ABSTRACT
Importance: Black or African American (hereinafter, Black) and Hispanic or Latino/a/x (hereinafter, Latinx) adults are disproportionally affected by Alzheimer disease, but most research studies do not enroll adequate numbers of both of these populations. The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative-3 (ADNI3) launched a diversity taskforce to pilot a multipronged effort to increase the study inclusion of Black and Latinx older adults. Objective: To describe and evaluate the culturally informed and community-engaged inclusion efforts to increase the screening and enrollment of Black and Latinx older adults in ADNI3. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used baseline data from a longitudinal, multisite, observational study conducted from January 15, 2021, to July 12, 2022, with no follow-up. The study was conducted at 13 ADNI3 sites in the US. Participants included individuals aged 55 to 90 years without cognitive impairment and those with mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer disease. Exposures: Efforts included (1) launch of an external advisory board, (2) changes to the study protocol, (3) updates to the digital prescreener, (4) selection and deployment of 13 community-engaged research study sites, (5) development and deployment of local and centralized outreach efforts, and (6) development of a community-science partnership board. Main Outcomes and Measures: Screening and enrollment numbers from centralized and local outreach efforts, digital advertisement metrics, and digital prescreener completion. Results: A total of 91 participants enrolled in the trial via centralized and local outreach efforts, of which 22 (24.2%) identified as Latinx and 55 (60.4%) identified as Black (median [IQR] age, 65.6 [IQR, 61.5-72.5] years; 62 women [68.1%]). This represented a 267.6% increase in the monthly rate of enrollment (before: 1.11 per month; during: 4.08 per month) of underrepresented populations. For the centralized effort, social media advertisements were run between June 1, 2021, and July 31, 2022, which resulted in 2079 completed digital prescreeners, of which 1289 met criteria for subsequent site-level screening. Local efforts were run between June 1, 2021, to July 31, 2022. A total of 151 participants underwent site-level screening (100 from local efforts, 41 from centralized efforts, 10 from other sources). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of pilot inclusion efforts, a culturally informed, community-engaged approach increased the inclusion of Black and Latinx participants in an Alzheimer disease cohort study.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Black or African American , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Alzheimer Disease/ethnology , Aged , Female , Male , Cross-Sectional Studies , Aged, 80 and over , Middle Aged , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Patient Selection , United States , Longitudinal Studies , Cognitive DysfunctionABSTRACT
Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is a neurodegenerative disorder resulting from the deposition of misfolded and neurotoxic forms of tau protein in specific areas of the midbrain, basal ganglia, and cortex. It is one of the most representative forms of tauopathy. PSP presents in several different phenotypic variations and is often accompanied by the development of concurrent neurodegenerative disorders. PSP is universally fatal, and effective disease-modifying therapies for PSP have not yet been identified. Several tau-targeting treatment modalities, including vaccines, monoclonal antibodies, and microtubule-stabilizing agents, have been investigated and have had no efficacy. The need to treat PSP and other tauopathies is critical, and many clinical trials investigating tau-targeted treatments are underway. In this review, the PubMed database was queried to collect information about preclinical and clinical research on PSP treatment. Additionally, the US National Library of Medicine's ClinicalTrials.gov website was queried to identify past and ongoing clinical trials relevant to PSP treatment. This narrative review summarizes our findings regarding these reports, which include potential disease-modifying drug trials, modifiable risk factor management, and symptom treatments.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Alzheimer disease (AD) is a major health problem of aging, with tremendous burden on healthcare systems, patients, and families globally. Lecanemab, an FDA-approved amyloid beta (Aß)-directed antibody indicated for the treatment of early AD, binds with high affinity to soluble Aß protofibrils, which have been shown to be more toxic to neurons than monomers or insoluble fibrils. Lecanemab has been shown to be well tolerated in multiple clinical trials, although risks include an increased rate of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) and infusion reactions relative to placebo. METHODS: Clarity AD was an 18-month treatment (Core study), multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study with open-label extension (OLE) in participants with early AD. Eligible participants were randomized 1:1 across 2 treatment groups (placebo and lecanemab 10 mg/kg biweekly). Safety evaluations included monitoring of vital signs, physical examinations, adverse events, clinical laboratory parameters, and 12-lead electrocardiograms. ARIA occurrence was monitored throughout the study by magnetic resonance imaging, read both locally and centrally. RESULTS: Overall, 1795 participants from Core and 1612 participants with at least one dose of lecanemab (Core + OLE) were included. Lecanemab was generally well-tolerated in Clarity AD, with no deaths related to lecanemab in the Core study. There were 9 deaths during the OLE, with 4 deemed possibly related to study treatment. Of the 24 deaths in Core + OLE, 3 were due to intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH): 1 placebo in the Core due to ICH, and 2 lecanemab in OLE with concurrent ICH (1 on tissue plasminogen activator and 1 on anticoagulant therapy). In the Core + OLE, the most common adverse events in the lecanemab group (> 10%) were infusion-related reactions (24.5%), ARIA with hemosiderin deposits (ARIA-H) microhemorrhages (16.0%), COVID-19 (14.7%), ARIA with edema (ARIA-E; 13.6%), and headache (10.3%). ARIA-E and ARIA-H were largely radiographically mild-to-moderate. ARIA-E generally occurred within 3-6 months of treatment, was more common in ApoE e4 carriers (16.8%) and most common in ApoE ε4 homozygous participants (34.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Lecanemab was generally well-tolerated, with the most common adverse events being infusion-related reactions, ARIA-H, ARIA-E. Clinicians, participants, and caregivers should understand the incidence, monitoring, and management of these events for optimal patient care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov numbers: Clarity AD NCT03887455).
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Humans , Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Male , Double-Blind Method , Female , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Amyloid beta-Peptides/metabolism , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Introduction: Cognitive impairment (CI) due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) encompasses a decline in cognitive abilities and can significantly impact an individual's quality of life. Early detection and intervention are crucial in managing CI, both in the preclinical and prodromal stages of AD prior to dementia. Methods: In this preliminary study, we investigated differences in resting-state functional connectivity and dynamic network properties between 23 individual with CI due to AD based on clinical assessment and 15 healthy controls (HC) using Independent Component Analysis (ICA) and Dominant-Coactivation Pattern (d-CAP) analysis. The cognitive status of the two groups was also compared, and correlations between cognitive scores and d-CAP switching probability were examined. Results: Results showed comparable numbers of d-CAPs in the Default Mode Network (DMN), Executive Control Network (ECN), and Frontoparietal Network (FPN) between HC and CI groups. However, the Visual Network (VN) exhibited fewer d-CAPs in the CI group, suggesting altered dynamic properties of this network for the CI group. Additionally, ICA revealed significant connectivity differences for all networks. Spatial maps and effect size analyses indicated increased coactivation and more synchronized activity within the DMN in HC compared to CI. Furthermore, reduced switching probabilities were observed for the CI group in DMN, VN, and FPN networks, indicating less dynamic and flexible functional interactions. Discussion: The findings highlight altered connectivity patterns within the DMN, VN, ECN, and FPN, suggesting the involvement of multiple functional networks in CI. Understanding these brain processes may contribute to developing targeted diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for CI due to AD.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: While preclinical studies have shown that alpha-synuclein can spread through cell-to-cell transmission whether it can be transmitted between humans is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to assess the presence of a synucleinopathy in autopsied conjugal couples. METHODS: Neuropathological findings in conjugal couples were categorized as Parkinson's disease (PD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), Alzheimer's disease with Lewy bodies (ADLB), incidental Lewy body disease (ILBD), or no Lewy bodies. RESULTS: Ninety conjugal couples were included; the mean age of death was 88.3 years; 32 couples had no Lewy bodies; 42 couples had 1 spouse with a synucleinopathy: 10 PD, 3 DLB, 13 ADLB, and 16 ILBD; 16 couples had both spouses with a synucleinopathy: in 4 couples both spouses had PD, 1 couple had PD and DLB, 4 couples had PD and ADLB, 2 couples had PD and ILBD, 1 couple had DLB and ADLB, in 3 couples both had ADLB, and 1 couple had ADLB and ILBD. No couples had both spouses with ILBD. CONCLUSIONS: This large series of 90 autopsied conjugal couples found 16 conjugal couples with synucleinopathies, suggesting transmission of synucleinopathy between spouses is unlikely. © 2024 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Subject(s)
Lewy Body Disease , Parkinson Disease , Synucleinopathies , Humans , Female , Male , Aged, 80 and over , Parkinson Disease/pathology , Parkinson Disease/metabolism , Lewy Body Disease/pathology , Lewy Body Disease/metabolism , Aged , Synucleinopathies/pathology , Autopsy , alpha-Synuclein/metabolism , Spouses , Alzheimer Disease/pathology , Alzheimer Disease/metabolism , Lewy Bodies/pathologyABSTRACT
Huge investments continue to be made in treatment for Alzheimer's disease (AD), with more than one hundred drugs currently in development. Pharmacological approaches and drug development, particularly those targeting amyloid-ß, have dominated the therapeutic landscape. At the same time, there is also a growing interest in devices for treating AD. This review aimed to identify and describe devices under development for AD treatment. In this review, we queried the devices that are in development for the treatment of AD. PubMed was searched through the end of 2021 using the terms "device," "therapeutics," and "Alzheimer's" for articles that report on devices to treat AD. Ten devices with 31 references were identified as actively being developed for the treatment of AD. Many of these devices are far along in development. Device-based therapies are often overlooked when evaluating treatment approaches to AD. However, many devices for treating AD are in development and some show promising results.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of rescreening patients with Alzheimer's disease who do not meet the inclusion criteria for the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Delayed Memory Index (RBANS DMI) at the initial assessment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants (aged 50-85 years, without dementia, Mini-Mental State Examination score ≥22, valid Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR] global score, and amyloid status at baseline) were identified in the European Prevention of Alzheimer's Dementia database. Changes from baseline in RBANS DMI were estimated using a mixed model for repeated measurements. Logistic regressions were used to estimate the probability of participants with baseline RBANS DMI 86-95 having RBANS DMI ≤85, CDR global score ≥0.5, and amyloid positivity at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: There was significant variability in the change in RBANS DMI scores over time (median change at 6 months: 2.0). An estimated 15% of participants with RBANS DMI 86-95 at baseline progressed to ≤85 at 6 months; 8% also achieved CDR global score ≥0.5 and 5% were also amyloid positive. CONCLUSIONS: The results from our analysis indicate that there is limited value in rescreening patients based on their initial RBANS DMI score.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Humans , Neuropsychological Tests , Alzheimer Disease/diagnosis , Alzheimer Disease/psychology , Amyloidogenic Proteins , Repression, PsychologyABSTRACT
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) are chronic, progressive disorders affecting the elderly, which fosters global healthcare concern with the growing aging population. Both T2DM and AD have been linked with increasing age, advanced glycosylation end products, obesity, and insulin resistance. Insulin resistance in the periphery is significant in the development of T2DM and it has been posited that insulin resistance in the brain plays a key role in AD pathogenesis, earning AD the name "type 3 diabetes". These clinical and epidemiological links between AD and T2DM have become increasingly pronounced throughout the years, and serve as a means to investigate the effects of antidiabetic therapies in AD, such as metformin, intranasal insulin, incretins, DPP4 inhibitors, PPAR-γ agonists, SGLT2 inhibitors. The majority of these drugs have shown benefit in preclinical trials, and have shown some promising results in clinical trials, with the improvement of cognitive faculties in participants with mild cognitive impairment and AD. In this review, we have summarize the benefits, risks, and conflicting data that currently exist for diabetic drugs being repurposed for the treatment of AD.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The National Institute on Aging - Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) ATN research framework proposes to use biomarkers for amyloid (A), tau (T), and neurodegeneration (N) to stage individuals with AD pathological features and track changes longitudinally. The overall aim was to utilize this framework to characterize pre-mortem ATN status longitudinally in a clinically diagnosed cohort of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and to correlate it with the post mortem diagnosis. METHODS: The cohort was subtyped by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) ATN category. A subcohort had longitudinal data, and a subgroup was neuropathologically evaluated. RESULTS: We observed a significant difference in Aß42/40 after 12 months in the A+T- group. Post mortem neuropathologic analyses indicated that most of the p-Tau 181 positive (T+) cases also had a high Braak stage. DISCUSSION: This suggests that DLB patients who are A+ but T- may need to be monitored to determine whether they remain A+ or ever progress to T positivity. HIGHLIGHTS: Some A+T- DLB subjects transition from A+ to negative after 12-months. Clinically diagnosed DLB with LBP-AD (A+T+) maintain their positivity. Clinically diagnosed DLB with LBP-AD (A+T+) maintain their positivity. Monitoring of the A+T- sub-type of DLB may be necessary.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Lewy Body Disease , Humans , Alzheimer Disease/diagnosis , Alzheimer Disease/cerebrospinal fluid , Lewy Body Disease/diagnosis , Lewy Body Disease/cerebrospinal fluid , Amyloid beta-Peptides/cerebrospinal fluid , tau Proteins/cerebrospinal fluid , Biomarkers/cerebrospinal fluid , Peptide Fragments/cerebrospinal fluidABSTRACT
Spatial normalization-the process of mapping subject brain images to an average template brain-has evolved over the last 20+ years into a reliable method that facilitates the comparison of brain imaging results across patients, centers & modalities. While overall successful, sometimes, this automatic process yields suboptimal results, especially when dealing with brains with extensive neurodegeneration and atrophy patterns, or when high accuracy in specific regions is needed. Here we introduce WarpDrive, a novel tool for manual refinements of image alignment after automated registration. We show that the tool applied in a cohort of patients with Alzheimer's disease who underwent deep brain stimulation surgery helps create more accurate representations of the data as well as meaningful models to explain patient outcomes. The tool is built to handle any type of 3D imaging data, also allowing refinements in high-resolution imaging, including histology and multiple modalities to precisely aggregate multiple data sources together.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Brain Mapping/methods , Alzheimer Disease/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methodsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Despite the recent full FDA approval of lecanemab, there is currently no disease modifying therapy (DMT) that can efficiently slow down the progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in the general population. This statement emphasizes the need to identify novel DMTs in the shortest time possible to prevent a global epidemic of AD cases as the world population experiences an increase in lifespan. AREAS COVERED: Here, we review several classes of anti-cancer drugs that have been or are being investigated in Phase II/III clinical trials for AD, including immunomodulatory drugs, RXR agonists, sex hormone therapies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and monoclonal antibodies. EXPERT OPINION: Given the overall course of brain pathologies during the progression of AD, we express a great enthusiasm for the repositioning of anti-cancer drugs as possible AD DMTs. We anticipate an increasing number of combinatorial therapy strategies to tackle AD symptoms and their underlying pathologies. However, we strongly encourage improvements in clinical trial study designs to better assess target engagement and possible efficacy over sufficient periods of drug exposure.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Antineoplastic Agents , Drug Repositioning , Humans , Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
A summit held March 2023 in Scottsdale, Arizona (USA) focused on the intronic hexanucleotide expansion in the C9ORF72 gene and its relevance in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS; C9ORF72-FTD/ALS). The goal of this summit was to connect basic scientists, clinical researchers, drug developers, and individuals affected by C9ORF72-FTD/ALS to evaluate how collaborative efforts across the FTD-ALS disease spectrum might break down existing disease silos. Presentations and discussions covered recent discoveries in C9ORF72-FTD/ALS disease mechanisms, availability of disease biomarkers and recent advances in therapeutic development, and clinical trial design for prevention and treatment for individuals affected by C9ORF72-FTD/ALS and asymptomatic pathological expansion carriers. The C9ORF72-associated hexanucleotide repeat expansion is an important locus for both ALS and FTD. C9ORF72-FTD/ALS may be characterized by loss of function of the C9ORF72 protein and toxic gain of functions caused by both dipeptide repeat (DPR) proteins and hexanucleotide repeat RNA. C9ORF72-FTD/ALS therapeutic strategies discussed at the summit included the use of antisense oligonucleotides, adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated gene silencing and gene delivery, and engineered small molecules targeting RNA structures associated with the C9ORF72 expansion. Neurofilament light chain, DPR proteins, and transactive response (TAR) DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43)-associated molecular changes were presented as biomarker candidates. Similarly, brain imaging modalities (i.e., magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] and positron emission tomography [PET]) measuring structural, functional, and metabolic changes were discussed as important tools to monitor individuals affected with C9ORF72-FTD/ALS, at both pre-symptomatic and symptomatic disease stages. Finally, summit attendees evaluated current clinical trial designs available for FTD or ALS patients and concluded that therapeutics relevant to FTD/ALS patients, such as those specifically targeting C9ORF72, may need to be tested with composite endpoints covering clinical symptoms of both FTD and ALS. The latter will require novel clinical trial designs to be inclusive of all patient subgroups spanning the FTD/ALS spectrum.
The C9ORF72 Summit was held in March 2023 in Scottsdale, Arizona (USA). Some people who have the disease frontotemporal dementia or the disease amyotrophic lateral sclerosis have a change in one of their genes; the name of the gene is C9ORF72. People who carry this genetic difference usually inherited it from a parent. Researchers are improving their understanding of how the change in the C9ORF72 gene affects people, and efforts are being made to use this knowledge to develop treatments for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia. In addition to studying the cellular and molecular mechanisms of how the C9ORF72 mutation leads to cellular dysfunction and frontotemporal dementia and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis clinical symptoms, a large effort of the research community is aimed at developing measurements, called biomarkers, that could enhance therapy development efforts in multiple ways. Examples include monitoring of disease activity, identifying those at risk of developing amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or frontotemporal dementia, predicting which people might benefit from a particular treatment, and showing that a drug has had a biological effect. Markers that identify healthy people who are at risk of developing amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or frontotemporal dementia could be used to test treatments that would start before a person shows any symptoms and hopefully would delay or even prevent their onset.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although insulin dysregulation and resistance likely participate in Alzheimer's disease (AD) etiologies, little is known about the correlation between type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and the progression of cognitive decline in patients with AD. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether AD patients with T2DM experience more rapid cognitive decline than those without T2DM. METHODS: All cognitive performance data and the presence or absence of T2DM comorbidity in patients with AD were derived from the US National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center's (NACC) Uniform Data Set (UDS). A search of the UDS identified 3,055 participants with AD who had more than one epoch completed. The data set culled clinically diagnosed AD dementia patients who were assessed for diabetes type identified during at least 1 visit. These patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether they had a diagnosis of T2DM. The data from these groups were then analyzed for differences in cognitive decline based on neuropsychological test battery scores and a Clinician Dementia Rating using a general linear model. RESULTS: Comparisons of the mean scores for 16 selected tests from the neuropsychological test battery showed no significant differences in baseline scores and scores at subsequent visits between the T2DM and nondiabetic groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results revealed no differences in cognitive decline metrics over the course of 5 visits in either study group. These data indicate that the presence of T2DM does not increase the rate of cognitive decline in AD. This finding contradicts expected disease burden and will need to be explored further.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Cognitive Dysfunction , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Humans , Alzheimer Disease/complications , Alzheimer Disease/epidemiology , Alzheimer Disease/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnosis , Neuropsychological Tests , Comorbidity , Disease ProgressionABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A once-weekly donepezil transdermal delivery system (TDS; Adlarity; Corium, LLC) is indicated for the treatment of mild, moderate, and severe dementia of the Alzheimer type. METHODS: In this placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind phase 1 trial, healthy volunteers aged 40 years or older were randomized to receive a placebo and donepezil TDS and were evaluated for the primary endpoints of skin irritation and sensitization potential. Skin irritation was scored. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-six participants were randomized and received ≥1 dose of any treatment. After the first weekly TDS application, no skin irritation or minimal irritation was evident between donepezil and placebo TDSs. At the third weekly TDS application, for donepezil TDS, the average of the mean combined skin irritation score was 0.55 of a possible maximum of 7, indicating none to minimal skin irritation, and for placebo, the score was 0.19, indicating no skin irritation. Of 198 participants, 4 (2.0%) were considered potentially sensitized to donepezil TDS, and 0 were potentially sensitized to placebo TDS. CONCLUSION: Once-weekly 5-mg/d donepezil TDS demonstrated minimal skin irritation under conditions of use of 3 consecutive weekly patch applications to the same skin site and minimal sensitization potential.