Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Front Oncol ; 14: 1335344, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38434688

ABSTRACT

The diagnosis and treatment of cancer impose a significant emotional and psychological burden on patients, families, and caregivers. Patients undergo several interventions in a hospital setting, and the increasing number of patients requiring extended care and follow-up is driving the demand for additional clinical resources to address their needs. Hospital at Home (HaH) teams have introduced home-administered oncologic therapies that represent a new model of patient-centered cancer care. This approach can be integrated with traditional models and offers benefits to both patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs). Home-administered treatment programs have been successfully piloted globally, demonstrated as a preferred option for most patients and a safe alternative that could reduce costs and hospital burden. The document aims to establish the minimum recommendations for the home administration of oncologic therapies (ODAH) based on a national expert agreement. The expert panel comprised seven leading members from diverse Spanish societies and three working areas: clinical and healthcare issues, logistical and administrative issues, and economic, social, and legal issues. The recommendations outlined in this article were obtained after a comprehensive literature review and thorough discussions. This document may serve as a basis for the future development of home-administered oncologic therapy programs in Spain. .

2.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 60(4): 106664, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36002115

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The anti-biofilm efficacy of dalbavancin (DAL) has been evaluated in static models. The comparative activity of DAL alone and with rifampicin (RIF) against biofilm-embedded methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was evaluated using an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model. METHODS: Two MRSA strains (HUB-4, HUB-5) were evaluated with the Calgary Device System and the dynamic CDC-Biofilm Reactor over 144 h. Dosage regimens simulated the human PK of DAL (1500 mg, single dose), vancomycin (VAN) (1000 mg/12 h) and linezolid (LZD) (600 mg/12 h), alone and with RIF (600 mg/24 h). Efficacy was evaluated by assessing log10CFU/mL changes (ΔlogCFU/mL) and screening for resistance was conducted. RESULTS: The minimal biofilm inhibitory/eradication concentrations of DAL were 0.25/16 mg/L (HUB-4) and 0.25/8 mg/L (HUB-5). In the PK/PD analysis, DAL alone showed limited efficacy but no development of resistance. Adding RIF improved the activities of DAL, VAN, and LZD, but RIF-resistant strains appeared over time in all cases. DAL-RIF was bactericidal against HUB-4 in the absence of resistance at 72 h and 144 h (ΔlogCFU/mL: -3.54±0.83, -4.32±0.12, respectively), an effect that was only achieved by LZD-RIF at 144 h (-3.33 ± 0.66). DAL-RIF activity against HUB-5 was impaired by RIF resistance to a greater extent than other combinations and this combination had no bactericidal effect. CONCLUSIONS: The anti-biofilm efficacy of DAL was improved significantly by adding RIF. Although DAL resistance did not occur, RIF resistance appeared in all combination therapies and decreased their efficacy over time. DAL-RIF in vitro treatment appears to be a promising anti-biofilm therapy, but further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy and risk of resistance in vivo.


Subject(s)
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Biofilms , Humans , Linezolid/pharmacology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Rifampin/pharmacology , Teicoplanin/analogs & derivatives , Vancomycin/pharmacology
3.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 189: 109975, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35777672

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To evaluate if microbial load from diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) can help in predicting outcomes. METHODS: A multicenter prospective cohort study was performed in an outpatient setting (September 1, 2017-January 31, 2019) in diabetic patients with DFU.Quantitative cultures from DFU tissue biopsies at a baseline visit were obtained; high and low microbial loads were defined as ≥6logCFU/mL and <6logCFU/mL, respectively. Diagnosis of DFU infection was made and managed according to established guidelines. The outcome was evaluated at 6 month-visit as failure (persistence/new infection/amputation) or cure. RESULTS: Out of 65 patients, 52 (80%) had long-standing DFUs (≥4 weeks), with high microbial load in 19 (29%).DFU infection (n = 24, 37%) was not associated with high microbial load in all patients but those with shorter DFU duration.Treatment failure occurred in 20/57 (35%) patients; high DFU microbial load was associated with worse outcome (n = 9/20, 45% failure rate, adjusted OR4.69; 95% CI, 1.22-18.09; p = 0.03),mainly due to the subgroup of patients with high microbial load and long-stand DFUs. CONCLUSIONS: Since patients with high microbial load had a worse outcome, quantitative cultures from DFUs can identify patients who would benefit from antibiotic therapy.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Foot , Amputation, Surgical , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Diabetic Foot/diagnosis , Humans , Prospective Studies
4.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 76(7): 1741-1751, 2021 06 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33792695

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance and the prevalence of the polysaccharide capsule among urogenital and respiratory Haemophilus parainfluenzae isolates. METHODS: Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested by microdilution. Fifty-five MDR strains were subjected to WGS and were phylogenetically compared with all the available H. parainfluenzae genomes from the NCBI database. The identification of the capsular bexA gene was performed by PCR in 266 non-MDR strains. RESULTS: In 31 of the 42 ampicillin-resistant strains, blaTEM-1 located within Tn3 was identified. ß-Lactamase-negative cefuroxime-resistant strains (n = 12) presented PBP3 substitutions. The catS gene (n = 14), the tet(M)-MEGA element (n = 18) and FolA substitutions (I95L and F154V/S) (n = 41) were associated with resistance to chloramphenicol, tetracycline plus macrolides, and co-trimoxazole, respectively. Thirty-seven isolates had a Tn10 harbouring tet(B)/(C)/(D)/(R) genes with (n = 15) or without (n = 22) catA2. Putative transposons (Tn7076-Tn7079), including aminoglycoside and co-trimoxazole resistance genes, were identified in 10 strains (18.2%). These transposons were integrated into three new integrative and conjugative elements (ICEs), which also included the resistance-associated transposons Tn3 and Tn10. The capsular operon was found only in the urogenital isolates (18/154, 11.7%), but no phylogenetic clustering was observed. The capsular operons identified were similar to those of Haemophilus influenzae serotype c and Haemophilus sputorum type 2. CONCLUSIONS: The identification of ICEs with up to three resistance-associated transposons suggests that these transferable elements play an important role in the acquisition of multidrug resistance in H. parainfluenzae. Moreover, the presence of polysaccharide capsules in some of these urogenital isolates is a cause for concern.


Subject(s)
Haemophilus Infections , Haemophilus parainfluenzae , Ampicillin , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Haemophilus , Haemophilus Infections/drug therapy , Haemophilus influenzae , Haemophilus parainfluenzae/genetics , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests
5.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 39(4): 703-710, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31828685

ABSTRACT

Haemophilus parainfluenzae (HPAR) is a Gram-negative bacterium that can become an opportunistic urogenital pathogen. Recently, multidrug resistant (MDR) strains have emerged. We aim to analyse the epidemiology of HPAR at Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge between 2013 and 2017 to determine its putative role in sexually transmitted infections (STI). Strains were classified by sample origin, and antimicrobial susceptibility was performed by disk-diffusion tested on Mueller-Hinton Fastidious. MDR was defined as the resistance of the antimicrobial to three or more antibiotic class. Molecular typing was performed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) after restriction with SmaI and Cfr9I. We classified 944 HPAR isolates as being of urogenital (n = 175; 18.5%), respiratory (n = 719; 76.2%), or other (n = 50; 5.3%) origins. Among the urogenital isolates, 50 (28.6%) were MDR, which was significantly higher than that found in respiratory samples (40/719; 5.6%; p < 0.01). The frequency of MDR increased progressively among urogenital samples from 13.3% (2013) to 33.3% (2017) (r = 0.8; p = 0.035). The resistance rates for all 944 episodes were significantly higher for cotrimoxazole (51.4%), tetracycline (46.3%), chloramphenicol (28.0%), ciprofloxacin (21.1%), and ampicillin (20.6%). After PFGE, no clonal relationship was found. Clinical charts were available for 40 symptomatic patients with MDR HPAR infections presenting mostly urethritis (n = 26; 65.0%). In all cases, symptoms were treated effectively with combination therapy. Furthermore, in 10 of those patients with urethritis, MDR HPAR was the only potential pathogen to be identified. The emergence of MDR HPAR is a matter of concern, and the detection as a single pathogen highlights its putative role as cause of STI.


Subject(s)
Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Haemophilus Infections/epidemiology , Haemophilus parainfluenzae/drug effects , Haemophilus parainfluenzae/genetics , Respiratory System/microbiology , Urogenital System/microbiology , Adult , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Haemophilus Infections/microbiology , Humans , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Molecular Typing , Prevalence , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/microbiology , Retrospective Studies , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/microbiology , Spain/epidemiology , Urethritis/epidemiology , Urethritis/microbiology , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiology , Young Adult
6.
Sci Rep ; 9(1): 4481, 2019 03 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30872664

ABSTRACT

The human commensal Haemophilus parainfluenzae is emerging as an opportunistic multidrug-resistant pathogen. The objectives of this work were to characterise a new capsular operon of extensively drug-resistant (XDR) H. parainfluenzae clinical isolates and study their resistance mechanisms using whole-genome sequencing. All strains were resistant to: ß-lactams, via amino acid changes in PBP3 (S385T, I442F, V511A, N526K and V562I); quinolones, by alterations in GyrA (S84F and D88Y) and ParC (S84F and S138T); chloramphenicol, through the presence of catS; macrolides, via the presence of mel and mef(E)-carrying MEGA element; and tetracycline, through the presence of tet(M) and/or tet(B). Phylogenetic analysis revealed high genomic diversity when compared to the H. parainfluenzae genomes available on the NCBI, the isolates from this study being closely related to the Swiss XDR AE-2096513. A full capsular operon showing homology to that of H. influenzae was identified, in accordance with the observation of a capsular structure by TEM. This study describes for the first time a capsular operon in H. parainfluenzae, a major determinant of pathogenicity that may contribute to increased virulence in XDR clinical isolates. Moreover, phylogenetic analysis suggests the possible spread of an XDR-encapsulated strain in Europe.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Haemophilus Infections/microbiology , Haemophilus parainfluenzae/classification , Polysaccharides, Bacterial/genetics , Whole Genome Sequencing/methods , Adult , Chloramphenicol/pharmacology , Female , Haemophilus parainfluenzae/genetics , Haemophilus parainfluenzae/isolation & purification , Humans , Macrolides/pharmacology , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Operon , Phylogeny , Quinolones/pharmacology , Tetracycline/pharmacology , beta-Lactams/pharmacology
7.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 53(5): 612-619, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30682497

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Ceftolozane/tazobactam is a potential tool for infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), but its efficacy against some difficult-to-treat infections has not been well defined. METHODS: Using an in vitro pharmacodynamic biofilm model, this study evaluated the comparative efficacy of ceftolozane/tazobactam against MDR/extensively drug-resistant (XDR) P. aeruginosa strains, alone and in combination with colistin. Simulated regimens of ceftolozane/tazobactam (2 g/1 g every 8 h), meropenem (2 g every 8 h) and ceftazidime (2 g every 8 h), alone and in combination with colistin (continuous infusion) were evaluated against three colistin-susceptible and ceftazidime-resistant strains: MDR-HUB1, ceftolozane/tazobactam-susceptible and meropenem-susceptible; XDR-HUB2, ceftolozane/tazobactam-susceptible and meropenem-resistant; MDR-HUB3, ceftolozane/tazobactam-resistant and meropenem-susceptible. Antibiotic efficacy was evaluated by decreases in bacterial counts (Δlog CFU/mL) from biofilm-embedded bacteria over 54 h. Resistance emergence was screened. RESULTS: Among monotherapies, ceftolozane/tazobactam had low killing but no resistance appeared, ceftazidime was ineffective, colistin was initially effective but regrowth and resistance occurred, and meropenem was bactericidal against carbapenem-susceptible strains. Ceftolozane/tazobactam plus colistin was the most effective combination against the meropenem-resistant XDR-HUB2 strain (Δlog CFU/mL 54-0 h = -4.42 vs. -3.54 for meropenem-colistin; P = 0.002), whereas this combination against MDR-HUB1 (-4.36) was less effective than meropenem-colistin (-6.25; P < 0.001). Ceftolozane/tazobactam plus colistin was ineffective against the ceftolozane/tazobactam-resistant strain; meropenem plus colistin was the most bactericidal therapy (-6.37; P < 0.001 vs. others). Combinations of active beta-lactams plus colistin prevented the emergence of colistin-resistant strains. CONCLUSIONS: Combinations of colistin plus ceftolozane/tazobactam and meropenem were the most appropriate treatments for biofilm-related infections caused by XDR and MDR P. aeruginosa strains, respectively. These combinations could be considered as potential treatment options for these difficult to treat infections.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Biofilms/drug effects , Cephalosporins/administration & dosage , Colistin/administration & dosage , Pseudomonas Infections/drug therapy , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Tazobactam/administration & dosage , beta-Lactamase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Biofilms/growth & development , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Humans , Models, Theoretical , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/growth & development
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL