the blood. Troponin is a broad term used for the category of muscle contraction regulatory proteins and is commonly measured during ACS evaluation. Troponin I is only released by cardiac tissue, while some assay measurements will also pick up troponin released by skeletal muscle injury. This retrospective observational study was performed investigating troponin assays and how they relate to patient's outcomes. The troponin assays used in this Miami hospital where the database of patients was collected between 2018 and 2023 were troponin I (cTnI), the conventional troponin assay, and the newer high-sensitivity troponin I assay (hs-cTn). In this observational study patients who received an admitting diagnosis of NSTEMI corroborated by an independent cardiologist had their respective troponin assay levels included. Patients found to have ECG changes significant for non-ischemic pathologies, or echocardiogram findings suggestive of myocardial dysfunction not clinically correlated to an ACS were excluded from the study. A total of 75 patients were included in this study and the mean age was 75.97 ±14.72 years, with a presentation of chest pain, dyspnea and general weakness recorded in 59% (n = 45) of patients. The median time between troponin samples was 6.63 hours across both assays and hs-cTn showed a 4.99% increase in variation between samples while cTnI had a decrease of 2.53%. The study objective is to support whether there is a difference in rates of cardiac catheterization or mortality based on the type of troponin testing. There was no significant association found between, the type of troponin assay used during hospital admission, and the outcomes of catheterization and death (p > 0.009).

Association of interleukin-1 α (-889) gene polymorphism in patients with generalized aggressive and chronic periodontitis.

BACKGROUND: There is a strong evidence that genetic as well as environmental factors affect the age of onset, severity and lifetime risk of developing periodontitis. The objective of the present study was to compare and to evaluate the association between interleukin (IL)-1α(-889) and gene polymorphisms in patients with generalized aggressive periodontitis, chronic periodontitis and healthy controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 Indian patients, with 20 aggressive periodontitis, 20 chronic periodontitis and 20 healthy controls were recruited for this study. From each patient, a volume of 2 ml of blood was collected by venipuncture in the ante-cubital fossa and was stored in sodium EDTA vacutainers and was used for genotyping assays with the polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism technique. Clinical parameters such as oral hygiene index, gingival index and clinical attachment loss (CAL) were evaluated for each patient. Genotype distribution between different groups were analyzed using Chi-square test. A P = 0.05 or less was set for significance. RESULTS: The mean oral hygiene index was 3.7 ± 0.86 and 3.25 ± 0.30 for chronic and aggressive periodontitis cases respectively. The CAL was 4.29 ± 0.63 mm for chronic periodontitis and 6.44 ± 0.57 mm for aggressive periodontitis. Homozygous genotype 2,2 was more predominant in cases of aggressive periodontitis whereas in chronic periodontitis, heterozygous genotype 1,2 was more predominant when compared with others (P < 0.001). Odds ratio for aggressive versus chronic periodontitis was calculated as 6.2 (95% confidence interval 6.019-7.892). CONCLUSION: The results of the present study support a positive association between aggressive periodontitis and the presence of the IL-1α-889, allele 2 polymorphism in Indian patients.

Restorative aspects of periodontal disease: an update part 1.

UNLABELLED: Today's dentistry is dominated by restorative procedures which are carried out to meet the demands of not only function but also aesthetics. Prosthetic and restorative therapies generally require a healthy periodontium as a prerequisite for successful treatment outcome. A mouth with a healthy periodontium may be affected by restorations of poor quality, and restorations of the highest quality may fail in a mouth with periodontal disease. This is the first of two articles that attempt to explain the concept of the complex question of biologic width and the problems that occur after improper margin placement in the periodontium. Initially, the dimensions of biologic width are considered and then margin placement and reasons for restorative procedures are discussed. This article also addresses the interactions between periodontal tissues and restorative procedures. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Understanding the impact of restorative procedures on periodontal health in regular dental examination by dentists can help in early diagnosis and treatment of periodontal diseases. This could prevent further progression of disease and reduce the frequency of tooth loss.

An in vitro comparison of root canal length determination by DentaPort ZX and iPex apex locators.

AIM: THE AIM OF THE PRESENT STUDY IS TO EVALUATE AND TO COMPARE THE ACCURACY OF TWO ELECTRONIC APEX LOCATORS (EALS): DentaPort ZX and iPex, at a position 0.5 mm short of the apical foramen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty single-rooted, mandibular premolar teeth were selected. Standard access cavities were prepared and the actual length (AL) was calculated. The samples were then embedded in alginate and the electronic measurements were determined and recorded. RESULTS: The results obtained showed that in determining the root canal length with a tolerance level of ±0.5 mm, i.e., AL ± 0.5 mm, DentaPort ZX was accurate in 93.3% of the samples and iPex was accurate in 90% of the samples at a position 0.5 mm short of the apical foramen. CONCLUSION: A strong correlation was seen between the two electronic methods and AL and also in between the two EALs, showing the possibility of their use to measure the root canal length. No statistically significant difference was found between both the apex locators.

Effect of controlled-release Periochip™ on clinical and microbiological parameters in patients of chronic periodontitis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the clinical and microbiological effectiveness of Periochip™ as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) with SRP alone in patients with chronic periodontitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized, split mouth, 3-month clinical and microbiological trial included 30 sites in 15 patients aged 30-50 years diagnosed with chronic periodontitis. In each patient, two bilateral pockets probing 5-7 mm were randomly assigned to test and control groups. The test group received SRP plus Periochip™, whereas the control group received SRP alone. Clinical indices and anaerobic culture analysis was done at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months interval. Total bacterial count and analysis of four major periodontopathogenic bacteria Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg), Prevotella intermedia (Pi), Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (Aa), and Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn) was done. RESULTS: Significant improvement was obtained in all clinical variables in the test group as compared to the control group over the study period. Total colony counts were significantly reduced in the test group as compared to control over the period of time. At baseline Aa was recovered from 4 test group sites and 5 control group sites, Pg from 15 test group and 14 control group sites, Pi from 5 test group and 2 control group sites, Fn from 7 test and 7 control group sites. At 3 months, Aa was recovered from 1 test group and 4 control group sites, Pg from 4 test group and 8 control group sites, Pi from 1 test group and 1 control group site, Fn from 3 test and 4 control group sites. CONCLUSION: Periochip™ placement as an adjunct to SRP, showed promising results, when compared to SRP alone. Healthy microflora can be maintained for a longer period of time and delay in the repopulation by periodontopathic microorganisms was observed.