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Skin , Humans , Donepezil/therapeutic use , Administration, Cutaneous , Double-Blind Method , Healthy Volunteers , Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Cholinesterase Inhibitors/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Cerebral white matter rarefaction (CWMR) was considered by Binswanger and Alzheimer to be due to cerebral arteriolosclerosis. Renewed attention came with CT and MR brain imaging, and neuropathological studies finding a high rate of CWMR in Alzheimer disease (AD). The relative contributions of cerebrovascular disease and AD to CWMR are still uncertain. In 1181 autopsies by the Arizona Study of Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders (AZSAND), large-format brain sections were used to grade CWMR and determine its vascular and neurodegenerative correlates. Almost all neurodegenerative diseases had more severe CWMR than the normal control group. Multivariable logistic regression models indicated that Braak neurofibrillary stage was the strongest predictor of CWMR, with additional independently significant predictors including age, cortical and diencephalic lacunar and microinfarcts, body mass index, and female sex. It appears that while AD and cerebrovascular pathology may be additive in causing CWMR, both may be solely capable of this. The typical periventricular pattern suggests that CWMR is primarily a distal axonopathy caused by dysfunction of the cell bodies of long-association corticocortical projection neurons. A consequence of these findings is that CWMR should not be viewed simply as "small vessel disease" or as a pathognomonic indicator of vascular cognitive impairment or vascular dementia.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Cerebrovascular Disorders , Dementia, Vascular , White Matter , Female , Humans , White Matter/pathology , Brain/pathology , Cerebrovascular Disorders/complications , Cerebrovascular Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Cerebrovascular Disorders/pathology , Alzheimer Disease/diagnostic imaging , Alzheimer Disease/pathology , Dementia, Vascular/pathologyABSTRACT
The regulatory path for drug approval is increasingly well defined. Drugs for the treatment of Alzheimer disease (AD) need to show statistically significant benefit over placebo with respect to cognitive and functional measures, with the Clinical Dementia Rating scale and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale being among the most often used instruments in AD clinical trials. In contrast, there are no validated instruments for use in clinical trials of drugs for the treatment of dementia with Lewy bodies. This poses challenges for drug development because the regulatory pathway to drug approval requires demonstrable efficacy measures. In December 2021, the Lewy Body Dementia Association advisory group met with representatives from the US Food and Drug Administration to discuss the lack of approved drugs and treatments, discernment of efficacy measures, and identification of biomarkers. Highlights: The Lewy Body with Dementia Association convened a listening session with the US Food and Drug Administration on dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and clinical trial design.Gaps include DLB-specific measures, alpha synuclein biomarkers, and coexisting pathologies.DLB clinical trial design should focus on clinical value and disease specificity.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Nearly a dozen monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed against beta-amyloid (Aß) have been developed for the treatment of Alzheimer disease (AD), and most of these mAbs are undergoing clinical trials. Newer mAbs have targeted more specific Aß types. Lecanemab Eisai has a high affinity for large and soluble Aß protofibrils. Data from phase 2 clinical trials have suggested the possibility of a robust efficacy signal and manageable risk of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIAs). Lecanemab is currently being studied in phase 3 trials. AREAS COVERED: This article briefly reviews mAbs that target Aß in AD and discusses the biology, mechanism of action, and targets of lecanemab. EXPERT OPINION: mAbs that target Aß are an important focus of therapeutic development for AD, with several soon to be considered for US Food and Drug Administration approval. The experience of aducanumab informs the development of other mAbs, such as lecanemab. One consideration is the conformation of Aß targets. Targeting monomeric species has not resulted in robust clinical efficacy, whereas targeting Aß in the form of oligomers, protofibrils, and plaques has shown evidence of slowing clinical decline. Another consideration is that mAbs will require safety monitoring for ARIAs.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Humans , Alzheimer Disease/therapy , Amyloid beta-Peptides , Antibodies, Monoclonal/pharmacology , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Plaque, AmyloidSubject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Humans , Alzheimer Disease/diagnosis , Amyloid beta-Peptides , BiomarkersABSTRACT
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) to the fornix is an investigational treatment for patients with mild Alzheimer's Disease. Outcomes from randomized clinical trials have shown that cognitive function improved in some patients but deteriorated in others. This could be explained by variance in electrode placement leading to differential engagement of neural circuits. To investigate this, we performed a post-hoc analysis on a multi-center cohort of 46 patients with DBS to the fornix (NCT00658125, NCT01608061). Using normative structural and functional connectivity data, we found that stimulation of the circuit of Papez and stria terminalis robustly associated with cognitive improvement (R = 0.53, p < 0.001). On a local level, the optimal stimulation site resided at the direct interface between these structures (R = 0.48, p < 0.001). Finally, modulating specific distributed brain networks related to memory accounted for optimal outcomes (R = 0.48, p < 0.001). Findings were robust to multiple cross-validation designs and may define an optimal network target that could refine DBS surgery and programming.