Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cell Biochem Funct ; 42(4): e4055, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38856033

ABSTRACT

The heterogeneity of the solid tumor microenvironment (TME) impairs the therapeutic efficacy of standard therapies and also reduces the infiltration of antitumor immune cells, all of which lead to tumor progression and invasion. In addition, self-renewing cancer stem cells (CSCs) support tumor dormancy, drug resistance, and recurrence, all of which might pose challenges to the eradication of malignant tumor masses with current therapies. Natural forms of oncolytic viruses (OVs) or engineered OVs are known for their potential to directly target and kill tumor cells or indirectly eradicate tumor cells by involving antitumor immune responses, including enhancement of infiltrating antitumor immune cells, induction of immunogenic cell death, and reprogramming of cold TME to an immune-sensitive hot state. More importantly, OVs can target stemness factors that promote tumor progression, which subsequently enhances the efficacy of immunotherapies targeting solid tumors, particularly the CSC subpopulation. Herein, we describe the role of CSCs in tumor heterogeneity and resistance and then highlight the potential and remaining challenges of immunotherapies targeting CSCs. We then review the potential of OVs to improve tumor immunogenicity and target CSCs and finally summarize the challenges within the therapeutic application of OVs in preclinical and clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Immunotherapy , Neoplasms , Neoplastic Stem Cells , Oncolytic Virotherapy , Oncolytic Viruses , Humans , Neoplastic Stem Cells/immunology , Oncolytic Viruses/genetics , Oncolytic Viruses/immunology , Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasms/immunology , Tumor Microenvironment/immunology , Animals
2.
Med Oncol ; 41(5): 125, 2024 Apr 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38652207

ABSTRACT

Plant-derived immunomodulators and antitumor factors have appealed lots of attention from natural product scientists for their efficiency and safety and their important contribution to well-designed targeted drug action and delivery mechanisms. Zerumbone (ZER), the chief component of Zingiber zerumbet rhizomes, has been examined for its wide-spectrum in the treatment of multi-targeted diseases. The rhizomes have been used as food flavoring agents in numerous cuisines and in flora medication. Numerous in vivo and in vitro experiments have prepared confirmation of ZER as a potent immunomodulator as well as a potential anti-tumor agent. This review is an interesting compilation of all the important results of the research carried out to date to investigate the immunomodulatory and anticancer properties of ZER. The ultimate goal of this comprehensive review is to supply updated information and a crucial evaluation on ZER, including its chemistry and immunomodulating and antitumour properties, which may be of principal importance to supply a novel pathway for subsequent investigation to discover new agents to treat cancers and immune-related sickness. In addition, updated information on the toxicology of ZER has been summarized to support its safety profile.


Subject(s)
Glioma , Neoplasms , Sesquiterpenes , Animals , Humans , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/pharmacology , Glioma/drug therapy , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Sesquiterpenes/therapeutic use , Sesquiterpenes/pharmacology , Zingiberaceae/chemistry
3.
Pediatr Transplant ; 17(4): 380-6, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23551456

ABSTRACT

HSCT is the only proven treatment option for CML, a rare disease in children. Recently, there are promising reports on the advantageous effect of imatinib mesylate for pediatric patients with CML. We conducted a retrospective study on 33 pediatric patients suffering from CML. Fourteen underwent HSCT and the rest were treated with imatinib. With a median follow-up of 24 months, the two-yr OS in the HSCT group and the imatinib group was 84% and 87%, respectively (p = 0.714). The probabilities of two-yr DFS were 59% in the HSCT group and 82% in the imatinib group, either (p = 0.880). Relapse occurred in 5 (35.7%) patients of the HSCT group, and 8 (42.1%) patients showed relapse in the imatinib group. Among nine patients who died, five were in the HSCT group and the rest were in the imatinib group. The probability of relapse in the patients of the imatinib group followed up for several consecutive years may be higher than observed in the HSCT group, so we cannot easily conclude which way is more reliable.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Benzamides/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/therapy , Piperazines/therapeutic use , Pyrimidines/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Imatinib Mesylate , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/mortality , Male , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Transplantation, Homologous , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL