Improved Short-Term Prognosis of Pediatric Partial-Thickness Burns: Emergency Conservative Debridement Under Topical Anesthesia.

OBJECTIVES: Early wound management for pediatric patients with partial-thickness burns in the emergency department remains debatable. This study aims to evaluate the value of emergency conservative debridement under topical anesthesia in improving short-term prognosis of pediatric partial-thickness burns. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study enrolled children with partial-thickness thermal burns presenting to the emergency department within 6 hours postburn. All the enrolled patients were divided into 2 groups: the debridement group and the dressing group. The associations between emergency conservative debridement and time to reepithelialization was analyzed by using Kaplan-Meier curves with log rank test and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Moreover, the associations between emergency conservative debridement and in-hospital cost and length of stay were also evaluated. RESULTS: All baseline characteristics between groups were comparable (all P > 0.05). Emergency conservative debridement under topical anesthesia significantly decreased the median value of time to reepithelialization (13 vs 14 days, P = 0.02). Cox regression analysis showed that emergency conservative debridement significantly improved wound reepithelialization after adjusting for burn size (odds ratio, 4.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.64-10.11; P < 0.01). The mean length of stay of patients receiving conservative wound debridement was lower than that of patients in the wound dressing group (14.3 ± 7.3 vs 18.8 ± 10.4 days, P < 0.01), but not in terms of mean in-hospital cost per 1% total body surface area (2.8 ± 1.9 vs 3.0 ± 2.1 × 103 RMB per 1% total body surface area, P = 0.58). CONCLUSIONS: Emergency conservative debridement of pediatric partial-thickness burns under topical anesthesia significantly improves the wound healing outcomes without increasing health care burden.

Development and validation of a nomogram for pneumonia risk in burn patients with inhalation injury: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Burn patients with inhalation injury are at higher risk of developing pneumonia, and yet there is no reliable tool for the assessment of the risk for such patients at admission. This study aims to establish a predictive model for pneumonia risk for burn patients with inhalation injury based on clinical findings and laboratory tests. METHOD: This retrospective study enrolled 546 burn patients with inhalation injury. They were grouped into a training cohort and a validation cohort. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis and binary logistic regression analysis were utilized to identify risk factors for pneumonia. Based on the factors, a nomogram for predicting pneumonia in burn patients with inhalation injury was constructed. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the efficiency of the nomogram in both the training and validation cohorts. RESULTS: The training cohort included 432 patients, and the validation cohort included 114 patients, with a total of 225 (41.2%) patients experiencing pneumonia. Inhalation injury, tracheal intubation/tracheostomy, low serum albumin, and high blood glucose were independent risk factors for pneumonia in burn patients with inhalation injury and they were further used to build the nomogram. The AUC of the nomogram in the training and validation cohorts were 0.938 (95% CI: 0.917-0.960) and 0.966 (95% CI: 0.931-1), respectively. The calibration curve for probability of pneumonia showed optimal agreement between the prediction by nomogram and the actual observation, and the DCA indicated that the constructed nomogram conferred high clinical net benefit. CONCLUSION: This nomogram can accurately predict the risk of developing pneumonia for burn patients with inhalation injury, and help professionals to identify high-risk patients at an early stage as well as to make informed clinical decisions.

A novel skin grafting modality: prefabricated large sheet of postage-stamp autografts and allografts to repair extensive burn wounds; a prospective matched-control study.

BACKGROUND: The excessively long operative time has been the greatest barrier to the success of transplanting postage-stamp auto- and allografts directly and piece-by-piece onto extensive burn wounds. To solve this challenge, the authors present a novel grafting modality, that is, the prefabricated-large-sheet grafting that moves the labor-intensive and time-consuming process of grafts-positioning before grafting and thereby markedly shortens the operative time. METHODS: Twenty-one operations using the novel modality were performed on 11 patients with extensive deep burns. The grafting time using the novel modality was recorded and compared with that of the conventional piece-by-piece grafting. Eventually, the take rates of the two modalities were compared. RESULTS: All patients were healed and discharged. The average grafting time per unit area (100 cm2) of prefabricated-large-sheet grafting and piece-by-piece grafting were (0.41±0.09) min and (7.46±1.07) min, respectively, and the difference is statistically significant(P<0.001). The average take rate of the prefabricated sheets was (85.43±6.14)% and that of the piece-by-piece transplanted grafts was (87.29±5.23)% and there is no significant difference(P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The prefabricated-large-sheet grafting significantly reduces the intraoperative grafting time while ensures uniformity of the skin grafts and secures good outcomes, thereby making the intermingled transplantation of postage-stamp auto- and allografts, which has been an excellent modality per se but limited to repair small residual wounds, now feasible to repair extensive deep burn wounds. It is worth wider understanding and application in the treatment of extensive deep burns.