Simplified medical abortion screening: a demonstration project.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to evaluate the safety and acceptability of outpatient medical abortion in selected women without a pretreatment ultrasound or pelvic examination. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a prospective case-series study to estimate the incidence of serious adverse events (death, life-threatening event, hospitalization, transfusion or any other medical problem that we judged to be significant), surgical completion of the abortion and satisfaction in women provided with medical abortion without a pretreatment ultrasound or pelvic examination. We enrolled 406 women requesting medical abortion in Moldova, Mexico and the United States. To be eligible, a woman must have been certain that her last menstrual period started within the prior 56days, have had regular menses before the pregnancy, not have used hormonal contraceptives in the prior 2months (in the United States and Mexico) or 3months (in Moldova), have no risk factors for or symptoms of ectopic pregnancy, and not have had an ultrasound or pelvic exam in this pregnancy. One site also excluded women with uterine enlargement on abdominal palpation. Each participant received mifepristone (200mg orally) and misoprostol (400 mcg sublingually in Moldova; 800 mcg buccally at all other sites) and was followed until complete abortion, defined as requiring no further treatment. RESULTS: Of the 365 (90%) participants who provided sufficient follow-up information for analysis, 347 (95%) had complete abortion without additional treatment, 5 (1%) had surgical aspiration, and 10 (3%) had extra misoprostol. Three participants (1%) had serious adverse events; these included two hospital admissions for heavy bleeding managed with aspiration and one diagnosis of persistent gestational sac 19days after enrollment. Most (317, 90%) participants were pleased with omitting the pretreatment ultrasound and pelvic exam. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, medical abortion without screening ultrasound or pelvic exam resulted in no serious adverse events that were likely to have been prevented by those tests and was highly acceptable. IMPLICATIONS: Screening for medical abortion without exam or ultrasound shows promise as a means for increasing access to this service. More research is needed to develop screening criteria that are more inclusive and simpler for clinical use.

A single-arm study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and acceptability of pericoital oral contraception with levonorgestrel.

BACKGROUND: An oral dose of 0.75 mg levonorgestrel (LNG) taken shortly after sex was marketed as a routine, nonemergency contraceptive method until the 1990s. Because a hormonal method used only at the time of intercourse may be desirable for women who have infrequent sex, we conducted a study to reevaluate the potential of pericoital LNG as a primary means of contraception. METHODS: We enrolled women aged 18-45 years in Brazil and the USA who expected to have sex 1-4 days per month for 6.5 months. Participants were instructed to take one tablet 0.75 mg LNG within 24 h before or after sex, with no more than one dose in any 24-h period. The primary efficacy measure was the Pearl Index among women aged 18-35 years. RESULTS: The study was stopped after 72 of the planned 300 participants were enrolled due to slow recruitment and related feasibility considerations. In the primary analysis, three pregnancies occurred during 13.4 woman-years of follow-up, resulting in a Pearl Index of 22.4 (95% confidence interval, 4.6-65.4). No serious adverse events were reported, and vaginal bleeding patterns were generally acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: Our estimated Pearl Index was noticeably higher than expected from previous research of LNG for pericoital contraception. Although the regimen was safe and generally acceptable, the study was challenged by slow enrollment and curtailed person-years of follow-up, resulting in poor precision for the estimated treatment effect. Future research may inform whether our results are symptomatic of the regimen, study design or characteristics of the populations from which we recruited. IMPLICATIONS: Our study failed to confirm prior data suggesting that 0.75 mg LNG for pericoital contraception could be more effective than typical use of barrier methods among women having infrequent sex. Characterizing populations most likely to adhere to, and benefit from, pericoital regimens is essential to future research on these methods.