ABSTRACT
AIM: Understanding the nature of parent-child shared reading (SR) practices is important to reach children's developmental potential and subsequent achievement. We evaluated the parental attitudes and practices, associated variables and barriers related to SR. METHODS: This prospective study enrolled 624 parents of children aged 1-72 months who presented to a tertiary hospital for well-child care or acute minor illness. Face-to-face interviews were conducted using a questionnaire. RESULTS: The median age for starting SR was 12 (0-72) months. Daily SR activities were provided by 29.5% of the parents. Owning >10 children's books, higher socioeconomic status, attending pre-school/kindergarten and being a single child were associated with daily reading (P < 0.001). In total, 36.5% of the parents reported that they had not yet started SR and planned to start SR when their children reached a median age of 20.5 (2-72) months. The most commonly reported barriers were time constraints and the perception that their child was too young. Almost 10% of the parents had received an SR recommendation. Parents who had received a recommendation and those who had a habit of self-reading multiple times a week were more likely to begin SR at younger child age and to read daily (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated low rates of parent-child SR activities in early childhood, particularly in the first years of life, in Turkey. Our findings emphasise the need for a national strategy integrated into the healthcare system to promote SR.
Subject(s)
Parents , Reading , Humans , Child, Preschool , Infant , Prospective Studies , Turkey , Educational StatusSubject(s)
COVID-19 , Psychotic Disorders , COVID-19/complications , Delusions/diagnosis , Delusions/etiology , Humans , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: In the current study, we aimed to investigate fasting plasma levels of glucose, insulin, growth hormone, IGF-1, and lipid profile in remission schizophrenia patients, treatment resistant schizophrenia patients and healthy controls and to determine whether IGF-1 levels can be used as a theranostic biomarker in schizophrenia. METHODS: Sixty-two patients under remission from schizophrenia, sixty-five treatment-resistant patients with schizophrenia and sixty-two healthy controls were included in the study. All patients were recruited and evaluated over 11 months. Symptoms at the time of evaluation were assessed twice using BPRS, PANSS, CGI, and GAF scales by an experienced psychiatrist in accordance with Andreaseen's remission criteria and TRIPS group resistance criteria. Blood samples were collected from all participants to determine fasting glucose, LDL, HDL, Triglyceride, Total Cholesterol, fasting, insulin, GH and IGF-1 levels. RESULTS: Fasting blood glucose levels were found to be higher in patients with schizophrenia than in healthy controls. Moreover, LDL levels of the treatment sensitive group were higher than that of the treatment resistant group while they were not significantly different from the healthy controls. IGF-1 levels were lower in the treatment sensitive group than in both treatment resistant and healthy control groups. IGF-1, LDL and age of disease onset were found to be significantly associated with treatment resistance in a regression model. DISCUSSION: In the present study, remitted patients with schizophrenia could be distinguished from treatment-resistant patients and healthy controls with serum IGF-1, fasting glucose and LDL levels. In addition, we found that smoking and age of disease onset together with IGF-1 levels could significantly predict resistance to treatment.
Subject(s)
Insulin-Like Growth Factor I , Schizophrenia , Biomarkers , Blood Glucose , Humans , Insulin , Precision Medicine , Schizophrenia/diagnosis , Schizophrenia/drug therapyABSTRACT
Cognitive impairment has recently attracted researchers as one of the possible neuropsychiatric manifestations of COVID-19, although how the infection perpetuates impairment of cognitive functions is still obscure. We presented a 29-year-old male patient with COVID-19 who developed new-onset transient attention deficit and memory problems following a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Structural neuroimaging was normal. MR-spectroscopy (MRS) of the bilateral DLPFC revealed significant for decreased levels of N-acetylaspartate (NAA), glutamate, and glutamate/glutamine ratio. After a follow-up without any medical treatment but with suggestions of memory exercises for three months a control MRS screening of DLPFC showed improved levels of NAA, glutamate, and glutamate/glutamine ratio. This report may suggest that cognitive deficits in SARS-CoV-2 infection can result from glutamatergic dysfunction with decreased NAA and glutamate levels in bilateral DLPFC.
Subject(s)
Aspartic Acid/analogs & derivatives , COVID-19/metabolism , Cognitive Dysfunction/metabolism , Glutamic Acid/metabolism , Prefrontal Cortex/metabolism , Adult , Aspartic Acid/metabolism , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnostic imaging , Cognitive Dysfunction/etiology , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy/methods , Male , Prefrontal Cortex/diagnostic imaging , Signal Transduction/physiologyABSTRACT
Despite neuropsychiatric outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection are now under close scrutiny, psychoneuroimmunological characteristics of COVID-19 and precise pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric manifestations of the infection are still obscure. Moreover, there still exists a shortfall in demonstrating specific clinical manifestations of the brain involvement of the virus. Here, we presented a 33-year-old female patient with COVID-19, reporting acute-onset paranoid delusions symptoms, insomnia and irritability. Cranial MRI showed an hyperintense signal in the splenium of the corpus callosum with decreased apparent diffusion coefficient, which might possibly indicate the presence of cytotoxic edema related to the brain involvement of the infection. Following the completion of SARS-CoV-2 treatment, both cytotoxic edema and psychiatric symptoms resolved. In light of this report, we suggest that either heightened immune response and direct viral infection that SARS-CoV-2 may lead to such psychiatric manifestations and neuropsychiatric monitoring should be performed in patients with COVID-19. Prompt recognition of psychiatric consequences of COVID-19 may help clinicians provide guidance for differential diagnosis and manage them accordingly.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Mania/diagnostic imaging , Psychotic Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Acute Disease , Adult , Brain/diagnostic imaging , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/psychology , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Mania/etiology , Mania/psychology , Psychotic Disorders/etiology , Psychotic Disorders/psychologySubject(s)
Citalopram/adverse effects , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/adverse effects , Sinusitis/chemically induced , Citalopram/administration & dosage , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/administration & dosageABSTRACT
The pathophysiological underpinnings of central nervous system (CNS) involvement in SARS-CoV-2 infection, as well as the profile of adverse neuropsychiatric effects of pharmacological agents employed in the management of COVID-19, are yet to be elucidated. Here, we report a 43-year-old female patient who suffered from COVID-19 and who developed new-onset psychotic agitated behavior which may be related to either the COVID-19 infection itself or to the drugs that were used in the treatment. On her third day of treatment with oseltamivir, hydroxychloroquine, and azithromycin, the patient, who had no previous background of neurological or psychiatric diagnosis, presented with a new-onset psychomotor agitation with auditory hallucinations and insomnia. Her psychiatric symptoms have improved with oral olanzapine 5 mg/d. This report underscores the importance of neuropsychiatric monitoring in patients with COVID-19. Clinicians should be aware of the limited knowledge on the neuropsychiatric safety profile of the medication used for COVID-19 treatment, while they have focused on the neuropsychiatric outcomes of COVID-19 itself.