Clinical spectrum and outcome of children with deficiency of adenosine deaminase 2 (DADA2): multicentric experience from India.

OBJECTIVES: Deficiency of adenosine deaminase-2 (DADA2) is a monogenic disorder closely resembling polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) and can present to physicians across various specialties. Through this case series, we aim to describe the clinical spectrum and outcome of Indian children with DADA2. We aimed to study the clinical spectrum and outcome of Indian children with DADA-2. METHODS: The deidentified data from all participating centres were entered in an excel sheet, and the coordinating centre (All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi) screened the data for accuracy and completeness. RESULTS: We enrolled 16 children (11 females) in the study; the mean (SD) age at the time of onset of symptoms for males and females was 46.2 (47) and 73.6 (50.4) months, respectively. The most common clinical feature in this cohort was fever and rash in 80% of patients. More than half of children n, (%) [8, (53%)] had a CNS stroke. The other clinical features were hypertension [5(33%)], anaemia [3 (20%)] and arthralgia/arthritis in 4 (26%). These children were managed with various immunomodulators: steroids [13, (86%)], anti-TNF agents [(12, (80%)], cyclophosphamide [2 (13%)] and mycophenolate mofetil [3 (20%)]. The median (IQR) duration of follow-up for this cohort was 17 (10, 29) months. Fourteen children achieved remission and none had recurrent strokes after the initiation of anti-TNF drugs. CONCLUSION: DADA-2 closely resembles PAN; early age of onset and CNS stroke are striking differentiating features from classic PAN. Most children respond well to anti-TNF agents without serious adverse events during short-term follow-up.

Sensing the Simmering Inflammation: Clues for Diagnosis of Underlying Rheumatic Disorder.

Diagnosing pediatric rheumatic diseases can be challenging, as they often mimic common conditions such as infections and, less commonly, malignancies. Characteristic pattern recognition, guided by a detailed history and clinical examination, often helps in making the correct diagnosis. A delay in diagnosing these disorders can lead to disease-related damage, such as joint disabilities in juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and life-threatening organ involvement in conditions like childhood vasculitis and lupus. Easily accessible laboratory investigations can guide towards the underlying diagnosis. In the current era, early diagnosis help achieve favorable outcomes with the use of effective therapeutic options. This article aims to highlight important clinical and laboratory features that would assist primary care pediatricians in the early diagnosis of rheumatic disorders.

Use of immunomodulators in non-infectious uveitis: lights and shadows.

Non-infectious uveitis (NIU) is one of the leading causes of sight impairment worldwide. Corticosteroids are the mainstay treatment for acute NIU, although their known systemic and ocular side effects limit their long-term use. The most common types of immunosuppressants used as steroid-sparing treatment are non-biologic drugs, particularly antimetabolites (methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, and azathioprine) and biologic drugs, mainly TNF-α inhibitors such as Adalimumab or Infliximab. Antimetabolites have shown their effectiveness in the treatment of NIU in individual and comparative studies, being methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil usually preferred over azathioprine. The choice of which antimetabolite to use at first is not well defined, and decisions usually depend on the patient's characteristics and the physician's preferences. Treatment of NIU with biologic drugs, and particularly TNF-α inhibitors, has significantly increased in the last years and is considered an important alternative in patients not responding to first-line immunomodulators such as antimetabolites. However, data regarding how different immunomodulators or biologic drugs perform in different NIU is still limited, and little is known about the optimization of both biologic and non-biologic drugs when used in NIU. Further randomized clinical trials and comparative studies are required to achieve more understanding and better results when addressing complicated NIU. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the use of non-biologic and biologic drugs in NIU, which may be useful for clinicians in their daily practice, and to address those aspects that are less known about these treatments as well as their weaknesses.

Integration of genetic and clinical risk factors improves the risk classification of uveitis in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)-associated uveitis (JIAU) is a serious JIA comorbidity that can result in vision impairment. This study aimed to identify genetic risk factors, within the major histocompatibility complex , for JIAU and evaluate their contribution for improving risk classification when combined with clinical risk factors. METHODS: Data on single nucleotide polymorphisms, amino acids and classical human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles were available for 2,497 JIA patients without uveitis and 579 JIAU patients (female=2060, male=1015). Analysis was restricted to patients with inferred European ancestry. Forward conditional logistic regression identified genetic markers exceeding a Bonferroni corrected significance (6x10-6). Multivariable logistic regression estimated the effects of clinical and genetic risk factors and a likelihood ratio test calculated the improvement in model fit when adding genetic factors. Uveitis risk classification performance of a model integrating genetic and clinical risk factors was estimated using area under the receiver operator characteristic curve and compared to a model of clinical risk factors alone. RESULTS: Three genetic risk factors were identified mapping to HLA-DRB1, HLA-DPB1 and HLA-A. These markers were statistically independent from clinical risk factors and significantly improved the fit of a model when included with clinical risk factors (P = 3.3x10-23). The addition of genetic markers improved the classification of JIAU compared to a model of clinical risk factors alone (AUC 0.75 vs. 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: Integration of a genetic and clinical risk prediction model outperforms a model based solely on clinical risk factors. Future JIAU risk prediction models should include genetic risk factors.

Management of JIA associated uveitis.

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) is the most common chronic rheumatic disease in childhood, and is associated with uveitis in up to 20-25% of cases. Typically, the uveitis is chronic, asymptomatic, non-granulomatous and anterior. For this reason, screening for uveitis is recommended to identify uveitis early and allow treatment to prevent sight-threatening complications. The management of JIA associated uveitis requires a multidisciplinary approach and a close collaboration between paediatric rheumatologist and ophthalmologist. Starting the appropriate treatment to control uveitis activity and prevent ocular complications is crucial. Current international recommendations advise a step-wise approach, starting with methotrexate and moving on to adalimumab if methotrexate alone is not sufficient to control the disease. If the uveitis remains active despite standard treatment other therapeutic options may be considered including anti-IL6 or other anti-TNF agents such as infliximab, although the evidence for these agents is limited.

Update on ocular manifestations of the main monogenic and polygenic autoinflammatory diseases.

Autoinflammatory diseases include disorders with a genetic cause and also complex syndromes associated to polygenic or multifactorial factors. Eye involvement is present in many of them, with different extent and severity. The present review covers ophthalmological lesions in the most prevalent monogenic autoinflammatory diseases, including FMF (familial Mediterranean fever), TRAPS (TNF receptor-associated periodic syndrome), CAPS (cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes), Blau syndrome, DADA2 (deficiency of adenosine deaminase 2), DITRA (deficiency of the interleukin-36 receptor antagonist), other monogenic disorders, including several ubiquitinopathies, interferonopathies, and the recently described ROSAH (retinal dystrophy, optic nerve edema, splenomegaly, anhidrosis, and headache) syndrome, and VEXAS (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) syndrome. Among polygenic autoinflammatory diseases, ocular manifestations have been reviewed in Behçet's disease, PFAPA (periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and cervical adenitis) syndrome, Still's disease and autoinflammatory bone diseases, which encompass CRMO (chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis) and SAPHO (synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis and osteitis) syndrome.

Novel therapies in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarises the major novel treatment options for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) since the pandemic, reflecting not only on advancements in therapeutics but also approach to management and research. RECENT FINDINGS: Several recent international paediatric trials have been important in advancing understanding of JIA and furthering available treatment options. Biologic and small molecule agents were demonstrated to be effective and safe in recalcitrant or severe JIA (including extra-articular complications), mirroring the adult equivalent diseases. SUMMARY: Although joint and overall health have vastly improved for young people with JIA, ongoing international collaboration, critical review of treatment strategies and high quality research are essential to optimize outcomes.

Of oranges and lemons: you are what you eat.

A young boy presented with increasing lower limb pain and swelling for a month. At the time of his hospitalisation, he was unable to walk. We report the patient's clinical journey with clinical commentary throughout, highlighting the importance that uncommon diseases may be diagnosed with a high index of suspicion and thorough history taking.

British Society for Rheumatology guideline on management of adult and juvenile onset Sjögren disease.

Sjögren disease (SD) is a chronic, autoimmune disease of unknown aetiology with significant impact on quality of life. Although dryness (sicca) of the eyes and mouth are the classically described features, dryness of other mucosal surfaces and systemic manifestations are common. The key management aim should be to empower the individual to manage their condition-conserving, replacing and stimulating secretions; and preventing damage and suppressing systemic disease activity. This guideline builds on and widens the recommendations developed for the first guideline published in 2017. We have included advice on the management of children and adolescents where appropriate to provide a comprehensive guideline for UK-based rheumatology teams.

How can trial designs better serve the needs of children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis?

In juvenile idiopathic arthritis we have seen remarkable progress in the number of available licensed biological and small molecule treatments in the past two decades, leading to improved outcomes for patients. Designing clinical trials for these therapeutics is fraught with ethical, legislative, and practical challenges. However, many aspects of current clinical trial design in juvenile idiopathic arthritis do not meet the needs of patients and clinicians. Commonly used withdrawal trial designs raise substantial ethical concerns for patients and families who believe that they do not enable evidence-based and patient-centred decisions around medication choices. In this Viewpoint, we present the personal views of a patient and parent network that is of the opinion that current trial design in juvenile idiopathic arthritis is failing children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and set out the need for change informed by lived experience.

Tofacitinib for Refractory Uveitis and Scleritis in Children: A Case Series.

PURPOSE: This study analyzes the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in pediatric patients presenting with treatment-resistant uveitis and scleritis. METHOD: Retrospective Chart Review. RESULT: Nine children diagnosed with uveitis and one with scleritis received oral tofacitinib treatment. The median age of these patients was 9 years, with bilateral involvement observed in nine of them. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis was the most identifiable cause of uveitis, with anterior uveitis (50%) being the most frequent subtype of inflammation among these children. The median duration of immunosuppressive treatment before switching to tofacitinib was 18 (16-49) months. Remission of uveitis was achieved in all but two children, who experienced recurrence - manifesting as anterior uveitis. The median duration of follow-up in these children after tofacitinib treatment was 277.5 (183-549) days. At the end of follow-up, topical steroids could be withdrawn in six children, and two children were on topical steroids once a day. None of the children developed any systemic side-effect during the follow-up period. The mean BCVA at presentation was 0.62 ± 0.55, which improved to a mean of 0.27 ± 0.325 at the final follow-up (p = 0.0014). CONCLUSION: Treatment of pediatric uveitis with tofacitinib can be a valuable second-line treatment option and useful alternative in low- and middle-income countries.

Long-term efficacy and safety of subcutaneous tocilizumab in clinical trials of polyarticular or systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab (SC-TCZ) treatment in a long-term extension (LTE) of clinical trials in polyarticular or systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA or sJIA). METHODS: Patients with pJIA or sJIA from two open-label, 52-week phase 1b core trials of SC-TCZ who had adequate response per investigator assessment entered the LTE and continued SC-TCZ treatment according to body weight-based dosing regimens until commercial availability or up to 5 years. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy were assessed for up to 3 years, and safety for up to 5 years in the LTE. RESULTS: Forty-four patients with pJIA and 38 patients with sJIA entered the LTE. Tocilizumab trough concentrations were maintained within the range expected to provide clinical benefit (mean values: pJIA, ∼10 µg/ml; sJIA, ∼75 µg/ml over 3 years). Pharmacodynamic parameters (interleukin-6, soluble interleukin-6 receptor, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein) were maintained throughout the LTE at levels achieved in the core trials. Inactive disease per American College of Rheumatology provisional criteria was reported for 90% (17/19) and 53% (8/15) of patients with pJIA and 91% (10/11) and 92% (12/13) of patients with sJIA in the <30 and ≥30 kg body weight groups, respectively. Serious adverse events in the LTE were reported in six patients with pJIA (13.6%; five serious infections) and five patients with sJIA (13.2%; one serious infection). CONCLUSION: Patients with pJIA or sJIA experienced long-term disease control with SC-TCZ treatment. Long-term safety was consistent with the known tocilizumab safety profile. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02165345.

Long-Term Visual Outcome of Patients with Blau Syndrome.

PURPOSE: To document the long-term visual outcomes in patients with Blau syndrome. METHODS: A retrospective institutional cohort study was conducted, and 13 patients with genetically confirmed Blau syndrome were included. Demographic and clinical data were collected from standardised medical charts. Baseline was defined as the first detected uveitis and data were recorded onwards at intervals of 1, 3, 5, 10, 15 and 20 years. RESULTS: Anterior uveitis was the most common classification at baseline (57.1%). Among patients with documented uveitis lasting 10 years or more, all of them developed panuveitis. Median logMAR visual acuity at baseline was 0 (range -0.5; 0.7), 0.19 (range 0; 1.5) at year 5, and 0.7 (range 0.1 - no perception of light) at year 20, as recorded in 13, 16, and 10 eyes, respectively. All patients received treatment with topical and oral steroids, and multiple systemic immunosuppressants including biologics. Disease control, defined as having cells <1+ in both eyes and using topical steroid eye drops less than twice daily, was achieved in 14.3% to 37.5% of patients at the different time points. Cataract surgery was performed in 12 eyes of 8 patients, 3 eyes of 3 patients necessitated glaucoma surgery, and 4 eyes of 4 patients required surgery for retinal detachment. CONCLUSION: Uveitis associated with Blau syndrome commonly leads to severe, chronic panuveitis, requiring long-term systemic immunosuppression. Early diagnosis and timely initiation of biologics may prevent significant visual impairment.

Childhood Chronic Idiopathic Uveitis in a Multicentre International Cohort.

IMPORTANCE: Idiopathic uveitis makes up around 50% of non-infectious uveitis but the clinical characteristics in children are poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To report the demographic, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of children with idiopathic non-infectious uveitis (iNIU) in a multicentric retrospective study. RESULTS: There were 126 (61 female) children with iNIU. The median age at diagnosis was 9.3 years (3-16 years) . Uveitis was bilateral in 106 patients and anterior in 68.At onset,impaired visual acuity and blindness in the worse eye were reported, in 24.4% and 15.1% patients but at 3 years of follow-up, there was a significant improvement in visual acuity (mean 0.11 SD ±0.50 vs 0.42 SD ± 0.59 p < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: There is a high rate of visual impairment at presentation in children with idiopathic uveitis. The majority of patients have a significant improvement in vision, but 1 in 6 had impaired vision or blindness in their worse eye at 3 years.

This is a large retrospective study of children with chronic idiopathic uveitis,There is a high rate of visual impairment at presentation in children with idiopathic uveitis. Although visual acuity improves during follow-up, one in six still had impaired vision or blindness in their worse eye at 3 years.At 3 years, more than half of patients were on immunosuppression and one-third were on a biologic agent.

Global Association of the COVID-19 Pandemic With Pediatric Clinical Trial Publication.

This cross-sectional study investigates the association of the COVID-19 pandemic with rates of pediatric clinical trial publication.

Treatment patterns in paediatric and adult patients with SLE: a retrospective claims database study in the USA.

OBJECTIVE: To assess real-world treatment regimens and patterns in childhood-onset SLE (cSLE) and adult-onset SLE (aSLE) cohorts, including similarities in treatments, duration of use and adherence. METHODS: This retrospective study utilised data from Merative L.P. MarketScan Research Databases (USA). Index date was the date of first SLE diagnosis (2010-2019). Patients aged <18 years (cSLE) and ≥18 years (aSLE) at index date with confirmed SLE diagnosis and ≥12 months continuous enrolment during pre-index and post-index periods were included. The cohorts were stratified based on the presence (existing) or absence (new) of pre-index SLE. Primary outcomes (post-index period) included treatment regimens (all patients), and adherence (proportion of days covered (PDC)) and discontinuation of therapies initiated within 90 days of diagnosis (new patients). Univariate comparisons between cSLE and aSLE cohorts were performed using Wilcoxon rank-sum and χ2 (or Fisher's exact) tests. RESULTS: cSLE cohort included 1275 patients (mean age=14.1 years) and aSLE cohort included 66 326 patients (mean age=49.7 years). Antimalarials and glucocorticoids were commonly used among new (cSLE=64.4%/62.0%; aSLE=51.8%/49.7%) and existing (cSLE=68.6%/58.9%; aSLE=63.8%/51.3%) patients in both cohorts. Median oral glucocorticoid dose (prednisone equivalent) was higher in cSLE vs aSLE (new=22.1 vs 14.0 mg/day; existing=14.4 vs 12.3 mg/day; p<0.05). Mycophenolate mofetil use was higher in patients with cSLE vs aSLE (new=26.2% vs 5.8%; existing=37.6% vs 11.0%; p<0.0001). Compared with aSLE, more patients used combination therapies in cSLE (p<0.0001). Median PDC was higher in cSLE vs aSLE for antimalarials (0.9 vs 0.8; p<0.0001) and oral glucocorticoids (0.6 vs 0.3; p<0.0001). Treatment discontinuation was lower in cSLE vs aSLE for antimalarials (25.0% vs 33.1%; p<0.0001) and oral glucocorticoids (56.6% vs 71.2%; p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Management of cSLE and aSLE includes the same medication classes; differences include more intensive use of therapy in cSLE, warranting the need for approved safe medications for cSLE.