Posttraumatic proximal radioulnar synostosis: Current concepts on the clinical presentations, classifications, and open surgical approaches.

In the forearm, posttraumatic heterotopic ossification usually forms as a proximal radioulnar synostosis. It can occur after soft tissue injury involving the interosseous membrane or after surgery involving the radio and ulna, such as distal biceps tendon repair. It can also be induced by radial head dislocation or fracture. Screening radiography can be used to select the appropriate time for excision. The synostosis can be resected when the ectopic bone margin and trabeculation appear mature on radiographs. An interval of 6-12 months from the injury is generally recommended based on ectopic bone maturity. Selection of the surgical approach depends on site, extension (elbow joint or proximal radioulnar joint), severity of the initial articular surface, and periarticular tissue injury. The posterolateral approach is indicated for synostoses: at or distal to the bicipital tuberosity, at the level of the radial head, and proximal radioulnar joint. The posterior global approach is recommended when the forearm synostosis is associated with complete bony ankylosis of the elbow involving the distal aspect of the humerus. After surgical resection of a proximal radioulnar synostosis, the exposed bone surfaces can be covered with interposition material to minimize recurrence.

Three-dimensional printed models for surgery planning of post-traumatic stiff elbow: Current concepts.

The post-traumatic stiff elbow is a challenge for the surgeon, requiring expertise for the treatment choice and accurate planning. Stiffness can result from traumatic injury involving the periarticular soft tissues and the joint articular surfaces. In this article, we want to assess the impact of three-dimensional (3D) printed models in selecting the appropriate surgical strategy for this pathology. Six cases of increasing complexity regarding post-traumatic stiff elbow were submitted to four expert elbow surgeons who had the possibility to evaluate videos and reports of clinical examination, plain radiograms and CT with 3D reconstruction for each case. After a first treatment proposition given by the experts for each patient, a three-dimensional printed model of each elbow based on the CT was provided to the surgeons, asking them to evaluate again all the cases having the possibility to assess also the 3D models. In the four most complex cases all surgeons found more beneficial the use of three-dimensional representation for treatment planning and rate the risk of complications than the sole CT imaging with 3D reconstruction and many of them changed surgical strategy after analysing the model. 3D printing technology is a useful tool in surgery planning for treating complex cases of post traumatic elbow stiffness, especially in the presence of joint deformity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.