Diagnostic Utility of High-resolution Esophageal Manometry and Its Correlation with Symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Primary esophageal motility disorders present with a spectrum of symptoms where manometry plays an important role. We designed this study to evaluate the utility of esophageal manometry among various symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a single-center observational study conducted over 5 years in a tertiary referral center. A total of 564 patients who underwent high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) using a 16-channel water perfusion system were included in the study. Their clinical profile and manometric findings, as per the Chicago classification version 4.0, were recorded, and the diagnostic utility of HREM with respect to symptoms was studied. RESULTS: Motility disorders were identified in 48.8% of patients, the most common being Achalasia cardia (32.4%). Dysphagia (55.5%) was the most common indication of manometry, followed by gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (34.9%), chest pain (6.2%), and symptoms such as belching, globus, and hiccoughs (3.4%). Among those who were re-classified from Chicago classification v3.0 to v4.0, 21.2% had a newer diagnosis. Among the patients with dysphagia, HREM revealed the highest yield of detecting an abnormal esophageal motility test (70.6%); meanwhile, this yield was much lower in those with GERD (21.8%), chest pain (22.8%), and other symptoms (15.7%). The most common finding among those with dysphagia was Achalasia cardia (55.9%), while the study was normal among those with GERD (78.1%), chest pain (77.1%), and other symptoms (84.2%). The sensitivity and specificity of dysphagia for major motility disorders were 65% and 91%, respectively, with a positive predictive value of 90%. CONCLUSION: HREM has high accuracy and a good diagnostic yield among patients with dysphagia, with the most common finding being Achalasia cardia.

Résumé Contexte:Les troubles primaires de la motilité œsophagienne se manifestent par un spectre de symptômes dans lesquels la manométrie joue un rôle important. Nous conçu cette étude pour évaluer l'utilité de la manométrie œsophagienne parmi divers symptômes.Matériels et méthodes:Il s'agit d'un centre unique étude observationnelle menée sur 5 ans dans un centre de référence tertiaire. Au total, 564 patients ayant subi une chirurgie œsophagienne à haute resolution la manométrie (HREM) utilisant un système de perfusion d'eau à 16 canaux ont été incluses dans l'étude. Leur profil clinique et leurs résultats manométriques, selon la classification de Chicago version 4.0, ont été enregistrés et l'utilité diagnostique du HREM en ce qui concerne les symptômes a été étudiée.Résultats:Des troubles de la motilité ont été identifiés chez 48,8 % des patients, la plus fréquente étant l'Achalasia cardia (32,4 %). La dysphagie (55,5 %) était la l'indication la plus courante de la manométrie, suivie du reflux gastro-œsophagien (RGO) (34,9 %), des douleurs thoraciques (6,2 %) et des symptômes tels que comme les éructations, les globus et le hoquet (3,4 %). Parmi ceux qui ont été reclassés de la classification de Chicago v3.0 à v4.0, 21,2 % avaient un diagnostic. Parmi les patients atteints de dysphagie, l'HREM a révélé le rendement le plus élevé de détection d'un test de motilité œsophagienne anormale (70,6 %); dans le même temps, ce rendement était beaucoup plus faible chez les personnes souffrant de RGO (21,8 %), de douleurs thoraciques (22,8 %) et d'autres symptômes (15,7 %). Le plus courant le résultat parmi les personnes souffrant de dysphagie était l'achalasie cardiaque (55,9 %), tandis que l'étude était normale chez les personnes souffrant de RGO (78,1 %), douleur thoracique (77,1 %) et autres symptômes (84,2 %). La sensibilité et la spécificité de la dysphagie pour les troubles majeurs de la motilité étaient de 65 % et 91 %, respectivement, avec une valeur prédictive positive de 90 %.Conclusion:HREM présente une grande précision et un bon rendement diagnostique chez les patients atteints de dysphagie, la pathologie la plus fréquente étant l'achalasie cardiaque.

Primary omental infarction - a benign cause of acute abdomen.

Objectives: Omental infarction (OI) is an uncommon cause of acute abdominal pain. A high index of clinical suspicion is required for diagnosis of OI as the incidence is less than 1 %, presenting with abdominal pain. We report primary OI's clinical and radiological profile from a single tertiary care hospital in India. Methods: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, the electronic medical and radiology records of patients with abdominal pain were reviewed over seven years (2015-2022). Variables were systematically collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 22 patients diagnosed with primary OI were included in this study. Male preponderance (63.6 %) was noted with a mean age of 47.45 years (SD ± 13.84; range: 18-72 years). Most patients belonged to class I obesity (according to the Asia-Pacific body mass index classification) with a mean BMI of 26.56 kg/m2 (SD ± 3.21 kg/m2). All patients had abdominal pain as the primary symptom, with a mean duration of 8.64 days (SD ± 10.15; range: 1-42 days). The most common locations of pain were the right hypochondrium (27.3 %) and diffuse (27.3 %), followed by the right iliac fossa (18.1 %). Most (95.45 %, n=21/22) patients were treated conservatively, and only one required surgical intervention. Conclusions: Primary OI is a rare and benign cause of acute abdomen. Obesity is a risk factor but does not correlate with the size or severity of OI. Radiological imaging, like a computed tomography (CT) scan, is essential for diagnosis. A conservative management line should be the first approach in treating primary OI before considering surgical options.

Calcified pseudocyst: an uncommon presentation of chronic pancreatitis.

Pseudocysts are localised fluid collections, usually developing as a complication of acute or chronic pancreatitis. Pancreatic ductal or parenchymal calcifications are commonly seen in routine radiological imaging, but calcification of pseudocyst is extremely rare. Calcified pseudocysts have been reported in literature as case reports, but a calcified pseudocyst in the lesser sac, without underlying pancreatic calcification, has not been reported. We report a case of a pancreatic pseudocyst with a calcified wall, requiring surgical excision and histological examination confirming the diagnosis.