ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: We sought to establish normal reference ranges (NRRs) for a novel TEG 6s cartridge (TEG 6s Citrated: K, KH, RTH, FFH [Global Hemostasis]) (Haemonetics Corporation, Boston, MA, US). METHODS: Healthy volunteers (≥18 years of age) included in this single-arm study provided single samples of whole blood. Primary end points included TEG parameters in the citrated kaolin (CK), CK with heparinase (CKH), RapidTEG with heparinase (CRTH), and functional fibrinogen with heparinase (CFFH) assays. RESULTS: Evaluable data were contributed by 164 volunteers (48.8% female; 62% White/Caucasian). The following NRRs were established: CK maximum amplitude (MA), 51.0 to 67.6 mm; CKH-MA, 51.8 to 67.9 mm; CRTH-MA, 53.0 to 68.9 mm; CFFH-MA, 15.3 to 34.4 mm; CK reaction time, 5.0 to 9.1 minutes; CKH reaction time, 4.9 to 9.4 minutes; CKH lysis 30 minutes after MA, 0% to 3.2%. Duplicate measurements demonstrated high reproducibility. CFFH-MA correlated with Clauss fibrinogen concentration (Pearson correlation coefficient, 0.74). Laboratory-based studies demonstrated maintenance of the relationship between CFFH-MA and fibrinogen up to 1344 mg/dL (hyperfibrinogenemic samples) and acceptability of heparin neutralization up to concentrations of low molecular weight and unfractionated heparin of 1.3 IU/mL and 5 IU/mL, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study established NRRs for the Global Hemostasis cartridge and serves as a proof of concept for the validity of results obtained using this cartridge.
ABSTRACT
This review highlights noteworthy literature published in 2023 and pertinent to anesthesiologists and critical care physicians caring for patients undergoing abdominal organ transplantation. We feature 9 studies from 593 peer-reviewed papers on pancreatic transplantation, 3 from 194 on intestinal transplantation, and 28 from over 4513 on kidney transplantation. The liver transplantation section includes a special focus on 20 studies from 5666 clinical trial publications. We explore a broad range of topics, including donor management, perioperative recipient management, and innovative pharmacologic and mechanical interventions tested for the improvement of patient and graft outcomes and survival.
Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation , Liver Transplantation , Pancreas Transplantation , Humans , Liver Transplantation/methods , Pancreas Transplantation/methods , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Intestines/transplantation , Graft Survival , Perioperative Care/methodsABSTRACT
Introduction: The Society for Education in Anesthesia (SEA) promotes dissemination of discoveries and innovations. We investigated the rate of publication of SEA Spring Meeting abstracts, hypothesizing that Research abstracts were published more frequently than Innovative Curriculum abstracts. We also studied the time between abstract presentation and publication and tracked the journals in which they were published. Methods: All abstracts presented at SEA spring meetings from 2011-2019 were included. We searched PubMed for published articles that were based on those SEA abstracts. We calculated the overall publication rate and the respective publication rates for Research and Innovative Curriculum abstracts. We calculated odds ratio (OR) and performed the Pearson χ2 test to compare publication rates between Research abstracts and Innovative Curriculum abstracts. We calculated the mean number of years between meeting presentation and publication and tabulated the number of works published in each journal. Results: A total of 351 abstracts (128 Research and 223 Curriculum) were presented at SEA spring meetings. The overall publication rate was 15% (52/351). Research abstracts were published more frequently than Curriculum abstracts: 24.2% (31/128) versus 9.4% (21/223); OR = 3.1 (95% confidence interval, 1.7-5.6); P = .0003. The mean time from presentation to publication was 1.7 ± 1.3 years. The works appeared in 20 different journals. Conclusion: SEA Spring Meeting abstracts were published less frequently than abstracts from other medical professional society meetings (21%-72.3%). Although the lower publication rate of Innovative Curriculum abstracts unique to the SEA meeting largely explains this shortfall, a relatively low publication rate, even for the Research abstracts, signals opportunities for growth.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: During the perioperative period of living donor liver transplantation, anesthesiologists and intensivists may encounter patients in receipt of small grafts that puts them at risk of developing small for size syndrome (SFSS). METHODS: A scientific committee (106 members from 21 countries) performed an extensive literature review on aspects of SFSS with proposed recommendations. Recommendations underwent a blinded review by an independent expert panel and discussion/voting on the recommendations occurred at a consensus conference organized by the International Liver Transplantation Society, International Living Donor Liver Transplantation Group, and Liver Transplantation Society of India. RESULTS: It was determined that centers with experience in living donor liver transplantation should utilize potential small for size grafts. Higher risk recipients with sarcopenia, cardiopulmonary, and renal dysfunction should receive small for size grafts with caution. In the intraoperative phase, a restrictive fluid strategy should be considered along with routine use of cardiac output monitoring, as well as use of pharmacologic portal flow modulation when appropriate. Postoperatively, these patients can be considered for enhanced recovery and should receive proactive monitoring for SFSS, nutrition optimization, infection prevention, and consideration for early renal replacement therapy for avoidance of graft congestion. CONCLUSIONS: Our recommendations provide a framework for the optimal anesthetic and critical care management in the perioperative period for patients with grafts that put them at risk of developing SFSS. There is a significant limitation in the level of evidence for most recommendations. This statement aims to provide guidance for future research in the perioperative management of SFSS.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia , Liver Transplantation , Humans , India , Liver/surgery , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Living Donors , Guidelines as TopicABSTRACT
This review highlights noteworthy literature published in 2022 pertinent to anesthesiologists and critical care physicians caring for patients undergoing abdominal organ transplantation. We begin by exploring the impacts that the COVID-19 pandemic has had across the field of abdominal organ transplantation, including the successful use of grafts procured from COVID-19-infected donors. In pancreatic transplantation, we highlight several studies on dexmedetomidine and ischemia-reperfusion injury, equity in transplantation, and medical management, as well as studies comparing pancreatic transplantation to islet cell transplantation. In our section on intestinal transplantation, we explore donor selection. Kidney transplantation topics include cardiovascular risk management, obesity, and intraoperative management, including fluid resuscitation, dexmedetomidine, and sugammadex. The liver transplantation section focuses on clinical trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses published in 2022 and covers a wide range of topics, including machine perfusion, cardiovascular issues, renal issues, and coagulation/transfusion.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Dexmedetomidine , Kidney Transplantation , Organ Transplantation , Humans , PandemicsABSTRACT
This review highlights noteworthy literature pertinent to anesthesiologists and critical care physicians caring for patients undergoing abdominal organ transplantation. In 2021, we identified noteworthy papers from over 1,200 peer-reviewed publications on pancreatic transplantation, over 1,400 on intestinal transplantation, and over 9,000 on kidney transplantation. The liver transplantation section focuses on clinical trials and systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in 2021 and features 20 selected papers. COVID-19 and abdominal organ transplantation are featured in an independent section.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Kidney Transplantation , Organ Transplantation , Pancreas Transplantation , Anesthesiologists , HumansABSTRACT
Living donor liver transplantation was first developed to mitigate the limited access to deceased donor organs in Asia in the 1990s. This alternative liver transplantation option has become an established and widely practiced transplantation method for adult patients suffering from end-stage liver disease. It has successfully addressed the shortage of deceased donors. The Society for the Advancement of Transplant Anesthesia and the Korean Society of Transplant Anesthesia jointly reviewed published studies on the perioperative management of live donor liver transplant recipients. The review aims to offer transplant anesthesiologists and critical care physicians a comprehensive overview of the perioperative management of adult live liver transplantation recipients. We feature the status, outcomes, surgical procedure, portal venous decompression, anesthetic management, prevention of acute kidney injury, avoidance of blood transfusion, monitoring and therapeutic strategies of hemodynamic derangements, and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols for liver transplant recipients.
Subject(s)
End Stage Liver Disease , Liver Transplantation , Adult , Blood Transfusion , End Stage Liver Disease/surgery , Humans , Liver Transplantation/methods , Living Donors , Transplant RecipientsABSTRACT
Living donor liver transplantation was first developed to mitigate the limited access to deceased donor organs in Asia in the 1990s. This alternative liver transplantation method has become a widely practiced and established transplantation option for adult patients suffering with end-stage liver disease, and it has successfully helped address the shortage of deceased donors. The Society for the Advancement of Transplant Anesthesia and the Korean Society of Transplantation Anesthesiologists jointly reviewed published studies on the perioperative management of adult live liver donors undergoing donor hemi-hepatectomy. The goal of the review is to offer transplant anesthesiologists and critical care physicians a comprehensive overview of the perioperative management of adult live donors. We featured the current status, donor selection process, outcomes and complications, surgical procedure, anesthetic management, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols, avoidance of blood transfusion, and considerations for emergency donation. Recent surgical advances, including laparoscopic donor hemi-hepatectomy and robotic laparoscopic donor surgery, are also addressed.
Subject(s)
End Stage Liver Disease , Liver Transplantation , Adult , End Stage Liver Disease/surgery , Hepatectomy/methods , Humans , Liver Transplantation/methods , Living Donors , Tissue and Organ HarvestingABSTRACT
The Society for the Advancement of Transplant Anesthesia (SATA) is dedicated to improving patient care in all facets of transplant anesthesia. The anesthesia fellowship training recommendations for thoracic transplantation (heart and lungs) and part of the abdominal organ transplantation (liver) have been presented in previous publications. The SATA Fellowship Committee has completed the remaining component of abdominal transplant anesthesia (kidney/pancreas) and has assembled core competencies and milestones derived from expert consensus to guide the education and overall preparation of trainees providing care for kidney/pancreas transplant recipients. These recommendations provide a comprehensive approach to pre-operative evaluation, vascular access procedures, advanced hemodynamic monitoring, assessment of coagulation and metabolic abnormalities, operative techniques, and post-operative pain control. As such, this document supplements the current liver/hepatic transplant anesthesia fellowship training programs to include all aspects of "Abdominal Organ Transplant Anesthesia" recommended knowledge.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia , Anesthesiology , Organ Transplantation , Anesthesia/methods , Anesthesiology/education , Clinical Competence , Education, Medical, Graduate/methods , Fellowships and Scholarships , Humans , Kidney , PancreasABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Liver transplant anesthesiology is an evolving and expanding subspecialty, and programs have, in the past, exhibited significant variations of practice at transplant centers across the United States. In order to explore current practice patterns, the Quality & Standards Committee from the Society for the Advancement of Transplant Anesthesia (SATA) undertook a survey of liver transplant anesthesiology program directors. METHODS: Program directors were invited to participate in an online questionnaire. A total of 110 program directors were identified from the 2018 Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database. Replies were received from 65 programs (response rate of 59%). RESULTS: Our results indicate an increase in transplant anesthesia fellowship training and advanced training in transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). We also find that the use of intraoperative TEE and viscoelastic testing is more common. However, there has been a reduction in the use of veno-venous bypass, routine placement of pulmonary artery catheters and the intraoperative use of anti-fibrinolytics when compared to prior surveys. CONCLUSION: The results show considerable heterogeneity in practice patterns across the country that continues to evolve. However, there appears to be a movement towards the adoption of specific structural and clinical practices.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia , Anesthesiology , Liver Transplantation , Adult , Fellowships and Scholarships , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires , United StatesABSTRACT
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Despite the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education scholarly activity requirement, incorporating education on scholarly fundamentals into residency is challenging. We designed and implemented an academic non-clinical rotation for Post Graduate Year-1 (PGY-1) interns and its association with subsequent resident scholarly productivity was determined. We hypothesized that early immersion in such a rotation would be associated with increased scholarly activity during residency. DESIGN: Retrospective educational comparative study, of two cohorts of anesthesiology residents in the graduating classes of 2015-2020. SETTING: Large anesthesiology residency program at a U.S. academic medical center. INTERVENTION: A one-month academic rotation titled Anesthesia Professional Practice for PGY-1 interns has been implemented since 2014. The rotation curriculum broadly covers important topics for scholarly projects and provides introductions to academic faculty and institutional resources. MEASUREMENTS: The scholarly products (abstracts, publications, book chapters, research protocols, and grant applications) were quantified using Scholarly Activity Points, a previously described metric that accounts for significance and the resident's contribution. Total Scholarly Activity Points for each resident and number of publications prior to residency were determined for both cohorts. Segmented regression was employed with Scholarly Activity Points as the outcome; participation in the early immersion rotation and prior publications were used as input variables. MAIN RESULTS: Resident participation in the early immersion rotation was significantly associated with higher Scholarly Activity Points. The confounding variable of pre-residency publication count was not significantly correlated to this increase. CONCLUSIONS: Immersion in a one-month academic program during PGY-1 internship may contribute to increased scholarly productivity during residency.
Subject(s)
Anesthesiology , Internship and Residency , Anesthesiology/education , Curriculum , Education, Medical, Graduate/methods , Humans , Immersion , Professional Practice , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
In Japan, a relative shortage of practicing anesthesiologists continues to be a national issue. To address this issue, some Japanese medical institutions have started developing curriculums to train non-physician perioperative anesthesia personnel, including nurse practitioners and perianesthesia nurses. We urgently need to establish a national standard for the education programs that train these extended non-physician anesthesia care providers. A certified registered nurse anesthetist educational program at a large academic medical center in the United States is described in detail as a reference. Highly systematic educational programs using simulation, didactics, and full clinical subspecialty rotations are ideal if not easily achievable in many current training institutions in Japan. Anesthesia assistant education programs in the United States can be used as an additional reference to create a national educational program in Japan.
Subject(s)
Anesthesiology , Nurse Anesthetists , Anesthesiologists , Anesthesiology/education , Curriculum , Humans , Japan , United StatesABSTRACT
In 2020, we identified and screened over 490 peer-reviewed publications on pancreatic transplantation, over 500 on intestinal transplantation, and over 5000 on kidney transplantation. The liver transplantation section specially focused on clinical trials and systematic reviews published in 2020 and featured selected articles. This review highlights noteworthy literature pertinent to anesthesiologists and critical care physicians caring for patients undergoing abdominal organ transplantation. We explore a wide range of topics, including COVID-19 and organ transplantation, risk factors and outcomes, pain management, artificial intelligence, robotic donor surgery, and machine perfusion.
Subject(s)
Abdomen/surgery , COVID-19 , Organ Transplantation/methods , Anesthesiology , Artificial Intelligence , Critical Care/methods , Humans , Risk Factors , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Intraoperative cardiac arrest (ICA) has a reported frequency of 1 in 10,000 anesthetics but has a much higher estimated incidence in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Single-center studies of ICA in OLT are limited by small sample size that prohibits multivariable regression analysis of risks. METHODS: Utilizing data from 7 academic medical centers, we performed a retrospective, observational study of 5296 adult liver transplant recipients (18-80 years old) between 2000 and 2017 to identify the rate of ICA, associated risk factors, and outcomes. RESULTS: ICA occurred in 196 cases (3.7% 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.2-4.2) and mortality occurred in 62 patients (1.2%). The intraoperative mortality rate was 31.6% in patients who experienced ICA. In a multivariable generalized linear mixed model, ICA was associated with body mass index (BMI) <20 (odds ratio [OR]: 2.04, 95% CI, 1.05-3.98; P = .0386), BMI ≥40 (2.16 [1.12-4.19]; P = .022), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score: (MELD 30-39: 1.75 [1.09-2.79], P = .02; MELD ≥40: 2.73 [1.53-4.85], P = .001), postreperfusion syndrome (PRS) (3.83 [2.75-5.34], P < .001), living donors (2.13 [1.16-3.89], P = .014), and reoperation (1.87 [1.13-3.11], P = .015). Overall 30-day and 1-year mortality were 4.18% and 11.0%, respectively. After ICA, 30-day and 1-year mortality were 43.9% and 52%, respectively, compared to 2.6% and 9.3% without ICA. CONCLUSIONS: We established a 3.7% incidence of ICA and a 1.2% incidence of intraoperative mortality in liver transplantation and confirmed previously identified risk factors for ICA including BMI, MELD score, PRS, and reoperation and identified new risk factors including living donor and length of surgery in this multicenter retrospective cohort. ICA, while rare, is associated with high intraoperative mortality, and future research must focus on therapy to reduce the incidence of ICA.
Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers/trends , Heart Arrest/etiology , Heart Arrest/mortality , Intraoperative Complications/etiology , Intraoperative Complications/mortality , Liver Transplantation/mortality , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Incidence , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality/trends , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
Despite the lack of large randomized clinical studies, viscoelastic tests (VETs) have been a critical armamentarium for hemostatic control in liver transplantation (LT) since the 1960s. Many transplant institutions have adopted VETs in their clinical practice. Several small-size randomized clinical trials on LT patients have suggested that VET-guided hemostatic treatment algorithms have led to decreased indications for and amounts of transfused blood products, especially fresh-frozen plasma, compared to standard laboratory-based hemostatic management. VETs have also been reported to offer insight into the diagnosis and prediction of LT patients' development of hypercoagulability-related morbidity and mortality. There is still a need for VET device-specific hemostatic algorithms in LT, and clinicians must take into account the tendency to underestimate the coagulation capacity of VETs in patients with end-stage liver disease where hemostasis is rebalanced.