An unusual case of neurocardiogenic syncope: A case report and systematic review.

We present a case of syncopal episode in emergency department (ED) and subsequent admission to the geriatric assessment unit. The patient presented with self-limiting central abdominal pain. Given a history of previous aortic aneurysm repair, a contrast CT angiogram was performed. With no evidence of leaking aneurysm, the patient was discharged from the ED. The syncopal episode happened while waiting for a taxi. A review of the earlier CT scan showed the presence of air in the venous circulatory system. In hindsight, it was thought the syncopal episode occurred due to air embolism introduced during or shortly after venous cannulation. We discuss the aetiology of venous air embolism and highlight the lack of evidence regarding tolerable amounts of air in the circulatory system. Physiological changes associated with age may suggest that elderly patients are uniquely maladapted to overcome sudden insults to their cardiovascular status.

Routine pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in frail older hospitalised patients: where is the evidence?

It has been claimed that there are over 25,000 preventable in-hospital deaths from venous thromboembolism annually in the UK. NICE and SIGN guidelines therefore recommend that all hospitalised patients are risk assessed for venous thromboembolism. The guidelines would recommend using pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for all patients aged 60 and above with reduced mobility and acute medical illness unless obvious contra-indications exist. Meta-analysis data regarding pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for medical patients demonstrate reductions in asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) rather than fatal pulmonary embolism and mortality. There is also the potential for increased bleeding risk with this approach. Evidence for older medical in-patients, particularly those aged over 75, is more limited being derived from subgroup analyses of larger clinical trials. In addition, based on exclusion criteria such as increased bleeding risk, frailer older adults were unlikely to have been included within such trials. This commentary will (i) critically appraise available data on the incidence of DVT and PE in older hospitalised patients; (ii) review the evidence available from meta-analyses and subgroup analyses in older medical in-patients for the use of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis; (iii) discuss those situations out-with the guidelines where venous thromboprophylaxis may not be appropriate and even potentially harmful in this patient group and (iv) suggest future research directions.