Uso da adaptação transcultural nos cursos de pós-graduação em Enfermagem / Use of cross-cultural adaptation in Postgraduate Nursing courses / Uso de la adaptación transcultural en las carreras de grado en Enfermería

Objetivo: analisar a produção científica brasileira, na Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem, que utilizou o método de adaptação transcultural. Método: estudo documental, com busca realizada na Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações, que resultou em 140 dissertações e 72 teses para análise, oriundas de Programas de Pós-Graduação da região Sudeste, seguida das regiões Nordeste, Sul e Centro-Oeste, sem representação da região Norte. Resultados: os instrumentos adaptados foram, em sua maioria, procedentes do idioma inglês. Prevaleceram as pesquisas na área/campo Assistencial, destacando-se a linha de pesquisa Processo de Cuidar em Saúde e Enfermagem. Identificou-se descompasso entre o que é produzido na área e o que é recomendado internacionalmente. Conclusão: verificou-se aumento na utilização da adaptação transcultural como método de pesquisa, com persistência das assimetrias acadêmicas regionais e sem consenso sobre o referencial metodológico.

Objective: to analyze the Brazilian scientific production in Postgraduate Nursing education using the cross-cultural adaptation method. Method: documentary study with searches carried out in the Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations resulting in 140 Master's theses and 72 Doctoral dissertations for analysis originated from Postgraduate Programs carried out in the Southeast region of Brazil, followed by the Northeast, South and Midwest regions ­ there was no representation of the North region. Results: the adapted instruments were, mostly, originally written in English. Research in the Care area/field prevailed, highlighting the line of research called Health and Nursing Care Process. A gap between what is produced in the area and what is recommended internationally was identified. Conclusion: an increase in the use of cross-cultural adaptation as a research method was noticed, with the persistence of regional academic asymmetries and lack of consensus on the methodological framework.

Objetivo: analizar la producción científica brasileña, en el Postgrado en Enfermería, que utilizó el método de adaptación transcultural. Método: estudio documental, la búsqueda se realizó en la Biblioteca Digital de Tesis y Disertaciones, se obtuvieron 140 tesis de maestría y 72 tesis de doctorado para análisis, provenientes de Programas de Posgrado de la región Sudeste, seguida de las regiones Nordeste, Sur y Centro-Oeste, no se encontraron documentos de la región Norte. Resultados: los instrumentos adaptados fueron, en su mayoría, del idioma inglés. Predominaron las investigaciones en el área/campo Asistencial, se destacó la línea de investigación Proceso de Atención en Salud y Enfermería. Se identificó que lo que se produce en el área no coincide con lo que se recomienda a nivel internacional. Conclusión: se comprobó que aumentó el uso de la adaptación transcultural como método de investigación, que persisten las disparidades académicas regionales y que no hay consenso sobre el marco metodológico.

Standardization of Dental Vulnerability Scale scores (EVO-BR).

BACKGROUND: Dental Vulnerability Scale (EVO-BR) is an instrument developed to help identifying oral health-vulnerable individuals. This scale comprises 15 items distributed into 4 dimensions. It is the first instrument with the potential to guide clinical and managerial decisions in the oral health field. The aim is to validate a score to enable using EVO-BR in Primary Health Care (PHC). METHOD: The investigated sample included PHC users in five Brazilian regions. Data were collected at two different stages: in 2019 (São Paulo) and in 2022 (Minas Gerais, Mato Grosso, Roraima, Pernambuco e Paraná). Exploratory descriptive study of this scale scores was carried out to create classification ranges. Subsequently, discriminant analysis was performed to assess the accuracy of the established classification. Boosting regression was carried out to check items' weight for the instrument score. RESULTS: EVO-BR score ranged from 0 (highest vulnerability) to 15 (lowest vulnerability). Four (4) classification configurations were tested. Score equal to 12 points was the one presenting the best classification of the assessed individuals (100% were correctly classified). Boosting regression has evidenced that items 1 and 2 (Overall health domain) and 14 and 15 (Health Services domain) had the strongest influence on this instrument's score. CONCLUSION: The process to standardize the EVO-BR score and, consequently, to develop assessment ranges, is an important step in the fight against health inequalities, since it provides a tool to help planning actions and interventions aimed at meeting specific needs of the population in the Primary Health Care context.

Validity of the Brazilian online version of the Sexual Desire Inventory 2.

OBJECTIVE: The Sexual Desire Inventory 2 is a self-report instrument for assessing sexual desire in men and women. In Brazil, there is no validated sexual desire self-report for the adult population. The aim of this study was to determine the evidence of validity for the content and construct of the Brazilian online version of the Sexual Desire Inventory 2. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study with Brazilian men and women. The sample size was calculated using the criterion of more than 20 participants per item. The invitation to participate in the study was conducted online by the platform Survey Monkey®. The Sexual Desire Inventory 2 was evaluated for content, construct, reliability, and invariance. RESULTS: A total of 818 female and male adults participated in the study. The two-dimensional factorial solution represented 71% of the total variance explained by the model, and the factorial loads of the model were ≥0.40; commonalities presented values ≥0.23. Reliability was measured by the coefficients of Cronbach's alpha with a total score of 0.87, McDonald's of 0.87, Omega, and greatest lower bound with a total score of 0.95. The metric invariance was tested for the sex variables ΔCFI (comparative fit index) and ΔRMSEA (root mean square error of approximation) with a total score of 0.01. CONCLUSION: The analyses indicate evidence of robust validity in the Brazilian online version of the Sexual Desire Inventory 2.

Children and adolescents hospitalized with chronic conditions: sleep patterns, resilience and quality of life.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sleep pattern of children and adolescents with chronic conditions during hospitalization and correlate it with resilience, quality of life, clinical and sociodemographic data. METHOD: Quantitative, descriptive and cross-sectional study. Data collection took place between May 2022 and January 2023, with children and adolescents with chronic conditions from two hospitals in Rio de Janeiro. The instruments used were the Actigraph, Sandra Prince-Embury's Resilience Scale for Children and Adolescents and the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics and correlation tests. RESULTS: 40 hospitalized children and adolescents between the ages of nine and 18 took part. The results showed compromised sleep, especially in terms of duration and time awake after sleep onset. Quality of life scores were low and resilience levels were classified as medium to high. Correlations were found between resilience and sleep. In addition, sleep was influenced by diagnosis and treatment. CONCLUSION: Children and adolescents hospitalized with chronic conditions experience significant sleep disturbances and have a low quality of life, but have satisfactory levels of resilience.

Family Vulnerability Scale: validity evidence in primary health care.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate evidence of validity of the Family Vulnerability Scale (EVFAM-BR) as an instrument to support population-based management in primary health care (PHC), in the scope of Health Care Planning (PAS). METHODS: This is a psychometric study to assess any additional evidence of the internal structure of EVFAM-BR using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and network analysis (NA). A preliminary version of the scale with 38 items was submitted to patients of PHC facilities that use the PAS methodology, distributed across the five regions of Brazil. For the primary CFA data, factor loadings and predictive power (R2) of the item were used. Seven model adjustment indices were adopted and reliability was measured by three indicators, using Bayesian estimation. RESULTS: The preliminary version of the scale was applied to 1,255 patients. Using the AFC, factor loadings ranged from 0.66 to 0.90 and R2 from 0.44 to 0.81. Both the primary indicators and the model adequacy indices presented satisfactory and consistent levels. According to the NA, the items were appropriately associated with their peers, respecting the established dimensions, thus demonstrating sustainability and stability of the proposed model. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of validity presented by EVFAM-BR indicates, for the first time in Brazil, a concise instrument that is able to assertively measure family vulnerability, potentially supporting population-based management.

Validation of the internal structure of the Brazilian Dental Vulnerability Scale.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate evidence of validity of internal structure of the Brazilian Dental Vulnerability Scale (EVO-BR) when applied in Brazil. METHODS: This is a psychometric study that seeks to validate a scale elaborated by evidence of internal structure. Data collection was conducted in 18 basic health units that implement the Brazilian Healthcare Planning (PAS) methodology, across the five regions of Brazil. The initial version of the EVO-BR contained 41 items that measured dental vulnerability and was applied to users of the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) aged 18 years or older who were in basic health units for consultation with higher education professionals. To evaluate the evidence, the following statistical analyses were performed: exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and network analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1,753 users participated in the study. To adjust the sample, we considered the factorability obtained from Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test = 0.65, Bartlett sphericity test = 8019.7, and a matrix determinant of 0.008. The initial parallel analysis indicated a four-dimensional model and had the items adjusted according to factor loading (ranging from 0.38 to 0.99), common factors (0.13 to 0.89), and Pratt's measure, until the model presented congruence in the statistical and interpretative principles simultaneously. The final model contained 15 items, maintaining the four dimensions indicated by the parallel analysis, and held an explained variance of 68.56%. CONCLUSIONS: The EVO-BR is a validated scale to measure dental vulnerability and, thus, can contribute to the organization of access to the oral health team in primary health care (PHC) by stratifying the population, as recommended in the Brazilian Healthcare Planning.

Brazilian Scale for Evaluation of Mental Health Care Needs: Additional Evidence.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate validity evidence of the Brazilian Scale for Evaluation of Mental Health Care Needs (CuidaSM). METHODS: This is a psychometric study, which seeks additional evidence of internal structure. Data collection was carried out in 11 Primary Health Care (PHC) services , which implement the Health Care Planning (HCP) methodology, distributed across the five Brazilian regions. The preliminary version of CuidaSM, containing a block self-referred by the user and another block evaluated by PHC professionals, was applied to users aged 18 or over who attended the PHC services for consultation with a higher education professional. The techniques of confirmatory factor analysis and network analysis were used to investigate validity evidence. For the primary data of the confirmatory factor analysis, the factorial loads and the item's predictive power (R2) were used. Six model adjustment indices were adopted and reliability was measured by three indicators using Bayesian estimation. RESULTS: A total of 879 users participated in the study. By confirmatory factor analysis, factorial loads ranged from 0.43 to 0.99 and R2 from 0.19 to 0.98. Both the primary indicators and the model adequacy indices were established at satisfactory and consistent levels. The network analysis showed that the items were appropriately associated with their peers, respecting the established dimensions, which again indicates the sustainability and stability of the proposed model. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings confirm a consistent and reliable model of the instrument, through a combination of techniques. Considering the importance of using solid instruments in clinical practice, CuidaSM is a promising tool for population-based management and network care organization, aligned with HCP proposals.

Children and adolescents hospitalized with chronic conditions: sleep patterns, resilience and quality of life / Niños y adolescentes hospitalizados con enfermedades crónicas: patrón de sueño, resiliencia y calidad de vida / Crianças e adolescentes hospitalizados com condições crônicas: padrão de sono, resiliência e qualidade de vida

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the sleep pattern of children and adolescents with chronic conditions during hospitalization and correlate it with resilience, quality of life, clinical and sociodemographic data. Method: Quantitative, descriptive and cross-sectional study. Data collection took place between May 2022 and January 2023, with children and adolescents with chronic conditions from two hospitals in Rio de Janeiro. The instruments used were the Actigraph, Sandra Prince-Embury's Resilience Scale for Children and Adolescents and the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics and correlation tests. Results: 40 hospitalized children and adolescents between the ages of nine and 18 took part. The results showed compromised sleep, especially in terms of duration and time awake after sleep onset. Quality of life scores were low and resilience levels were classified as medium to high. Correlations were found between resilience and sleep. In addition, sleep was influenced by diagnosis and treatment. Conclusion: Children and adolescents hospitalized with chronic conditions experience significant sleep disturbances and have a low quality of life, but have satisfactory levels of resilience.

