The higher risk of death on peritoneal dialysis in the United States is not explained by background general population mortality: the CANUSA study revisited.

The CANUSA investigators reported a near doubling of the risk of death in peritoneal dialysis patients treated at U.S. sites compared to Canadian centers. Recently, evidence has suggested that background mortality rates in the general population might be responsible for differences in death rates on dialysis. The objective of this study was to determine if differences in background mortality in the general population were responsible for the increased risk of death observed in American patients in the CANUSA study. The CANUSA study was a prospective cohort study of 680 consecutive peritoneal dialysis patients at 14 centers in the U.S. and Canada. Extensive baseline data were available for all patients. The expected mortality rate of an individual of the same age, sex, and country of residence was determined at the time of enrollment in the CANUSA study. Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine if background mortality rates were responsible for the observed differences in survival between the two countries. Background mortality rate in the general population was associated with an increased risk of death on peritoneal dialysis, but after adjustment for other baseline factors, it was no longer significant. The adjusted, relative hazard of dying in the U.S. compared to Canada was unchanged after further adjusting for background mortality rate in statistical models (HR = 1.93; 95% confidence interval: 1.13 - 3.28). In conclusion, the increased risk of mortality in U.S. patients enrolled in the CANUSA study was not explained by differences in the background mortality rate in the general population.

The Vascular Access Questionnaire: assessing patient-reported views of vascular access.

BACKGROUND: The use of central venous catheters for vascular access in hemodialysis (HD) patients is associated with an increased risk of complications compared to arteriovenous fistulas (AVF). Despite this, catheter use remains high and patient satisfaction may be an important driver of catheter use. METHODS: We developed the Vascular Access Questionnaire (VAQ) to measure patient-reported views of their vascular access. Chronic HD patients at two centers were asked to rate how bothered they were by 17 access-related problems. VAQ symptom scores were compared between patients using catheters and those using fistulas for vascular access. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-two patients were eligible for the study. Symptom score was not different between patients using catheters and those using fistulas (p=0.36). However, patients using fistulas were more likely to be at least moderately bothered by pain, bleeding, bruising, swelling, and the appearance of their access than patients using catheters. Elderly patients reported lower symptom scores with catheters than fistulas. CONCLUSIONS: Patients appear to be primarily concerned with the appearance of their access and cannulation-related complications, particularly the elderly. Better education about the risk of adverse events with catheters and the implementation of measures aimed at reducing cannulation-related complications may help to increase fistula rates and improve patient satisfaction with their vascular access.

Restricting cadaveric kidney transplantation based on age: the impact on efficiency and equity.

BACKGROUND: Caring for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is resource intense, and health care costs for this small segment of the population continue to rise. When compared to long-term dialysis as a therapy for ESRD, kidney transplantation increases survival, improves quality of life, and is cost saving. METHODS: We used decision analytic techniques to determine if cadaveric kidney transplantation is cost-effective in all age groups. We then looked at the impact of a strategy of restricting access to transplantation to those under 60 years of age to determine the impact on overall clinical outcomes and costs, as well as the outcomes and costs within each age group. RESULTS: Equal access to cadaveric kidney transplantation resulted in an increase in expected life years (7.4 vs 6.7 years) and a significant cost savings ($376,577 vs $568,670 per patient) compared to a strategy of long-term dialysis therapy over a 25-year time horizon. This pattern was seen for the overall cohort, and for all four age groups individually. Restricting access to transplantation to patients under the age of 60 resulted in only a very small improvement in expected life years and small cost savings under base-case assumptions. As expected, older patients were adversely impacted by this strategy. CONCLUSION: We have shown that transplantation is cost-effective for all age groups. A strategy of restricting access to transplantation to younger patients does not result in large cost savings and provides only small improvements in expected life-years at the expense of significantly worse outcomes in older patients.

Home care assistance and the utilization of peritoneal dialysis.

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) may be declining because the elderly often have barriers to self-care PD. The objective of this study was to determine whether the availability of home care increases utilization of PD. In 134 incident chronic dialysis patients (median age 73), 108 (81%) had at least one medical or social condition, which was a potential barrier to self-care PD. Eighty percent of patients living in regions where home care was available were considered eligible for PD compared to 65% in regions without home care (P=0.01, adjusted). Each barrier reduced the probability of being eligible for PD by 26% (odds ratio 0.74, per condition, P=0.02) adjusted for age, sex, predialysis care, in-patient start, and availability of home care. In regions with and without home care, 59 and 58% of eligible patients choose PD when they were offered it (P=NS). The utilization of PD in the incident end-stage renal disease (ESRD) population living in regions with and without home care was 47 and 37%, respectively (P=0.27). The mean rate of home care visits over the first year was 4.3 per week (maximum available was 14 per week). Of the 22 assisted patients, 15 required chronic support, five graduated to self-care, and two started with self-care but later required assistance. Adverse events were similar between assisted PD and traditional modalities. Barriers to self-care PD are very common in the elderly ESRD population but home care assistance significantly increases the number of patients who can be safely offered PD.

Intracoronary ultrasound imaging: methods and clinical applications.

OBJECTIVE: To review the development of intracoronary ultrasound, its current utility and the impetus for its continued development as a coronary imaging modality. DATA SOURCES: English-language literature (1966 to 1999) was searched in the MEDLINE database with the key words 'ultra- sound', 'intravascular' and 'intracoronary', and limited to human studies. In addition, an online public access catalogue was searched using the subject headings 'cardiovascular diseases - therapy', 'heart diseases' and 'vascular diseases'. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Articles relating to the history of intravascular or intracoronary ultrasound, methods and materials employed, advantages and disadvantages, safety issues and future directions of research in the area of intracoronary ultrasound were selected. DATA SYNTHESIS: Intracoronary ultrasound has been shown to improve upon demonstrated weaknesses of coronary angiography. This imaging technique, while invasive, has not been associated with significant, acute adverse effects and has proved to be useful in guiding interventions, and evaluating the mechanism and extent of their success. Technological limitations with respect to the equipment employed, and the acquisition, processing and display of images are the subject of intense research focus because they hinder more widespread clinical use of intracoronary ultrasound. CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronary ultrasound has emerged as a safe and useful tool in the visualization of the coronary vasculature. Technological limitations and questions about long term safety are a concern. Its ability to overcome the inherent limitations of coronary angiography, and to guide and evaluate coronary interventions supports the notion that this technique will continue to assume an ever-expanding role in interventional cardiology.