A 73-Year-Old Man with Shortness of Breath, Edema, and Weight Gain.

AbstractMorning Report is a time-honored tradition where physicians-in-training present cases to their colleagues and clinical experts to collaboratively examine an interesting patient presentation. The Morning Report section seeks to carry on this tradition by presenting a patient's chief concern and story, inviting the reader to develop a differential diagnosis and discover the diagnosis alongside the authors of the case.This report examines the story of a 73-year-old man who sought evaluation for 1 month of shortness of breath, bilateral lower-extremity edema, and weight gain of 14 kg. Using questions, physical examination, and testing, an illness script for the presentation emerges. As the clinical course progresses, the differential is refined until a diagnosis is made.

Tele-visits for GERD: "Ecofriendly, efficient and effective".

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Sars-CoV-19 pandemic necessitated a transition to telemedicine for many healthcare encounters. The environmental impact of this transition in gastroenterology (GI) combined with user experience has not been studied. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent telemedicine visits (telephone and video) at a GI clinic at West Virginia University. Distance of patients' residence from clinic × 2 was calculated, and Environmental Protection Agency calculators utilized to calculate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that were avoided from tele-visits. Patients were reached by telephone and were asked questions to fill in a validated Telehealth Usability Questionnaire with Likert scales (1-7). Variables were also collected via chart review. RESULTS: A total of 81 video and 89 telephone visits were conducted for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) between March 2020 and March 2021. A total of 111 patients were enrolled, with a response rate of 65.29%. Mean age was lower in the video visit cohort compared with the telephone visit cohort (43.45 ± 14.32 years vs 52.34 ± 17.46 years). Most patients had medications prescribed during the visit (79.3%), and a majority had laboratory testing orders placed (57.7%). We calculated a total distance of 8732 miles that the patients would have traveled if they were to present for in-person visits (including return trips). A total of 393.3 gallons of gasoline would have been required to transport these patients to and from the healthcare facility to their residence. A total of 3.5 metric tons of GHG's were saved by avoiding 393.3 gallons of gasoline for travel. In relatable terms, this is equivalent to burning more than 3500 pounds of coal. This averages to 31.5-kg GHG emissions and 3.54 gallons of gasoline saved per patient. CONCLUSION: Telemedicine for GERD resulted in significant environmental savings and was rated highly for access, satisfaction, and usability by patients. Telemedicine for GERD can be an excellent alternative to in-person visits.

The Association of "GOOP" on Gross Examination of Fine Needle Aspiration Samples and On-Site Adequacy.

BACKGROUND: Rapid on-site cytologic evaluation (ROSE) is not always available for fine needle aspiration (FNA) specimens. We have examined the relationships between the presence of "GOOP" (defined as gooey white material) on FNA aspirates, on-site adequacy (OSA), and diagnosis. METHODS: Consecutive FNA samples obtained over the study interval were included. Samples were assessed macroscopically for the presence or absence of GOOP (GOOP+ or GOOP-). GOOP+ samples were further characterized as shiny (G+S) or cheesy (G+C). Gross descriptors were correlated with OSA and final diagnoses. RESULTS: Of the 204 sites biopsied, 102 were malignant, 94 benign, and 8 nondiagnostic. The presence of GOOP was highly predictive for adequacy (positive predictive value 98%). While these correlations for GOOP positivity were significant, the absence of GOOP did not rule out adequacy or malignancy. The presence of GOOP was also significantly correlated with a malignant diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: We have prospectively demonstrated that the presence of GOOP correlates strongly with adequacy. This may be of value for those for whom ROSE is not available and, when available, may help prioritize specimens for on-site review.

Rapid On-Site Cytologic Evaluation: A Feasibility Study Using Ancillary Interventional Pulmonary Personnel.

BACKGROUND: Ancillary health professionals helping in a procedural service is a common practice everywhere. OBJECTIVES: This was a proof-of-concept study to assess feasibility of using ancillary personnel for rapid on-site cytologic evaluation (ROSE) at interventional pulmonary procedures. METHODS: After a training interval, a respiratory therapist (RT) performed ROSE on consecutive interventional pulmonary specimens. Sample sites included lymph nodes, lung, liver, and the left adrenal gland. RT findings were subsequently correlated with blinded cytopathology-performed ROSE and with final histopathology results, with primary foci of adequacy and the presence or absence of malignancy. RESULTS: Seventy consecutive cases involved 163 separate sites for ROSE analysis. Adequacy: There was a high level of concordance between RT-performed ROSE (RT-ROSE) and cytopathology ROSE (CYTO-ROSE). They agreed upon the adequacy of 159 specimens. The Cohen's κ coefficient ± asymptotic standard error (ASE) was 0.74 ± 0.175, with p < 0.0001. Malignancy: RT-ROSE concurred highly with CYTO-ROSE, with agreement on 150 (92%) of the 163 specimens. Cohen's κ coefficient ± ASE was 0.83 ± 0.045, with p < 0.0001. When the comparison was for malignancy by case rather than individual site, Cohen's κ coefficient ± ASE was 0.68 ± 0.08, with p < 0.0001. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that ancillary personnel supporting an interventional pulmonary service can be trained to perform initial ROSE. Cytopathology can be called after sampling and staining have produced adequate samples. This setup streamlines ROSE evaluation with regard to time and cost.

Tracheobronchial stent sizing and deployment practices airway stenting practices around the world: a survey study.

BACKGROUND: Tracheobronchial stents types, uses, techniques for deployment and extraction have practice variations around the world. METHODS: We collected responses by sending an online survey of 8 questions to world interventional bronchology member societies and social media groups. RESULTS: There were 269 respondents from 47 countries. Europe had 97 respondents from 22 countries. There were 8 respondents from Australia, 7 from Africa (3 countries) and 7 from 4 countries in South America (SA). North America (NA) had 72 respondents from 3 countries. Asia had 78 respondents from 14 countries. For stent placements 15% [41] used fiberoptic bronchoscope (FB) only. Rigid bronchoscopy (RB) was solely utilized by 38% [102]. Forty-six percent [123] used a combination of RB and FB (P value <0.00001). For stent extraction 13% [19] used FB alone, 57% [85] used RB, and 36% [54] used a combination of RB and FB (P value <0.00001). Placement of stents were 50.5% [135] only by direct visualization. Twenty-three percent [61] always used fluoroscopic guidance. Twenty-six-point-five percent [71] used fluoroscopy in certain cases (P value <0.00001). Sixty percent [162] decided stent sizing by measurements of stenotic and non-stenotic areas on radiology. Twelve percent [32] respondents used sizing devices. Sixty-five percent [177] used a ruler and bronchoscope to measure stenotic areas. Thirty-eight percent [104] used visual estimation and experience. Seven percent [19] used serial balloon dilatation size. To prevent clogging of stents, 22% [59] prescribed mucolytics. Seventy-three percent [195] nebulized saline, 26% [70] had Mucomyst Nebulization, 24% [65] Nebulized bronchodilators and other methods 11% [30] were advised. Covered self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) 44% was the commonest type of stent used around the world. Silicone stents 37%, Y stents 15%, uncovered SEMS 12%, Montgomery T tube 5% followed. Polyflex stents 3% and custom-made stents 3% were least used. Biodegradable stents were used by 7.5%, and not used by 92.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Tracheobronchial stent practice norms have slowly evolved, but its practice variations lack uniformity, and have sparse evidence-based studies for its direction.