Angiotensin-(1-7) attenuates SARS-CoV2 spike protein-induced interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 production in alveolar epithelial cells through activation of Mas receptor.

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins (SP) can bind to the human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in human pulmonary alveolar epithelial cells (HPAEpiC) and trigger an inflammatory process. Angiotensin-(1-7) may have an anti-inflammatory effect through activation of Mas receptor. This study aims to investigate whether SARS-CoV-2 SP can induce inflammation through ACE2 in the alveolar epithelial cells which can be modulated through angiotensin-(1-7)/Mas receptor axis. METHODS: HPAEpiC were treated with SARS-CoV-2 SP in the presence or absence of ACE2 antagonist-dalbavancin and Mas receptor agonist-angiotensin-(1-7). Proinflammatory cytokine production (IL-6 and IL-8) were measured at mRNA and protein levels. MAP kinase phosphorylation and transcription factor activation was determined by Western Blot. Mas receptor was blocked by either antagonist (A779) or knockdown (specific SiRNA). Experiments were replicated using A549 cells. FINDINGS: SARS-CoV-2 SP (5 µg/mL) significantly induced MAP kinase (ERK1/2) phosphorylation, downstream transcription factor (activator protein-1, AP-1) activation and cytokine production (IL-6 and IL-8) at both mRNA and protein levels. Pretreatment with dalbavancin (10 µg/mL), or angiotensin-(1-7) (10 µM) significantly reduced ERK1/2 phosphorylation, AP-1 activation, and cytokine production. However, these angiotensin-(1-7)-related protective effects were significantly abolished by blocking Mas receptor with either antagonist (A799,10 µM) or SiRNA knockdown. INTERPRETATION: SARS-CoV-2 SP can induce proinflammatory cytokine production, which can be inhibited by either ACE2 antagonist or Mas receptor agonist-angiotensin-(1-7). Angiotensin-(1-7)-related protective effect on cytokine reduction can be abolished by blocking Mas receptor. Our findings suggest that ACE2/angiotensin-(1-7)/Mas axis may serve as a therapeutic target to control inflammatory response triggered by SARS-CoV-2 SP.

Assessing the prognostic value of respiratory oscillometry in patients with difficult-to-treat asthma.

Respiratory oscillometry is widely explored in asthma management; however, there is currently no consensus on its routine work-up in patients with difficult-to-treat asthma. We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study involving patients with difficult-to-treat asthma at Asia University Hospital between January 2017 and October 2020. We aimed to correlate clinical significance of respiratory oscillometry and asthma treatment outcomes including symptoms control and exacerbation in patients with difficult-to-treat asthma. Among the 69 patients enrolled in the study, a total of 26.1% of the patients experienced at least one severe or two moderate exacerbations. Patients with ACT < 20 presented a higher prevalence of higher frequency-dependent resistance (FDR; the difference in resistance at 5 Hz and 20 Hz) and frequency of resonance (Fres) than those with ACT ≥ 20. In the multivariable analysis, comorbidities, COPD or allergic rhinitis, and FDR were independent factors in increasing the odds ratio in poorly controlled asthma. (FDR ≥ 0.10 vs. < 0.10, adjusted ORR = 5.05, P = 0.037) There was a higher proportion of frequent exacerbations in patients with higher FDR (FDR ≥ 0.10 vs. < 0.10 = 30.0%:20.7%), but IOS parameters failed to predict frequent exacerbations on further analysis. FDR may be a potential clinical parameter for predicting symptom control in patients with difficult-to-treat asthma.

Reduced FEV1 as Prognostic Factors in Patients With Advanced NSCLC Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Background: The aim of study is to investigate the influence of pulmonary function on the prognosis in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Patients and Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from 151 patients with stage IV NSCLC who received ICI and completed spirometry before ICI therapy in Taipei Veterans General Hospital between January 2016 and December 2020. The co-primary end points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between groups divided by 80% predicted FEV1 since ICI therapy started; the secondary outcomes were objective response rate. Results: Among 151 patients enrolled to this study, 67.5% of patients were men, 75.5% were adenocarcinoma, 24.5% had known targetable driver mutation, 33.8% received first-line ICI, and 62.8% received ICI monotherapy. The objective response rate was 24.5% and disease control rate was 54.3%. In multivariable analysis, patient with reduced FEV1 had inferior PFS (FEV1 < 80% vs. FEV1 ≥ 80%, adjusted HR = 1.80, P = 0.006) and OS (FEV1 < 80% vs. FEV1 ≥ 80%, adjusted HR = 2.50, P < 0.001). Median PFS and OS in the preserved FEV1 group (≥80% predicted FEV1) compared to the reduced FEV1 group (<80% predicted FEV1) were 5.4 vs. 2.9 months (HR = 1.76, P = 0.003) and 34.9 vs. 11.1 months (HR = 2.44, P < 0.001), respectively. The other independent prognostic factors of OS include stage IVA disease (adjusted HR = 0.57, P = 0.037), initial liver metastasis (adjusted HR = 2.00, P = 0.049), ICI monotherapy (adjusted HR = 1.73, P = 0.042) and ICI related pneumonitis (adjusted HR = 3 .44, P = 0.025). Conclusions: Reduced FEV1 is strongly associated with inferior clinical outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICI.