Efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus penpulimab as second-line treatment for small cell lung cancer: A multicenter, open-label, single-arm phase II trial.

Background: Currently, the need for new therapeutic strategies involving programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibodies in the second-line setting of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is urgent. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus penpulimab as a second-line treatment for patients with SCLC who progressed after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Methods: This study included the patients from Cohort 4 of a single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase II clinical trial. A safety run-in phase was performed under anlotinib (10/12 mg quaque die [QD], days 1-14) plus penpulimab (200 mg intravenously [IV], day 1) in a 21-day cycle, followed by the formal trial in which the patients received anlotinib (12 mg QD, days 1-14) plus penpulimab (200 mg IV, day 1) in a 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint of the safety run-in phase was safety. The primary endpoint of the formal trial phase was the objective response rate (ORR). Results: From April 28, 2020, to November 24, 2020, 21 patients were enrolled from 11 hospitals, including 2 in the safety run-in phase and 19 in the formal trial phase. In the formal trial phase, the ORR was 42.1% (8/19; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.7-66.6%). The median progression-free survival was 4.8 months (95% CI: 2.9-11.3 months), and the median overall survival was 13.0 months (95% CI: 4.6-not applicable [NA] months). The incidence of ≥grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was 52.4% (11/21), and the incidence of treatment-related serious adverse events (AEs) was 28.6% (6/21). Two AE-related deaths occurred. The most common AEs were hypertension (57.1%, 12/21), hypothyroidism (42.9%, 9/21), and hypertriglyceridemia (38.1%, 8/21). Conclusions: In patients with SCLC who progressed after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, the second-line anlotinib plus penpulimab treatment demonstrates promising anti-cancer activity and a manageable safety profile, which warrants further investigation. Trial registration: No. NCT04203719, https://clinicaltrials.gov/.

Multi-omics analysis and response prediction of PD-1 monoclonal antibody containing regimens in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) show varied responses to PD-1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) containing regimens. The mechanisms and predictive biomarkers for the efficacy of this regimen are unclear. This study retrospectively collected r/r DLBCL patients who received PD-1 mAb and rituximab regimens as salvage therapy. Clinical and genomic features were collected, and mechanisms were explored by multiplex immunofluorescence and digital spatial profiling. An artificial neural network (ANN) model was constructed to predict the response. Between October 16th, 2018 and May 4th, 2023, 50 r/r DLBCL patients were collected, 29 were response patients and 21 were non-response patients. CREBBP (p = 0.029) and TP53 (p = 0.015) alterations were statistically higher in non-response patients. Patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 were correlated with a longer overall survival (OS) than those with PD-L1 CPS < 5 (median OS: not reached vs. 9.7 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 3.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-22.44, p = 0.016). Immune-related pathways were activated in response patients. The proportion and spatial organization of tumor-infiltrating immune cells affect the response. PD-L1 CPS level, age, and alterations of TP53, MYD88, CREBBP, EP300, GNA13 were used to build an ANN predictive model that showed high prediction efficiency (training set area under curve [AUC] of 0.97 and test set AUC of 0.94). The proportion and spatial distribution of tumor-infiltrating immune cells may be related to the function of immune-related pathways, thereby influencing the efficacy of PD-1 mAb containing regimens. The ANN predictive model showed potential value in predicting the responses of r/r DLBCL patients received PD-1 mAb and rituximab regimens.

Spatial analyses revealed S100P + TFF1 + tumor cells in spread through air spaces samples correlated with undesirable therapy response in non-small cell lung cancer.

Spread through air spaces (STAS) is a recognized aggressive pattern in lung cancer, serving as a crucial risk factor for postoperative recurrence. However, its phenotype and related spatial structure have remained elusive. To address these limitations, we conducted a comprehensive study based on spatial data, analyzing over 30,000 spots from 14 non-STAS samples and one STAS sample. We observed increased proliferation activities and angiogenesis in STAS, identifying S100P as a potential biomarker for STAS. Furthermore, our investigation into the heterogeneity of STAS tumor cells revealed a subset identified as S100P + TFF1 +, exhibiting a negative impact on patients' survival in public datasets. This subtype exhibited the highest activities in the TGFb and hypoxia, suggesting its potential pro-tumor role within the tumor microenvironment. To assess the role of S100P + TFF1 + tumor cells in therapy response, we included data from two clinical trial cohorts (BPI-7711 for EGFR-TKI therapy and ORIENT-3 for immunotherapy). The presence of S100P + TFF1 + tumor cells correlated with worse responses to both EGFR-TKI therapy and immunotherapy. Notably, TFF1 emerged as a serum marker for predicting EGFR-TKI response. Cell-cell communication analysis revealed that the TGFb signaling pathway was the most activated in S100P + TFF1 + tumor cells, with TGFB2-TGFBR2 identified as the main ligand-receptor pair. This was further validated by multiplex immunofluorescence performed on twenty NSCLC samples. In summary, our study identified S100P as the biomarker for STAS and highlighted the adverse role of S100P + TFF1 + tumor cells in survival outcomes.

Phase 2 dose-ranging study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of liposomal irinotecan (LY01610) as a second-line treatment for patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer.

Background: This was a multicenter, single-arm dose-ranging phase 2 study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of LY01610, a liposomal irinotecan, at various doses for patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Methods: This study (NCT04381910) enrolled patients with relapsed SCLC at 10 hospitals across China, who have failed with previous platinum-based treatments. LY01610 was administered at doses of 60 mg/m2, 80 mg/m2, and 100 mg/m2. Primary endpoints were investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) and investigator-assessed duration of response (DoR). Secondary endpoints included investigator-assessed disease control rate (DCR), investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Findings: From September 3, 2020 to March 3, 2022, a total of 66 patients were enrolled, with 6, 30, and 30 allocated to the 60 mg/m2, 80 mg/m2, and 100 mg/m2 dose groups, respectively, with 68% (45/66) having a chemotherapy-free interval <90 days. In all 66 patients, the ORR was 32% (21/66, 95% confidence interval [CI], 21-44), with a median DoR of 5.2 months (95% CI, 3.0-8.3). Median PFS and OS were 4.0 (95% CI, 2.9-5.5) and 9.7 (95% CI, 7.2-12.3) months, respectively. The ORR of 60 mg/m2, 80 mg/m2, and 100 mg/m2 dose group were 33% (2/6), 33% (10/30), and 30% (9/30), respectively. The median DoR of 60 mg/m2, 80 mg/m2, and 100 mg/m2 dose group were 4.2 (95% CI, 2.8-not reached), 6.9 (95% CI, 2.5-9.9), and 4.0 (95% CI, 2.7-6.8) months, respectively. The incidence of ≥ grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in the 60 mg/m2, 80 mg/m2, and 100 mg/m2 dose group were 33% (2/6), 47% (14/30), and 50% (15/30), respectively. The most common ≥ grade 3 TRAEs of all 66 patients were neutropenia (27%), leukopenia (24%) and anemia (15%). Interpretation: LY01610 exhibited promising clinical efficacy and manageable safety profiles in patients with relapsed SCLC, the 80 mg/m2 dose group had the best benefit-risk ratio. Funding: This study was supported by Luye Pharma Group Ltd.

Plinabulin plus docetaxel versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer after disease progression on platinum-based regimen (DUBLIN-3): a phase 3, international, multicentre, single-blind, parallel group, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: There is an unmet need for second-line and third-line treatments that are effective and tolerable for advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with no driver mutations. METHODS: In this phase 3, international, multicentre, single-blind, parallel group, randomised controlled trial, we enrolled patients from 58 medical centres in Australia, China, and the USA. Eligible patients were adults with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) wild-type NSCLC who had progressed after first-line platinum-based therapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using an independent stratified randomisation schedule with a block size of four to receive intravenous docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1 and either plinabulin (30 mg/m2) or placebo on days 1 and 8 in 21-day cycles until progression, unacceptable toxic effects, withdrawal, or death. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Safety was analysed in all patients who had received at least one dose of study drug or placebo. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02504489) and is now closed. FINDINGS: Between Nov 30, 2015, and Jan 6, 2021, 919 patients were screened for inclusion. 360 patients were excluded, and 559 were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either docetaxel and plinabulin (n=278) or docetaxel and placebo (n=281). 406 (73%) of 559 patients were male, 153 (27%) were female, and 488 (87%) were Asian. Median OS was 10·5 months (95% CI 9·34-11·87) in the plinabulin group compared with 9·4 months (8·38-10·68) in the control group (stratified HR 0·82, 95% CI 0·68-0·99; p=0·0399). Mean OS was 15·08 months (13·42-16·74) in the plinabulin group compared with 12·77 months (11·45-14·10) in the placebo group using restricted mean survival time analysis (difference 2·31 months, 95% CI 0·18-4·44; p=0·0332). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 273 (>99%) of 274 patients in the plinabulin group and 276 (99%) of 278 patients in the control group. Grade 3 or 4 gastrointestinal disorders occurred more frequently in the plinabulin group than in the placebo group, with the most frequent being diarrhoea (24 [9%] of 274 patients vs three [1%] of 278) and vomiting (six [2%] vs one [<1%]), as did transient grade 3 hypertension (50 [18%] vs eight [3%]). Treatment-emergent death was reported in 12 patients (4%) in the plinabulin group and ten patients (4%) in the placebo group. INTERPRETATION: Plinabulin plus docetaxel significantly improved OS as second-line and third-line treatment in patients with advanced or metastatic EGFR wild-type NSCLC and could be considered as a new treatment option in this population. FUNDING: BeyondSpring Pharmaceuticals.

The co-location of CD14+APOE+ cells and MMP7+ tumour cells contributed to worse immunotherapy response in non-small cell lung cancer.

Intra-tumour immune infiltration is a crucial determinant affecting immunotherapy response in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its phenotype and related spatial structure have remained elusive. To overcome these restrictions, we undertook a comprehensive study comprising spatial transcriptomic (ST) data (28 712 spots from six samples). We identified two distinct intra-tumour infiltration patterns: immune exclusion (characterised by myeloid cells) and immune activation (characterised by plasma cells). The immune exclusion and immune activation signatures showed adverse and favourable roles in NSCLC patients' survival, respectively. Notably, CD14+APOE+ cells were recognised as the main cell type in immune exclusion samples, with increased epithelial‒mesenchymal transition and decreased immune activities. The co-location of CD14+APOE+ cells and MMP7+ tumour cells was observed in both ST and bulk transcriptomics data, validated by multiplex immunofluorescence performed on 20 NSCLC samples. The co-location area exhibited the upregulation of proliferation-related pathways and hypoxia activities. This co-localisation inhibited T-cell infiltration and the formation of tertiary lymphoid structures. Both CD14+APOE+ cells and MMP7+ tumour cells were associated with worse survival. In an immunotherapy cohort from the ORIENT-3 clinical trial, NSCLC patients who responded unfavourably exhibited higher infiltration of CD14+APOE+ cells and MMP7+ tumour cells. Within the co-location area, the MK, SEMA3 and Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) signalling pathway was most active in cell‒cell communication. This study identified immune exclusion and activation patterns in NSCLC and the co-location of CD14+APOE+ cells and MMP7+ tumour cells as contributors to immune resistance.

Efficacy and safety of MIL62, a novel glycoengineered type â ¡ anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, combined with lenalidomide in patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma or marginal zone lymphoma: a multicentre, single-arm, phase 1b/2 trial.

Background: MIL62, a novel glycoengineered type Ⅱ anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, with a nearly completely afucosylated N-glycans in Fc region, has demonstrated superior activity compared with rituximab and obinutuzumab in vitro and in vivo, respectively. Methods: This multicentre, single-arm, phase 1b/2 trial aimed to explore the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and safety of MIL62 combined with lenalidomide in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) or marginal zone lymphoma (MZL). Eligible patients included those who had histopathologically confirmed CD20 positive FL (grade 1-3a) or MZL and failed to be treated with rituximab. Patients received intravenously infused MIL62 1000 mg (cycle 1: day 1, 15; cycles 2-8: day 1, cycles 10 and 12: day 1) combined with oral lenalidomide (once a day, days 2-22, the initial dose was 10 mg, and the maximum dose was 20 mg) for 12 cycles, 28 days as a cycle. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by investigator per Lugano 2014 criteria every 3 cycles. This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04110301). Findings: Between November 22, 2019 and December 22, 2020, 54 patients were enrolled from 11 hospitals in China and received study treatment. Fifty patients were included in the efficacy analysis set, and 43 patients (86%, 95% CI: 73, 94) achieved objective response, meeting the pre-specified primary endpoint. Disease control rate was 96% (48/50, 95% CI: 86, 100), proportion of patients with duration of response (DoR) > 6 months was 77% (33/43). The median follow-up for survival was 12.3 months (IQR 12.0-12.6). The 1-year progression-free survival rate was 72% (95% CI: 57, 83), 9-month DoR rate was 74% (95% CI: 58, 85), and 1-year overall survival rate was 98% (95% CI: 85, 100). Most common TRAEs were neutropenia (93%, 50/54), leukopenia (85% 46/54), thrombocytopenia (61% 33/54), lymphopenia (32% 17/54), and alanine aminotransferase increased (20% 11/54). Interpretation: MIL62 combined with lenalidomide showed promising efficacy in patients with R/R FL and MZL. A multicentre, randomized, open-label, phase Ⅲ trial of MIL62 combined with lenalidomide versus lenalidomide in anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody refractory FL patients is ongoing (NCT04834024). Funding: Beijing Mabworks Biotech Co. Ltd, Beijing China and the National Science and Technology Major Project for Key New Drug Development (2017ZX09304015).

Patient-reported outcomes for the phase 3 FURLONG study of furmonertinib versus gefitinib as first-line therapy for Chinese patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: Furmonertinib showed superior efficacy compared with gefitinib as first-line therapy in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the FURLONG study. Here we present prespecified secondary endpoints of patient-reported outcomes (PRO). Methods: In this multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised phase 3 study, patients were 1:1 randomly assigned to receive furmonertinib 80 mg once daily or gefitinib 250 mg once daily. PROs assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Core 30 and Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer 13 were analysed using a mixed model for repeated measures and time-to-event analyses. A difference in score of 10 points or more was deemed clinically relevant. Findings: Three hundred and fifty-seven patients (furmonertinib group, n = 178; gefitinib group, n = 179) received at least one dose of the study drug, all of whom completed at least one PRO assessment. Statistically significant difference of overall score changes from baseline favoured furmonertinib in physical functioning (between-group difference 2.14 [95% CI 0.25-4.04], p = 0.027), nausea/vomiting (-1.56 [95% CI -2.62 to -0.49], p = 0.004), appetite loss (-2.24 [95% CI -4.26 to -0.23], p = 0.029), diarrhoea (-3.36 [95% CI -5.19 to -1.54], p < 0.001), alopecia (-2.62 [95% CI -4.54 to -0.71], p = 0.007), and pain in other parts (-4.55 [95% CI -7.37 to -1.74], p = 0.002), but not reached clinical relevance. Time to deterioration in physical functioning (hazard ratio 0.63 [95% CI 0.42-0.94], p = 0.021), cognitive functioning (0.73 [95% CI 0.54-0.98], p = 0.034), nausea/vomiting (0.64 [95% CI 0.41-0.99], p = 0.042), appetite loss (0.63 [95% CI 0.43-0.92], p = 0.016), diarrhoea (0.63 [95% CI 0.46-0.85], p = 0.002), dyspnoea (0.72 [95% CI 0.53-0.98], p = 0.034), cough (0.67 [95% CI 0.44-1.00], p = 0.049), dysphagia (0.54 [95% CI 0.35-0.83], p = 0.004), and alopecia (0.62 [95% CI 0.42-0.90], p = 0.012) was longer with furmonertinib versus gefitinib. Interpretation: In patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, furmonertinib showed improved scores and delayed deterioration in several functioning and symptoms compared to gefitinib. Funding: Shanghai Allist Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd and the National Science and Technology Major Project for Key New Drug Development (2017ZX09304015).

Finotonlimab with chemotherapy in recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial.

Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy regimen has been shown to be effective in recurrent or metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, due to the small number of patients, its efficacy remains controversial in Asian populations, particularly in mainland China. Here a randomized, double-blind phase 3 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of finotonlimab (SCT-I10A), a programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody, combined with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (C5F) for the first-line treatment of R/M HNSCC. Eligible patients (n = 370) were randomly 2:1 assigned to receive finotonlimab plus C5F (n = 247) or placebo plus C5F (n = 123). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). In the finotonlimab plus C5F group, OS was 14.1 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 11.1-16.4), compared with 10.5 months (95% CI 8.1-11.8) in the placebo plus C5F group. The hazard ratio was 0.73 (95% CI 0.57-0.95, P = 0.0165), meeting the predefined superiority criteria for the primary endpoint. Finotonlimab plus C5F showed significant OS superiority compared with C5F alone and acceptable safety profile with R/M HNSCC, supporting its use as a first-line treatment option for R/M HNSCC. These results validate the efficacy and safety of the combination of finotonlimab and C5F in Asian patients with R/M HNSCC. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04146402 .

Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics reveal a high glycolysis B cell and tumor-associated macrophages cluster correlated with poor prognosis and exhausted immune microenvironment in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous malignancy characterized by varied responses to treatment and prognoses. Understanding the metabolic characteristics driving DLBCL progression is crucial for developing personalized therapies. METHODS: This study utilized multiple omics technologies including single-cell transcriptomics (n = 5), bulk transcriptomics (n = 966), spatial transcriptomics (n = 10), immunohistochemistry (n = 34), multiple immunofluorescence (n = 20) and to elucidate the metabolic features of highly malignant DLBCL cells and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), along with their associated tumor microenvironment. Metabolic pathway analysis facilitated by scMetabolism, and integrated analysis via hdWGCNA, identified glycolysis genes correlating with malignancy, and the prognostic value of glycolysis genes (STMN1, ENO1, PKM, and CDK1) and TAMs were verified. RESULTS: High-glycolysis malignant DLBCL tissues exhibited an immunosuppressive microenvironment characterized by abundant IFN_TAMs (CD68+CXCL10+PD-L1+) and diminished CD8+ T cell infiltration. Glycolysis genes were positively correlated with malignancy degree. IFN_TAMs exhibited high glycolysis activity and closely communicating with high-malignancy DLBCL cells identified within datasets. The glycolysis score, evaluated by seven genes, emerged as an independent prognostic factor (HR = 1.796, 95% CI: 1.077-2.995, p = 0.025 and HR = 2.631, 95% CI: 1.207-5.735, p = 0.015) along with IFN_TAMs were positively correlated with poor survival (p < 0.05) in DLBCL. Immunohistochemical validation of glycolysis markers (STMN1, ENO1, PKM, and CDK1) and multiple immunofluorescence validation of IFN_TAMs underscored their prognostic value (p < 0.05) in DLBCL. CONCLUSIONS: This study underscores the significance of glycolysis in tumor progression and modulation of the immune microenvironment. The identified glycolysis genes and IFN_TAMs represent potential prognostic markers and therapeutic targets in DLBCL.

Mutational variant allele frequency profile as a biomarker of response to immune checkpoint blockade in non-small cell lung Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Identifying new biomarkers for predicting immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) response in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is crucial. We aimed to assess the variant allele frequency (VAF)-related profile as a novel biomarker for NSCLC personalized therapy. METHODS: We utilized genomic data of 915 NSCLC patients via cBioPortal and a local cohort of 23 patients for model construction and mutational analysis. Genomic, transcriptomic data from 952 TCGA NSCLC patients, and immunofluorescence (IF) assessment with the local cohort supported mechanism analysis. RESULTS: Utilizing the random forest algorithm, a 15-gene VAF-related model was established, differentiating patients with durable clinical benefit (DCB) from no durable benefit (NDB). The model demonstrated robust performance, with ROC-AUC values of 0.905, 0.737, and 0.711 across training (n = 313), internal validation (n = 133), and external validation (n = 157) cohorts. Stratification by the model into high- and low-score groups correlated significantly with both progression-free survival (PFS) (training: P < 0.0001, internal validation: P < 0.0001, external validation: P = 0.0066) and overall survival (OS) (n = 341) (P < 0.0001). Notably, the stratification system was independent of PD-L1 (P < 0.0001) and TMB (P < 0.0001). High-score patients exhibited an increased DCB ratio and longer PFS across both PD-L1 and TMB subgroups. Additionally, the high-score group appeared influenced by tobacco exposure, with activated DNA damage response pathways. Whereas, immune/inflammation-related pathways were enriched in the low-score group. Tumor immune microenvironment analyses revealed higher proportions of exhausted/effector memory CD8 + T cells in the high-score group. CONCLUSIONS: The mutational VAF profile is a promising biomarker for ICI therapy in NSCLC, with enhanced therapeutic stratification and management as a supplement to PD-L1 or TMB.

Tunlametinib (HL-085) plus vemurafenib in patients with advanced BRAF V600-mutant solid tumors: an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase I study.

BACKGROUND: Tunlametinib (HL-085) is a novel, highly selective MEK inhibitor with substantial clinical activities in patients with NRAS-mutant melanoma. This phase I study evaluated the safety and preliminary efficacy of tunlametinib plus vemurafenib in patients with advanced BRAF V600-mutant solid tumors. METHODS: Patients with confirmed advanced BRAF V600-mutant solid tumors who had progressed on or shown intolerance or no available standard therapies were enrolled and received tunlametinib plus vemurafenib. This study consisted of a dose-escalation phase and a dose-expansion phase. Primary end points of this study were safety, the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), and preliminary efficacy. RESULTS: From August 17, 2018 to April 19, 2022, 72 patients were enrolled. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred, and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The RP2D for BRAF V600-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients was tunlametinib 9 mg plus vemurafenib 720 mg, twice daily (BID, bis in die). Until the data cut-off date of December 15, 2023, of 33 NSCLC patients with evaluable disease, the objective response rate (ORR) was 60.6% (20/33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 42.1-77.1), the median progression free survival (PFS) was 10.5 months (95%CI, 5.6-14.5) and median duration of response (DoR) was 11.3 months (95%CI, 6.8-NE). At the RP2D, ORR was 60.0% (9/15; 95% CI, 32.3-83.7), the median PFS was 10.5 months (95%CI, 5.6 -NE) and median DoR was 11.3 months (95%CI, 3.9-NE). Of 24 colorectal cancer patients with evaluable disease, the ORR was 25.0% (6/24; 95% CI, 5.6-NE). All 72 patients had treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and the most common grade 3-4 TRAEs were anemia (n = 13, 18.1%) and blood creatine phosphokinase increased (n = 10, 13.9%). Tunlametinib was absorbed rapidly with Tmax of 0.5-1 h. Vemurafeinib did not influence the system exposure of tunlametinib and vice versa, indicating no drug-drug interaction for this combination. CONCLUSIONS: Tunlametinib (HL-085) plus vemurafenib had a favorable safety profile and showed promising antitumor activity in patients with BRAF V600-mutant solid tumors. The RP2D for NSCLC was tunlametinib 9 mg BID plus vemurafeinib 720 mg BID. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03781219.

Efficacy and safety of utidelone for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer who have failed standard second-line treatment: A phase 2 clinical trial (BG01-1801).

Background: Chemotherapy remains the standard-of-care for many patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but acquired resistance presents challenges. The aim of this open-label, multicenter phase 2 clinical trial was to determine the efficacy and safety of utidelone, a novel genetically engineered epothilone analog and microtubule-stabilizing agent, as a third- or later-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Methods: Patients who had failed standard second-line treatment (including platinum-containing chemotherapy or targeted therapy) received utidelone (40 mg/m2 via intravenous injection daily, day 1-5) every 21 days. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were the duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: From March 12, 2019 to January 18, 2021, 26 pretreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC (100% of patients had received prior platinum and 65.4% patients had received prior taxane treatment) were enrolled (80.8% of patients had adenocarcinoma). At baseline, nine (34.6%) patients had received second-line treatment, 10 (38.5%) patients had received third-line treatment, and seven (26.9%) patients had received fourth- or later-line treatment. By the data cut-off date of August 10, 2021, the median follow-up was 7.49 months (range, 1.4-26.7 months). The ORR was 15.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.4%-34.9%) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) cohort (N = 26) and 19.0% (95% CI, 5.4%-41.9%) in the per-protocol (PP) cohort (N = 21). The disease control rate was 69.2% (95% CI, 48.2%-85.7%) and 81.0% (95% CI, 58.1%-94.6%) in the ITT and PP cohorts, respectively. The median DoR was 4.1 months (95% CI, 3.1-5.1 months) in the ITT cohort. The median PFS was 4.37 months (95% CI, 2.50-5.29 months) in the ITT cohort and 4.37 months (95% CI, 2.50-9.76 months) in the PP cohort. The median OS was not reached, and the 12-month OS rate was 69% (95% CI, 45.1%-84.1%). Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 38.5% of patients, and the most common was peripheral neuropathy (23.1%, all Grade 3), which was manageable with dose modifications. Conclusions: In this clinical trial, utidelone showed promising efficacy and had a manageable safety profile. Further clinical studies are warranted to confirm its role in NSCLC treatment. Trial registration: No.NCT03693547; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov.

