Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Pancreas ; 53(4): e350-e356, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38518061

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening Consortium recommended annual imaging for individuals at increased risk for developing a pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who did not have concerning pancreatic findings or a cyst <3 cm without worrisome features. We aimed to determine if 3-cm cyst size accurately predicted advanced precursor lesions in high-risk individuals undergoing surveillance. METHODS: Imaging for high-risk individuals (HRIs) undergoing PDAC surveillance from 2007 to 2021 was reviewed and pancreatic abnormalities were recorded including dominant cyst size and number of cysts. Subjects were excluded if they had the following: (1) no follow-up imaging after baseline, (2) solid lesion at baseline, or (3) development of solid lesion without having cyst on prior imaging. RESULTS: Five of the 77 HRIs found to have a cystic lesion on surveillance developed a PDAC: 3 with cystic lesion >1 cm as compared with only 2 of 67 HRIs with cystic lesions <1 cm (P < 0.05). None of these cysts developed worrisome findings and 4/5 PDACs did not arise from visualized cystic precursor lesion. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a cyst ≥1 cm were at increased risk for developing PDAC compared with patients with cyst <1 cm. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma usually did not arise from a recognized cystic lesion.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal , Pancreatic Cyst , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Pancreatic Cyst/diagnosis , Pancreas/pathology , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology , Retrospective Studies
2.
JCO Precis Oncol ; 7: e2300445, 2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37883920

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: An effective blood-based test for pancreatic cancer (PC) screening has remained elusive. The IMMray PanCan-d is the first commercially available blood-based test specifically designed for early detection of PC; however, outcomes from its use in clinical practice have not been reported. METHODS: We performed a blinded spike-in study of 100 individuals who had an IMMray PanCan-d test, including 94 high-risk individuals (HRIs) undergoing PC surveillance and six individuals with known PC. Specimens were processed blindly following the commercial laboratory's standardized operating procedure. Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. RESULTS: Cohort characteristics included a median age of 63 (IQR, 55-70) years, 57% female, 96% non-Hispanic White, 57% with a pathogenic variant in a PC risk gene (BRCA2 most commonly-18%), and 83% with a family history of PC. Among IMMray PanCan-d results from 94 HRIs undergoing PC surveillance, there was one positive (1%), seven borderlines (7%), 73 negatives (78%), and 13 tests not performed because of low CA19-9 expression (14%). No PC was diagnosed among these HRIs; however, there were two sub-cm pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, seven clinically diagnosed side branch intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms ≥1 cm, and a sub-cm solid mass with indeterminate cytology requiring close follow-up; all these individuals had negative IMMray PanCan-d tests. Of the six spiked-in PCs, four (67%) yielded a positive and two (33%) yielded a negative. With an estimated disease prevalence of 2%, the PPV and NPV are 52% and 99%, respectively, if borderline results are considered negative and 12% and 99%, respectively, if borderline tests are considered positive. CONCLUSION: In clinical practice, IMMray PanCan-d has a robust NPV; however, PPV is dramatically influenced by whether borderline results are characterized as a positive or negative result.


Subject(s)
Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Male , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Pancreatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/genetics , Pancreatic Neoplasms
3.
Ann Surg ; 278(4): e789-e797, 2023 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37212422

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We report the development and validation of a combined DNA/RNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) platform to improve the evaluation of pancreatic cysts. BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Despite a multidisciplinary approach, pancreatic cyst classification, such as a cystic precursor neoplasm, and the detection of high-grade dysplasia and early adenocarcinoma (advanced neoplasia) can be challenging. NGS of preoperative pancreatic cyst fluid improves the clinical evaluation of pancreatic cysts, but the recent identification of novel genomic alterations necessitates the creation of a comprehensive panel and the development of a genomic classifier to integrate the complex molecular results. METHODS: An updated and unique 74-gene DNA/RNA-targeted NGS panel (PancreaSeq Genomic Classifier) was created to evaluate 5 classes of genomic alterations to include gene mutations (e.g., KRAS, GNAS, etc.), gene fusions and gene expression. Further, CEA mRNA ( CEACAM5 ) was integrated into the assay using RT-qPCR. Separate multi-institutional cohorts for training (n=108) and validation (n=77) were tested, and diagnostic performance was compared to clinical, imaging, cytopathologic, and guideline data. RESULTS: Upon creation of a genomic classifier system, PancreaSeq GC yielded a 95% sensitivity and 100% specificity for a cystic precursor neoplasm, and the sensitivity and specificity for advanced neoplasia were 82% and 100%, respectively. Associated symptoms, cyst size, duct dilatation, a mural nodule, increasing cyst size, and malignant cytopathology had lower sensitivities (41-59%) and lower specificities (56-96%) for advanced neoplasia. This test also increased the sensitivity of current pancreatic cyst guidelines (IAP/Fukuoka and AGA) by >10% and maintained their inherent specificity. CONCLUSIONS: PancreaSeq GC was not only accurate in predicting pancreatic cyst type and advanced neoplasia but also improved the sensitivity of current pancreatic cyst guidelines.


Subject(s)
Pancreatic Cyst , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Humans , RNA , Early Detection of Cancer , Pancreatic Cyst/diagnosis , Pancreatic Cyst/genetics , Pancreatic Cyst/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Pancreatic Neoplasms/genetics , Pancreatic Neoplasms/metabolism , DNA , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Pancreatic Neoplasms
4.
Pancreas ; 50(6): 807-814, 2021 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34149034

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Data from the International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening Consortium studies have demonstrated that screening for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma can be effective and that surveillance improves survival in high-risk individuals. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and cross-sectional imaging are both used, although there is some suggestion that EUS is superior. Demonstration of the cost-effectiveness of screening is important to implement screening in high-risk groups. METHODS: Results from centers with EUS-predominant screening were pooled to evaluate efficacy of index EUS in screening. A decision analysis model simulated the outcome of high-risk patients who undergo screening and evaluated the parameters that would make screening cost-effective at a US $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year willingness to pay. RESULTS: One-time index EUS has a sensitivity of 71.25% and specificity of 99.82% to detection to detect high-risk lesions. Screening with index EUS was cost-effective, particularly at lifetime pancreatic cancer probabilities of greater than 10.8%, or at lower probabilities if life expectancy after resection of a lesion that was at least 16 years, and if missed, lesion rates on index EUS are 5% or less. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic cancer screening can be cost-effective through index EUS, particularly for those individuals at high-lifetime risk of cancer.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/diagnosis , Cost-Benefit Analysis/methods , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Endosonography/methods , Pancreas/diagnostic imaging , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Cohort Studies , Cost-Benefit Analysis/economics , Early Detection of Cancer/economics , Endosonography/economics , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Economic , Pancreas/pathology , Risk Factors , Sensitivity and Specificity
6.
Pancreas ; 45(2): 228-33, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26418902

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: In considering whether medications that increase insulin levels accelerate pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PC) development, we hypothesized that PC patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) who used exogenous insulin or insulin-stimulating medications should have an earlier age at diagnosis or present with more advanced disease. METHODS: Patients enrolled in our PC registry from June 1, 2003, to May 31, 2012, were stratified according to treatment solely with insulin, insulin-stimulating medications, or insulin-independent medications. Age at PC diagnosis, PC stage, and years between DM and PC diagnoses were analyzed among the cohorts. RESULTS: Of 122 DM patients (mean age, 67.4 ± 10.2 years), the mean ages at PC diagnosis within the insulin-only (n = 40), insulin-stimulating (n = 11), insulin-independent (n = 71), and non-DM (n = 321) cohorts were 68.7 ± 10.5, 69.6 ± 10.8, 66.3 ± 9.7, and 65.5 ± 10.5 years, respectively. No significant difference among the age at PC diagnosis was observed based on duration or type of DM treatment. There was no correlation between PC stage and increased insulin exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-DM medications that increase exposure to insulin do not appear to accelerate PC development using outcomes of mean age at PC diagnosis, PC stage, or duration between DM and PC diagnoses.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/blood , Diabetes Mellitus/blood , Insulin/blood , Pancreatic Neoplasms/blood , Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Age of Onset , Aged , Alcohol Drinking , Body Mass Index , Cohort Studies , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/blood , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Insulin/therapeutic use , Linear Models , Male , Metformin/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Smoking , Time Factors
7.
Am J Surg Pathol ; 39(8): 1114-20, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25871621

ABSTRACT

Current guidelines on germline mutation testing for patients suspected of having Lynch syndrome are not entirely clear in patients with tumors demonstrating isolated loss of PMS2 immunohistochemical expression. We analyzed the clinical and pathologic features of patients with tumors demonstrating isolated loss of PMS2 expression in an attempt to (1) determine the frequency of germline MLH1 and PMS2 mutations and (2) correlate mismatch-repair protein immunohistochemistry and tumor histology with germline mutation results. A total of 3213 consecutive colorectal carcinomas and 215 consecutive endometrial carcinomas were prospectively analyzed for DNA mismatch-repair protein expression by immunohistochemistry. In total, 32 tumors from 31 patients demonstrated isolated loss of PMS2 immunohistochemical expression, including 16 colorectal carcinomas and 16 endometrial carcinomas. Microsatellite instability (MSI) polymerase chain reaction was performed in 29 tumors from 28 patients with the following results: 28 tumors demonstrated high-level MSI, and 1 tumor demonstrated low-level MSI. Twenty of 31 (65%) patients in the study group had tumors demonstrating histopathology associated with high-level MSI. Seventeen patients underwent germline mutation analysis with the following results: 24% with MLH1 mutations, 35% with PMS2 mutations, 12% with PMS2 variants of undetermined significance, and 29% with no mutations in either MLH1 or PMS2. Three of the 4 patients with MLH1 germline mutations had a mutation that results in decreased stability and quantity of the MLH1 protein that compromises the MLH1-PMS2 protein complex, helping to explain the presence of immunogenic but functionally inactive MLH1 protein within the tumor. The high frequency of MLH1 germline mutations identified in our study has important implications for testing strategies in patients suspected of having Lynch syndrome and indicates that patients with tumors demonstrating isolated loss of PMS2 expression without a germline PMS2 mutation must have MLH1 mutation analysis performed.


Subject(s)
Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/genetics , Adenosine Triphosphatases/deficiency , Biomarkers, Tumor/deficiency , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Carcinoma/chemistry , Carcinoma/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/chemistry , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/genetics , DNA Repair Enzymes/deficiency , DNA-Binding Proteins/deficiency , Endometrial Neoplasms/chemistry , Endometrial Neoplasms/genetics , Germ-Line Mutation , Immunohistochemistry , Nuclear Proteins/genetics , Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/analysis , Adult , Aged , Biopsy , Carcinoma/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/pathology , DNA Mismatch Repair , DNA Mutational Analysis , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Humans , Male , Microsatellite Instability , Middle Aged , Mismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2 , MutL Protein Homolog 1 , Nuclear Proteins/analysis , Phenotype , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies
8.
Am J Surg Pathol ; 38(3): 346-53, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24525505

ABSTRACT

Hereditary pancreatitis is an autosomal dominant disorder with 80% penetrance and variable expressivity. The vast majority of cases have been linked to mutations within the cationic trypsinogen gene, also referred to as serine protease 1 (PRSS1). Other than inheritance, PRSS1 pancreatitis has been considered clinically and pathologically indistinguishable from other etiologies of chronic pancreatitis. However, to date, the histologic findings of PRSS1 pancreatitis have not been well described. We, therefore, collected pancreatic specimens from 10 PRSS1 patients of various ages and examined their clinicopathologic features. Patients at the time of resection ranged in age from 9 to 66 years (median, 29 y), with a slight female predominance (60%). All patients reported a history of intermittent abdominal pain, with an age of onset ranging from infancy to 21 years of age. Examination of the gross and microscopic findings suggested a sequential pattern of changes with increasing patient age. In pediatric patients (n=4), although in most cases the pancreas was grossly normal, there was microscopic variation in lobular size and shape. Although the central portions of the pancreas displayed parenchymal loss accompanied by loose perilobular and interlobular fibrosis, the periphery was remarkable for replacement by mature adipose tissue. These changes were more developed in younger adults (n=2), in whom fatty replacement seemed to extend from the periphery to the central portions of the pancreas. With older patients (n=4), the pancreas showed marked atrophy and extensive replacement by mature adipose tissue with scattered islets of Langerhans and rare acinar epithelium concentrated near the main pancreatic duct. In summary, PRSS1 hereditary pancreatitis is characterized by progressive lipomatous atrophy of the pancreas.


Subject(s)
Mutation , Pancreas/pathology , Pancreatitis, Chronic/genetics , Pancreatitis, Chronic/pathology , Trypsin/genetics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Atrophy , Child , Disease Progression , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Heredity , Humans , Lipomatosis/enzymology , Lipomatosis/genetics , Lipomatosis/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Pancreas/enzymology , Pancreas/surgery , Pancreatectomy , Pancreatitis, Chronic/complications , Pancreatitis, Chronic/enzymology , Pancreatitis, Chronic/surgery , Phenotype , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL