[Joint study of seclusion, mechanical restraint and chemical restraint: Pilot study in three French psychiatric hospitals]. / Étudier conjointement l'isolement, la contention mécanique et la contention chimique : étude pilote dans trois établissements psychiatriques français.

Psychiatric wards that only exceptionally use isolation and mechanical restraint may be suspected of using "chemical restraint". However, in the case of these services, the hypothesis of a reduction in the general level of restraint can also be formulated. Prior to a comprehensive study to test these hypotheses, the current research aims to assess indicators which define high levels of the use of these measures and a relevant sample. The study was conducted in three facilities with 254 hospitalized patients over a week. Five per cent experienced isolation, 2% mechanical restraint, and 13% received high doses of medication (including "as needed" treatments). These figures are below literature data and national averages. Variances exist among centers, with one showing higher percentages for all three measures. While confirming the feasibility of studying these measures together, the study suggests the need for longer observations and continuous evaluation of prescription practices to better reflect yearly isolation and restraint trends. Future studies should involve more centers and include case studies for a nuanced understanding of administration practices in relation to prescriptions.

Smoking and mental disability : A mixed observational study using a diverse sample of medical-social establishments and services / Tabagisme et handicap psychique : étude observationnelle mixte dans un échantillon diversifié d'établissements et de services médico-sociaux.

INTRODUCTION: A multi-center observational study was carried out in ten ESMS, using a mixed methodology (site visits, questionnaire survey, semi-directive group interviews with professionals and individual interviews with users). PURPOSE OF THE RESEARCH: The aim of this article is to describe the management and prevention of smoking in ESMS for people with mental health disorders, and to characterize and identify the smoking behaviors and representations of ESMS users and the professionals working there. RESULTS: The study made it possible to distinguish between ESMS in terms of the organization of smoking areas and tobacco prevention initiatives. It also revealed that 37 percent of respondents among the professionals said they smoked tobacco, with some of them explaining that they smoked with users and sometimes gave them cigarettes. With regard to prevention, there was a consensus among professionals that they should help users who wanted to stop smoking. Professionals were divided, however, on the need for more active prevention, citing the users' freedom and the fact that ESMS are places where people live. Among the users, 47 percent said they were smokers. Of the users who smoked, 55 percent said they wanted to stop. Interviews with the users revealed that twelve of them wanted to quit, with some asking for help and more assistance from professionals. CONCLUSIONS: This report suggests that intervention research could be developed in ESMS for people with mental health disorders, who could benefit from the smoking prevention actions identified in the facilities and services investigated.

Introduction: Une étude observationnelle multicentrique a été réalisée dans dix ESMS et mobilisait une méthodologie mixte (visite des structures, enquête par questionnaires, entretiens semi-directifs collectifs avec des professionnels et individuels avec des usagers). But de l'étude: Cet article vise à décrire la gestion et la prévention du tabagisme dans des établissements et services médico-sociaux (ESMS) accueillant des personnes avec un trouble psychique, et à caractériser et identifier les comportements tabagiques et les représentations de leurs usagers et professionnels. Résultats: L'étude a permis de distinguer les ESMS au regard de l'organisation des espaces du tabagisme et des actions de prévention du tabac. Elle a permis également de constater que 37 % des professionnels qui ont répondu déclaraient fumer du tabac, une partie d'entre eux expliquant fumer avec les usagers et leur donner parfois des cigarettes. Concernant la prévention, un consensus se dégageait chez les professionnels sur le fait d'aider les usagers qui souhaitaient arrêter. Les professionnels étaient cependant divisés à l'égard d'une prévention plus active, invoquant la liberté de l'usager et le fait que les ESMS sont des lieux de vie. 47 % des usagers se disaient fumeurs. 55 % des usagers fumeurs déclaraient vouloir arrêter. Les entretiens avec les usagers ont permis de constater que douze d'entre eux souhaitaient arrêter, une partie réclamant de l'aide et d'être davantage aidés par les professionnels. Conclusions: Cet état des lieux invite à développer des recherches interventionnelles dans les ESMS accueillant des personnes avec un trouble psychique qui pourraient tirer profit des actions de prévention du tabac repérées dans des structures enquêtées.

The (De)normalisation of Smoking Among Apprentices: Plurality of Settings, Norms and Vulnerability Levels.

When it comes to smoking, apprentices are considered a 'vulnerable' population. They have been the subject of targeted approaches based on the assumption of common characteristics. In contrast to most public health studies, that assume homogeneity of vulnerable groups, this article, based on Lahire's 'theory of the plural individual', aims to examine inter- and intra-individual variability in relation to tobacco exposure. It is based on a secondary analysis of 30 interviews with apprentices in France on the stigma attached to their use in their different living environments. Our study confirms that the family and the Centre de Formation des Apprentis, as a whole, encourage smoking. It also provides a better understanding of the mechanisms by which inequalities are perpetuated (permissive rules, loans and gifts of cigarettes, spillover effects, lack of incentives to quit). Nevertheless, it allows us to observe that, in some families and in some companies, smoking is denormalised, even stigmatised. Several apprentice profiles emerge: those who are protected from tobacco and seem to be able to quit easily; those who are permanently confronted with it and for whom it is difficult to consider quitting or reducing; and those who are confronted with a plurality of norms, who seem ambivalent and whose consumption varies significantly. These results will allow us to adapt the interventions according to the profile of the apprentices and by including their entourage. In particular, it will be necessary to propose a 'go-to' approach that goes beyond the school setting and involves the family and the workplace.

[PLAID-Care: Research into the reduced use of coercion in France]. / PLAID-Care : une recherche sur le moindre recours à la coercition en France.

The use of coercion is a common practice in psychiatry despite its deleterious effects and insufficient evidence of benefits. It is so deeply rooted that the mention of establishments that make little use of it arouses a form of incredulity. However, the history of psychiatry and the international literature provide numerous examples of a psychiatry that is hardly coercive and numerous experiences of a reduction in the use of seclusion and/or restraint in psychiatric facilities. Today, in France, there are also less coercive establishments, which, for example, do not use mechanical restraint, have all their units open, or have reduced their use of seclusion and restraint. With regard to the stated policy objectives of reducing the use of coercion, it is surprising that most of these facilities receive little attention. PLAID-Care research aims to contribute to the visibility and analysis of these institutions and the factors involved in the reduced use of coercion. While these factors have already been identified in the international literature, the research is based on the multiplication of disciplinary perspectives (nursing, sociology, anthropology, geography) and the mobilization of a multi-level analytical framework that allows us to embrace their multiplicity and better understand their articulation. The originality of the research also lies in its historical dimension, which allows us to understand, on the scale of an institution, how a policy and practices aiming at the least recourse emerge and are consolidated. The project timeline is divided in three tasks: firstly, an inventory of "low-coercion" facilities in France; secondly, we will select and research four traditionally "low-coercion" facilities in France; thirdly we will focus on recently emerged "low-coercion" practices. PLAID-Care aims to revitalize French research on this theme which to date has been relatively lagging behind the numerous international studies. It will bring together and articulate the knowledge, tools and forms of organization and collaboration that contribute to making a policy of lesser use of coercion operational.

Stigmatisation et santé publique : le côté obscur des interventions anti-tabac.

Tobacco control strategies, considered legitimate and effective, are rarely the subject of critical analysis in France. This is specifically true with regard to their potentially harmful effects, particularly against people who continue to smoke. This article introduces this debate, focusing on the potentially stigmatizing effects of anti-smoking policies. It has been attested by numerous international studies, and by a study in France, that the general process of tobacco denormalization has led to the stigmatization of smokers who then may be subject to discrimination. To the extent that smoking is now concentrated in the most disadvantaged socio-economic populations in France, the latter are thus more exposed to stigma. While underscoring the need to develop targeted interventions against them, this article also warns and calls for vigilance regarding the potential iatrogenic effects of these interventions. It is therefore necessary to develop research and evaluations on this subject in order to accurately measure the effects of these interventions, particularly in terms of stigmatization and self-stigma, and to ensure that public health actors do not generate more problems than they solve.

[Stigmatization and public health: The dark-side of anti-smoking interventions]. / Stigmatisation et santé publique : le côté obscur des interventions anti-tabac.

Tobacco control strategies, considered legitimate and effective, are rarely the subject of critical analysis in France. This is specifically true with regard to their potentially harmful effects, particularly against people who continue to smoke. This article introduces this debate, focusing on the potentially stigmatizing effects of anti-smoking policies. It has been attested by numerous international studies, and by a study in France, that the general process of tobacco denormalization has led to the stigmatization of smokers who then may be subject to discrimination. To the extent that smoking is now concentrated in the most disadvantaged socio-economic populations in France, the latter are thus more exposed to stigma. While underscoring the need to develop targeted interventions against them, this article also warns and calls for vigilance regarding the potential iatrogenic effects of these interventions. It is therefore necessary to develop research and evaluations on this subject in order to accurately measure the effects of these interventions, particularly in terms of stigmatization and self-stigma, and to ensure that public health actors do not generate more problems than they solve.