Using analogue data to substantiate long-term durability of gene therapies: a narrative review.

The number of gene therapies in clinical trials and moving toward licensure is increasing. Most gene therapies are designed to achieve long-term effects, but at licensure the data to support claims of long-term durability are often limited, as long-term monitoring studies are often part of post-approval commitments by companies. Health technology assessors must therefore assess the potential for the long-term durability of a product and the potential cost-effectiveness based on the data available. The authors explored the benefit of strengthening the ability to infer durability of effect using analogue category data. Different analogue categories were assessed for the potential to substantiate claims of sustainability of effect for gene therapies by leveraging biological plausibility arguments. The authors propose a pathway for identifying potential analogues. Such a pathway should help establish plausible or theoretical long-term outcomes that can be considered in value assessments of gene therapies.

Many diseases, affecting all parts of the body, can be treated with gene therapy. Gene therapies make changes to a person's genes by either replacing or inactivating a gene that is causing disease or by adding new genes that can fight diseases such as cancers. These therapies have the potential to cure patients of the disease for their lifetime. When decisions are being made over whether gene therapies are safe and work well in patients, it can be difficult to understand if they will maintain their benefits to a person over a lifetime, as they have only been studied in clinical trials for a much shorter amount of time. In this paper, the authors explore whether information around the benefits of therapies that work in a similar way, or target similar diseases, can be used to strengthen an understanding of how well newer therapies work over a long period of time. The authors propose a pathway that can be followed to identify the suitability of a comparison between different therapies and how the evidence of benefit over time can be interpreted. This information will be useful for developers of gene therapies who are trying to generate evidence of long-term benefit to patients, as well as for decision makers who need to understand how well these gene therapies will work over a patient's lifetime.

Clinical Adoption of Advanced Therapies: Challenges and Opportunities.

As the cell and gene therapy field matures the powerful therapeutic potential of these innovative therapies is starting to be shown, particularly in the fields of oncology and childhood immune deficiency diseases. However, as more therapies enter late stage clinical trials, advances and innovation are required in manufacturing, logistics, regulation, reimbursement and the healthcare setting to ensure that systems are in place to support wider clinical adoption of these promising treatments. A window of opportunity exists to implement new methodologies for best practice in both the ability to manufacture products reproducibly at scale, as well as ensuring healthcare systems are not overwhelmed by the variety and complexity of these new therapies and the additional burden they will place on already stretched facilities. If all interested parties work together it will be possible for the sector to develop the necessary processes, skilled staff and infrastructure needed as more treatments move from clinical trial to marketed products.

Accept or Reject: The Role of Immune Tolerance in the Development of Stem Cell Therapies and Possible Future Approaches.

In 2011, Goldring and colleagues published a review article describing the potential safety issues of novel stem cell-derived treatments. Immunogenicity and immunotoxicity of the administered cell product were considered risks in the light of clinical experience of transplantation. The relative immunogenicity of mesenchymal stem cells, embryonic stem cells (ESCs), and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) was being addressed through in vitro and in vivo models. But the question arose as to whether the implanted cells needed to be identical to the recipient in every respect, including epigenetically, to evade immune recognition? If so, this set a high bar which may preclude use of many cells derived from iPSCs which have vestiges of a fetal phenotype and epigenetic memory of their cell of origin. However, for autologous iPSCs, the immunogenicity reduces once the surface antigen expression profile becomes close to that of the parent somatic cells. Therefore, a cell product containing incompletely differentiated cells could be more immunogenic. The properties of the administered cells, the immune privilege of the administration site, and the host immune status influence graft success or failure. In addition, the various approaches available to characterize potential immunogenicity of a cell therapy will be discussed.

Correction to: Preclinical Development of Cell-Based Products: a European Regulatory Science Perspective.

The article [Preclinical Development of Cell-Based Products: a European Regulatory Science Perspective], written by [James W. McBlane, Parvinder Phul, and Michaela Sharpe], was originally published electronically on the publisher's internet portal (currently SpringerLink).

Preclinical Development of Cell-Based Products: a European Regulatory Science Perspective.

PURPOSE: This article describes preclinical development of cell-based medicinal products for European markets and discusses European regulatory mechanisms open to developers to aid successful product development. Cell-based medicinal products are diverse, including cells that are autologous or allogeneic, have been genetically modified, or not, or expanded ex vivo, and applied systemically or to an anatomical site different to that of their origin; comments applicable to one product may not be applicable to others, so bespoke development is needed, for all elements - quality, preclinical and clinical. METHODS: After establishing how the product is produced, proof of potential for therapeutic efficacy, and then safety, of the product need to be determined. This includes understanding biodistribution, persistence and toxicity, including potential for malignant transformation. These elements need to be considered in the context of the intended clinical development. RESULTS: This article describes regulatory mechanisms available to developers to support product development that aim to resolve scientific issues prior to marketing authorization application, to enable patients to have faster access to the product than would otherwise be the case. CONCLUSIONS: Developers are encouraged to be aware of both the scientific issues and regulatory mechanisms to ensure patients can be supplied with these products.

T-cell Immunotherapies and the Role of Nonclinical Assessment: The Balance between Efficacy and Pathology.

Gene-engineered T-cell therapies have the potential to revolutionize the treatment of cancer. These therapies have shown exceptional clinical efficacy specifically in the field of B-cell malignancies and the first products (Kymriah™ and Yescarta™) have recently been approved in the United States for specific indications. The power of these treatments is also linked with a distinct set of toxicities both predicted and unpredicted, including off-tumor activity, cytokine release syndromes, and neurotoxicity, occasionally with fatal consequences. As these therapies begin to reach more patients, it is critical to develop the nonclinical tools to adequately determine the mechanisms driving these toxicities, to assess the safety risks of candidate products, and to develop strategies for safety management.

Preclinical development of an automated injection device for intradermal delivery of a cell-based therapy.

Current methods for intradermal delivery of therapeutic products in clinical use include manual injection via the Mantoux technique and the use of injection devices, primarily developed for the delivery of vaccines and small molecules. A novel automated injection device is presented specifically designed for accurate delivery of multiple doses of product through a number of adjustable injection parameters, including injection depth, dose volume and needle insertion speed. The device was originally conceived for the delivery of a cell-based therapy to patients with skin wounds caused by epidermolysis bullosa. A series of preclinical studies was conducted (i) to evaluate the performance of the pre-production model (PreCTCDV01) and optimise the final design, (ii) to confirm that a cell therapy product can be effectively delivered through the injection system and (iii) to test whether the device can be safely and effectively operated by potential end-users. Results from these studies confirmed that the device is able to consistently deliver repeated doses of a liquid to the intradermal layer in an ex vivo skin model. In addition, the device can support delivery of a cell therapy product through a customised microbore tubing without compromising cell viability. Finally, the device was shown to be safe and easy to use as evidenced by usability testing. The clinical device has since been granted European market access and plans for clinical use are currently underway. The device is expected to find use in the emerging area of cell therapies and a broad spectrum of traditional parenteral drug delivery applications.

Genetically modified T cells in cancer therapy: opportunities and challenges.

Tumours use many strategies to evade the host immune response, including downregulation or weak immunogenicity of target antigens and creation of an immune-suppressive tumour environment. T cells play a key role in cell-mediated immunity and, recently, strategies to genetically modify T cells either through altering the specificity of the T cell receptor (TCR) or through introducing antibody-like recognition in chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) have made substantial advances. The potential of these approaches has been demonstrated in particular by the successful use of genetically modified T cells to treat B cell haematological malignancies in clinical trials. This clinical success is reflected in the growing number of strategic partnerships in this area that have attracted a high level of investment and involve large pharmaceutical organisations. Although our understanding of the factors that influence the safety and efficacy of these therapies has increased, challenges for bringing genetically modified T-cell immunotherapy to many patients with different tumour types remain. These challenges range from the selection of antigen targets and dealing with regulatory and safety issues to successfully navigating the routes to commercial development. However, the encouraging clinical data, the progress in the scientific understanding of tumour immunology and the improvements in the manufacture of cell products are all advancing the clinical translation of these important cellular immunotherapies.

The issue of immunology in stem cell therapies: a pharmaceutical perspective.

Cautious approaches in the clinic are currently proposed, supported by relevant in vitro, in vivo and published data. Key to developing our understanding of the risks of immune rejection of stem cell based therapies will be the inclusion of immunological endpoints in clinical trials and the sharing of data. There is likely not a one-size-fits all strategy but one dependent on cell therapy, mode of action and disease indication.

Landscape of current and emerging cell therapy clinical trials in the UK: current status, comparison to global trends and future perspectives.

Cell Therapy Clinical Trial and Preclinical Research databases have been established by the Cell Therapy Catapult to document current and future cell therapy clinical trials in the UK. We identified 41 ongoing trials in April 2014, an increase of seven trials from April 2013. In addition, we identified 45 late-stage preclinical research projects. The majority of the clinical trials are early phase, primarily led by academic groups. The leading therapeutic areas are cancer, cardiology and neurology. The trends in the UK are also seen globally. As the field matures, more later phase and commercial studies will emerge and the challenges will likely evolve into how to manufacture sufficient cell quantities, manage complex logistics for multi-center trials and control cost.

Concise review: workshop review: understanding and assessing the risks of stem cell-based therapies.

The field of stem cell therapeutics is moving ever closer to widespread application in the clinic. However, despite the undoubted potential held by these therapies, the balance between risk and benefit remains difficult to predict. As in any new field, a lack of previous application in man and gaps in the underlying science mean that regulators and investigators continue to look for a balance between minimizing potential risk and ensuring therapies are not needlessly kept from patients. Here, we attempt to identify the important safety issues, assessing the current advances in scientific knowledge and how they may translate to clinical therapeutic strategies in the identification and management of these risks. We also investigate the tools and techniques currently available to researchers during preclinical and clinical development of stem cell products, their utility and limitations, and how these tools may be strategically used in the development of these therapies. We conclude that ensuring safety through cutting-edge science and robust assays, coupled with regular and open discussions between regulators and academic/industrial investigators, is likely to prove the most fruitful route to ensuring the safest possible development of new products.

Nonclinical safety strategies for stem cell therapies.

Recent breakthroughs in stem cell biology, especially the development of the induced pluripotent stem cell techniques, have generated tremendous enthusiasm and efforts to explore the therapeutic potential of stem cells in regenerative medicine. Stem cell therapies are being considered for the treatment of degenerative diseases, inflammatory conditions, cancer and repair of damaged tissue. The safety of a stem cell therapy depends on many factors including the type of cell therapy, the differentiation status and proliferation capacity of the cells, the route of administration, the intended clinical location, long term survival of the product and/or engraftment, the need for repeated administration, the disease to be treated and the age of the population. Understanding the product profile of the intended therapy is crucial to the development of the nonclinical safety study design.

Assessing the safety of stem cell therapeutics.

Unprecedented developments in stem cell research herald a new era of hope and expectation for novel therapies. However, they also present a major challenge for regulators since safety assessment criteria, designed for conventional agents, are largely inappropriate for cell-based therapies. This article aims to set out the safety issues pertaining to novel stem cell-derived treatments, to identify knowledge gaps that require further research, and to suggest a roadmap for developing safety assessment criteria. It is essential that regulators, pharmaceutical providers, and safety scientists work together to frame new safety guidelines, based on "acceptable risk," so that patients are adequately protected but the safety "bar" is not set so high that exciting new treatments are lost.

DNA vaccination protects against an influenza challenge in a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled phase 1b clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: We have developed a Trivalent DNA vaccine for influenza consisting of three plasmids expressing haemagglutinin from different seasonal influenza virus strains delivered using PMED (particle mediated epidermal delivery). We set out to determine whether this vaccine (with and without a molecular adjuvant DNA Encoded Immunostimulator-Labile Toxin (DEI-LT)) could protect subjects from a controlled influenza virus challenge. METHODS: Healthy adult subjects were screened for susceptibility to infection with influenza A/H3 Panama/2007/99 then vaccinated with 4microg Trivalent influenza DNA vaccine, 2microg Trivalent influenza DNA vaccine plus DEI-LT or placebo. Safety and serological responses to vaccination were assessed and on Day 56 subjects were challenged with A/H3 Panama/2007/99 virus. RESULTS: Vaccination with 4microg Trivalent or 2microg Trivalent/DEI-LT was well tolerated and induced antibody responses to two of the three influenza virus vaccine strains. Post challenge, subjects in the 4microg Trivalent group (N=27) showed reductions in disease symptoms and viral shedding compared to placebo (N=27), with an overall vaccine efficacy of 41% (95% confidence interval (CI)=?1.5, 67.7) for 'Any illness with or without fever' and 53% for 'Upper respiratory tract infection' (95% CI=8.0, 77.7). CONCLUSION: It was concluded that PMED vaccination with 4microg Trivalent influenza DNA vaccine was safe and elicited immunological responses that protected human subjects from influenza; this is the first report of protection of human subjects from disease by DNA vaccination.

Protection of mice from H5N1 influenza challenge by prophylactic DNA vaccination using particle mediated epidermal delivery.

Mice were vaccinated with a DNA plasmid encoding the haemagglutinin (HA) antigen of H5N1 influenza A/Vietnam/1194/2004 by particle mediated epidermal delivery (PMED). Vaccination led to potent anti-HA serological responses that were significantly enhanced by the inclusion of a plasmid expressing the A and B subunits of Escherichia coli heat labile enterotoxin (designated DEI-LT). Mice were vaccinated with H5 or H5/DEI-LT and challenged with 100LD50 H5N1 A/Vietnam/1194/2004 virus. Vaccination provided considerable protection, and mice that received two doses (prime-boost) of H5/DEI-LT showed no symptoms of disease post vaccination, did not shed detectable virus and did not show any rise in anti-H5N1 HI titre post challenge, indicating that they were fully protected. These results demonstrate that the PMED technology may hold promise for the prophylaxis of pandemic influenza.

Analysis of the CoIE1 stability determinant Rcd.

Multimer formation is an important cause of instability for many multicopy plasmids. Plasmid CoIE1 is maintained stably because multimers are converted to monomers by Xer-mediated site-specific recombination at the cer site. However, multimer resolution is not the whole story; inactivation of a promoter (Pcer) within cer causes plasmid instability even though recombination is unaffected. The promoter directs the synthesis of a short transcript (Rcd) which is proposed to delay the division of multimer-containing cells. Mapping of the 5' terminus of Rcd confirms that transcription initiates from Pcer. The 3' terminus shows considerable heterogeneity, consistent with a primary transcript of 95 nt being degraded via intermediates of 79 and 70 nt. Secondary structure predictions for Rcd are presented. Of four mutations which abolish Rcd-mediated growth inhibition, one reduces the activity of Pcer while the other three map to the rcd coding sequence and reduce the steady-state level of the transcript. RNA folding analysis suggests that these three mutant transcripts adopt a common secondary structure in which the major stem-loop differs from that of wild-type Rcd. A survey of 24 cer-like multimer resolution sites revealed six which contain Pcer-like sequences. The putative transcripts from these sites have similar predicted secondary structures to Rcd and contain a highly conserved 15 base sequence. To test the hypothesis that Rcd acts as an anti-sense RNA, interacting with its target gene(s) through the 15 nt sequence, we used DNA hybridization and sequence analysis to find matches to this sequence in the Escherichia coli chromosome. Our failure to find plausible anti-sense targets has led to the suggestion that Rcd may interact directly with a protein target.