ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis (GMA) removes neutrophils and monocytes from peripheral blood, preventing their incorporation into the inflamed tissue also influencing cytokine balance. Published therapeutic efficacy in ulcerative colitis (UC) is more consistent than in Crohn's disease (CD). We assessed clinical efficacy of GMA in UC and CD 4 weeks after last induction session, at 3 and 12 months, sustained remission and corticosteroid-free remission. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Retrospective observational study of UC and CD patients treated with GMA. Partial Disease Activity Index-DAIp in UC and Harvey-Bradshaw Index-HBI in CD assessed efficacy of Adacolumn® with induction and optional maintenance sessions. RESULTS: We treated 87 patients (CD-25, UC-62), 87.3% corticosteroid-dependent (CSD), 42.5% refractory/intolerant to immunomodulators. In UC, remission and response were 32.2% and 19.3% after induction, 35.5% and 6.5% at 12 weeks and 29% and 6.5% at 52 weeks. In CD, remission rates were 60%, 52% and 40% respectively. In corticosteroid-dependent and refractory or intolerant to INM patients (UC-41, CD-14), 68.3% of UC achieved remission or response after induction, 51.2% at 12 weeks and 46.3% at 52 weeks, and 62.3%, 64.3% and 42.9% in CD. Maintained remission was achieved by 66.6% in CD and 53.1% in UC. Up to 74.5% of patients required corticosteroids at some timepoint. Corticosteroid-free response/remission was 17.7% in UC and 24% in CD. CONCLUSIONS: GMA is a good therapeutic tool for both in UC and CD patients. In corticosteroid-dependent and refractory or intolerant to INM patients it avoids biological therapy or surgery in up to 40% of them in one year.
Subject(s)
Abdominal Pain/surgery , Gastrectomy , Gastritis/surgery , Abdominal Pain/diagnostic imaging , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Gastritis/complications , Gastritis/diagnostic imaging , Gastritis/pathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radiography, Abdominal , Stomach/diagnostic imaging , Stomach/pathology , Stomach/surgery , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
Introducción: describir un cuadro poco habitual como es la leishmaniasis visceral con afectación colónica. Caso clínico: presentamos el caso de un paciente VIH positivo con leishmaniasis visceral. Se describe el caso clínico, con los procedimientos realizados, el tratamiento y su evolución. Se adjunta tabla comparativa de los casos publicados de leishmaniasis con afectación de colon. Discusión: la afectación intestinal en la leishmaniasis visceral es un proceso infrecuente, que debe incluirse en el diagnóstico diferencial en todo paciente inmunodeprimido con clínica de diarrea y que requiere un diagnóstico precoz y tratamiento adecuado, del que depende el pronóstico del paciente (AU)
Background: To describe an unusual clinical presentation of visceral leishmaniasis affecting the colon. Case report: We report the case of an HIV-positive patient with visceral leishmaniasis. We describe the clinical case, the procedures performed, the treatment provided and the patients evolution. A comparative table of previously reported similar cases is shown. Discussion: Visceral leishmaniasis with intestinal involvement is an uncommon process. Nevertheless, this possibility should be taken into consideration in the differential diagnosis of immunosuppressed patients with symptoms of diarrhea, as a favorable prognosis depends on early diagnosis and appropriate treatment (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Middle Aged , HIV/pathogenicity , Leishmaniasis, Visceral/complications , Leishmaniasis, Visceral/drug therapy , Leishmaniasis, Visceral/pathology , Early Diagnosis , Clostridioides difficile , Clostridioides difficile/isolation & purification , Amphotericin B/therapeutic use , Immunocompromised Host , Prognosis , Splenomegaly/complications , Splenomegaly/pathology , Anti-Retroviral Agents/therapeutic use , Renal Insufficiency/complicationsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To describe an unusual clinical presentation of visceral leishmaniasis affecting the colon. CASE REPORT: We report the case of an HIV-positive patient with visceral leishmaniasis. We describe the clinical case, the procedures performed, the treatment provided and the patient's evolution. A comparative table of previously reported similar cases is shown. DISCUSSION: Visceral leishmaniasis with intestinal involvement is an uncommon process. Nevertheless, this possibility should be taken into consideration in the differential diagnosis of immunosuppressed patients with symptoms of diarrhea, as a favorable prognosis depends on early diagnosis and appropriate treatment.