RESUMEN Objetivo: Evaluar el patrón de sueño de niños y adolescentes con enfermedades crónicas durante la hospitalización y correlacionarlo con la resiliencia, la calidad de vida y los datos clínicos y sociodemográficos. Método: Estudio cuantitativo, descriptivo y transversal. La recolección de datos se realizó entre mayo de 2022 y enero de 2023, con niños y adolescentes con condiciones crónicas de dos hospitales de Río de Janeiro. Los instrumentos utilizados fueron el Actigraph, la Escala de Resiliencia para Niños y Adolescentes de Sandra Prince-Embury y el Inventario Pediátrico de Calidad de Vida. El análisis de los datos incluyó estadística descriptiva y pruebas de correlación. Resultados: Participaron 40 niños y adolescentes hospitalizados de entre 9 y 18 años. Los resultados mostraron un sueño comprometido, especialmente en términos de duración y tiempo despierto tras el inicio del sueño. Las puntuaciones de calidad de vida fueron bajas y los niveles de resiliencia se clasificaron entre medios y altos. Se hallaron correlaciones entre la resiliencia y el sueño. Además, el diagnóstico y el tratamiento influyeron en el sueño. Conclusión: Los niños y adolescentes hospitalizados con enfermedades crónicas experimentan alteraciones significativas del sueño y tienen una baja calidad de vida, pero presentan niveles satisfactorios de resiliencia.

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar o padrão de sono de crianças e adolescentes com condições crônicas durante a hospitalização e correlacioná-lo com resiliência, qualidade de vida, dados clínicos e sociodemográficos. Método: Estudo quantitativo, descrito e transversal. A coleta de dados ocorreu entre maio de 2022 e janeiro de 2023, com crianças e adolescentes com condições crônicas de dois hospitais do Rio de Janeiro. Os instrumentos utilizados foram o Actigraph, Escala de Resiliência para Crianças e Adolescentes de Sandra Prince-Embury e Inventário Pediátrico de Qualidade de Vida. A análise dos dados envolveu estatística descritiva e teste de correlação. Resultados: Participaram 40 crianças e adolescentes hospitalizados entre nove e 18 anos. Os resultados mostraram sono comprometido, principalmente nos quesitos duração e tempo acordado após início do sono. Os escores para qualidade de vida foram baixos e níveis de resiliência classificados entre médio e alto. Foram encontradas correlações entre resiliência e sono. Além disso, o sono foi influenciado pelo diagnóstico e pelo tratamento. Conclusão: Crianças e adolescentes hospitalizados com condições crônicas vivenciam importantes distúrbios do sono e possuem baixa qualidade de vida, mas apresentam níveis satisfatórios de resiliência.

Versão brasileira da Self-efficacy for home exercise programs scale para a população idosa / Brazilian version of Self-efficacy for home exercise programs scale for the elderly population / Versión brasileña de "self-efficacy for home exercise programs scale" para la población de ancianos

Objetivo: buscar evidências de validade da versão brasileira Self-efficacy for home exercise programs scale" para a população idosa. Método: foram analisadas as evidências de conteúdo, processo de resposta e estrutura interna. Foram utilizados dois painéis de especialistas (equivalências e conteúdo) por ser um assembly. Três formatos da escala foram analisados: original, 5 pontos e 7 pontos. Para o processo de resposta e estrutura interna participaram 174 idosos. A Estrutura interna foi testada pela análise fatorial exploratória. Resultados: Sete dos 12 itens passaram por ajuste de redação, e um item foi adicionado por orientação dos especialistas. O processo de resposta indicou que a versão com 5 pontos foi a apontada pelos idosos como a melhor para ser respondida. Na estrutura interna, o modelo unidimensional com a escala de 5 pontos obteve com os melhores indicadores. Conclusão: recomenda-se a adoção do instrumento de forma unidimensional e o uso da escala de 5 pontos(AU)

Objective: to seek evidence of validity of the Brazilian version Self-efficacy for home exercise programs scale" for the elderly population. Method: evidence of content, response process and internal structure were analyzed. Two expert panels were used (equivalences and content) as it is an assembly. Three scale formats were analyzed: original, 5 points and 7 points. For the response process and internal structure, 174 older people participated. The Internal Structure was tested by exploratory factor analysis. Results: Seven of the 12 items underwent wording adjustments, and one item was added following expert guidance. The response process indicated that the version with 5 points was pointed out by the elderly as the best to be answered. In the internal structure, the one-dimensional model with the 5-point scale obtained the best indicators. Conclusion: it is recommended to adopt the instrument in a unidimensional way and use the 5-point scale(AU)

Objetivo: buscar evidencias de validez de la versión brasileña de "Self-efficacy for home exercise programs scale" (escala de autoeficacia de programas de ejercicios en el hogar) para la población anciana. Método: se analizaron evidencias de contenido, proceso de respuesta y estructura interna. Se utilizaron dos paneles de expertos (equivalencias y contenido) por tratarse de una asamblea. Se analizaron tres formatos de escala: original, 5 puntos y 7 puntos. 174 ancianos participaron en el proceso de respuesta y la estructura interna. Se probó la Estructura Interna mediante análisis factorial exploratorio. Resultados: Siete de los 12 ítems se sometieron a ajustes de redacción y se agregó un ítem siguiendo la opinión de expertos. El proceso de respuesta indicó que los ancianos indicaron la versión con 5 puntos como siendo la mejor para ser respondida. En la estructura interna, el modelo unidimensional con escala de 5 puntos obtuvo los mejores indicadores. Conclusión: se recomienda adoptar el instrumento de forma unidimensional y utilizar la escala de 5 puntos(AU)

Validity and reliability of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey for patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Device acceptance is a crucial factor in identifying implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients at risk for psychosocial distress and unfavorable quality of life outcomes. The purpose of this study was to examine the evidence of the validity of internal structure (construct) and reliability of the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey (FPAS) in a sample of ICD patients, comparing the psychometric indicators of the complete (FPAS-18 item) and abbreviated (FPAS-12 item) versions. The sample included 151 participants (97 males, mean age of 55.7 ± 14.1 years) who completed the cross-culturally adapted version of the FPAS instrument for the Brazilian context. The psychometric properties of both versions of the FPAS instrument were evaluated by two distinct approaches:•Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: used to test the internal structure of the instrument•Cronbach's Alpha and McDonald's Omega: used to determine the reliability of the instrument The two versions of the FPAS-Br instrument showed consistent evidence of internal structure validity and reliability. However, the FPAS-Br 12-item showed a better psychometric adjustment, confirmed by the analysis of the quality indicators of the models.

Normatização dos escores da escala eHealth Literacy Scale para avaliação do letramento digital em saúde / Standardization of eHealth Literacy Scale scores for assessing digital health literacy / Estandarización de las puntuaciones de la escala eHealth Literacy Scale para evaluar la alfabetización digital en salud

Objetivo: analisar os dados de normatização dos escores da versão brasileira do instrumento eHealth Literacy Scale (eHeals) para avaliação do letramento digital em saúde. Método: estudo transversal com 502 adultos brasileiros, realizado em 2019. Dados coletados pelo instrumento eHeals e questionário sociodemográfico. Foram aplicadas árvores de decisão e análise discriminante. Estudo aprovado pelo Comite de Ética em Pesquisa. Resultados: a análise discriminante determinou as faixas de classificação do eHeals a partir da distribuição dos escores. A árvore de decisão indicou que a escolaridade afetou de forma relevante os resultados da escala. Os indivíduos com escolaridade até o ensino fundamental II incompleto: baixo (até 10), médio (11 a 25), alto (27 a 40), e escolaridade acima: baixo (até 25), médio (25 a 32) e alto LDS (33 a 40). Conclusão: a classificação dos níveis de letramento digital em saúde de adultos pelo eHeals deve ser controlada pelos níveis de escolaridade dos participantes(AU)

Objective: to analyze the normative data of the scores of the Brazilian version of the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHeals) instrument for assessing digital health literacy. Method: cross-sectional study with 502 Brazilian adults in 2019. Data collected using the eHeals instrument and sociodemographic questionnaire. Decision trees and discriminant analysis were applied. Study approved by the Research Ethics Committee. Results: Discriminant analysis determined the eHeals classification ranges based on the distribution of scores. The decision tree indicated that education significantly affected the scale results. Thus, individuals with incomplete elementary school education up to II: low (up to 10), medium (11 to 25), high (27 to 40), and higher education: low (up to 25), medium (25 to 32) and high LDS (33 to 40). Conclusion: the classification of digital health literacy levels using eHeals in adults should be controlled by the participants' education levels(AU)

Objetivo: analizar los datos de estandarización de las puntuaciones de la versión brasileña del instrumento eHealth Literacy Scale (eHeals) para evaluar la alfabetización digital en salud. Método: estudio transversal con 502 adultos brasileños que tuvo lugar en 2019. La recolección de datos se hizo mediante el instrumento eHeals y un cuestionario sociodemográfico. Se aplicaron árboles de decisión y análisis discriminante. El Comité de Ética en Investigación aprobó el estudio. Resultados: El análisis discriminante determinó los rangos de clasificación de eHeals con base en la distribución de puntuaciones. El árbol de decisión indicó que la educación afectó significativamente los resultados de la escala. Individuos con educación primaria incompleta: baja (hasta 10), media (11 a 25), alta (27 a 40), y educación superior a esa mencionada: baja (hasta 25), media (25 a 32) y alto LDS (33 a 40). Conclusión: la clasificación de los niveles de alfabetización en salud digital en adultos con eHeals debe ser controlada por los niveles de educación de los participantes(AU)

Family vulnerability scale: Evidence of content and internal structure validity.

INTRODUCTION: Territory view based on families' vulnerability strata allows identifying different health needs that can guide healthcare at primary care scope. Despite the availability of tools designed to measure family vulnerability, there is still a need for substantial validity evidence, which limits the use of these tools in a country showing multiple socioeconomic and cultural realities, such as Brazil. The primary objective of this study is to develop and gather evidence on the validity of the Family Vulnerability Scale for Brazil, commonly referred to as EVFAM-BR (in Portuguese). METHODS: Items were generated through exploratory qualitative study carried out by 123 health care professionals. The data collected supported the creation of 92 initial items, which were then evaluated by a panel of multi-regional and multi-disciplinary experts (n = 73) to calculate the Content Validity Ratio (CVR). This evaluation process resulted in a refined version of the scale, consisting of 38 items. Next, the scale was applied to 1,255 individuals to test the internal-structure validity by using the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). Dimensionality was evaluated using Robust Parallel Analysis, and the model underwent cross-validation to determine the final version of EVFAM-BR. RESULTS: This final version consists of 14 items that are categorized into four dimensions, accounting for an explained variance of 79.02%. All indicators were within adequate and satisfactory limits, without any cross-loading or Heywood Case issues. Reliability indices also reached adequate levels (α = 0.71; ω = 0.70; glb = 0.83 and ORION ranging from 0.80 to 0.93, between domains). The instrument scores underwent a normalization process, revealing three distinct vulnerability strata: low (0 to 4), moderate (5 to 6), and high (7 to 14). CONCLUSION: The scale exhibited satisfactory validity evidence, demonstrating consistency, reliability, and robustness. It resulted in a concise instrument that effectively measures and distinguishes levels of family vulnerability within the primary care setting in Brazil.

Content validity evidence of the Brazilian version of the Cognitive Symptom Checklist-Work-21.

OBJECTIVE: to cross-culturally adapt and assess the content validity evidence of the Cognitive Symptom Checklist-Work-21 for the Brazilian context. METHOD: a psychometric study of cross-cultural adaptation, covering the stages of translation, reconciliation, back-translation, intercultural equivalence assessment and content validity evidence analysis, considering Content Validity Ratio parameters in breast cancer survivors. RESULTS: the translations were equivalent to the original version. Colloquial expressions were modified, tense, verbal adjusted, and two items containing multiple commands were separated. The final version now contains 22 items, presenting semantic, conceptual, idiomatic and experimental equivalences. The pre-test indicated good understanding and ease in the response process. CONCLUSION: the final version was defined as "Lista de verificação de sintomas cognitivos relacionados ao trabalho - 22 itens", showing good linguistic equivalence and strong evidence of content validity in the Brazilian context.

Análise de estrutura interna do IBALEC / Analysis of the internal structure of IBALEC / Análisis de la estructura interna de IBALEC

O Instrumento para Breve Avaliação da Leitura, Escrita e Compreensão (IBALEC) se propõe a avaliar o desempenho de alunos de escola pública no domínio das habilidades básicas de alfabetização. Após a validação de conteúdo, por meio da análise de um grupo de especialistas, o IBALEC foi aplicado individualmente em 825 alunos (439 do sexo masculino e 386 do sexo feminino) do 1º ao 5º ano do ensino fundamental em duas escolas públicas, a fim de realizar a análise de sua estrutura interna. As análises fatoriais efetuadas demonstraram bom ajustamento do instrumento a um modelo de estrutura interna composto por cinco fatores correlacionados, correspondentes aos construtos teóricos que subsidiaram a sua construção: leitura de palavras, escrita de palavras, escrita de frases, leitura/compreensão de frases e, leitura/compreensão de texto. Esses resultados constituem forte evidência da validade de construto do IBALEC, para avaliar as habilidades a que se propõe. (AU)

The Instrument for Brief Assessment of Reading, Writing, and Comprehension (IBALEC) aims to assess the performance of public school students in the mastery of basic literacy skills. After content validation, based on the analysis of a group of specialists, the IBALEC was applied individually to 825 students (439 boys and 386 girls) from the 1st to the 5th year of Elementary Education in two public schools, to analyze its internal structure. The factorial analyses performed demonstrated a good fit of the instrument to an internal structure model composed of five correlated factors, corresponding to the theoretical constructs that subsidized its construction: word reading, word writing, sentence writing, sentence reading comprehension, and reading/understanding text. These results are strong evidence of the construct validity of IBALEC, to assess the proposed skills. (AU)

El Instrumento de Evaluación Breve de Lectura, Escritura y Comprensión (IBALEC) tiene como objetivo evaluar el desempeño de los estudiantes de escuelas públicas en las competencias básicas de alfabetización. Después de la validación del contenido, mediante el análisis de un grupo de especialistas, el IBALEC se aplicó de forma individual a 825 alumnos (439 niños y 386 niñas) de 1º a 5º año de primaria de dos centros públicos, con el fin de realizar el análisis de su estructura interna. Los análisis factoriales ejecutados demostraron un buen ajuste del instrumento a un modelo de estructura interna compuesto por cinco factores correlacionados, correspondientes a los constructos teóricos que subsidiaban su construcción: lectura de palabras, escrita de palabras, escrita de oraciones, lectura/comprensión de oraciones, y lectura/comprensión de texto. Estos resultados constituyen una fuerte evidencia de la validez de constructo del IBALEC para evaluar las habilidades propuestas. (AU)

Brazilian Scale for Evaluation of Mental Health Care Needs: Additional Evidence / Escala de Avaliação da Necessidade de Cuidado em Saúde Mental: evidências adicionais

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To investigate validity evidence of the Brazilian Scale for Evaluation of Mental Health Care Needs (CuidaSM). METHODS This is a psychometric study, which seeks additional evidence of internal structure. Data collection was carried out in 11 Primary Health Care (PHC) services , which implement the Health Care Planning (HCP) methodology, distributed across the five Brazilian regions. The preliminary version of CuidaSM, containing a block self-referred by the user and another block evaluated by PHC professionals, was applied to users aged 18 or over who attended the PHC services for consultation with a higher education professional. The techniques of confirmatory factor analysis and network analysis were used to investigate validity evidence. For the primary data of the confirmatory factor analysis, the factorial loads and the item's predictive power (R2) were used. Six model adjustment indices were adopted and reliability was measured by three indicators using Bayesian estimation. RESULTS A total of 879 users participated in the study. By confirmatory factor analysis, factorial loads ranged from 0.43 to 0.99 and R2 from 0.19 to 0.98. Both the primary indicators and the model adequacy indices were established at satisfactory and consistent levels. The network analysis showed that the items were appropriately associated with their peers, respecting the established dimensions, which again indicates the sustainability and stability of the proposed model. CONCLUSIONS The study findings confirm a consistent and reliable model of the instrument, through a combination of techniques. Considering the importance of using solid instruments in clinical practice, CuidaSM is a promising tool for population-based management and network care organization, aligned with HCP proposals.

RESUMO OBJETIVO Investigar evidências de validade da Escala de Avaliação da Necessidade de Cuidado em Saúde Mental (CuidaSM). MÉTODOS Trata-se de um estudo de natureza psicométrica, que busca evidências adicionais de estrutura interna. A coleta de dados foi realizada em 11 unidades básicas de saúde (UBS), que executam a metodologia da Planificação da Atenção à Saúde (PAS), distribuídas nas cinco regiões brasileiras. A versão preliminar da CuidaSM, contendo um bloco autorreferido pelo usuário e outro avaliado por profissionais da atenção primária à saúde (APS), foi aplicada em usuários com 18 anos ou mais que compareceram às UBS para consulta com profissional de nível superior. As técnicas de análise fatorial confirmatória e network analysis foram utilizadas para investigação das evidências de validade. Para os dados primários da análise fatorial confirmatória, utilizou-se as cargas fatoriais e o poder preditivo do item (R2). Foram adotados seis índices de ajustamento do modelo e a confiabilidade foi aferida por três indicadores por meio de bayesian estimation. RESULTADOS Participaram do estudo 879 usuários. Pela análise fatorial confirmatória, as cargas fatoriais variaram de 0,43 a 0,99 e R2 de 0,19 a 0,98. Tanto os indicadores primários como os índices de adequação do modelo estabeleceram-se em níveis satisfatórios e consistentes. A network analysis apontou que os itens se associaram de forma adequada a seus pares, respeitando as dimensões estabelecidas, o que indica, novamente, a sustentabilidade e estabilidade do modelo proposto. CONCLUSÕES Os achados do estudo confirmam um modelo consistente e confiável do instrumento, por meio da combinação de técnicas. Considerando a relevância do uso de instrumentos sólidos na prática clínica, a CuidaSM se apresenta como uma ferramenta promissora para a gestão de base populacional e organização do cuidado em rede, alinhada às propostas da PAS.

Family Vulnerability Scale: validity evidence in primary health care / Escala de Vulnerabilidade Familiar: evidências de validade na atenção primária à saúde

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE Investigate evidence of validity of the Family Vulnerability Scale (EVFAM-BR) as an instrument to support population-based management in primary health care (PHC), in the scope of Health Care Planning (PAS). METHODS This is a psychometric study to assess any additional evidence of the internal structure of EVFAM-BR using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and network analysis (NA). A preliminary version of the scale with 38 items was submitted to patients of PHC facilities that use the PAS methodology, distributed across the five regions of Brazil. For the primary CFA data, factor loadings and predictive power (R2) of the item were used. Seven model adjustment indices were adopted and reliability was measured by three indicators, using Bayesian estimation. RESULTS The preliminary version of the scale was applied to 1,255 patients. Using the AFC, factor loadings ranged from 0.66 to 0.90 and R2 from 0.44 to 0.81. Both the primary indicators and the model adequacy indices presented satisfactory and consistent levels. According to the NA, the items were appropriately associated with their peers, respecting the established dimensions, thus demonstrating sustainability and stability of the proposed model. CONCLUSIONS The evidence of validity presented by EVFAM-BR indicates, for the first time in Brazil, a concise instrument that is able to assertively measure family vulnerability, potentially supporting population-based management.

RESUMO OBJETIVO Investigar evidências de validade da Escala de Vulnerabilidade Familiar (EVFAM-BR) como instrumento de apoio à gestão de base populacional na atenção primária à saúde (APS), no escopo da Planificação da Atenção à Saúde (PAS). MÉTODOS Estudo de natureza psicométrica de evidências adicionais da estrutura interna da EVFAM-BR, por meio da análise fatorial confirmatória (AFC) e análise de redes (network analysis, NA). Versão preliminar da escala com 38 itens foi submetida a usuários de unidades de APS, que executam a metodologia da PAS, distribuídas nas cinco regiões brasileiras. Para os dados primários da AFC, utilizou-se as cargas fatoriais e o poder preditivo do item (R2). Foram adotados sete índices de ajustamento do modelo e a confiabilidade foi aferida por três indicadores, por meio de estimação bayesiana. RESULTADOS A versão preliminar da escala foi aplicada a 1.255 usuários. Pela AFC, as cargas fatoriais variaram de 0,66 a 0,90 e R2 de 0,44 a 0,81. Tanto os indicadores primários como os índices de adequação do modelo estabeleceram-se em níveis satisfatórios e consistentes. A NA apontou que os itens se associaram de forma adequada com seus pares, respeitando as dimensões estabelecidas, o que indica, novamente, a sustentabilidade e estabilidade do modelo proposto. CONCLUSÕES As evidências de validade apresentadas pela EVFAM-BR enunciam, de forma inédita no Brasil, um instrumento conciso, capaz de mensurar assertivamente a vulnerabilidade familiar, potencialmente apoiando a gestão de base populacional.

Validation of the internal structure of the Brazilian Dental Vulnerability Scale / Validação da estrutura interna da Escala Brasileira de Vulnerabilidade Odontológica

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate evidence of validity of internal structure of the Brazilian Dental Vulnerability Scale (EVO-BR) when applied in Brazil. METHODS This is a psychometric study that seeks to validate a scale elaborated by evidence of internal structure. Data collection was conducted in 18 basic health units that implement the Brazilian Healthcare Planning (PAS) methodology, across the five regions of Brazil. The initial version of the EVO-BR contained 41 items that measured dental vulnerability and was applied to users of the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) aged 18 years or older who were in basic health units for consultation with higher education professionals. To evaluate the evidence, the following statistical analyses were performed: exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and network analysis. RESULTS A total of 1,753 users participated in the study. To adjust the sample, we considered the factorability obtained from Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test = 0.65, Bartlett sphericity test = 8019.7, and a matrix determinant of 0.008. The initial parallel analysis indicated a four-dimensional model and had the items adjusted according to factor loading (ranging from 0.38 to 0.99), common factors (0.13 to 0.89), and Pratt's measure, until the model presented congruence in the statistical and interpretative principles simultaneously. The final model contained 15 items, maintaining the four dimensions indicated by the parallel analysis, and held an explained variance of 68.56%. CONCLUSIONS The EVO-BR is a validated scale to measure dental vulnerability and, thus, can contribute to the organization of access to the oral health team in primary health care (PHC) by stratifying the population, as recommended in the Brazilian Healthcare Planning.

RESUMO OBJETIVO Avaliar evidências de validade da estrutura interna da Escala Brasileira de Vulnerabilidade Odontológica (EVO-BR) quando aplicada no Brasil. MÉTODOS Trata-se de um estudo de natureza psicométrica, que busca validar uma escala elaborada por meio de evidências de estrutura interna. A coleta de dados foi realizada em 18 unidades básicas de saúde que executam a metodologia da Planificação da Atenção à Saúde (PAS), distribuídas nas cinco regiões do Brasil. A versão inicial da EVO-BR continha 41 itens que mediam vulnerabilidade odontológica e foram aplicadas em usuários com 18 anos ou mais, usuários do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), que estivessem nas unidades básicas de saúde para consulta com profissionais de nível superior. Para avaliação das evidências, foram utilizadas as seguintes análises estatísticas: análise fatorial exploratória, análise fatorial confirmatória e network analysis. RESULTADOS Participaram do estudo 1.753 usuários. Para adequação da amostra, considerou-se a fatorabilidade obtida de Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) = 0,65, Bartlett sphericity = 8019,7 e determinante da matriz de 0,008. A análise paralela inicial indicou um modelo de quatro dimensões e teve os itens ajustados conforme cargas fatorais (variaram de 0,38 a 0,99), comunalidades (0,13 a 0,89) e Pratt's measure, até que o modelo tivesse congruência nos princípios estatístico e interpretativo simultaneamente. O modelo final apresentou 15 itens, manteve a indicação de quatro dimensões pela análise paralela e uma variância explicada de 68,56%. CONCLUSÕES A EVO-BR é uma escala validada para mensurar vulnerabilidade odontológica e, dessa forma, pode contribuir para organização do acesso a equipe de saúde bucal na atenção primária à saúde (APS) por meio da estratificação da população, como recomendado na planificação.

Transtornos de ansiedade em idosos: um estudo bibliométrico anxiety disorders in the elderly people: a bibliometric study / Anxiety disorders in the elderly: a bibliometric study anxiety disorders in the elderly people / Trastornos de ansiedad en ancianos: estudio bibliométrico trastornos de ansiedad en ancianos

OBJETIVO: Esboçar o panorama científico sobre os sintomas dos transtornos de ansiedade em idosos. MÉTODOS: Trata-se de um artigo original com abordagem descritiva através de um estudo bibliométrico a partir de dois bancos gerados pela SCOPUS, os dados foram organizados com o Rayyan com a retirada das duplicidades e o VOSviewer foi o software escolhido para realizar as análises bibliométricas. RESULTADOS: Destaca-se que as análises bibliométricas agruparam os termos em clusters, corroborando com os pressupostos teóricos encontrados, com a prevalência de sintomas clínicos e doenças neurológicas associando-se com as intervenções e aspectos sociais, entretanto, os índices também revelam novas linhas de pesquisas. A partir das análises mais minuciosas e individualizadas da bibliometria, podemos inferir que os termos associados aos sintomas dos transtornos de ansiedade e idosos estabelecem baixa correlação, existindo assim, lacunas e fragilidades no campo de pesquisa com este tema. CONCLUSÃO: Este estudo permitiu explorar os sintomas dos transtornos de ansiedade em idosos através do campo literário e científico produzido em 2020, 2021 e 2022 em um cenário mundial com o total de 22.087 documentos, sendo 17.665 artigos e 4.422 revisões. Sugerimos que novos estudos com o objetivo de avançar frente a temática, ressaltando a importância dos estudos longitudinais e/ou multidisciplinares devido à natureza das variáveis.

Outline the scientific panorama on the symptoms of anxiety disorders in older adults. METHODS: It is an original article with a descriptive approach through a bibliometric study from two databases generated by SCOPUS, the data were organized with Rayyan with the removal of duplicates and VOSviewer was the software chosen to perform the bibliometric analyzes. RESULTS: It is noted that bibliometric analyzes grouped the terms into clusters, corroborating the theoretical assumptions found, with the prevalence of clinical symptoms and neurological diseases associating with interventions and social aspects, however, the indices also reveal new lines of research. From the most detailed and individualized analyzes of bibliometry, we can infer that the terms associated with the symptoms of anxiety disorders and the elderly establish low correlation, thus existing gaps and weaknesses in the field of research with this theme. CONCLUSION: This study allowed to explore the symptoms of anxiety disorders in older adults through the literary and scientific field produced in 2020, 2021 and 2022 in a global setting with a total of 22,087 documents, 17,665 articles and 4,422 reviews. We suggest that new studies with the aim of advancing the subject, emphasizing the importance of longitudinal and/or multidisciplinary studies due to the nature of the variables.

