Perioperative Indices Predicting Fever Following Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate 18 independent peroperative parameters that may have an effect on fever after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). STUDY DESIGN: A descriptive study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Departments of Urology, Nevsehir State Hospital, and Sultan Abdulhamid Han Education and Research Hospital, Turkey, from January 2016 to June 2019. METHODOLOGY: Two hundred and seventy-six patients, who underwent PCNL between 2016 and 2019 in two institutions, were evaluated retrospectively. Patients were divided as Group I and II, according to the absence or presence of fever after PCNL, then peroperative parameters were compared. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between Group I and II in terms of age, gender, side of stone, ipsilateral open stone surgery or PCNL history, presence of renal anatomic anomaly, preoperative hydronephrosis grade, stone size in computed tomography (CT), stone Houndsfield Unit (HU) value, skin stone distance, duration of operation, postoperative D-J insertion rate and postoperative blood transfusion requirement (p >0.05). Guy' s Stone Score (GSS), number of calyceal access and duration of achieving limpid urine coming out of the nephrostomy tube were significantly higher in Group II (p <0.05). The rate of postoperative fever was statistically significantly higher in patients with middle calyceal (mid-calyceal) access, than patients with inferior calyceal access (p=0.05). CONCLUSION: High GSS, mid-calyceal access, the increase in the amount of mid-calyceal access, the longer duration of achieving limpid urine coming out of the nephrostomy tube were found to be related with fever after PCNL. Key Words: PCNL, Post-PCNL fever, Nephrolithiasis, Guy's stone score.

The Relationship Between Nocturnal Enuresis and Spina Bifida Occulta: A Prospective Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency of spina bifida occulta (SBO) detected in patients with nocturnal enuresis (NE) and to investigate its clinical significance. METHODS: Patients aged 6 to 15 years who were admitted to the urology clinic with NE were included in this prospective study. The control group consisted of patients who were admitted with a complaint of abdominal or lateral pain. The patients who had lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) were classified as nonmonosymptomatic NE (NMNE). Those with monosymptomatic NE were treated with desmopressine. In patients with NMNE, treatment with oxybutynin was added if an overactive bladder or uninhibited contraction was detected by urodynamics. RESULTS: A total of 184 NE and 180 control patients were included in the study. SBO was detected in 71 (19.5%) patients and LUTS in 100 (27.4%). When the groups with and without NE were compared, the number of patients with SBO (26% vs 17%, P = .044) and those with LUTS (36% vs 17.5%, P < .001) were significantly higher in the NE group. The overall rate of dryness (67.4% vs 83.6%, P = .024) and response to LUTS treatment (65% vs 97%, P < .01) were significantly lower in those with SBO than in those without SBO. CONCLUSION: SBO is more common in NE patients than in non-NE patients. Response to NE treatment is lower in SBO patients with severe LUTS; for this population, advanced treatment options may be considered earlier.

The effect of stone localization on the success and complication rates of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of stone localization on the success and complication rates of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five hundred seventy-eight PNL procedures that were performed in our clinic were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were divided into seven groups according to the localization of the renal stones as: group 1, patients having stones only in the upper calyx; group 2, patients having stones only in the pelvis; group 3, patients having stones only in the lower calyx; group 4, patients having partial staghorn stones; group 5, patients having multiple calyx stones; group 6, patients having stones in both the pelvis and lower calyx and group 7, patients having complete staghorn stones. The first three groups were defined as simple stones, and the other four groups were defined as complex stones. RESULTS: The mean stone clearance rate was 77% in simple stones and 53% in complex stones (P = .005). The complication rate was significantly higher only in the group with complex staghorn stones at a rate of 19.5% (P = .006). The difference between preoperative and postoperative hematocrit concentrations was the least in the group that had stones in the pelvis and this value was statistically significantly lower than the patients with complex staghorn stones (P = .027). The mean duration of the operation and the number of ports was higher in patients with complex stones. CONCLUSION: The localization of stone affects the success and complication rates of the operation. 

Comparison of laparoscopic and open ureterolithotomy in impacted and very large ureteral stones.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of laparoscopic and open ureterolithotomy in patients with ureteral stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who had undergone open or laparoscopic ureterolithotomy between 2001 and 2013 in our clinic were enrolled in the study.Ureterolithotomy was performed due to the following reasons: failure to position the patient for ureteroscopy, unreachable stone with ureteroscopy also use of balloon dilatation, high stone volume, and the need for removal of kidney stones at the same session.. The patients' demographic data, the volume of the stones, the duration of the operation and the hospital stay, the amount of analgesics administered after the operation, and the need for another procedure were compared. RESULTS: Of study subjects 32 patients had undergone open and 20 patients had undergone laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. When the two groups were compared, there was no statistically significant difference with regard to the mean age (44.5-44 years), the body mass index (26-24.7 kg/m²), the stone volume (420-580 mm³), the duration of operation (122-123 min), the need for another procedure and complications. The mean amount of analgesics administered after the operation (3.6 and 1.81 doses, P = .02) and the mean hospital stay (6.1 and 2.9 days, P = .01) were significantly lower in the laparoscopic ureterolithotomy group. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy is a good alternative with less need for analgesia and a shorter hospital stay when compared with open ureterolithotomy.