Deciphering the Prognostic Significance of MYD88 and CD79B Mutations in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Insights into Treatment Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The clinical and genetic characteristics, as well as treatment outcomes, of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients with different MYD88 and CD79B mutation status merit further investigation. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the distinctions in clinical manifestations, genetic characteristics, and treatment outcomes among MYD88-CD79Bco-mut, MYD88/CD79Bsingle-mut, and MYD88-CD79Bco-wt DLBCL patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical and genetic characteristics, along with treatment outcomes among 2696 DLBCL patients bearing MYD88-CD79Bco-mut, MYD88/CD79Bsingle-mut, and MYD88-CD79Bco-wt treated with R-CHOP/R-CHOP-like regimens from the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College and six external cohorts were analyzed. Potential molecular mechanisms were investigated through Gene Set Enrichment Analysis and xCell methodology. RESULTS: In the MCD subtype, patients with MYD88-CD79Bco-mut showed comparable progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to MYD88/CD79Bsingle-mut or MYD88-CD79Bco-wt. However, in the non-MCD subtype, patients with MYD88-CD79Bco-mut exhibited significantly inferior OS than MYD88/CD79Bsingle-mut or MYD88-CD79Bco-wt, while there was no significant OS difference between MYD88/CD79Bsingle-mut and MYD88-CD79Bco-wt (median OS: 68.8 [95% CI 22-NA] vs NA [95% CI 112-NA] vs 177.7 [95% CI 159-NA] months; MYD88-CD79Bco-mut vs MYD88/CD79Bsingle-mut: p = 0.02; MYD88-CD79Bco-mut vs MYD88-CD79Bco-wt: p = 0.03; MYD88/CD79Bsingle-mut vs MYD88-CD79Bco-wt: p = 0.33). Regarding patients with MYD88-CD79Bco-mut, there was no significant difference in PFS and OS between the MCD and non-MCD subtypes. Within the MYD88-CD79Bco-mut group, patients with PIM1mut had better PFS than PIM1wt (median PFS: 8.34 [95% CI 5.56-NA] vs 43.8 [95% CI 26.4-NA] months; p = 0.02). Possible mechanisms contributing to the superior PFS of PIM1mut patients may include activated lymphocyte-mediated immunity and interferon response, a higher proportion of natural killer T cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cells, as well as suppressed angiogenesis and epithelial-mesenchymal transition, along with lower fibroblast and stromal score. CONCLUSIONS: In the MCD subtype, patients with MYD88-CD79Bco-mut showed comparable PFS and OS compared to MYD88/CD79Bsingle-mut or MYD88-CD79Bco-wt, while in the non-MCD subtype, they exhibited significantly inferior OS. There was no significant disparity in PFS and OS of MYD88-CD79Bco-mut between the MCD and non-MCD subtypes. The presence of PIM1mut within the MYD88-CD79Bco-mut group correlated with better PFS, which may result from an intricate interplay of immune processes and tumor microenvironment alterations.

Single-cell and spatial analyses revealed the co-location of cancer stem cells and SPP1+ macrophage in hypoxic region that determines the poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma.

In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), classical cancer stem cells (CSC) markers were shared by normal stem cells, targeting which may hinder hepatic regeneration and cause liver failure. Additionally, the spatial structure of CSC still remained elusive. To address these limitations, we undertook a comprehensive study combining single-cell data (56,022 cells from 20 samples) and spatial data (38,191 spots from eight samples) to obtain CSC signature and uncover its spatial structure. Utilizing the CytoTRACE algorithm, we discretely identified CSC, which displayed upregulated proliferation pathways regulated by HIF1A. A CSC signature of 107 genes was then developed using Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA). Notably, HCC patients with high CSC levels exhibited an accumulation of SPP1+ macrophages (Macro_SPP1) expressing metalloproteinases (MMP9, MMP12, and MMP7) regulated by HIF1A, suggesting a hypoxic tumor region connecting Macro_SPP1 and CSC. Both CSC and Macro_SPP1 correlated with worse prognosis and undesirable immunotherapy response. Spatial analysis revealed the co-location of CSC and Macro_SPP1, with CD8 T cells excluded from the tumor region. The co-location area and non-tumor area of boundary exhibited a high level of hypoxia, with the HAVRC2 checkpoint highly expressed. Within the co-location area, the SPP1 signaling pathway was most active in cell-cell communication, with SPP1-CD44 and SPP1-ITGA/ITGB identified as the main ligand-receptor pairs. This study successfully constructed a CSC signature and demonstrated the co-location of CSC and Macro_SPP1 in a hypoxic region that exacerbates the tumor microenvironment in HCC.

High-Throughput Antigen Microarray Identifies Longitudinal Prognostic Autoantibody for Chemoimmunotherapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Chemoimmunotherapy has evolved as a standard treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). However, inevitable drug resistance has limited its efficacy, highlighting the urgent need for biomarkers of chemoimmunotherapy. A three-phase strategy to discover, verify, and validate longitudinal predictive autoantibodies (AAbs) for aNSCLC before and after chemoimmunotherapy was employed. A total of 528 plasma samples from 267 aNSCLC patients before and after anti-PD1 immunotherapy were collected, plus 30 independent formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. Candidate AAbs were firstly selected using a HuProt high-density microarray containing 21,000 proteins in the discovery phase, followed by validation using an aNSCLC-focused microarray. Longitudinal predictive AAbs were chosen for ELISA based on responders versus non-responders comparison and progression-free survival (PFS) survival analysis. Prognostic markers were also validated using immunohistochemistry and publicly available immunotherapy datasets. We identified and validated a panel of two AAbs (MAX and DHX29) as pre-treatment biomarkers and another panel of two AAbs (MAX and TAPBP) as on-treatment predictive markers in aNSCLC patients undergoing chemoimmunotherapy. All three AAbs exhibited a positive correlation with early responses and PFS (p < 0.05). The kinetics of MAX AAb showed an increasing trend in responders (p < 0.05) and a tendency to initially increase and then decrease in non-responders (p < 0.05). Importantly, MAX protein and mRNA levels effectively discriminated PFS (p < 0.05) in aNSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy. Our results present a longitudinal analysis of changes in prognostic AAbs in aNSCLC patients undergoing chemoimmunotherapy.

Longitudinal plasma proteomic analysis identifies biomarkers and combinational targets for anti-PD1-resistant cancer patients.

The response rate of anti-PD1 therapy is limited, and the influence of anti-PD1 therapy on cancer patients is unclear. To address these challenges, we conducted a longitudinal analysis of plasma proteomic changes with anti-PD1 therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS), and lymphoma patients. We included 339 plasma samples before and after anti-PD1 therapy from 193 patients with NSCLC, ASPS, or lymphoma. The plasma proteins were detected using data-independent acquisition-mass spectrometry and customable antibody microarrays. Differential proteomic characteristics in responders (R) and non-responders (NR) before and after anti-PD1 therapy were elucidated. A total of 1019 proteins were detected using our in-depth proteomics platform and distributed across 10-12 orders of abundance. By comparing the differential plasma proteome expression between R and NR groups, 50, 206, and 268 proteins were identified in NSCLC, ASPS, and lymphoma patients, respectively. Th17, IL-17, and JAK-STAT signal pathways were identified upregulated in NR group, while cellular senescence and transcriptional misregulation pathways were activated in R group. Longitudinal proteomics analysis revealed the IL-17 signaling pathway was downregulated after treatment. Consistently, many proteins were identified as potential combinatorial therapeutic targets (e.g., IL-17A and CD22). Five noninvasive biomarkers (FLT4, SFTPB, GNPTG, F5, and IL-17A) were further validated in an independent lymphoma cohort (n = 39), and another three noninvasive biomarkers (KIT, CCL3, and TNFSF1) were validated in NSCLC cohort (n = 76). Our results provide molecular insights into the anti-PD1 therapy in cancer patients and identify new therapeutic strategies for anti-PD1-resistant patients.

Longitudinal plasma proteomic profiling of EML4-ALK positive lung cancer receiving ALK-TKIs therapy.

BACKGROUND: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs) has demonstrated remarkable therapeutic effects in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Identifying prognostic biomarkers can enhance the clinical efficacy of relapsed or refractory patients. METHODS: We profiled 737 plasma proteins from 159 pre-treatment and on-treatment plasma samples of 63 ALK-positive NSCLC patients using data-independent acquisition-mass spectrometry (DIA-MS). The consensus clustering algorithm was used to identify subtypes with distinct biological features. A plasma-based prognostic model was constructed using the LASSO-Cox method. We performed the Mfuzz analysis to classify the patterns of longitudinal changes in plasma proteins during treatment. 52 baseline plasma samples from another independent ALK-TKI treatment cohort were collected to validate the potential prognostic markers using ELISA. RESULTS: We identified three subtypes of ALK-positive NSCLC with distinct biological features and clinical efficacy. Patients in subgroup 1 exhibited activated humoral immunity and inflammatory responses, increased expression of positive acute-phase response proteins, and the worst prognosis. Then we constructed and verified a prognostic model that predicts the efficacy of ALK-TKI therapy using the expression levels of five plasma proteins (SERPINA4, ATRN, APOA4, TF, and MYOC) at baseline. Next, we explored the longitudinal changes in plasma protein expression during treatment and identified four distinct change patterns (Clusters 1-4). The longitudinal changes of acute-phase proteins during treatment can reflect the treatment status and tumor progression of patients. Finally, we validated the prognostic efficacy of baseline plasma CRP, SAA1, AHSG, SERPINA4, and TF in another independent NSCLC cohort undergoing ALK-TKI treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to the search for prognostic and drug-resistance biomarkers in plasma samples for ALK-TKI therapy and provides new insights into the mechanism of drug resistance and the selection of follow-up treatment.