ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To identify the type of infections and risk factors for infection-related mortality (IRM) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients <16 years of age treated in 2010-2019 was conducted. Unadjusted hazard ratios (HR) and adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated using Cox regression. Cumulative incidence was calculated. RESULTS: Data for 99 pediatric patients were analyzed. The myeloablative conditioning was the most used regimen (78.8%) and the hematopoietic stem cell source was predominantly peripheral blood (80.8%). Primary graft failure occurred in 19.2% of patients. Frequency of acute graft-versus-host disease was 46.5%. Total of 136 infectious events was recorded, the most common of which were bacterial (76.4%) followed by viral infection (15.5%) and then fungal infection (8.1%). The best predictors for infection subtypes where the following: a) for bacterial infection (the age groups of 10.1-15 years: aHR = 3.33; 95% CI: 1.62-6.85 and. >15 years: aHR = 3.34; 95% CI: 1.18-9.45); b) for viral infection (graft versus host disease: aHR = 5.36; 95% CI: 1.62-17.68), however, for fungal infection statistically significant predictors were not identified. Related mortality was 30% (n = 12). Increased risk for infection-related mortality was observed in patients with unrelated donor and umbilical cord stem cells recipients (HR = 3.12; 95% CI: 1.00-9.85). CONCLUSIONS: Frequencies of infections and infection-related mortality appear to be similar to those reported. Unrelated donors and stem cells from umbilical cord recipients were associated with a high risk of mortality.
Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Mycoses , Humans , Child , Adolescent , Retrospective Studies , Mexico/epidemiology , Transplantation, Homologous/adverse effects , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Risk Factors , Unrelated Donors , Mycoses/etiology , Transplantation Conditioning/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Resumen Las plaquetas tienen un papel central en diferentes escenarios fisiológicos, incluyendo la hemostasia; se unen unas con otras en la agregación plaquetaria, lo cual permite formar un coágulo plaquetario. Para que la agregación sea apropiada se requiere del complejo glicoproteico IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa) en la superficie plaquetaria. Toda alteración funcional plaquetaria, hereditaria o adquirida, impide la formación adecuada del coágulo y se manifiesta como hemorragia. Las enfermedades plaquetarias hereditarias son raras y, hasta recientemente, fueron ignoradas. Una de las más reconocidas y estudiadas es la trombastenia de Glanzmann (TG), entidad en la cual el número de plaquetas puede ser normal pero la función está alterada. Es un padecimiento autosómico y recesivo que causa hemorragia de diferente intensidad toda la vida y en la cual el problema radica en precisamente en la GPIIb/IIIa. Las hemorragias son típicamente mucocutáneas: equimosis, púrpura, epistaxis, gingivorragia; menos frecuentes son la hemorragia gastrointestinal, hemartrosis o en sistema nervioso central. La hiperpolimenorrea es común en las mujeres y llega a ser tan importante que amerita transfusiones en la menarca. La TG afecta a todos los grupos étnicos y su prevalencia varía entre 1/40,000 y 1/400,000. A pesar de esta información acerca de la TG en el mundo, hay pocas guías o recomendaciones basadas en la opinión de expertos y experiencias unicéntricas. En México la TG es rara y no se cuenta con una recomendación general para su diagnóstico y tratamiento. El objetivo de este documento fue establecer un consenso y hacer sugerencias generales para su diagnóstico y tratamiento.
Abstract Platelets have a central role in several physiological scenarios including hemostasis. Platelets bind each other during platelet aggregation allowing the proper formation of the clot; to be appropriate, platelet aggregation requires the glycoproteic complex IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa). Every platelet function abnormality both, congenital or acquired, impedes clot formation and favors bleeding episodes. Hereditary platelet abnormalities are rare and, until recently, they were almost ignored. Among these disorders, Glanzmann Thrombasthenia (GT) is a widely recognized abnormality in which platelet counts may be normal, but their function is affected. GT is an autosomal, recessive disease that causes life-long bleeding of different intensity. Main biochemical abnormality resides in GPIIb/IIIa. Bleeding is typically mucocutaneous: easy bruising, purpura, and nose and gum bleeds; less frequently are gastrointestinal bleeds, hemarthrosis, or intracranial. Menorrhagia and hyperpolymenorrhea are common findings in in women and may be the cause of anemia requiring blood transfusions at fertile age. GT affects all ethnic groups and its prevalence ranges between 1/40,000 to 1/400,000. Despite this worldwide information regarding GT, only a few guidelines and recommendations have been published, most of them based on expert opinions. In Mexico, GT is rare and there is not a general recommendation regarding its diagnosis and treatment. The aim of this document was to establish a consensus to suggest a general guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of GT in Mexico.
ABSTRACT
Resumen El espectro clínico de la hemofilia severa ha evolucionado a lo largo de la historia desde una condición catastrófica y altamente fatal a principios del siglo xx, hasta un trastorno crónico y «manejable¼ en las últimas décadas, gracias a los notables avances en el tratamiento alcanzados en los últimos 40 años, avances impulsados y reforzados por algunas experiencias catastróficas pasadas, como lo fue el desastre biológico en la década de 1980 debido a infecciones virales fatales transmitidas por trasfusión, como hepatitis y virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana/sida, a partir de lo cual la aparición de nuevos agentes infecciosos son una preocupación constante para la comunidad de hemofilia, como lo es actualmente el caso al que nos enfrentamos con la pandemia de enfermedad por coronavirus 2019, que ha creado una situación extremadamente desafiante para los miembros de la comunidad mundial de trastornos hemorrágicos. Ante esta pandemia han surgido interrogantes sobre la posibilidad de si los pacientes con hemofilia tendrán mayor riesgo de infección y si la deficiencia de factor y su tratamiento podrían influir en las manifestaciones de la infección, su curso natural, tratamiento y complicaciones; aunado a la preocupación de que parece claro que la pandemia actual tendrá consecuencias definitivas sobre el manejo de la hemofilia en todo el mundo. Tales interrogantes han dado lugar a la revisión de la literatura, guías, consensos de expertos, incluyendo las recomendaciones de la Federación Mundial de Hemofilia, en un intento de responder a dichas interrogantes, generando así tanto pautas para la atención como ampliando algunas de ellas, impulsando el desarrollo de nuevos protocolos de investigación.
Abstract The clinical spectrum of severe hemophilia has evolved throughout history from a catastrophic and highly fatal condition in the early 20th century to a chronic and manageable disorder in recent decades, thanks to the remarkable advances in treatment achieved. in the last 40 years, advances driven and reinforced by some past catastrophic experiences, such as the biological disaster in the 1980s due to fatal viral infections transmitted by transfusion, such as hepatitis and HIV/AIDS, from which, the appearance of new infectious agents are an ongoing concern for the hemophilia community, as is currently the case facing us with the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, which has created an extremely challenging situation for members of the global bleeding disorders community. Faced with this pandemic, questions have arisen regarding the possibility of whether patients with hemophilia will have a higher risk of infection and whether factor deficiency and its treatment could influence the manifestations of the infection, its natural course, treatment and complications; coupled with the concern that it seems clear that the current pandemic will have definitive consequences on the management of hemophilia around the world. Such questions have led to a review of the literature, guidelines, and expert consensus, including the recommendations of the World Federation of Hemophilia, in an attempt to answer these questions, thus generating both guidelines for care, and expanding some of them, promoting the development of new research protocols.
ABSTRACT
Resumen Este documento fue preparado (en junio de 2020) por y para los profesionales médicos (clínicos y proveedores de salud), y está disponible públicamente para propósitos de recomendaciones relacionada con pacientes pediátricos y enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19). Según datos disponibles hasta la fecha, los niños de todas las edades pueden contraer la COVID-19; sin embargo, tienen mejor pronóstico que los adultos, siendo pocos los casos graves reportados, y los casos leves se recuperan en 1-2 semanas después del inicio de la enfermedad. El objetivo de este documento es aportar peculiaridades que consideramos importantes para el diagnóstico y tratamiento. Debido a los cambios en la actual situación epidemiológica se pueden modificar algunos conceptos y acciones, por lo que la información aquí contenida debe ser adaptada a cada paciente, basada en el juicio clínico, necesidades del paciente y recursos disponibles.
Abstract This document was prepared (June 2020) by and for medical professionals (clinicians and health providers), and it is available as a guideline for pediatric patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). So far, according to available data although children of all ages can acquire COVID-19, they have better outcome than adults, with a little proportion of severe disease, and in mild cases they have a 1 to 2-week recovery after the beginning of the infection. The objective of this document is to provide particularities that we consider important for diagnosis and treatment. Owe to the changing epidemiological situation some concepts and actions can change, so this information must be adapted to each specific case, based on the clinical judgement according to patient requirements and available resources.
ABSTRACT
SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) has become a pandemic with a high case fatality rate that mainly affects adults. Most severely ill adult patients develop a coagulopathy that was not described until recently, and which is currently considered a main cause of death. Everything indicates that a similar phenomenon also occurs in children with COVID-19. Anticoagulant treatment has become one of the therapeutic foundations for this infection; however, its implementation in children can be difficult since, until recently, it was not considered in the pediatric population. Evidence regarding the use of anticoagulants in COVID-19 is rapidly generated, changes constantly, it is often difficult to interpret, and can be contradictory. After an extensive review of the published literature, a proposal was generated that offers suggestions for anticoagulant treatment, considering available resources in Mexico.
La infección por SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) se ha constituido en una pandemia con alto índice de letalidad que afecta principalmente a los adultos. La mayor parte de los pacientes adultos graves desarrolla una coagulopatía que no estaba descrita, la cual actualmente se considera la principal causa de muerte. Todo indica que un fenómeno parecido ocurre también en el niño con COVID-19. El tratamiento anticoagulante se ha convertido en uno de los fundamentos terapéuticos de esta infección; sin embargo, su establecimiento en el niño puede ser difícil ya que, hasta hace poco, no estaba considerado en la población pediátrica. La evidencia respecto al uso de anticoagulantes en COVID-19 se genera con rapidez, cambia constantemente, con frecuencia es difícil de interpretar y puede ser contradictoria. Después de una extensa revisión de la literatura publicada, se generó una propuesta que ofrece sugerencias para el tratamiento anticoagulante en la que se consideran los recursos disponibles en México.
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Blood Coagulation Disorders/virology , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Adult , Age Factors , Blood Coagulation Disorders/drug therapy , Blood Coagulation Disorders/epidemiology , COVID-19 , Child , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Mexico , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
Abstract SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) has become a pandemic with a high case fatality rate that mainly affects adults. Most severely ill adult patients develop a coagulopathy that was not described until recently, and which is currently considered a main cause of death. Everything indicates that a similar phenomenon also occurs in children with COVID-19. Anticoagulant treatment has become one of the therapeutic foundations for this infection; however, its implementation in children can be difficult since, until recently, it was not considered in the pediatric population. Evidence regarding the use of anticoagulants in COVID-19 is rapidly generated, changes constantly, it is often difficult to interpret, and can be contradictory. After an extensive review of the published literature, a proposal was generated that offers suggestions for anticoagulant treatment, considering available resources in Mexico.
Resumen La infección por SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) se ha constituido en una pandemia con alto índice de letalidad que afecta principalmente a los adultos. La mayor parte de los pacientes adultos graves desarrolla una coagulopatía que no estaba descrita, la cual actualmente se considera la principal causa de muerte. Todo indica que un fenómeno parecido ocurre también en el niño con COVID-19. El tratamiento anticoagulante se ha convertido en uno de los fundamentos terapéuticos de esta infección; sin embargo, su establecimiento en el niño puede ser difícil ya que, hasta hace poco, no estaba considerado en la población pediátrica. La evidencia respecto al uso de anticoagulantes en COVID-19 se genera con rapidez, cambia constantemente, con frecuencia es difícil de interpretar y puede ser contradictoria. Después de una extensa revisión de la literatura publicada, se generó una propuesta que ofrece sugerencias para el tratamiento anticoagulante en la que se consideran los recursos disponibles en México.
Subject(s)
Humans , Child , Adult , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Blood Coagulation Disorders/virology , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Severity of Illness Index , Blood Coagulation Disorders/drug therapy , Blood Coagulation Disorders/epidemiology , Age Factors , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pandemics , COVID-19 , MexicoABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Development of inhibitors is the most serious complication in patients with haemophilia (PWH). The prevalence of inhibitors in patients with severe haemophilia A (HA) is approximately 25%-30%. Inhibitor prevalence differs among populations. Some studies report a prevalence of almost twice in Hispanic as compared to Caucasian patients. Most data available, on the prevalence of inhibitors and their predisposing factors, originate from centres in developed countries. AIM: Establish the prevalence of inhibitors of FVIII and FIX in Mexico. METHODS: This was an observational, cross-sectional and descriptive study. The records of all patients diagnosed with haemophilia A (HA) or B (HB), with and without inhibitors, were included. Clinical and demographical characteristics of patients with inhibitors were assessed. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS version 22. The Ethics Committees of the various participating institutions approved this study. RESULTS: A total of 1455 patients from the 20 participating centres were recruited, from which 1208 (83.02%) had HA and 247 (16.97%) were diagnosed with HB. The presence of inhibitors in severe HA was reported in 93/777(11.96%), and 10/162 (6.17%) in severe HB. Of them, 91.7% exhibited high titres in HA and 100% in HB. CONCLUSION: In Mexico, the general prevalence of inhibitors varies considerably among centres. This study established a basis of comparison for future development and advances in the treatment and follow-up of patients. These findings also augment our understanding of risk factors related to inhibitor development.
Subject(s)
Hemophilia A/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Latin America , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Young AdultABSTRACT
Abstract Introduction: Hemophagocytic syndrome, macrophage activation syndrome, reactive histiocytosis or hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) represent a group of diseases whose common thread is reactive or neoplastic mononuclear phagocytic system cells and dendritic cell proliferation. Clinical case: We present a case of an HLH probably associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in a 4-year-old male patient treated with HLH-04 protocol. Viral etiology in HLH is well accepted. In this case, clinical picture of HLH was assumed secondary to EBV infection because IgM serology at the time of clinical presentation was the only positive factor in the viral panel. Conclusions: Diagnosis of HLH is the critical first step to successful treatment. The earlier it is identified, the less the tissue damage and reduced risk of multiple organ failure, which favors treatment response.
Resumen Introducción: El síndrome hemofagocítico, síndrome de activación de macrófagos, histiocitosis reactiva o linfohistiocitosis hemofagocítica (HLH) representan un grupo de enfermedades cuyo factor común es la proliferación reactiva o neoplásica de las células mononucleares fagocíticas y del sistema de células dendríticas. Caso clínico: Se presenta un caso de HLH sugestivo de tener una asociación con el virus del Epstein Barr (VEB) de un paciente masculino de 4 años de edad, tratado con el protocolo HLH-04. La etiología viral en HLH es reconocida. En este caso se asumió un cuadro de HLH secundario a una infección por VEB, ya que la serología de IgM en el momento de la presentación clínica fue la única positiva en el panel viral. Conclusiones: El diagnóstico de la HLH es el primer paso crítico para el éxito del tratamiento. Entre más temprano se identifique, existe menor daño tisular y menor riesgo de falla orgánica múltiple, lo que favorece la respuesta al tratamiento.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Hemophagocytic syndrome, macrophage activation syndrome, reactive histiocytosis or hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) represent a group of diseases whose common thread is reactive or neoplastic mononuclear phagocytic system cells and dendritic cell proliferation. CLINICAL CASE: We present a case of an HLH probably associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in a 4-year-old male patient treated with HLH-04 protocol. Viral etiology in HLH is well accepted. In this case, clinical picture of HLH was assumed secondary to EBV infection because IgM serology at the time of clinical presentation was the only positive factor in the viral panel. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis of HLH is the critical first step to successful treatment. The earlier it is identified, the less the tissue damage and reduced risk of multiple organ failure, which favors treatment response.
ABSTRACT
Our aim in this paper is to describe the results of treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) in Mexican children treated from 2006 to 2010 under the protocol from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) 00-01. The children were younger than 16 years of age and had a diagnosis of ALL de novo. The patients were classified as standard risk if they were 1-9.9 years old and had a leucocyte count <50 × 10(9)/L, precursor B cell immunophenotype, no mediastinal mass, CSF free of blasts, and a good response to prednisone. The rest of the patients were defined as high risk. Of a total of 302 children, 51.7% were at high risk. The global survival rate was 63.9%, and the event-free survival rate was 52.3% after an average follow-up of 3.9 years. The percentages of patients who died were 7% on induction and 14.2% in complete remission; death was associated mainly with infection (21.5%). The relapse rate was 26.2%. The main factor associated with the occurrence of an event was a leucocyte count >100 × 10(9)/L. The poor outcomes were associated with toxic death during induction, complete remission, and relapse. These factors remain the main obstacles to the success of this treatment in our population.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Disease-Free Survival , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Cytarabine/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Methotrexate/administration & dosage , Mexico , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/epidemiology , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/pathology , Prednisone/administration & dosage , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States , Vincristine/administration & dosageABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In Mexico and other developing countries, few reports of the survival of children with acute leukaemia exist. Objective. We aimed at comparing the disease-free survival of children with acute myeloid leukaemia who, in addition to being treated with the Latin American protocol of chemotherapy and an autologous transplant, either underwent early intensified chemotherapy or did not undergo such treatment. PROCEDURE: This was a cohort study with a historical control group, forty patients, less than 16 years old. Group A (20 patients), diagnosed in the period 2005-2007, was treated with the Latin American protocol of chemotherapy with an autologous transplant plus early intensified chemotherapy: high doses of cytarabine and mitoxantrone. Group B (20 patients), diagnosed in the period 1999-2004, was treated as Group A, but without the early intensified chemotherapy. RESULTS: Relapse-free survival for Group A was 90% whereas that for Group B it was 60% (P = 0.041). Overall survival for Group A (18, 90%) was higher than that for Group B (60%). Complete remission continued for two years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Relapse-free survival for paediatric patients treated with the Latin American protocol of chemotherapy with an autologous transplant plus early intensified chemotherapy was higher than that for those who did not receive early intensified chemotherapy.