[Evolution of the presence of women in decision-making bodies of the Spanish national health system]. / Evolución de la presencia de mujeres en los órganos de decisión del Sistema Nacional de Salud en España.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the presence of women in the organs of the Interterritorial Council of the Spanish National Health System (CISNS). METHOD: Annual reports of the CISNS from 2005 to 2022 were analyzed. Artificial intelligence was used to assign gender, and percentages of women's participation were calculated. Temporal evolution, vertical segregation, and horizontal segregation were analyzed. RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2022, there were 14,308 participations in 85 organs, with 52% women, rising from 42% in 2005 to 61% in 2022. There was a higher participation of women in propositional organs (54%), followed by executive ones (50%), and plenary sessions (40%). The General State Administration had 61% women compared to 48% in autonomous communities. Women's participation varied by topic, being higher (82%) in gender violence and lower (35%) in inspection. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is a slight reduction in the participation gap between women and men, inequalities persist. Women have less presence in higher hierarchical levels (plenary sessions), maintaining vertical segregation. Additionally, women's representation in certain topics remains low, maintaining horizontal segregation. Concrete actions must be taken to continue advancing equality and improving health outcomes in society as a whole.

[Translated article] Type III acromioclavicular dislocation: Mid term results after operative and non-operative treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Controversy exists in the literature about the best treatment for type III acromioclavicular dislocations. The aim of this study is to compare functional results between surgical and conservative treatment in type III acromioclavicular joint dislocations. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We retrospectively evaluated the records of 30 patients from our area with acute type III acromioclavicular dislocations that were treated from January 1st, 2016 to December 31st, 2020. Fifteen patients were treated surgically and 15 conservatively. Follow-up mean time was 37.93 months in operative group and 35.73 months in non-operative group. Results obtained on the Constant score was the main variable analysed and results obtained on the Oxford score and the Visual Analogue Scale for pain were the secondary variables. Epidemiological variables were analysed, as well as range of mobility in injured shoulder and subjective and radiological variables (distance between the superior border of the acromion and the superior border of the clavicle's distal end and presence of osteoarthritis in the acromioclavicular joint). RESULTS: Functional evaluation scores did not show differences between the two groups (Constant: operative 82/non-operative 86.38, p 0.412; Oxford: operative 42/non-operative 44.80, p 0.126) nor did Visual Analogue Scale (operative 1/non-operative 0.20, p 0.345). Subjective evaluation of the injured shoulder was excellent or good in 80% of the patients in both groups. Measurement of the distance between the superior border of the acromion and the superior border of the clavicle's distal end were significantly higher in non-operative group (operative 8.95/non-operative 14.21, p 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Although radiographic results were better in the surgical treatment group, functional evaluation scores did not show significant differences between the two groups. These results do not support the routine use of surgical treatment for grade III acromioclavicular dislocations.

Type III acromioclavicular dislocation: Mid term results after operative and non-operative treatment. / Luxación acromioclavicular grado III. Resultados a medio plazo tras tratamiento conservador y quirúrgico.

INTRODUCTION: Controversy exists in the literature about the best treatment for type III acromioclavicular dislocations. The aim of this study is to compare functional results between surgical and conservative treatment in type III acromioclavicular joint dislocations. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We retrospectively evaluated the records of 30 patients from our area with acute type III acromioclavicular dislocations that were treated from January 1st, 2016 to December 31st, 2020. Fifteen patients were treated surgically and 15 conservatively. Follow up mean time was 37.93 months in operative group and 35.73 months in non-operative group. Results obtained on the Constant score was the main variable analysed and results obtained on the Oxford score and the Visual Analogue Scale for pain were the secondary variables. Epidemiological variables were analysed, as well as range of mobility in injured shoulder and subjective and radiological variables (distance between the superior border of the acromion and the superior border of the clavicle's distal end and presence of osteoarthritis in the acromioclavicular joint). RESULTS: Functional evaluation scores did not show differences between the two groups (Constant: operative 82/non-operative 86.38, p 0.412; Oxford: operative 42/non-operative 44.80, p 0.126) nor did Visual Analogue Scale (operative 1/non-operative 0.20, p 0.345). Subjective evaluation of the injured shoulder was excellent or good in 80% of the patients in both groups. Measurement of the distance between the superior border of the acromion and the superior border of the clavicle's distal end were significantly higher in non-operative group (operative 8.95/non-operative 14.21, p 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Although radiographic results were better in the surgical treatment group, functional evaluation scores did not show significant differences between the two groups. These results do not support the routine use of surgical treatment for grade III acromioclavicular dislocations.

Violencia de odio en los servicios de urgencias de hospitales de tercer nivel. Primeros datos en España / Hate violence in the emergency rooms of third level hospitals. First data in Spain

OBJETIVO: Describir los casos de violencia de odio atendidos en servicios de urgencias. MÉTODO: Estudio transversal de una serie de casos de agresión atendidos en los servicios de urgencias de dos hospitales de Madrid, entre abril de 2015 y marzo de 2018. Se describen los casos de violencia de odio en cuanto a características sociodemográficas, clínico-epidemiológicas y del incidente, y se comparan con las de otros tipos de violencia dentro del estudio. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 147 pacientes. El 49% refirieron haber sido víctimas de la violencia de odio. El 61% eran hombres, la media de edad fue de 36 años y un 48% tenían un nivel de estudios medio-alto. Las motivaciones más frecuentes son el aspecto físico, la nacionalidad y el origen étnico. El lugar de la agresión es la calle en un 50% de los casos, y en el 61% la agresión fue perpetrada por más de una persona (el 83% por hombres). La lesión más común fue la contusión (71%) y las localizaciones más frecuentes fueron la cabeza y el cuello (71%). El 8% de las víctimas requirieron ingreso. CONCLUSIONES: La vigilancia de la violencia de odio permitiría conocer con mayor exactitud la magnitud real y las características de este problema de salud, así como mejorar la calidad de la atención a las víctimas

OBJECTIVE: To describe the cases of hate violence attended in emergency services. METHOD: A cross-sectional study of a series of cases of aggression treated in the emergency rooms of two hospitals in Madrid, between April 2015 and March 2018. The cases of hate violence are described in terms of their sociodemographic, clinical-epidemiological and incident data and compared with other types of violence within the study. RESULTS: A total of 147 patients were included and 49% reported having been victims of hate violence. Among the victims, 61% were men, the average age was 36 years and 48% had a medium-high level of education. The most frequent motivations were physical appearance, nationality and ethnic origin. The place of aggression was the street in 50%, and in 61% of the cases it was perpetrated by more than one person (83% by men). The most common injury was contusion (71%) and the most frequent location the head and neck (71%). Only 8% required admission. CONCLUSIONS: The surveillance of hate violence would foster more accurate knowledge of the real magnitude and characteristics of this health problem and improve the quality of care for victims

[Causes of hospital admission and morbidity according to gender identity in the Autonomous Community of Madrid].

The objective was to identify differences in health between transgender (trans) and cisgender (cis) people using the hospital discharge survey from the Autonomous Community of Madrid. Their characteristics, causes of admission and morbidities were described, comparing them by prevalence ratio and confidence interval (95% CI). One hundred and twelve trans vs 1,043,621 cis discharges were studied. The main differences were that more frequently trans people had been attended in a single center (55.4 vs. 9.3%), were under 49 years old (75.9 vs. 37.1%) and had used private health services (2.7 vs. 0.4%). Admissions related to mental health problems (23.96; 95% CI: 17.41-32.78) and HIV morbidity (11.26 95% CI: 5.46-20.93) were more frequent among trans discharges. Information is limited beyond body modification, mental health, and HIV. It is necessary to improve the knowledge about trans population's health.

Elaboración de un cuestionario de detección de casos de violencia de odio en urgencias hospitalarias / Preparation of a questionnaire to detect cases of hate violence in emergency rooms

OBJETIVO: En el marco del proyecto SIVIVO se propuso la elaboración de una herramienta que facilitase la detección, el registro y la descripción de casos de violencia de odio y sus consecuencias sobre la salud. MÉTODO: Se utilizó el método Delphi a dos vueltas con personas expertas pertenecientes a los ámbitos clínico-asistencial, salud pública, investigación epidemiológica, académico, administración y organizaciones no gubernamentales para evaluar la pertinencia de diferentes ítems mediante una escala Likert de 1 a 5, y los resultados se presentan como medianas y coeficientes de variación. RESULTADOS: Las preguntas mejor valoradas, con puntaciones ≥4, y que componen la versión final del cuestionario, son las relativas a las características sociodemográficas de la víctima, el tipo de lesiones, la descripción del incidente, las motivaciones percibidas por la persona agredida, posibles evidencias de odio, la intención de denunciar y la percepción del personal sanitario del motivo de la agresión. El pilotaje mostró la adecuación de las preguntas finalmente seleccionadas. CONCLUSIONES: La incorporación sistemática de esta herramienta puede ayudar a conocer la magnitud y las características de la violencia de odio y su repercusión en la salud. Esta información permitiría elaborar estrategias de prevención e intervención dirigidas, especialmente, a los sectores de población más expuestos a este tipo de violencia

OBJECTIVE: In the context of the SIVIVO project, the development of a tool to facilitate the detection, recording and description of cases of hate violence and its consequences on health was proposed. METHOD: A two-round Delphi method was used with experts from clinical-care, public health, epidemiological, academic, administration and non-governmental organizations to assess the relevance of different items using a Likert scale, presenting the results with medians and coefficients of variation. RESULTS: The best evaluated questions, with scores equal to or greater than 4, and which make up the final version of the questionnaire are the relative socio-demographic characteristics of the victim, the injuries, description of the incident, the motivations perceived by the aggrieved person, possible evidence of hatred, the intention to denounce and the perception of the health personnel of the motive for the aggression. The piloting showed the adequacy of the questions that were finally selected. CONCLUSIONS: The systematic incorporation of this tool can help us to learn the magnitude and characteristics of hate violence and its impact on health. This information would allow the elaboration of prevention and intervention strategies aimed, specifically, at the sectors of the population most exposed to this type of violence

[Preparation of a questionnaire to detect cases of hate violence in emergency rooms]. / Elaboración de un cuestionario de detección de casos de violencia de odio en urgencias hospitalarias.

OBJECTIVE: In the context of the SIVIVO project, the development of a tool to facilitate the detection, recording and description of cases of hate violence and its consequences on health was proposed. METHOD: A two-round Delphi method was used with experts from clinical-care, public health, epidemiological, academic, administration and non-governmental organizations to assess the relevance of different items using a Likert scale, presenting the results with medians and coefficients of variation. RESULTS: The best evaluated questions, with scores equal to or greater than 4, and which make up the final version of the questionnaire are the relative socio-demographic characteristics of the victim, the injuries, description of the incident, the motivations perceived by the aggrieved person, possible evidence of hatred, the intention to denounce and the perception of the health personnel of the motive for the aggression. The piloting showed the adequacy of the questions that were finally selected. CONCLUSIONS: The systematic incorporation of this tool can help us to learn the magnitude and characteristics of hate violence and its impact on health. This information would allow the elaboration of prevention and intervention strategies aimed, specifically, at the sectors of the population most exposed to this type of violence.

[Hate violence in the emergency rooms of third level hospitals. First data in Spain]. / Violencia de odio en los servicios de urgencias de hospitales de tercer nivel. Primeros datos en España.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the cases of hate violence attended in emergency services. METHOD: A cross-sectional study of a series of cases of aggression treated in the emergency rooms of two hospitals in Madrid, between April 2015 and March 2018. The cases of hate violence are described in terms of their sociodemographic, clinical-epidemiological and incident data and compared with other types of violence within the study. RESULTS: A total of 147 patients were included and 49% reported having been victims of hate violence. Among the victims, 61% were men, the average age was 36 years and 48% had a medium-high level of education. The most frequent motivations were physical appearance, nationality and ethnic origin. The place of aggression was the street in 50%, and in 61% of the cases it was perpetrated by more than one person (83% by men). The most common injury was contusion (71%) and the most frequent location the head and neck (71%). Only 8% required admission. CONCLUSIONS: The surveillance of hate violence would foster more accurate knowledge of the real magnitude and characteristics of this health problem and improve the quality of care for victims.

La violencia interpersonal en España a través del Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos / Interpersonal violence in Spain through national hospital discharge survey

Objetivo: Describir la epidemiología de la violencia interpersonal en España. Método: Estudio descriptivo de los casos de pacientes con diagnóstico secundario de agresión registrados en el Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos de altas hospitalarias, entre 1999 y 2011, utilizando los códigos E960 a E969 de la Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades (CIE-9). Se describe la distribución por sexo, edad y tipo de alta y de atención requerida, morbilidad asociada, mortalidad y comunidad autónoma. Se estudia la calidad del registro en función de su variación temporal. Resultados: El perfil de agresión en hombres (85%) es el de un paciente de entre 15 y 44 años, que en un 93,7% de los casos precisa atención urgente y cuya gravedad es moderada (95% alta a domicilio). El 2,5% de los pacientes reingresa, y se produce la muerte en el 1,1% de las ocasiones. El perfil en las mujeres (15%) difiere ligeramente: edad comprendida entre 31 y 52 años, el 94% requiere atención urgente (si bien el 96% tiene una gravedad moderada), el 3% reingresa y en el 1,7% de las ocasiones la paciente muere. Conclusiones: Aunque necesitan ser mejorados para evitar ciertas limitaciones, los sistemas de información sanitaria constituyen una riquísima fuente de datos que pueden ser utilizados para la investigación en salud y, a través de sus resultados, para el desarrollo de planes de prevención e intervención sociosanitaria en temas de violencia

Objective: To describe the epidemiology of interpersonal violence in Spain. Method: Descriptive study of the cases of patients with secondary diagnosis of aggression registered on a national hospital discharge database, between 1999 and 2011, using the codes from E960 to E969 of the ICD-9. The distribution by sex, age and type of discharge, associated morbidity, mortality and by autonomous community is described. The quality of the record is studied according to its temporal variation. Results: The case profile of aggression in men (85%) is of a patient between 15 and 44 years old, who in 93.7% of cases requires urgent care and whose severity is moderate (95% discharge home). Two point five percent of patients are readmitted and death occurs in1.1%. The profile in women (15%) differs slightly, with an age between 31 and 52 years, 94% require urgent attention, although 96% have moderate severity; 3% are readmitted and 1.7% die. Conclusions: Although they need to be improved to avoid certain limitations, health information systems are a rich source of data that can be used for research in health and, through their results, for the development of prevention plans and intervention in matters of violence

[Interpersonal violence in Spain through national hospital discharge survey]. / La violencia interpersonal en España a través del Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiology of interpersonal violence in Spain. METHOD: Descriptive study of the cases of patients with secondary diagnosis of aggression registered on a national hospital discharge database, between 1999 and 2011, using the codes from E960 to E969 of the ICD-9. The distribution by sex, age and type of discharge, associated morbidity, mortality and by autonomous community is described. The quality of the record is studied according to its temporal variation. RESULTS: The case profile of aggression in men (85%) is of a patient between 15 and 44 years old, who in 93.7% of cases requires urgent care and whose severity is moderate (95% discharge home). Two point five percent of patients are readmitted and death occurs in1.1%. The profile in women (15%) differs slightly, with an age between 31 and 52 years, 94% require urgent attention, although 96% have moderate severity; 3% are readmitted and 1.7% die. CONCLUSIONS: Although they need to be improved to avoid certain limitations, health information systems are a rich source of data that can be used for research in health and, through their results, for the development of prevention plans and intervention in matters of violence.

Inclusión de la orientación afectivo-sexual y de las identidades de género como determinantes sociales de la salud / Inclusion of affective-sexual orientation and gender identities as social determinants of health

No disponible

Intervenciones en salud pública contra la violencia de odio / Public health interventions against hate violence

No disponible

Propuesta de actuación para la detección y la atención a víctimas de violencia de odio para profesionales de la salud / Proposed action for detection and care of victims of hate violence for health professionals

No disponible

Violence in adulthood and mental health: gender and immigrant status.

The aim of this study was to describe perceived abuse in adult Spanish and Ecuadorian women and men and to assess its association with mental health. A population-based survey was conducted in Spain in 2006. Data were taken from a probabilistic sample allowing for an equal number of men and women, Spaniards and Ecuadorians. Mental disorder was measured with the General Health Questionnaire-28. The nine questions on exposure to physical, sexual, and psychological abuse during the previous year were self-administered. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the association between exposure to abuse and poor mental health, adjusting for potential confounders. The sample was composed of 1,059 individuals aged 18 to 54, 104 of whom reported physical, psychological, or sexual abuse. Some 6% refused to answer the questions on abuse. Overall, reported abuse ranged from 13% in Ecuadorian women to 5% in Spanish men. Psychological abuse was the most frequent. Half the abused women, both Spanish and Ecuadorian, reported intimate partner violence (IPV), as did 22% of abused men. Poor mental health was found in 61% of abused Spanish women (adjusted Odds Ratio [ORa] = 5.1; 95% CI: 1.8-14.4), and 62% abused Ecuadorian women (ORa = 4; 95% CI: 2-7.9), in 36% of abused Spanish men (ORa = 3; 95% CI: 0.9-10.7) and in 30% abused Ecuadorian men (ORa = 2.8; 95% CI: 1-7.7). Interpersonal violence is frequent in relations with the partner, the family, and outside the family, and it seriously affects the mental health. Ecuadorian women stand out as the most vulnerable group.

[Methodology and fieldwork logistics of a multilevel research study on the influence of neigbourdhood's characteristics on natives and Ecuadorian's mental health in Spain]. / Metodología y logística de campo de un estudio multinivel sobre la influencia en España de las características medioambientales en la salud mental de población autóctona y ecuatoriana inmigrante.

The methodological design, characteristics and fieldwork stage of a multilevel research study on the impact of the environmental characteristics on mental health in an autochthonous and immigrant population are described in this paper. Individual data were obtained using a core questionnaire 40 minutes length from home interviews of Spanish and Ecuadorian adults from September 2006 to January 2007. A random sample of 1186 people aged 18-55, with equal distribution of gender and nationality was obtained from Civil Registers of 33 areas (municipalities or neighbourhoods) of Madrid, Alicante, Almeria and Murcia, chosen by ethnic density and socioeconomic criteria. Previously, a pilot study was carried out. Socioeconomic indicators of neighbourhoods and selected communities were obtained from Municipal Registers and other secondary sources. Finally, 1144 people were interviewed (96%). Each person was contacted at home at two different times. The global response rate was 61%, higher among Ecuadorians (69%), who presented more problems of localisation (34%). Analyzing methods and fieldwork process the conclusion is that sample strategies for this type of population studies should be evaluated using feasibility criteria given time and money constraints, against the need to obtain representative samples of the target populations. There were serious shortcomings in the availability of social integration indicators at the neighbourhood level.

Metodología y logística de campo de un estudio multinivel sobre la influencia en España de las características medioambientales en la salud mental de población autóctona y ecuatoriana inmigrante / Methodology and fieldwork logistics of a multilevel research study on the influence of neigbourdhood’s characteristics on natives and ecuadorian’s mental health in Spain

Se realizó una investigación multinivel sobre el impacto de lascaracterísticas ambientales de la zona de residencia en la salud mentalde población autóctona e inmigrante. El objetivo de este artículo esdescribir el planteamiento metodológico de la investigación, el trabajode campo, las tasas de respuesta correspondientes y discutir el diseñometodológico y las dificultades derivadas de su puesta en práctica.Los datos individuales se obtuvieron aplicando un cuestionarioestructurado de aproximadamente 40 minutos, mediante entrevistadomiciliaria a personas españolas y ecuatorianas de 18 a 55 años. Eltrabajo se realizó de septiembre de 2006 a enero de 2007 en una muestraestimada de 1.186 personas equiparada por sexo y nacionalidad,obtenida aleatoriamente de los Padrones Municipales de 33 áreas(municipios o barrios) de Madrid, Alicante, Almería y Murcia, seleccionadassegún criterios de densidad étnica y socioeconómicos. Previamentese realizó un estudio piloto (n=113)Los indicadores sociodemográficosde las áreas se obtuvieron a partir de fuentes secundarias. Seentrevistó a 1.144 personas (96%). La tasa de respuesta global fue del61%, superior entre ecuatorianos (69%), colectivo que presentó másproblemas de localización (34%). Las negativas a colaborar fueron másaltas entre españoles (21%).Se concluye que en este tipo de estudios sería conveniente revisarlas estrategias de muestreo para combinar criterios de eficiencia con lanecesidad de obtener una muestra representativa de la población diana.Se constata la dificultad de obtener datos inframunicipales de integraciónsocial(AU)

The methodological design, characteristics and fieldwork stage ofa multilevel research study on the impact of the environmentalcharacteristics on mental health in an autochthonous and immigrantpopulation are described in this paper.Individual data were obtained using a core questionnaire 40minutes length from home interviews of Spanish and Ecuadorianadults from September 2006 to January 2007. A random sample of1186 people aged 18-55, with equal distribution of gender andnationality was obtained from Civil Registers of 33 areas(municipalities or neighbourhoods) of Madrid, Alicante, Almeria andMurcia, chosen by ethnic density and socioeconomic criteria.Previously, a pilot study was carried out. Socioeconomic indicators ofneighbourhoods and selected communities were obtained fromMunicipal Registers and other secondary sources.Finally, 1144 people were interviewed (96%). Each person wascontacted at home at two different times. The global response rate was61%, higher among Ecuadorians (69%), who presented more problemsof localisation (34%).Analyzing methods and fieldwork process the conclusion is thatsample strategies for this type of population studies should beevaluated using feasibility criteria given time and money constraints,against the need to obtain representative samples of the targetpopulations. There were serious shortcomings in the availability ofsocial integration indicators at the neighbourhood level(AU)

Discrimination and mental health in Ecuadorian immigrants in Spain.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine the effects of ethnic discrimination on the mental health of Ecuadorian immigrants in Spain and to assess the roles of material and social resources. METHODS: Data were taken from the "Neighbourhood characteristics, immigration and mental health" survey conducted in 2006 in Spain. Psychological distress measured as "Possible Psychiatric Case" (PPC) was measured by the GHQ-28. A logistic regression was fitted to assess the association between PPC and discrimination. Interactions of discrimination with social and material resources were tested using product terms. RESULTS: Some 28% of the participants met our definition of PPC. About 20% of those who reported no discrimination were PPCs, rising to 30% of those who sometimes felt discriminated against and 41% of those who continually perceived discrimination. The OR for continuous discrimination was 12 (95% CI 3.5 to 40.3) among those with high financial strain, and 10 (2.4 to 41.7) when there was lack of economic support. Emotional support had an independent effect on PPC (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.0 to 3.6, for those who reported having no friends). Social integration through a community group or association was positively related to the probability of being a PPC (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.0 to 2.9). CONCLUSION: Ethnic discrimination is associated with psychological distress in these Ecuadorian immigrants in Spain. Discrimination effects may be exacerbated among those facing economic stress and those without economic support. These particularly vulnerable immigrants should be the subject of social and health interventions.