Esbozar el panorama científico sobre los síntomas de los trastornos de ansiedad en los adultos mayores. MÉTODOS: Es un artículo original con enfoque descriptivo a través de un estudio bibliométrico a partir de dos bases de datos generadas por SCOPUS, los datos fueron organizados con Rayyan con la eliminación de duplicados y VOSviewer fue el software elegido para realizar los análisis bibliométricos. RESULTADOS: Se observa que los análisis bibliométricos agruparon los términos en conglomerados, corroborando los supuestos teóricos encontrados, con la prevalencia de síntomas clínicos y enfermedades neurológicas asociadas a intervenciones y aspectos sociales, sin embargo, los índices también revelan nuevas líneas de investigación. A partir de los análisis más detallados e individualizados de la bibliometría, podemos inferir que los términos asociados a los síntomas de los trastornos de ansiedad y los adultos mayores establecen baja correlación, existiendo así brechas y debilidades en el campo de la investigación con este tema. CONCLUSIÓN: Este estudio permitió explorar los síntomas de los trastornos de ansiedad en adultos mayores a través del campo literario y científico producido en 2020, 2021 y 2022 en un escenario global con un total de 22.087 documentos, 17.665 artículos y 4.422 revisiones. Se sugiere realizar nuevos estudios con el objetivo de avanzar en el tema, enfatizando la importancia de los estudios longitudinales y/o multidisciplinares debido a la naturaleza de las variables.

Content validity evidence of the Brazilian version of the Cognitive Symptom Checklist-Work-21 / Evidencia de validez de contenido de la versión brasileña del Cognitive Symptom Checklist-Work-21 / Evidências de validade de conteúdo da versão brasileira do Cognitive Symptom Checklist-Work-21

ABSTRACT Objective: to cross-culturally adapt and assess the content validity evidence of the Cognitive Symptom Checklist-Work-21 for the Brazilian context. Method: a psychometric study of cross-cultural adaptation, covering the stages of translation, reconciliation, back-translation, intercultural equivalence assessment and content validity evidence analysis, considering Content Validity Ratio parameters in breast cancer survivors. Results: the translations were equivalent to the original version. Colloquial expressions were modified, tense, verbal adjusted, and two items containing multiple commands were separated. The final version now contains 22 items, presenting semantic, conceptual, idiomatic and experimental equivalences. The pre-test indicated good understanding and ease in the response process. Conclusion: the final version was defined as "Lista de verificação de sintomas cognitivos relacionados ao trabalho - 22 itens", showing good linguistic equivalence and strong evidence of content validity in the Brazilian context.

RESUMEN Objetivo: realizar la adaptación transcultural y evaluar las evidencias de validez de contenido del Cognitive Symptom Checklist-Work-21 para el contexto brasileño. Método: estudio psicométrico de adaptación transcultural, abarcando las etapas de traducción, reconciliación, retrotraducción, evaluación de equivalencia intercultural y análisis de evidencias de validez de contenido, considerando parámetros de Content Validity Ratio en sobrevivientes de cáncer de mama. Resultados: las traducciones fueron equivalentes a la versión original. Se modificaron las expresiones coloquiales, se tensaron, se ajustaron las verbales y se separaron dos ítems que contenían múltiples comandos. La versión final ahora contiene 22 ítems, presentando equivalencia semántica, conceptual, idiomática y experimental. El pre-test indicó buena comprensión y facilidad en el proceso de respuesta. Conclusión: la versión final fue definida como "Lista de verificação de sintomas cognitivos relacionados ao trabalho - 22 itens", mostrando buena equivalencia lingüística y fuerte evidencia de validez de contenido en el contexto brasileño.

RESUMO Objetivo: realizar a adaptação transcultural e avaliar as evidências de validade de conteúdo do Cognitive Symptom Checklist-Work-21 para o contexto brasileiro. Método: estudo psicométrico de adaptação transcultural, abrangendo as etapas de tradução, reconciliação, retrotradução, avaliação de equivalência intercultural e análise das evidências de validade de conteúdo, considerando parâmetros de Content Validy Ratio em sobreviventes de câncer de mama. Resultados: as traduções demonstraram equivalência à versão original. Expressões coloquiais foram modificadas, o tempo verbal ajustado, e dois itens contendo múltiplos comandos foram separados. A versão final passou a conter 22 itens, apresentando equivalências semântica, conceitual, idiomática e experimental. Os valores de CVR mantiveram-se acima de 0,87. O pré-teste indicou boa compreensão e facilidade no processo de resposta. Conclusão: a versão final foi definida como "Lista de verificação de sintomas cognitivos relacionados ao trabalho - 22 itens", apresentando boa equivalência linguística e fortes evidências de validade de conteúdo no contexto brasileiro.

Evidence of validity of internal structure of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp-12) in Brazilian adolescents with chronic health conditions.

This study explored the evidence of validity of internal structure of the 12-item Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Wellbeing Scale (FACIT-Sp-12) in Brazilian adolescents with chronic health conditions. The study involved 301 Brazilian adolescents with cancer, type 1 diabetes mellitus, or cystic fibrosis. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and Item Response Theory (IRT) were used to test the internal structure. Reliability was determined with Cronbach's Alpha and McDonald's Omega. The EFA suggested a one-dimensional scale structure in contrast to the original 2-factor model or the 3-factor model which were not reproduced in the current CFA. All quality indicators for the EFA one-factor exceeded the required criteria (FDI = 0.97, EAP = 0.97, SR = 3.96 and EPTD = 0.96, latent GH = 0.90. and the observed GH = 0.85). The FACIT-Sp-12 for adolescents yielded strong evidence for a 1-factor model and with good reliability.