Thrombectomy in large vessel occlusion stroke-Does age matter?

OBJECTIVES: Endovascular treatment (EVT) is the gold standard treatment for emergent large vessel occlusion (LVO). The benefit of EVT for emergent LVO in elderly patients (>80 years old) is still debated as they have been under-represented in randomized controlled trials. Elderly patients with an emergent LVO are a growing population warranting further study. MATERIALS & METHODS: We included 225 consecutive patients treated with EVT for LVO either in the anterior or posterior circulation. The clinical outcome was assessed using the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Long-term functional outcome was assessed using 90-day modified ranking scale (mRS). RESULTS: Neurological improvement: A five-year higher age predicted a 0.43 higher mean NIHSS score after EVT (p = .027). After adjusting for confounders (influencing variables), the association between age and post-interventional NIHSS was reduced and non-significant (p = .17). At discharge, a five-year higher age predicted a 0.74 higher mean NIHSS (p = .003). After adjusting for confounders this association was reduced and non-significant (p = .06). Long-term functional outcome: A five-year higher age predicted a 0.20 higher mRS at three months (p < .001). When adjusting for confounders this number was reduced to 0.16, yet still highly significant (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Age seems to have a minor role in predicting neurological improvement after EVT but has an impact on long-term functional outcome. The decision to perform or withhold EVT should therefore not solely be based on age.

Endovascular thrombectomy at low-volume centres: A Bayesian solution.

PURPOSE: Endovascular treatment (EVT) is traditionally performed by neurointerventional radiologists at tertiary medical centres imposing long transport ways to large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke patients in rural areas. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the technical and clinical results over time at Stavanger University Hospital, a hospital without neurointerventional expertise, where trained general interventional radiologist performs EVT. METHODS: All patients with LVO stroke treated with EVT from May 2009 to December 2018 were included in the analysis. Technical outcome was measured by the modified treatment in cerebral ischaemia (mTICI) score, functional outcome by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), complications registered. RESULTS: A total of 235 patients were treated with EVT. An angiographically good result (mTICI 2b or 3) could be seen in 66.7% of the patients treated the first year. In 2011, the year EVT with stent retrievers was introduced, the recanalization rate rose to 81.8%, and from 2014 onwards, it was stable around 80%. After introduction of aspiration together with stent retrievers in 2012, a good functional outcome (mRS 0-2) was obtained in >40% of the treated patients. In 2018, 61.1% of the patients got a good functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular treatment of LVO stroke performed by general vascular interventional radiologist in close collaboration with diagnostic neuroradiologists and stroke neurologists can achieve technical revascularization results and clinical patient outcomes in line with international recommendations, and the randomized controlled studies performed. This approach may help to introduce EVT in geographical areas where this service is lacking due to the absence of neurointerventional specialists.

Endovascular Thrombectomy in the Elderly: Do Radiological and Clinical Outcomes Differ from Those in Younger Patients? A Prospective Single-Center Experience.

OBJECTIVES: Endovascular treatment (EVT) has emerged as the gold standard therapy for stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). There is however limited evidence to suggest that similar efficacy can be expected in elderly patients. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of EVT in elderly patients (aged > 80), comparing outcomes to younger patients (aged < 80). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 195 patients with LVO stroke treated with EVT were included and dichotomized by age. We compared neurological improvement, clinical 90 day outcome, technical recanalization rates, procedure-related complications, and mortality in between the groups. RESULTS: Both groups showed equally marked neurological improvement. A favorable outcome modified Rankin Scale (mRS < 2) was seen in 28% of the elderly patients compared to 46% of the younger patients (p = 0.01). mRS 0-3 was seen in 46% of the elderly patients and 58% of the younger patients (p = 0.09). The rates of successful technical recanalization did not differ between the groups and there were no differences in procedural complication rates or incidence of symptomatic intracranial bleeding. Three-month mortality rates were however higher in the elderly group. CONCLUSIONS: EVT in the elderly resulted in equally notable neurological improvement as compared to younger patients. Although the elderly had a higher mortality rate and fewer favorable clinical outcomes at 3 month follow-up, a strict upper age limit for EVT seems unjustified.