ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Elderly patients with critical limb ischemia are an especially frail and vulnerable group of patients. There is little literature investigating outcomes and resource utilization in nonagenarians undergoing major lower extremity amputation (MLEA). This study aims to elucidate the outcomes of this unique set of patients for whom amputation may often be considered a "palliative" intervention. METHODS: Analyzing over 16,000 records from the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database, we collected demographic, operative, and postoperative data on all patients who underwent an MLEA. We performed univariate analysis comparing nonagenarians to younger patients examining both short-term and long-term outcomes. Multimodel inference was used to analyze the effect of age on clinically meaningful outcomes: mortality and long-term living disposition. RESULTS: With 392 nonagenarians and 16,349 patients under the age of 90, we found nonagenarians were less comorbid and less likely to have a prior bypass or amputation. Despite experiencing lower rates of reoperation and individual postoperative complications, nonagenarians suffered higher long-term mortality (46% vs. 22%, P < 0.0005) and were more likely to be living in a facility at follow-up (34% vs. 15%, P < 0.0005). Incorporating important demographic and clinical factors, multimodel inference demonstrated that, the nonagenarian age group was a critical predictor of nonhome living status (Akaike Importance weight 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Although nonagenarians were less comorbid than their younger counterparts and suffered fewer perioperative complications, MLEA leads to a poorer outcome with significant mortality and a higher likelihood of residing in a facility at long-term follow-up. These findings underscore the importance of frank goals of care discussions in nonagenarians considering major amputation.
Subject(s)
Amputation, Surgical , Nonagenarians , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Risk Factors , Amputation, Surgical/adverse effects , Lower Extremity/blood supply , Retrospective Studies , Ischemia/diagnosis , Ischemia/surgery , Limb SalvageABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and effectiveness of vena cava filters (VCFs). METHODS: A total of 1429 participants (62.7 ± 14.7 years old; 762 [53.3% male]) consented to enroll in this prospective, nonrandomized study at 54 sites in the United States between October 10, 2015, and March 31, 2019. They were evaluated at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months following VCF implantation. Participants whose VCFs were removed were followed for 1 month after retrieval. Follow-up was performed at 3, 12, and 24 months. Predetermined composite primary safety (freedom from perioperative serious adverse events [AEs] and from clinically significant perforation, VCF embolization, caval thrombotic occlusion, and/or new deep vein thrombosis [DVT] within 12-months) and effectiveness (composite comprising procedural and technical success and freedom from new symptomatic pulmonary embolism [PE] confirmed by imaging at 12-months in situ or 1 month postretrieval) end points were assessed. RESULTS: VCFs were implanted in 1421 patients. Of these, 1019 (71.7%) had current DVT and/or PE. Anticoagulation therapy was contraindicated or had failed in 1159 (81.6%). One hundred twenty-six (8.9%) VCFs were prophylactic. Mean and median follow-up for the entire population and for those whose VCFs were not removed was 243.5 ± 243.3 days and 138 days and 332.6 ± 290 days and 235 days, respectively. VCFs were removed from 632 (44.5%) patients at a mean of 101.5 ± 72.2 days and median 86.3 days following implantation. The primary safety end point and primary effectiveness end point were both achieved. Procedural AEs were uncommon and usually minor, but one patient died during attempted VCF removal. Excluding strut perforation greater than 5 mm, which was demonstrated on 31 of 201 (15.4%) patients' computed tomography scans available to the core laboratory, and of which only 3 (0.2%) were deemed clinically significant by the site investigators, VCF-related AEs were rare (7 of 1421, 0.5%). Postfilter, venous thromboembolic events (none fatal) occurred in 93 patients (6.5%), including DVT (80 events in 74 patients [5.2%]), PE (23 events in 23 patients [1.6%]), and/or caval thrombotic occlusions (15 events in 15 patients [1.1%]). No PE occurred in patients following prophylactic placement. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of VCFs in patients with venous thromboembolism was associated with few AEs and with a low incidence of clinically significant PEs.
Subject(s)
Pulmonary Embolism , Vena Cava Filters , Venous Thromboembolism , Venous Thrombosis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , Female , Vena Cava Filters/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Venous Thrombosis/diagnostic imaging , Venous Thrombosis/therapy , Venous Thrombosis/complications , Pulmonary Embolism/etiology , Pulmonary Embolism/prevention & control , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Vena Cava, Inferior , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and effectiveness of vena cava filters (VCFs). METHODS: A total of 1429 participants (62.7 ± 14.7 years old; 762 [53.3% male]) consented to enroll in this prospective, nonrandomized study at 54 sites in the United States between October 10, 2015, and March 31, 2019. They were evaluated at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months following VCF implantation. Participants whose VCFs were removed were followed for 1 month after retrieval. Follow-up was performed at 3, 12, and 24 months. Predetermined composite primary safety (freedom from perioperative serious adverse events [AEs] and from clinically significant perforation, VCF embolization, caval thrombotic occlusion, and/or new deep vein thrombosis [DVT] within 12-months) and effectiveness (composite comprising procedural and technical success and freedom from new symptomatic pulmonary embolism [PE] confirmed by imaging at 12-months in situ or 1 month postretrieval) end points were assessed. RESULTS: VCFs were implanted in 1421 patients. Of these, 1019 (71.7%) had current DVT and/or PE. Anticoagulation therapy was contraindicated or had failed in 1159 (81.6%). One hundred twenty-six (8.9%) VCFs were prophylactic. Mean and median follow-up for the entire population and for those whose VCFs were not removed was 243.5 ± 243.3 days and 138 days and 332.6 ± 290 days and 235 days, respectively. VCFs were removed from 632 (44.5%) patients at a mean of 101.5 ± 72.2 days and median 86.3 days following implantation. The primary safety end point and primary effectiveness end point were both achieved. Procedural AEs were uncommon and usually minor, but one patient died during attempted VCF removal. Excluding strut perforation greater than 5 mm, which was demonstrated on 31 of 201 (15.4%) patients' computed tomography scans available to the core laboratory, and of which only 3 (0.2%) were deemed clinically significant by the site investigators, VCF-related AEs were rare (7 of 1421, 0.5%). Postfilter, venous thromboembolic events (none fatal) occurred in 93 patients (6.5%), including DVT (80 events in 74 patients [5.2%]), PE (23 events in 23 patients [1.6%]), and/or caval thrombotic occlusions (15 events in 15 patients [1.1%]). No PE occurred in patients following prophylactic placement. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of VCFs in patients with venous thromboembolism was associated with few AEs and with a low incidence of clinically significant PEs.
Subject(s)
Pulmonary Embolism , Vena Cava Filters , Venous Thromboembolism , Venous Thrombosis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , Female , Vena Cava Filters/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Venous Thrombosis/diagnostic imaging , Venous Thrombosis/therapy , Venous Thrombosis/complications , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging , Pulmonary Embolism/etiology , Pulmonary Embolism/prevention & control , Venous Thromboembolism/complications , Vena Cava, Inferior , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) who are deemed unacceptable candidates for open repair (UNFIT) pose a clinical challenge. The EVAR2 Trial randomized UNFIT patients to endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) vs no intervention from 1999 to 2003, concluding that survival was not improved by EVAR. However, outcomes after EVAR over the last 2 decades have dramatically changed. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes after EVAR in UNFIT patients using more contemporary data and to determine which subsets of UNFIT patients may potentially benefit from EVAR. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative database (2003-2020) was used to identify elective EVARs for AAAs. Patients were categorized as UNFIT or suitable (SUITABLE) for open repair by the operative surgeon. Predicted 1-year mortality of untreated AAAs was calculated via a modified Gagne Index adjusted for AAA size. The primary outcome for the study was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included perioperative major adverse cardiac events (a composite of clinically significant arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, and myocardial infarction), length of stay, and 1-year mortality. RESULTS: A total of 31,471 patients met study criteria with 27,036 (85.9%) deemed SUITABLE and 4435 (14.1%) UNFIT. UNFIT patients were more likely to experience a perioperative major adverse cardiac event (5.1% vs 2.2%, P < .001) and had longer lengths of stay (1 day [interquartile range, 1-3 days] vs 1 day [interquartile range, 1-2 days], P < .001). The 30-day mortality was significantly higher for UNFIT patients (0.8% vs 0.4%, P < .001). UNFIT patients had worse 1-year survival compared with SUITABLE patients. However, UNFIT and SUITABLE patients had significantly improved actual 1-year mortality with EVAR compared with predicted 1-year mortality without EVAR: 9.5% vs 15.6% (P < .001) and 4.0% vs 11.7% (P < .001), respectively. The mortality benefit after EVAR in UNFIT patients was primarily restricted to those with smaller Gagne Indices and larger aneurysm diameters. Patients deemed unsuitable for open repair due to frailty or multiple reasons had significantly higher 30-day mortality rates after EVAR when compared with SUITABLE patients (1.3% vs 1.6% vs 0.4%, P < .001). Those deemed unsuitable for open repair due to frailty or multiple reasons had worse 1-year cumulative survival compared with all other UNFIT patients. CONCLUSIONS: Despite being high risk with higher perioperative morbidity and mortality, UNFIT patients have lower actual 1-year mortality with EVAR than predicted 1-year mortality without EVAR. However, this potential benefit is reserved to those with small Gagne Indices, larger AAA diameters, and lack of frailty.
Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Endovascular Procedures , Frailty , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/complications , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Frailty/complications , Humans , Postoperative Complications , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program is an option to trainees to help alleviate federal education debt. The prevalence of PSLF utilization and how this may impact career decisions of trainees is unknown. The purpose of this study was to understand the prevalence, impact, and understanding of PSLF participation on trainees. DESIGN: IRB-approved anonymous survey asking study subjects to report demographics, financial status, and reliance on PSLF. In addition, study subjects were asked to report their participation in PSLF, the possible impact of PSLF participation on career decisions, and to identify the qualifications needed to complete PSLF. SETTING: Online anonymous survey. PARTICIPANTS: The survey was offered to all physician trainees in all specialties at the University of Texas, Southwestern, University of Wisconsin, Madison, and University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. RESULTS: There were 934 respondents, yielding a 37.6% response rate. A total of 416/934 (44.5%) respondents were actively or planning on participating in the PSLF program with 175/934 (18.7%) belonging to a surgical specialty. Those belonging to a surgical specialty were more likely to be PSLF participants compared to medical specialties (53.1% versus 42.6%, pâ¯=â¯0.01). For those participating in PSLF, 82/416 (19.7%) stated this participation impacted career decisions. A total of 275/934 (29.4%) respondents obtained and 437/934 (46.8%) wanted to receive formal training/lectures in regards to the PSLF program. Of those actively or planning on participating in the PSLF program, only 58/416 (13.9%) were able to correctly identify all of the qualifications/criteria to complete the program. CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of trainees rely on the PSLF program for education loan forgiveness with approximately 20% reporting participation impacted career decisions. Additionally, the majority may not fully understand PSLF criteria. Programs should strongly consider providing a formal education regarding PSLF to their trainees.
Subject(s)
Education, Medical , Forgiveness , Internship and Residency , Career Choice , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires , Training SupportABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: For decades, open intervention was the treatment of choice in patients requiring lower extremity revascularization. In the endovascular era, however, open and endovascular revascularization are options. The implications of prior revascularization on the outcomes for subsequent revascularization are not known. In the present study, we evaluated 30-day outcomes after open lower extremity revascularization for critical limb ischemia (CLI) in those who had previous interventions. METHODS: The 2012-2017 open lower extremity bypass Participant User Data Files from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program were used to identify a cohort of patients with CLI. Patients whose operation was considered emergent were excluded from the analysis. Patients were stratified on whether they had a previous open or endovascular intervention or undergoing a primary revascularization. The primary outcome measure was 30-day major adverse limb events (MALEs). Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and wound complications. RESULTS: A total of 12,668 patients met study criteria with 59.6% (n = 7,549) undergoing a primary open revascularization, 22.4% (n = 2,839) having a prior endovascular intervention, and 18.0% (n = 2,280) having a prior open revascularization. There were notable differences in the baseline characteristics between the 3 groups. In addition, there were differences in the reason for intervention (rest pain versus tissue loss), type of revascularization, and type of conduit used between the 3 groups. After adjustment, a prior open revascularization was significantly associated with 30-day MALE when compared with a primary revascularization (adjusted odds ratio, 1.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.47-1.94; P < 0.001) and prior endovascular intervention (adjusted odds ratio, 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.46-2.12; P < 0.001). There were no differences in outcomes between primary revascularization and prior endovascular patients. There were no differences between MACEs or wound complications between the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: A prior endovascular intervention does not seem to accrue any additional short-term risk when compared with primary revascularization, suggesting an endovascular-first approach may be a safe strategy in patients with CLI. However, a prior open intervention is significantly associated with 30-day MALE in patients undergoing redo open revascularization, which may be related to the rapid decline in patients once they have exhausted their best open revascularization option.
Subject(s)
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Endovascular Procedures , Ischemia/surgery , Peripheral Arterial Disease/surgery , Saphenous Vein/transplantation , Aged , Amputation, Surgical , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Critical Illness , Databases, Factual , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Female , Humans , Ischemia/diagnosis , Ischemia/mortality , Limb Salvage , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnosis , Peripheral Arterial Disease/mortality , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The outcomes for common vascular operations, such as carotid endarterectomy (CEA), are associated with surgeon volume. However, the number of operations associated with an improved stroke or death rate for CEA is not known. The objective of the current study was to define the annual surgeon volume of CEAs that is associated with a lower risk of stroke or death rate. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was analyzed to identify patients undergoing CEA between 2003 and 2009. Annual surgeon volume was correlated with a composite end point of in-hospital stroke or death. Mixed linear regression analyses were conducted to determine if annual surgeon volume of CEAs is independent predictor of the composite outcome. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed from the regression models and used to calculate the Youden Index, which defined the optimal cutoff point of annual surgeon volume of CEAs in predicting in-hospital stroke and death. This cutoff point was further assessed using Chi square analyses to determine whether incremental increases in the annual volume of CEAs were associated with a lower in-hospital stroke or death rate. RESULTS: A total of 104,918 CEA cases with surgeon identifiers were included in the analysis. The crude in-hospital stroke or death rate for CEA was 1.26 %. As expected, the stroke or death rate after CEA was higher for symptomatic patients, compared to asymptomatic patients (6.46 % vs 0.72%; P < .0001). For symptomatic patients, the relationship between surgeon volume and the composite end point was not significant (P = .435). In contrast, there was a strong relationship between surgeon volume and outcomes for asymptomatic patients undergoing CEA with a stroke/death rate of 1.66%, 0.91%, and 0.65% for low-, moderate-, and high-volume surgeons (P < .0001). Multivariate analysis identified age, African-American race, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and surgeon volume as independent predictors of stroke/death after CEA for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. For asymptomatic patients, the optimal cutoff number of CEAs to predict stroke/death rate was 19.4 CEAs per year (sensitivity = 74.9%, specificity = 72.6%, Youden index = 0.475). Analyses of outcomes at different cutoff points of surgeon volume revealed that the rate of crude complications and the adjusted probability of stroke or death was higher with case numbers less than 20 CEAs per year and lower with case numbers of 20 CEA or higher per year. Cutoff points above 20 cases were year did not yield a stroke/death rate that was significantly lower than the stroke/death rate at 20 CEAs per year, which confirmed the cutoff point of 20 CEAs per year. Only 16% of surgeons in the database achieved the threshold of 20 CEAs per year. CONCLUSIONS: Higher surgeon volume is associated with improved outcomes for CEAs performed in patients with asymptomatic carotid disease, but not for symptomatic carotid disease. For asymptomatic carotid disease, the probability of stroke or death was no longer reduced significantly at cutoff points of 20 or more CEAs per year. There are a number of other variables that may impact the clinical outcomes for CEA, so it is premature at this time to restrict privileges based on surgeon volume criteria.
Subject(s)
Carotid Stenosis/surgery , Endarterectomy, Carotid , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Quality Improvement , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Surgeons , Workload , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carotid Stenosis/mortality , Child , Child, Preschool , Clinical Competence , Databases, Factual , Endarterectomy, Carotid/adverse effects , Endarterectomy, Carotid/mortality , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/mortality , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Death from venous thromboembolism remains a significant cause of death worldwide. Although anticoagulation is the cornerstone of treatment in patients at risk for venous thromboembolism, inferior vena cava (IVC) filter use has increased exponentially over the last decade driven predominantly by the prophylactic use in patients at risk for venous thromboembolism despite limited evidence supporting this practice. The Predicting the Safety and Effectiveness of Inferior Vena Cava Filters (PRESERVE) Study is being implemented by the Society for Vascular Surgery, Society of Interventional Radiology, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and several IVC filter manufactures to better understand the safety, effectiveness, and current patterns of real-world use of IVC filters. METHODS: The PRESERVE Study includes IVC filters from seven manufacturers: ALN (ALN ± hook), Argon (Option Elite), B. Braun (LP, Vena Tech Convertible), CR Bard (Denali), Cook (Gunther Tulip), Cordis (OptEase, TrapEase), and Philips Volcano (Crux). The indications for filter placement, filter brand, complications, stability, frequency and success of retrieval, and clinical effectiveness of each filter will be recorded. Approximately 2100 patients (300 for each filter brand included in the study) are intended to be enrolled at 60 U.S. centers. RESULTS: Men and women age 18 years or older requiring IVC filters for prevention of venous thromboembolism will be included in the study if no contrast allergy is present and they are willing to commit to the prescribed study follow-up. Participants will be evaluated at discharge, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after filter placement and/or 1 month after retrieval, which ever occurs first. Intravascular ultrasound examination or venography will be done before and after IVC filter placement, with abdominal plain film at 3 months, and contrast enhanced computed tomography scans at 12 and 24 months to evaluate filter stability. The primary safety end point is a composite of clinical end points, including freedom from perforation, embolization, thrombosis, recurrent DVT, and defined serious adverse events. Secondary end points include mechanical stability and procedure related complications at 3 months, major adverse events at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, and filter tilt of more than 15° at any point. CONCLUSIONS: The PRESERVE Study represents the largest prospective study ever undertaken to investigate real-world outcomes with contemporary use of IVC filters. The investigators await results with the hope that it can improve patient care.
Subject(s)
Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Vena Cava Filters , Vena Cava, Inferior , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Device Removal , Humans , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Design , Prosthesis Failure , Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Recurrence , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States , Vena Cava, Inferior/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Safe resection of intraabdominal and retroperitoneal malignancies with a goal of negative margins may require vascular surgical assistance with grafting of the aorta and/or vena cava. The current report reviews malignancies associated with major vascular reconstructions at a single tertiary referral center. METHODS: Adults with abdominal or retroperitoneal tumors involving the aorta, vena cava, or iliac arteries that underwent reconstruction with vascular grafts at the University of Michigan from 2010 to 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. The initial presentation, surgical management, and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Twelve patients with tumors involving the abdominal aorta, vena cava, or iliac arteries underwent major vascular reconstruction in this seven-year study period. Tumor pathology included solid tumors (leiomyosarcoma [n = 7], germ cell tumor [n = 3], and intravascular lymphoma [n = 2]). Surgical treatment included grafting of the vena cava (n = 6), aorta (n = 3), iliac artery (n = 4), or both the aorta and vena cava (n = 1). Patients with intravascular lymphoma were identified incidentally during treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm or on pathological analysis of thromboembolism from an aortic source. Other patients had planned resection. Follow-up ranged from 9 to 86 months (median: 28.9). There were no graft occlusions. Tumor metastasized or recurred in patients with sarcoma (n = 2; 28.6%), germ cell tumor (n = 1; 33.3%), and intravascular lymphoma (n = 2; 100%). Both patients with lymphoma had multiple anastomotic or tumor-embolic pseudoaneurysms for <14 months after vascular reconstruction. Both lymphoma patients died during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This single-center review suggests that sarcoma and germ cell tumors may be safely resected in conjunction with major vascular reconstruction in carefully selected patients. In comparison, intravascular lymphoma identified incidentally at the time of aortic reconstruction resulted in a more malignant course with pseudoaneurysm formation of anastomoses or native vessels, cancer recurrence, and 100% mortality. Aneurysm contents and emboli should be carefully reviewed perioperatively by pathologists.
Subject(s)
Abdominal Neoplasms/surgery , Aorta, Abdominal/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Endovascular Procedures , Iliac Artery/surgery , Leiomyosarcoma/surgery , Lymphoma/surgery , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Retroperitoneal Neoplasms/surgery , Vena Cava, Inferior/surgery , Abdominal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Abdominal Neoplasms/mortality , Abdominal Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aorta, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Aorta, Abdominal/pathology , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Computed Tomography Angiography , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Female , Humans , Iliac Artery/diagnostic imaging , Iliac Artery/pathology , Incidental Findings , Leiomyosarcoma/diagnostic imaging , Leiomyosarcoma/mortality , Leiomyosarcoma/pathology , Lymphoma/diagnostic imaging , Lymphoma/mortality , Lymphoma/pathology , Male , Michigan , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/diagnostic imaging , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/mortality , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/pathology , Phenotype , Plastic Surgery Procedures/adverse effects , Plastic Surgery Procedures/mortality , Retroperitoneal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Retroperitoneal Neoplasms/mortality , Retroperitoneal Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Tertiary Care Centers , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Ultrasonography, Interventional , Vena Cava, Inferior/diagnostic imaging , Vena Cava, Inferior/pathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Attrition in surgical programs remains a significant problem resulting in trainee dissatisfaction and wasted time and educational dollars. Attrition rates in general surgery training programs approximate 5% per year (30% cumulative). Attrition rates in cardiovascular surgery training for the traditional vascular surgery fellowship (VSF), the vascular surgery residency (VSR), and the corresponding programs in cardiothoracic surgery have yet to be described, although they are assumed to be similar to those associated with general surgery training. METHODS: A retrospective review of the Association of American Medical Colleges Annual Physician Specialty Data Book was performed. Data from consecutive academic years 2007-2008 to 2013-2014 were analyzed. The number of total residents, the number who did not complete their training, and those who successfully completed the program were recorded. Attrition rates were then calculated for VSF, VSR, general surgery residency (GSR), cardiothoracic surgery fellowship (CTF), and cardiothoracic surgery integrated residency (CTR). RESULTS: Annually, between 2007-2008 and 2013-2014, there were zero to two vascular surgery residents who failed to complete the program (0%-5.9%). In the last 4 years of the study, whereas the absolute number of residents who failed to complete the program remained constant at 1 or 2 per year, the attrition rate decreased to 1 of 171 trainees (0.6%) in 2013-2014 as the total number of programs (and numbers of vascular surgery residents) significantly increased. During the same 7-year period, the number of vascular surgery fellows who did not complete their training ranged from one to six annually (0.4%-2.5%). Compared with the VSF, the VSR data show a relatively low and constant rate of attrition. In contrast, the number of general surgery residents who did not complete their program during the study period varied from 255 to 388 residents annually (3.3%-5.2%). During its first 3 years of inception, the CTR program had an attrition rate of 0%, and it was not until 2012-2013 that trainees failed to complete the program, resulting in an annual attrition rate of 1.2% to 3.2% from that point on. The annual attrition rate of CTF training programs ranged from 7 to 15 fellows (2.9%-6.8%) during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The inception of VSR and CTR programs dramatically changed the paradigms for training in these highly specialized surgical fields. Comparisons of attrition rates between these two programs and the traditional VSF and CTR as well as GSR suggests lesser rates of attrition in the integrated programs. These data may prove reassuring to VSR and CTR program directors, whose significantly smaller programs are more vulnerable to the loss of even a single trainee than general surgery training programs are. In addition, the VSF program has stable and lower attrition rates compared with the CTF and GSR programs.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures/education , Education, Medical, Graduate/methods , Fellowships and Scholarships , Internship and Residency , Specialization , Surgeons/education , Thoracic Surgical Procedures/education , Vascular Surgical Procedures/education , Attitude of Health Personnel , Career Choice , Curriculum , Educational Status , Humans , Job Satisfaction , Program Evaluation , Retrospective Studies , Surgeons/psychologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hand ischemia following trauma in children is rare, and the natural history after upper extremity arterial bypass in children is unknown. We hypothesize children with brachial artery repair are at long-term risk of developing aneurysmal degeneration or thrombosis, thus necessitating annual duplex ultrasonography and physical examination. METHODS: A retrospective review of children who had brachial artery repair (bypass or vein patch) for hand ischemia secondary to trauma at a level I trauma pediatric hospital was performed. Telephone interviews were conducted to assess the presence of arm/hand symptoms (pain, weakness, fatigue, sensory function, limb length discrepancy). RESULTS: Between 2003 and 2016, 16 children (12 males), mean age 8 years (3-13 years) underwent brachial artery repair (12 bypass with vein, 4 vein patch). Mechanism of injury included 11 supracondylar fractures and 5 lacerations. All patients were seen at 2 weeks with a duplex ultrasound. Thirteen patients were lost to follow-up. The 3 patients with follow-up had patent bypasses, but one patient 6 years out from the repair had aneurysmal degeneration of the vein graft. Seven patients were never seen again. Phone interviews were conducted for the remaining 6 patients and 2 complained of arm fatigue and intermittent hand pain. Only one patient reported that the pediatrician checked pulses in the affected extremity. CONCLUSIONS: Eighty percentage of children had no further follow-up after the postoperative visit. Asymptomatic aneurysmal degeneration of the vein graft was noted 6 years following repair in one patient, and 2 patients had unevaluated hand complaints. These patients are at risk for late complications and are unlikely to return for routine follow-up. The importance of graft surveillance must be more clearly emphasized at time of initial surgery.
Subject(s)
Brachial Artery/diagnostic imaging , Hand Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Ischemia/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex , Vascular System Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Age Factors , Aneurysm/diagnostic imaging , Aneurysm/etiology , Brachial Artery/injuries , Brachial Artery/physiopathology , Brachial Artery/surgery , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Hand Injuries/physiopathology , Hand Injuries/surgery , Humans , Ischemia/physiopathology , Ischemia/surgery , Male , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Saphenous Vein/transplantation , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Grafting/adverse effects , Vascular Grafting/methods , Vascular Patency , Vascular System Injuries/physiopathology , Vascular System Injuries/surgeryABSTRACT
The vena cava filter (VCF) is intended to prevent the progression of deep venous thrombosis to pulmonary embolism. Recently, the indications for VCF placement have expanded, likely due in part to newer retrievable inferior vena caval filters and minimally invasive techniques. This article reviews the available VCFs, the indications for use, the techniques for placement, and possible outcomes and complications.
Subject(s)
Pulmonary Embolism/prevention & control , Vascular Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Vascular Surgical Procedures/methods , Vena Cava Filters , Vena Cava, Inferior/surgery , Venous Thrombosis/surgery , Humans , Perioperative Care/methods , Pulmonary Embolism/etiology , Treatment Outcome , Vena Cava Filters/adverse effects , Venous Thrombosis/complicationsABSTRACT
Minimally invasive treatment options are a safe and feasible alternative for treatment of nutcracker syndrome. Endovascular stenting has shown promising long-term resolution of symptoms but can be complicated by stent migration or thrombosis. Laparoscopic extravascular stent placement has shown promising results with the potential to avoid these complications. We report the first case of extravascular stent placement using the robotic approach for the treatment of nutcracker syndrome.
Subject(s)
Laparoscopy/instrumentation , Renal Nutcracker Syndrome/surgery , Robotic Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Stents , Adult , Female , Humans , Phlebography , Renal Nutcracker Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Renal Veins/diagnostic imaging , Renal Veins/surgery , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Cardiovascular Outcomes in Renal Atherosclerotic Lesions (CORAL) Trial cast doubt on the benefits of renal artery stenting (RAS). However, the outcomes for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) were not analyzed separately in the CORAL Trial. We hypothesized that patients who experienced a significant improvement in renal function after RAS would have improved long-term survival, compared with patients whose renal function was not improved by stenting. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included 60 patients with stage 3 or worse CKD and renal artery occlusive disease who were treated with RAS for renal salvage. Patients were categorized as "responders" or "nonresponders" based on postoperative changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) after RAS. "Responders" were those patients with an improvement of at least 20% in eGFR over baseline; all others were categorized as "nonresponders." Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify predictors of long-term survival. RESULTS: The median age of the cohort was 66 years (interquartile range [IQR], 60-73). Median preoperative eGFR was 34 mL/min/1.73 m2 (IQR, 24-45). At late follow-up (median 35 months, IQR, 22-97 months), 16 of 60 patients (26.7%) were categorized as "responders" with a median increase in postoperative eGFR of 40% (IQR, 21-67). Long-term survival was superior for responders, compared with nonresponders (P = 0.046 by log-rank test). Cox proportional hazards regression identified improved renal function after RAS as the only significant predictor of increased long-term survival (hazard ratio = 0.235, 95% confidence interval = 0.075-0.733; P = 0.0126 for improved versus worsened renal function after RAS). CONCLUSIONS: Successful salvage of renal function by RAS is associated with improved long-term survival. These data provide an important counter argument to the prior negative clinical trials that found no benefit to RAS.
Subject(s)
Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Kidney/physiopathology , Renal Artery Obstruction/therapy , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/physiopathology , Stents , Aged , Chi-Square Distribution , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Recovery of Function , Renal Artery Obstruction/diagnostic imaging , Renal Artery Obstruction/mortality , Renal Artery Obstruction/physiopathology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/diagnosis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Texas , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to better define the clinical relevance of aneurysms affecting collateral vessels in patients with celiac artery (CA) occlusive disease. METHODS: True pancreaticoduodenal artery (PDA) and gastroduodenal artery (GDA) aneurysms associated with CA stenoses or occlusions reported from 1970 to 2010 in the English literature and similar cases treated at the University of Michigan were reviewed. Clinical presentations and differing treatment modalities were documented and analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-five patients having CA occlusive disease exhibited true arterial aneurysms affecting the PDA (105 patients), GDA (10 patients), or both PDA and GDA and their branches (10 patients). Aneurysm size averaged 2.1 cm. Included were 110 patients culled from the literature and 15 treated by the authors. The mean age of patients in this series was 59 years and there was no gender predilection. Aneurysms were asymptomatic in 26%. Abdominal pain affected 54% of the patients, including all who experienced rupture. Rupture occurred in 48 patients of whom 15 were hemodynamically unstable, including 6 who died. Surgical interventions included endovascular embolization (39), aneurysmectomy alone (25), and aneurysmectomy with arterial reconstruction (20). Salutary outcomes occurred in 91% of the cases. Open surgical procedures have remained constant, but were equaled by endovascular interventions in 1996, with the latter having increased 3-fold in the past 15 years. CONCLUSIONS: PDA and GDA aneurysms associated with CA occlusive disease carry a high risk of nonfatal rupture, warranting early treatment. Endovascular and open interventions may be successfully undertaken with minimal risks in treating these uncommon aneurysms.
Subject(s)
Aneurysm, Ruptured/etiology , Aneurysm/etiology , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/complications , Arteries , Celiac Artery , Duodenum/blood supply , Pancreas/blood supply , Stomach/blood supply , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aneurysm/diagnostic imaging , Aneurysm/physiopathology , Aneurysm/therapy , Aneurysm, Ruptured/diagnostic imaging , Aneurysm, Ruptured/physiopathology , Aneurysm, Ruptured/therapy , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/physiopathology , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/therapy , Arteries/diagnostic imaging , Arteries/physiopathology , Arteries/surgery , Celiac Artery/diagnostic imaging , Celiac Artery/physiopathology , Celiac Artery/surgery , Collateral Circulation , Computed Tomography Angiography , Constriction, Pathologic , Endovascular Procedures , Female , Humans , Male , Michigan , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Splanchnic Circulation , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Surgical ProceduresABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The natural history of type II endoleak (T2EL) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) remains elusive; as such, treatment guidelines are ill defined. The purpose of this study was to better delineate the natural history of T2EL after EVAR for rAAA in an effort to determine the need for reintervention and optimal surveillance. METHODS: A retrospective record review was conducted of all patients undergoing EVAR for rAAA in two large tertiary care academic vascular centers. Patient demographics, comorbidities, anatomic variables, and operative details were analyzed. Primary outcomes included the presence of T2EL, reintervention, delayed rupture, and aneurysm-related death. RESULTS: EVAR was used to treat rAAA in 56 patients between 2000 and 2013. Mean follow-up of this cohort was 634 days. Completion arteriogram demonstrated T2ELs in 12 patients (21%), and an additional four T2ELs (7%) were found by postoperative computed tomography angiogram that were not identified on the completion angiogram. Body mass index was the only statistically significant variable associated with the development of T2EL (P = .03). Preoperative warfarin use, aortic thrombus burden, and device type did not correlate with T2EL development. Iliolumbar vessels supplied 75% (n = 12) of T2ELs. Of the 14 patients with T2ELs who underwent serial imaging postoperatively, six (43%) sealed spontaneously. Five patients (36%) underwent reintervention for T2EL by way of coil embolization-four in which treatment was initiated by attending preference. One patient was treated for ongoing anemia in the immediate postoperative period. There was no sac expansion, delayed rupture, or graft explantation. CONCLUSIONS: T2ELs after EVAR for rAAA are common and appear to be associated with a benign natural history if left untreated. Although many will spontaneously seal early in the postoperative period, those that remain patent do not appear to increase the risk for sac expansion or delayed rupture or affect patient survival. As such, a conservative approach to treatment of T2ELs in rAAA may be warranted.
Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Aortic Rupture/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Endoleak/etiology , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/mortality , Aortic Rupture/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Rupture/mortality , Aortography/methods , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Computed Tomography Angiography , Embolization, Therapeutic , Endoleak/diagnostic imaging , Endoleak/mortality , Endoleak/therapy , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Michigan , Middle Aged , New Hampshire , Retreatment , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Tertiary Care Centers , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous femoral vascular access is frequently used for aortic endovascular procedures, with a local access complication rate of 5% to 16%. Fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) has recently emerged as a new technique for the repair of short-neck and juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. The safety and effectiveness of percutaneous access for FEVAR has not been established to date. METHODS: Since United States Food and Drug Administration approval of the Zenith fenestrated aortic endograft (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind), 94 patients (60 Zenith fenestrated, 6 p-Branch, and 28 custom-made devices) have undergone FEVAR. Percutaneous access was performed using the "preclose" technique with the Perclose Proglide device (Abbott Vascular, Redwood City, Calif). Open access was performed when severely disease or calcified femoral arteries prevented percutaneous access. Patient-based analysis was performed assessing outcomes for the access site used for the larger profile sheath of the main device. RESULTS: Percutaneous access was used in 90 patients (177 common femoral arteries) and open access in four (11 common femoral arteries). Arm access was used in 41 patients (44%). The median sheath size was 20F (interquartile range [IQR], 20F-22F). Median operative time was 207 minutes (IQR, 160-270 minutes), with a median blood loss of 500 mL (IQR, 300-700 mL). The percutaneous access success rate was 92%. No preoperative factors predicted technical failure. No 30-day deaths occurred. Patients with failed percutaneous closure and who required conversion to open repair had higher estimated median blood loss of 800 (IQR, 600-1200) vs 500 (IQR, 300-600) mL (P = .01) and a longer median time to start ambulation of 4 (IQR, 2-7) vs 2 (IQR, 1-3) days (P = .03). Patients undergoing percutaneous closure had lower median blood loss (500 mL; IQR, 300-600 mL) than patients who underwent open surgical access (800 mL; IQR, 750-800 mL). Postoperative complications related to vascular access occurred in 11 patients (12%). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous femoral access is a safe and effective alternative to open access for FEVAR. Operative blood loss and longer time to ambulation are significantly increased after failed percutaneous closure.
Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Catheterization, Peripheral/methods , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Femoral Artery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Blood Loss, Surgical , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Catheterization, Peripheral/adverse effects , Databases, Factual , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Female , Femoral Artery/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Operative Time , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Punctures , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Stents , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
A 28-year-old male with single ventricular heart disease status post Fontan palliation and subsequent placement of left ventricle to ascending aorta (LV-AAo) valved conduit developed ascites and edema. Diagnostic catheterization revealed elevated ventricular end diastolic pressures (EDP) secondary to severe LV-AAo conduit regurgitation. Given the unique anatomy, surgical access via the right axillary artery provided optimal route for transcatheter valve implantation within the conduit. The procedure resulted in significant hemodynamic improvement with no complications. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Subject(s)
Bioprosthesis , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Cardiac Catheterization/instrumentation , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Fontan Procedure/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Prosthesis Failure , Pulmonary Valve/transplantation , Ventricular Function, Left , Ventricular Outflow Obstruction/surgery , Adult , Aortography , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Hemodynamics , Humans , Male , Palliative Care , Product Labeling , Pulmonary Valve/diagnostic imaging , Pulmonary Valve/physiopathology , Reoperation , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Outflow Obstruction/etiology , Ventricular Outflow Obstruction/physiopathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients with painful varicose veins and venous insufficiency can be treated by eliminating axial reflux only or by eliminating axial reflux plus phlebectomy with transilluminated powered phlebectomy. This study was undertaken with the aim of determining and improving signs and symptoms of venous disease (measured by venous clinical severity score) and complications (by routine surveillance ultrasound and long-term post-operative follow up) for each treatment strategy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective evaluation of prospectively collected data from 979 limbs undergoing procedures for significant varicose veins and venous insufficiency from March 2008 until June 2014 performed at a single tertiary referral hospital. Patient demographics, Clinical Etiology Anatomy and Pathophysiology classification, venous clinical severity scores pre- and post-procedure, treatment chosen, and peri-operative complications were collected; descriptive statistics were calculated and unadjusted surgical outcomes for patients stratified by the procedure performed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between procedure type and thrombotic complications after adjusting for patient characteristics, severity of disease, pre-operative anticoagulation, and post-operative compression. RESULT: Venous clinical severity scores improved more with radiofrequency ablation + transilluminated powered phlebectomy as compared to radiofrequency ablation alone (3.8 ± 3.4 vs. 3.2 ± 3.1, p = 0.018). Regarding deep venous thrombosis, there was no significant difference between radiofrequency ablation + transilluminated powered phlebectomy vs. radiofrequency ablation alone. There was no statistical difference in asymptomatic endovenous heat-induced thrombosis or infection, although there were slightly more hematomas and cases of asymptomatic superficial thrombophlebitis with combined therapy. On multivariable analysis, only procedure type predicted thrombotic complications. CONCLUSION: Ablation of axial reflux plus transilluminated powered phlebectomy produces improved outcomes as measured by venous clinical severity score, with slight increases in minor post-operative complications and should be strongly considered as initial therapy when patients present with significant symptomatic varicose veins and superficial venous insufficiency. Implementation of a standardized thromboprophylaxis protocol with individual risk assessment results in few significant thrombotic complications amongst high-risk patients, thus potentially obviating the need for routine post-operative duplex.
Subject(s)
Catheter Ablation/methods , Postoperative Complications , Thrombosis , Varicose Veins , Venous Insufficiency , Adult , Aged , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Postoperative Complications/physiopathology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Thrombosis/diagnostic imaging , Thrombosis/physiopathology , Thrombosis/prevention & control , Varicose Veins/diagnostic imaging , Varicose Veins/physiopathology , Varicose Veins/surgery , Venous Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Venous Insufficiency/physiopathology , Venous Insufficiency/surgeryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Endovascular (EV) techniques are being advocated as the preferred method for mesenteric interventions because of their safety profile. However, midterm and long-term results are thought to be inferior to open interventions. We sought to compare our institutional experience with treatment of acute and chronic mesenteric ischemia (AMI and CMI, respectively) using EV and open techniques. METHODS: The medical records of open and EV mesenteric procedures performed at a single center were queried from 2002 to 2012. Demographic, perioperative, and follow-up data were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients underwent EV mesenteric interventions, whereas 77 patients underwent open revascularization. The demographic and perioperative characteristics for patients were similar. Most EV procedures (89.2%) comprised stenting, whereas open procedures included 25 (32.1%) antegrade bypasses, 38 (48.7%) retrograde bypasses, 8 (10.3%) thromboembolectomies, and 7 (9%) transaortic endarterectomies. Postoperative complications, overall 30-day morbidity and mortality were not significantly different in the open and EV groups for AMI or CMI. Thirty-day mortality in AMI (n = 34) was 38.2% (EV: 45.5% vs. open: 34.8%; P = nonsignificant). There was no mortality in either group for CMI patients. Mean follow-up was much longer for the open procedures (34.9 vs. 12.7 months, P = 0.004). Primary and secondary patency rates were better for open revascularization for CMI patients. CONCLUSIONS: Open revascularizations are equally safe as EV interventions for AMI and CMI. Patency of open revascularization for CMI is better than EV procedures at midterm follow-up.