Filgotinib in Active Noninfectious Uveitis: The HUMBOLDT Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Noninfectious uveitis is a leading cause of visual impairment with an unmet need for additional treatment options. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of filgotinib, a Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) preferential inhibitor, for the treatment of noninfectious uveitis. Design, Setting, and Participants: The HUMBOLDT trial was a double-masked, placebo-controlled, phase 2, randomized clinical trial conducted from July 2017 to April 2021 at 26 centers in 7 countries. Eligible participants (aged ≥18 years) had active noninfectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, or panuveitis despite at least 2 weeks of treatment with oral prednisone (10-60 mg per day). Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive filgotinib, 200 mg, or placebo orally once daily for up to 52 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the proportion of participants experiencing treatment failure by week 24. Treatment failure was a composite end point represented by assessment of the presence of chorioretinal and/or retinal vascular lesions, best-corrected visual acuity, and anterior chamber cell and vitreous haze grades. Safety was assessed in participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug or placebo. Results: Between July 26, 2017, and April 22, 2021, 116 participants were screened, and 74 (mean [SD] age, 46 [16] years; 43 female [59.7%] of 72 participants, as 2 participants did not receive treatment doses) were randomly assigned to receive filgotinib (n = 38) or placebo (n = 36). Despite early termination of the trial for business reasons ahead of meeting enrollment targets, a significantly reduced proportion of participants who received filgotinib experienced treatment failure by week 24 vs placebo (12 of 32 participants [37.5%] vs 23 of 34 participants [67.6%]; difference vs placebo -30.1%; 95% CI, -56.2% to -4.1%; P = .006). Business reasons were unrelated to efficacy or safety. Adverse events were reported in 30 of 37 participants (81.1%) who received filgotinib and in 24 of 35 participants (68.6%) who received placebo. Serious adverse events were reported in 5 of 37 participants (13.5%) in the filgotinib group and in 2 of 35 participants (5.7%) in the placebo group. No deaths were reported during the trial. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this randomized clinical trial show that filgotinib lowered the risk of treatment failure in participants with active noninfectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, or panuveitis vs placebo. Although the HUMBOLDT trial provided evidence supporting the efficacy of filgotinib in patients with active noninfectious uveitis, the premature termination of the trial prevented collection of additional safety or efficacy information of this JAK1 preferential inhibitor. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03207815.

Topical Ocular Anti-TNFα Agent Licaminlimab in the Treatment of Acute Anterior Uveitis: A Randomized Phase II Pilot Study.

Purpose: Licaminlimab is a new anti-TNFα antibody fragment for topical ocular application. This phase II study assessed the tolerability, treatment effect, and pharmacokinetics of licaminlimab in acute anterior uveitis (AAU). Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, double-masked study, 43 adult patients with non-infectious AAU and Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) anterior chamber (AC) cell score of 2+ or 3+ were randomized (3:1 ratio) to licaminlimab (60 mg/mL, 8 drops/day for 15 days, 4 drops/day for 7 days, then matching vehicle for 7 days) or dexamethasone eye drops (8 drops/day for 15 days, tapering to 1 drop/day over 14 days). The primary efficacy end point was clinical response (≥2-step decrease in AC cell grade at day 15). A treatment effect was considered as established if the lower limit of the 95% posterior interval of the responder rate was >30%. Serum levels of licaminlimab were determined. Results: The day 15 response rate for licaminlimab was 56%; the lower bound of the 95% credible interval was 40% (i.e. >30%), demonstrating a treatment effect according to prespecified criteria. By day 4, 36% of licaminlimab-treated patients were responders; 76% had an AC cell grade of 0 on ≥1 post-treatment visit. The day 15 dexamethasone response rate was 90% (no inferential between-arm comparison was planned). Both treatments were well-tolerated. Intraocular pressure increased from baseline with dexamethasone but not licaminlimab. Licaminlimab was undetectable in serum in most patients. Conclusions: Licaminlimab is the first biologic demonstrated to have a treatment effect on an intraocular condition with topical ocular application. The trial met its primary objective and the observed responder rate for licaminlimab was 56.0%. Ocular administration of licaminlimab was well-tolerated in adult subjects with AAU for up to 35 days.

Novel Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate Treatment (DSP-Visulex) for Noninfectious Anterior Uveitis: A Randomized Phase I/II Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: Frequent steroid drops represent a challenge in patient compliance. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of 5 minute topical dexamethasone sodium phosphate-Visulex (DSP-Visulex) treatment regimen (two applications on the first week then weekly after) compared to daily prednisolone acetate 1% (PA) for noninfectious anterior uveitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-four patients were randomized to 8% DSP-Visulex with placebo eye drops (8% group, n = 14), 15% DSP-Visulex with placebo eye drops (15% group, n = 15), or Vehicle-Visulex with PA eye drops (PA group, n = 15). Patients received daily eye drops and Visulex treatments on days 1, 3, 8, and 15 with an optional treatment on day 22. Efficacy measures were change in anterior chamber cell (ACC) count from baseline and proportion of patients with zero ACC count at days 8, 15, and 29. Safety measures were adverse events (AEs), visual acuity, ocular symptoms, and intraocular pressure (IOP). RESULTS: ACC resolution over time was similar among the three groups. The percentage of patients with clear ACC was 18%, 22%, and 15% on day 8; 27%, 56%, and 54% on day 15; and 90%, 88%, and 77% on day 29 for the 8%, 15%, and PA groups, respectively. The numbers of reported AEs were 10, 36, and 12 for the 8%, 15%, and PA groups, respectively. Ten patients among all groups experienced treatment-related AEs, which included headache, eye pain, corneal abrasion, conjunctival/corneal staining, conjunctivitis, visual acuity reduction, and keratitis all of which were resolved during the timeframe of patients' participation in the study. IOP elevation was noted in the PA group throughout the study, whereas IOP elevation in the DSP-Visulex groups was observed at day 3 but not thereafter. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of the DSP-Visulex applications was comparable to the daily PA drops in the treatment of noninfectious anterior uveitis. Both 8% and 15% DSP-Visulex treatments were safe and well tolerated.