Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 18950, 2024 08 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39147775

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to evaluate the superiority of anthropometric indices compared to others for predicting ischemic heart disease (IHD) or cardiometabolic risk factors. This study was a cross-sectional analysis of the Pars Cohort Study data. In total, 9229 Valashahr inhabitants aged 40-75 were included in the analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analyses was used to compare the predictive accuracy of four anthropometric measures, including body mass index, waist to height ratio (WHtR), waist to hip ratio (WHR), and waist circumference (WC). IHD prevalence was 10.4% in our sample. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, dyslipidemia, and metabolic syndrome was 12.7%, 29.2%, 58.4%, and 22.3%, respectively. All anthropometric indices had poor to good accuracy in predicting IHD risk factors, with AUCs ranging between 0.580 and 0.818. WHR was the most accurate measure for predicting IHD in both genders. All indexes had a better accuracy for predicting DM, dyslipidemia, and metabolic syndrome (MetS) in males than in females. To conclude, anthropometric measures, especially WC and WHtR, are recommended for predicting metabolic syndrome in primary prevention settings. These simple indices could help physicians find those who need further evaluation for MetS.


Subject(s)
Metabolic Syndrome , Myocardial Ischemia , Humans , Male , Female , Myocardial Ischemia/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Middle Aged , Iran/epidemiology , Aged , Adult , Metabolic Syndrome/epidemiology , Anthropometry , Waist-Hip Ratio , Waist Circumference , Body Mass Index , Risk Factors , Prevalence , Waist-Height Ratio , Dyslipidemias/epidemiology , ROC Curve , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Hypertension/epidemiology
2.
Balkan Med J ; 41(2): 121-129, 2024 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38332586

ABSTRACT

Background: Previous studies have mainly focused on individual mental disorders, and there is no study addressing the total burden of mental disorders in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). Aims: To evaluate the burden of mental disorders in the MENA region from 1990 to 2019. Study Design: A cross-sectional study. Methods: We utilized global burden of disease data to examine the burden of 12 mental disorders from 1990 to 2019 across age groups, genders, and the 21 MENA countries. We collected data on prevalence, incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALY), including both crude and age-standardized rates per 100,000 people. Results: The DALY rate of mental disorders in MENA countries increased by 13.88% from 1,747.92 per 100,000 people in 1990 to 1990.5 per 100,000 people in 2019. The highest percentage increases in the DALY rates of mental disorders were observed for bulimia nervosa (35.69%), other mental health disorders (34.58%), and schizophrenia (33.02%) from 1990 to 2019. However, the DALY rates for idiopathic developmental intellectual disability (-26.48%), conduct disorder (-23.91%), attentiondeficit/ hyperactivity disorder (-16.46%), and autism spectrum disorders (-4.12%) decreased in the MENA region from 1990 to 2019. In 2019, the highest DALY rates for idiopathic developmental intellectual disability, anxiety disorders, and major depressive disorder were observed in age groups ≤ 4 years, 5-19 years, and ≥ 20 years, respectively. The age-standardized DALY rate of mental disorders was the highest in Palestine (2,396.9 per 100,000), Iran (2,295.8 per 100,000), and Lebanon (2,126.0 per 100,000) compared with other MENA countries in 2019. Conclusion: There has been a slight increase in the burden of mental disorders in the MENA region between 1990 and 2019. National policies should prioritize evidence-based preventive measures and ensure accessible treatment options for mental health disorders in the population, especially in the MENA region.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Intellectual Disability , Female , Humans , Male , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Global Burden of Disease , Middle East/epidemiology , Africa, Northern/epidemiology
3.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 103: 107891, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36642027

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) may present in COVID-19 patients without the classic risk factors of AMI, and the symptoms might confuse physicians, leading to delayed diagnosis and increased mortality. In this manuscript, we report a patient with COVID-19 who presented with AMI as its initial presenting symptom. CASE PRESENTATION: A 68-year-old man presented to the emergency room with periumbilical non-radiating pain that had started three days before the admission. He had no defecation or gas passing in the past three days. In the physical exam, the patient had guarding of the abdomen, generalized tenderness, and rebound tenderness. C-reactive protein, Creatine phosphokinase and WBC count were elevate. Abdominal X-ray in the supine position was suggestive of obstruction of the small intestine. Diagnostic laparotomy was performed because of peritonitis and acute abdominal pain. The diagnosis was mesenteric ischemia due to vein thrombosis based on laparotomy and paraclinic findings. In the post-surgery evaluations COVID-19 infection was confirmed based on PCR and chest CT scan. DISCUSSION: Based on paraclinical, clinical, and diagnostic laparotomy findings, the patient was diagnosed with small bowel obstruction and gangrene due to acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI). But as described, this patient didn't have any history of medical diseases that cause a hypercoagulable state, in the past. While AF was ruled out because his ECG was normal. We concluded that in this patient AMI was due to his infection with COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Patients with COVID-19 may not have the typical risk factors for AMI, and AMI diagnosis should be considered in patients presenting with acute abdominal pain, even without the routine risk factors.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL