Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
ACS Omega ; 9(31): 33826-33832, 2024 Aug 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39130586

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have reported that the inappropriate use of allopurinol may increase the risk of cerebrovascular accidents, but some studies have also confirmed that allopurinol is a protective factor against stroke. To clarify whether there is a relevant causal relationship between allopurinol and cerebral infarction, we conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study. METHODS: Data on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with allopurinol and genome-wide association studies of cerebral infarction were obtained from the genome-wide association study (GWAS) web site. Five basic MR analyses were performed using MR-Egger regression, weighted median (WM1), inverse variance weighting (IVW), weighted mode (WM2), and simple mode. Sensitivity analysis was subsequently performed to detect horizontal pleiotropy, heterogeneity, and potential outliers. The final analysis results were mainly based on the IVW estimates. RESULTS: A total of 10 SNPs were used as instrumental variables (IVs). MR analysis [(IVW: odds ratio (OR) = 1.053, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.019-1.088, P = 0.002), (WM1: OR = 1.053, 95% CI: 1.009-1.098, P = 0.017), (WM2: OR = 1.050, 95% CI: 1.008-1.095, P = 0.044), (MR Egger: Q = 4.285, P = 0.830)] showed a positive causal association between allopurinol and the risk of cerebral infarction. Sensitivity analysis such as horizontal pleiotropy and heterogeneity increased the reliability of this result. CONCLUSION: The results of this study provide direct evidence that there is a causal relationship between allopurinol and cerebral infarction and that allopurinol may increase the risk of cerebral infarction.

2.
Front Pharmacol ; 15: 1370661, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38881871

ABSTRACT

Objective: To compare the effects of tofacitinib and adalimumab on the risk of adverse lipidaemia outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Data of adult patients newly diagnosed with RA who were treated with tofacitinib or adalimumab at least twice during a 3-year period from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2020, were enrolled in the TriNetX US Collaborative Network. Patient demographics, comorbidities, medications, and laboratory data were matched by propensity score at baseline. Outcome measurements include incidental risk of dyslipidemia, major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and all-cause mortality. Results: A total of 7,580 newly diagnosed patients with RA (1998 receiving tofacitinib, 5,582 receiving adalimumab) were screened. After propensity score matching, the risk of dyslipidaemia outcomes were higher in the tofacitinib cohort, compared with adalimumab cohort (hazard ratio [HR] with 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.250 [1.076-1.453]). However, there is no statistically significant differences between two cohorts on MACE (HR, 0.995 [0.760-1.303]) and all-cause mortality (HR, 1.402 [0.887-2.215]). Conclusion: Tofacitinib use in patients with RA may increase the risk of dyslipidaemia to some extent compared to adalimumab. However, there is no differences on MACE and all-cause mortality.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL