Dose Gradient Index for Stereotactic Radiosurgery/Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: Steep dose falloff outside of tumors is a hallmark of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and radiation therapy (SRT). Dose gradient index (DGI) quantifies the dose drop off. Tables of DGIs versus target volumes have been published for body sites, but none is available for brain. This study recommends guidelines for DGIs for brain SRS/SRT treatments based on clinical CyberKnife (CK) cases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Four hundred ninety-five plans for patients with central nervous system tumors treated with CK at our institution between March 2015 and May 2018 were analyzed. The CK treatment planning system MultiPlan was used for planning. SRS/SRT plans were stratified into 6 groups by tumor size (Group I [0-1 cm3], II [1.0-3.0 cm3], III [3.0-5.0 cm3], IV [5.0-10.0 cm3], V [10.0-15.0 cm3], and VI [15.0-40.0 cm3]). Ideal and minimally acceptable DGIs were determined for each size group. To evaluate the effect of target shape on DGI criteria, the plans were divided into 4 target shape groups: (1) homogeneous shape (circular), (2) adjacent to radiosensitive organs at risk (adjacent), (3) irregularly shaped (irregular), and (4) multiple target plans (multilesion). The mean for each target size group was defined as the ideal DGI. Minimally acceptable DGI criteria are specified to reject the lowest 10% of cases. RESULTS: The minimal acceptable DGIs were 83 (Group I), 72 (II), 65 (III), 58 (IV), 52 (V), and 35 (VI). The ideal DGI is designated to evaluate SRS/SRT plans for homogeneous circular lesions, whereas minimal DGI is chosen to assess the plans for irregular, adjacent to organs at risk, and multilesions. SRS/SRT plans with higher DGI values are correlated with lower irradiated normal tissue volumes. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a table of DGIs for brain SRS/SRT treatments as a tool for assessing the quality of intracranial SRS/SRT plans. DGI guidelines support SRS/SRT planning that results in lower risk of radionecrosis.

Surface dose measurements with commonly used detectors: a consistent thickness correction method.

The purpose of this study was to review application of a consistent correction method for the solid state detectors, such as thermoluminescent dosimeters (chips (cTLD) and powder (pTLD)), optically stimulated detectors (both closed (OSL) and open (eOSL)), and radiochromic (EBT2) and radiographic (EDR2) films. In addition, to compare measured surface dose using an extrapolation ionization chamber (PTW 30-360) with other parallel plate chambers RMI-449 (Attix), Capintec PS-033, PTW 30-329 (Markus) and Memorial. Measurements of surface dose for 6MV photons with parallel plate chambers were used to establish a baseline. cTLD, OSLs, EDR2, and EBT2 measurements were corrected using a method which involved irradiation of three dosimeter stacks, followed by linear extrapolation of individual dosimeter measurements to zero thickness. We determined the magnitude of correction for each detector and compared our results against an alternative correction method based on effective thickness. All uncorrected surface dose measurements exhibited overresponse, compared with the extrapolation chamber data, except for the Attix chamber. The closest match was obtained with the Attix chamber (-0.1%), followed by pTLD (0.5%), Capintec (4.5%), Memorial (7.3%), Markus (10%), cTLD (11.8%), eOSL (12.8%), EBT2 (14%), EDR2 (14.8%), and OSL (26%). Application of published ionization chamber corrections brought all the parallel plate results to within 1% of the extrapolation chamber. The extrapolation method corrected all solid-state detector results to within 2% of baseline, except the OSLs. Extrapolation of dose using a simple three-detector stack has been demonstrated to provide thickness corrections for cTLD, eOSLs, EBT2, and EDR2 which can then be used for surface dose measurements. Standard OSLs are not recommended for surface dose measurement. The effective thickness method suffers from the subjectivity inherent in the inclusion of measured percentage depth-dose curves and is not recommended for these types of measurements.