ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of irreversible electroporation (IRE) ablation of pT1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the first prospective, monocentric phase 2a pilot ablate-and-resect study (Irreversible Electroporation of Kidney Tumors Before Partial Nephrectomy [IRENE] trial). It has been postulated that focal IRE can bring about complete ablation of soft-tissue tumors with protection of healthy peritumoral tissue and anatomic structures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The first 7 study patients with biopsy-proven pT1a RCC (15-39 mm) underwent IRE. Percutaneous computed tomography-guided IRE was performed with electrocardiographic triggering under general anesthesia and deep muscle paralysis with 3-6 monopolar electrodes positioned within the renal tumor. Twenty-eight days later, the tumor region was completely resected to confirm tumor destruction pathologically. Individual results for these patients are displayed, described, and discussed. RESULTS: Technical feasibility was attained in all patients, but electrode placement and ablation were complex, with a mean overall procedure time of 129 minutes. There were no major complications. Partial kidney resection was performed in 5 patients, and radical nephrectomy was performed in 2 patients because of central tumor location and ablation areas. Resections revealed by tumor, node, and metastasis classification of the International Union for Cancer Control 2017 no residual tumor as complete ablation in 4 cases (ypT0V0N0Pn0R0) and microscopic residual tumor cells as incomplete ablation in the other 3 cases (ypT1aV0N0Pn0R1). CONCLUSION: Renal percutaneous IRE appears to be a safe treatment for pT1a RCC but requires substantial procedural effort. Resection specimens of the ablation zone revealed a high rate of microscopic incomplete ablation 4 weeks after IRE. According to these initial study results, curative, kidney-sparing ablation of T1a RCC appears possible but needs technical improvement to ensure complete ablation.
Subject(s)
Ablation Techniques , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/surgery , Electroporation/methods , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Female , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Nephrectomy , Pilot Projects , Radiography, InterventionalABSTRACT
Dysregulation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) activation promoted DNA damage response bypass and tumorigenesis in our model of hydrogen peroxide-associated ulcerative colitis (UC) and in patients with quiescent UC (QUC), UC-related dysplasia, and UC-related carcinoma (UC-CRC), thereby adapting to oxidative stress. In the UC model, we have observed features of oncogenic transformation: increased proliferation, undetected DNA damage, and apoptosis resistance. Here, we show that Chk1 was downregulated but activated in the acute and quiescent chronic phases. In both phases, Chk1 was linked to DNA damage response bypass by suppressing JNK activation following oxidative stress, promoting cell cycle progression despite DNA damage. Simultaneously, activated Chk1 was bound to chromatin. This triggered histone acetylation and the binding of histone acetyltransferases and transcription factors to chromatin. Thus, chromatin-immobilized activated Chk1 executed a dual function by suppressing DNA damage response and simultaneously inducing chromatin modulation. This caused undetected DNA damage and increased cellular proliferation through failure to transmit the appropriate DNA damage signal. Findings in vitro were corroborated by chromatin accumulation of activated Chk1, Ac-H3, Ac-H4, and c-Jun in active UC (AUC) in vivo. Targeting chromatin-bound Chk1, GCN5, PCAF, and p300/CBP could be a novel therapeutic strategy to prevent UC-related tumor progression.
Subject(s)
Checkpoint Kinase 1/metabolism , Chromatin/metabolism , Colitis, Ulcerative/metabolism , DNA Damage , Hydrogen Peroxide/adverse effects , MAP Kinase Kinase 4/metabolism , Models, Biological , Oxidative Stress/drug effects , Checkpoint Kinase 1/genetics , Chromatin/genetics , Colitis, Ulcerative/chemically induced , Colitis, Ulcerative/genetics , Enzyme Activation/drug effects , Humans , Hydrogen Peroxide/pharmacology , MAP Kinase Kinase 4/geneticsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: It is postulated that focal IRE affords complete ablation of soft-tissue tumours while protecting the healthy peritumoral tissue. Therefore, IRE may be an interesting option for minimally invasive, kidney-tissue-sparing, non-thermal ablation of renal tumours. AIM: With this current pilot study ("IRENE trial"), we present the first detailed histopathological data of IRE of human RCC followed by delayed tumour resection. The aim of this interim analysis of the first three patients was to investigate the ablation efficiency of percutaneous image-guided focal IRE in RCC, to assess whether a complete ablation of T1a RCC and tissue preservation with the NanoKnife system is possible and to decide whether the ablation parameters need to be altered. METHODS: Following resection 4 weeks after percutaneous IRE, the success of ablation and detailed histopathological description were used to check the ablation parameters. RESULTS: The IRE led to a high degree of damage to the renal tumours (1 central, 2 peripheral; size range 15-17 mm). The postulated homogeneous, isomorphic damage was only partly confirmed. We found a zonal structuring of the ablation zone, negative margins and, enclosed within the ablation zone, very small tumour residues of unclear malignancy. CONCLUSION: According to these initial, preliminary study results of the first three renal cases, a new zonal distribution of IRE damage was described and the curative intended, renal saving focal ablation of localised RCC below <3 cm by percutaneous IRE by the NanoKnife system appears to be possible, but needs further, systematic evaluation for this treatment method and treatment protocol.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/therapy , Electroporation/methods , Kidney Neoplasms/therapy , Ablation Techniques/methods , Biopsy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Diagnostic Imaging , Electrocardiography , Female , Germany , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Pilot Projects , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
AIM: This study was designed to assess the possible usefulness of shear-wave elastography in differentiating between benign and malignant tissue in prostate neoplasia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 120 prostate tissue samples were obtained from 10 patients treated by radical prostatectomy and investigated pre-operatively by ultrasound elastography followed by directed biopsy. After resection, whole-mount sectioning and histological examination was performed. The predictions based on shear-wave elastography were compared with biopsy and histological results. RESULTS: The comparison between the results of shear-wave elastography and those of biopsy was performed by receiver operating characteristic analysis, which suggested an optimum cut-off tissue elasticity value of 50 kPa, in agreement with earlier studies aimed at distinguishing between benign and malignant tissue. However, the diagnostic selectivity (and thus the diagnostic power) was poor (area under the curve 0.527, which hardly differs from the value of 0.500 that would correspond to a complete lack of predictive power); furthermore, application of this cut-off value to the samples led to a sensitivity of only 74% and a specificity of only 43%. An analogous comparison between the results of shear-wave elastography and those of whole-mount histology, which itself is more reliable than biopsy, gave an even poorer diagnostic selectivity (sensitivity of 62%, specificity of 35%). Meaningful association with Gleason score was not found for D'Amico risk groups (p = 0.35). CONCLUSIONS: The (negative) findings of this investigation add to the dissonance among results of studies investigating the possible value of shear-wave elastography as a diagnostic tool to identify malignant neoplasia. There is a clear need for further research to elucidate the diversity of study results and to identify the usefulness, if any, of the method in question.