ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The risk of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) is increased during freckles and lentigines treatment in Asians. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness and safety of using 595-nm long pulsed dye laser (LPDL), 755-nm LP Alexandrite laser, 532-nm QS Nd:YAG laser and 532-nm LP potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP) laser for the treatment of freckles or lentigines in Asian patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 40 Chinese patients, who were divided into four groups based on treatment modality using four different pigment lasers. Each patient attended between 1 and 4 treatments (mean of 1.8), at 4-6 weeks intervals, depending on clinical response. Lesional clearance and PIH were assessed by two independent clinicians. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvement of global and focal facial pigmentation was found after treatment with LPDL, QS Nd:YAG and LP KTP lasers. No significant improvement was found after LP Alexandrite laser. PIH risk was 20% after LP Alexandrite treatment, 10% with QS Nd:YAG, and absent after LPDL and LP KTP treatment. CONCLUSION: A long pulse laser and small spot size appear to reduce the risks of lentigines treatment in darker skin types.
Subject(s)
Asian People , Lasers, Dye/therapeutic use , Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use , Melanosis/therapy , Adult , Female , Humans , Hyperpigmentation/ethnology , Hyperpigmentation/etiology , Lasers, Dye/adverse effects , Lasers, Solid-State/adverse effects , Lentigo/ethnology , Lentigo/therapy , Melanosis/ethnology , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Q-switched (QS) lasers are effective in the treatment of freckles and lentigines in Type I and II skin, with minimal adverse effects. Long pulsed (LP) lasers have been proposed to be more suitable for treatment of darker skin types. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy and adverse effects of using QS or LP Alexandrite laser for the treatment of freckles and lentigines in Oriental patients. METHODS: A prospective split-face study of 20 Chinese patients who were randomly assigned to undergo a single QS (50 nanosecond) or LP (100 microseconds) laser treatment to either side of their face was carried out. Two blinded physicians assessed clinical efficacy using visual analogue scales of pre- and post-treatment photographs. Subjective assessment was evaluated using questionnaires which detailed the degree of pain, erythema and edema sustained during treatment, and improvement and satisfaction levels at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. RESULTS: There was statistically significant improvement in pigmentation (P < 0.05) in both groups throughout the study, with no statistical difference found between the groups. Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation was more frequently found after QS treatment (22%), compared to LP treatment (6%). Majority of patients reported moderate to marked improvement in pigmentation throughout the study with both pulse widths, and correspondingly high levels of satisfaction rates. More severe pain, erythema and edema were experienced during QS Alexandrite treatment. CONCLUSION: LP Alexandrite is quick and effective, and carries a lower risk of adverse effects than QS Alexandrite, for the removal of freckles and lentigines in darker skin types.
Subject(s)
Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use , Melanosis/surgery , Adult , China , Face , Female , Humans , Lasers, Solid-State/adverse effects , Lentigo/surgery , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) is characterized by an acquired increase in pigmentation secondary to an inflammatory process, and is a commonly observed response to cutaneous injury in Fitzpatrick types III-VI patients. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness and safety of using topical treatment, laser treatment, or combination topical and laser treatments to treat acne PIH in Oriental patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 34 randomly selected Chinese patients with acne PIH. They were divided into three groups, and treated with topical agents, 595 nm long pulsed dye laser and/or 1064 nm Q-switched Nd:YAG, or combination topical and laser treatments. An independent clinician assessed pre- and post-treatment photographs to determine efficacy and timing to visible and optimum improvement. RESULTS: There was significant global and focal improvement of acne PIH in patients in all three groups. However, no significant difference was found between the groups. An investigator global assessment showed improvement with all treatment modalities, with 70.6% moderate to marked improvement seen in the combination treatment group, compared to 55.6% in the laser only group, and 50% in the topical treatment only group. Visible and optimum improvement was seen by 3 months in majority of patients treated. One patient developed PIH as a result of laser treatment. CONCLUSION: Topical treatment, laser therapy, and combination topical and laser treatments all appear to be effective management strategies for acne PIH in Fitzpatrick types III and IV skin with little complications. Topical agents may be considered as first-line therapy for acne PIH, taking into consideration its effectiveness, ease of use and cost. Combined topical and laser therapy is also effective, and may be considered as second-line treatment.
