Effect of Virtual Reality on Pain Management and Opioid Use Among Hospitalized Patients After Head and Neck Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Optimal postoperative pain management is challenging. Virtual reality (VR) provides immersive, 3-dimensional experiences that may improve pain control and reduce reliance on pharmacologic pain management. Objective: To evaluate use of VR on postoperative pain management after head and neck surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, pilot randomized clinical trial was conducted at Oregon Health & Science University from July 2020 to October 2021 and included patients hospitalized after major head and neck surgery. Interventions: Similar 15-minute interactive gaming experiences (Angry Birds) using an Oculus Quest VR headset (VR intervention) or a handheld smartphone device (control). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was postintervention pain reduction. Pain scores were obtained preintervention, immediately after intervention, and then hourly for 4 hours. Secondary outcomes included changes in opioid use, measured as milligram morphine equivalents (MMEs), and patient experiences with their intervention using 5-point Likert scales. Results: Of the 30 patients randomized for inclusion, the final population included 14 patients in the VR cohort and 15 patients in the control cohort; the majority of patients were male (26 of 29 [90%]), and the mean (SD) age was 58.3 (13.8) years. After outlier removal, there were clinically meaningful reductions in postintervention pain among patients in the VR group immediately after intervention (mean difference, -1.42; 95% CI, -2.15 to -0.70; d = 1.50), at 1 hour (mean difference, -0.86; 95% CI, -1.90 to 0.14; d = 0.67), 2 hours (mean difference, -1.07; 95% CI, -2.30 to 0.14; d = 0.69), and 3 hours (mean difference, -1.36; 95% CI, -2.80 to 0.13; d = 0.71) compared with patients in the control group. Patients in the VR group also demonstrated reductions in 4-hour postintervention opioid use compared with 4-hour preintervention opioid use (mean difference, -9.10 MME; 95% CI, -15.00 to -1.27 MME; d = 0.90) and 8-hour postintervention opioid use compared with 8-hour preintervention opioid use (mean difference, -14.00 MME; 95% CI, -25.60 to -2.40 MME; d = 0.94). There were no meaningful differences in subjective patient experiences with their respective interventions. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, VR reduced pain scores and opioid use compared with a control intervention. Virtual reality may be a useful adjunct for postoperative pain management after head and neck surgery. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04464304.

Medical Liability in Sinus Surgery: A Westlaw Database Analysis From 2000 to 2017.

BACKGROUND: Medical malpractice occurs when a hospital or health-care provider through negligent act or omission results in an injury to a patient. More than 50% of otolaryngologists have faced at least 1 claim, with rhinology being the most litigated subspecialty. This study aims to analyze medical litigation trends in Rhinology from 2000 to 2017 in the United States. METHODS: The Westlaw database was reviewed from 2000 to 2017. Data were compiled on the demographics of the plaintiffs, procedures, nature of damages, legal allegations, and the use of expert witnesses, physician demographics/practice characteristics, verdicts, indemnities, and county/state of case. RESULTS: There were 75 cases that met inclusion criteria after review of 125 cases. Majority of cases went to trial over settlement (80%) and were found in the Northeast region of the United States (36%). Most common cited legal allegations were improper performance and failure to follow standard of care. The most common nature of injuries were eye injury (29%) and intracranial complications (27%). The highest payouts were for progression of disease followed by intracranial injury. Of the 75 total cases analyzed, 37 (49.3%) used expert witnesses. When an expert witness was used at trial, the verdict statistically favored the defendant (62.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis reveals the importance of meticulous surgical techniques and thorough preoperative evaluations.

Surgical exposures of the radius and ulna.

The forearm contains many muscles, nerves, and vascular structures that change position on forearm rotation. Exposure of the radial shaft is best achieved with the Henry (volar) or Thompson (dorsal) approach. The volar flexor carpi radialis approaches are used increasingly for exposure of the distal radius. Although the dorsal approach is a safe utilitarian option with many applications, its use for managing fracture of the distal radius has waned. Potential complications associated with radial exposure include injury to the superficial branch of the radial nerve, the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve, and the cephalic vein. Dorsal and ulnar proximal radial exposures are associated with increased risk of injury to the posterior interosseous nerve. With surgical exposure of the ulna, care is required to avoid injuring the dorsal cutaneous branch of the ulnar nerve.