Impacts on paediatricians testifying in cases of child maltreatment: protocol for a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Paediatricians perform medical assessments for children in cases of suspected child maltreatment. Due to their role with statutory child protection agencies and police, paediatricians may be asked to testify in court about child protection and criminal justice matters. To the authors' knowledge, there has been no previous systematic review of the literature synthesising the evidence on the impacts on paediatricians testifying in cases of child maltreatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A search strategy comprising indexed and key terms will be applied to six electronic reference databases from inception to May 2023: Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Criminal Justice Abstracts and Cochrane Library. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts and full-text articles against predefined eligibility criteria to identify studies of interest. Conflicts will be independently adjudicated by a third reviewer. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Since the systematic review methodology aims at synthesising information from available publications, this study does not require ethical approval. An article reporting the results of the systematic review will be submitted for publication in a scientific journal, presented at relevant conferences and used in subsequent stakeholder consultations.

The optimal timing of forensic evidence collection following paediatric sexual assault.

BACKGROUND: Forensic evidence collection following sexual assault has an important medico-legal role. Despite the advent of DNA profiling, research into the optimisation of forensic biological specimen collection is limited. This has led to inconsistent and variable guidelines for forensic evidence collection. The guidelines in this jurisdiction (Victoria, Australia) recommends that specimens be collected up to 7 days following sexual assault in some circumstances. The aims of this study were to determine the optimal times post sexual assault for the collection of forensic biological evidence in paediatric cases (aged 0-17 years). METHODS: A retrospective review of paediatric sexual assault cases seen by the Victorian Forensic Paediatric Medical Service (VFPMS) between 1 January 2009, and 1 May 2016, was undertaken. Specimen site and collection times post assault were collated from VFPMS medico-legal reports and compared with the forensic evidence analysis results reported by the Victoria Police, Forensic Services Department. In addition, a survey of recommended forensic specimen collection times post assault in the different Australian jurisdictions was undertaken for comparison. RESULTS: Within the 6 year 5 month period studied there were 122 cases consisting of 562 different forensic specimens that were collected and analysed. 62 (51%) of cases produced one or more positive forensic result and, of the 562 specimens collected, 153 (27%) were positive for one or more of foreign DNA, spermatozoa, semen or saliva. Foreign DNA was more likely to be found if forensic specimens were collected during the first 24 h after the assault as compared with those collected at 25-48 h, (p < 0.005). Similarly, spermatozoa were identified more frequently on swabs collected at 0-24 h compared to 25-48 h (p < 0.002). Foreign DNA was not identified beyond 48 h post assault and spermatozoa were not identified beyond 36 h. Saliva and semen were not identified beyond 24 h. The youngest victims with positive forensic evidence were 2-3 years old. The survey of current forensic specimen collection practice in Australia shows that the guidelines for timing of forensic evidence collection in child sexual assault cases is highly variable between jurisdictions. CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlight the importance of collecting forensic specimens as a matter of urgency, regardless of age, within the first 48 h post assault. Although there is need for further research, the findings indicate a need for the re-evaluation of current guidelines for specimen collection in paediatric sexual assault cases.

Community paediatrics: soft science or firm foundations?

Community paediatrics strives to integrate the biology of health into the social and psychological worlds within which children grow and develop. Consumer demand for limited community paediatric clinical services is increasing and medico-legal pressures escalate professional and personal concern. Meanwhile, the profession, through training and professional support, has struggled to keep up. Research into community paediatrics and its integration into policy and clinical practice remains limited, raising the perception that it is a 'soft' science. Our viewpoint is that necessary progress in this field requires leadership, apprenticeship and research. We argue that to build firm foundations for the future requires structures to enable clinical specialisation and continuing professional development in this area.

Early case conferences shorten length of stay in children admitted to hospital with suspected child abuse.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of two models for the management of children admitted to hospital with suspected child abuse: routine early case conferencing versus standard evaluation. METHODS: Between March 2001 and February 2002 professionals from the Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria Police and Child Protection services collaborated on a randomized controlled study involving children admitted to hospital with suspected child abuse. The intervention group (n = 13) received a case conference within 24 h of the child's admission to hospital. The control group (n = 12) were managed according to standard procedures whereby each organization conducted their own evaluation (and a case conference might or might not have been held). Patients were followed for 3 months with data collected from all three professional groups. RESULTS: The process of evaluation, the eventual diagnosis of child abuse and the confidence with which professionals made this diagnosis was not significantly different between the groups. Case conferences were judged to be useful regardless of their timing. Mean length of stay in the intervention group was significantly less than in controls (42.4 h vs 99.7 h, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Early case conferences appear to shorten the period of time children spend in hospital when child abuse is suspected. This has significant implications for reducing costs for all organizations involved in the evaluation of suspected child abuse.