[Medicaments and oral healthcare. Mechanisms of interaction between medicaments]. / Serie: Medicamenten en mondzorg. Mechanismen van interacties van medicamenten.

Interactions between medicaments or between a medicament and another product used by the patient may result in a medicamentbecoming inactive or in an increase in the side effects. By proper historytaking, a dentist will often know which medicaments a patient uses and can take this into account in prescribing a medicament. Self-care medications and specific foods are often not spontaneously reported by a patient but can still interact with a medicament prescribed. A dentist should be aware of the interactions a prescribed medicament can have with other medicaments and products used by the patient. Therefore dentists have to ask directly about such medicaments and products, and record them in the patients' file.

Comparison of the long-term clinical performance of a biodegradable and a titanium fixation system in maxillofacial surgery: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Biodegradable fixation systems could reduce or eliminate problems associated with titanium removal of implants in a second operation. AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the long-term (i.e. >5 years postoperatively) clinical performance of a titanium and a biodegradable system in oral and maxillofacial surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) was performed in four hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients treated with a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) and/or a Le Fort-I osteotomy, and those treated for fractures of the mandible, maxilla, or zygoma were included from December 2006 to July 2009. The patients were randomly assigned to either a titanium (KLS Martin) or a biodegradable group (Inion CPS). RESULTS: After >5 years postoperatively, plate removal was performed in 22 of the 134 (16.4%) patients treated with titanium and in 23 of the 87 (26.4%) patients treated with the biodegradable system (P = 0.036, hazard ratio (HR) biodegradable (95% CI) = 2.0 (1.05-3.8), HR titanium = 1). Occlusion, VAS pain scores, and MFIQ showed good and (almost) pain free mandibular function in both groups. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the performance of the Inion CPS biodegradable system was inferior compared to the KLS Martin titanium system regarding plate/screws removal in the abovementioned surgical procedures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://controlled-trials.com ISRCTN44212338.

[Complaints of pain in the orofacial area of non-odontogenic origin]. / Pijnklachten in het orofaciale gebied van niet-dentogene oorsprong.

Complaints of pain in the orofacial area usually are odontogenic in origin or have to do with temporomandibular dysfunction. Dentists can, nevertheless, be confronted with a number of disorders that are non-odontogenic in nature. In such instances it is not always a matter of nociceptive pain, associated with somatic damage, but the pain can also be the result of nerve damage (neuropathic pain) or of changes that may occur within the central nervous system (central sensitisation). In most of these cases, the pain is chronic in nature. By ruling out alarming symptoms ('red flags') and paying attention to factors that may contribute to an over-sensitised nervous system ('yellow flags'), the patient can often be reassured sufficiently and subsequently be referred to a pain specialist for further pain management.

[Recent increase in simple extractions in OMF-surgeries in the Netherlands studied]. / Recente toename van reguliere extracties in mka-chirurgie onderzocht.

Tooth extraction is a treatment that can be carried out by general dental practitioners. It is suspected that the number of referrals to OMF-surgeons for simple tooth extractions has increased in the Netherlands in recent years. In a study, the health records of 2 groups of outpatients treated at the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery department of a university medical centre between 1996 and 2014 were investigated. Patients who had undergone tooth extractions were included. The complexity of the tooth extractions was analyzed according to 4 criteria. The results of the study show a significant increase in simple tooth extractions by OMF surgeons in 2014 in comparison with 1996. The complexity of the total number of tooth extractions in 2014 was lower than in 1996. Reasons for these results could not be unambiguously determined. Possible significant aspects are the risk of per-operative complications, insufficient affinity of general dental practitioners with tooth extractions or financial considerations on the part of both the general dental practitioners and the patients.

Cost-Effectiveness of a Biodegradable Compared to a Titanium Fixation System in Maxillofacial Surgery: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Biodegradable fixation systems could reduce/delete the problems associated with titanium plate removal. This means less surgical discomfort, and a reduction in costs. AIM: The aim of the present study was to compare the cost-effectiveness between a biodegradable and a titanium system in Maxillofacial surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter RCT was performed in the Netherlands from December 2006 to July 2009. Included were 230 patients who underwent a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO), a Le Fort-I osteotomy, or a bi-maxillary osteotomy and those treated for fractures of the mandible, maxilla, or zygoma. The patients were randomly assigned to a titanium group (KLS Martin) or to a biodegradable group (Inion CPS). Costs were assessed from a societal perspective. Health outcomes in the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were bone healing (8 weeks) and plate removal (2 years). RESULTS: In 25 out of the 117 patients who were randomized to the biodegradable group, the maxillofacial surgeon made the decision to switch to the titanium system intra-operatively. This resulted in an Intention-To-Treat (ITT-)analysis and a Treatment-Received (TR-) analysis. Both analyses indicated that operations performed with titanium plates and screws had better health outcomes. In the TR-analysis the costs were lower in the biodegradable group, in the ITT-analysis costs were lower in the titanium group. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: The difference in costs between the ITT and the TR analyses can be explained by the intra-operative switches: In the TR-analysis the switches were analysed in the titanium group. In the ITT-analysis they were analysed in the biodegradable group. Considering the cost-effectiveness the titanium system is preferable to the biodegradable system in the regular treatment spectrum of mandibular, Le Fort-I, and zygomatic fractures, and BSSO's, Le Fort-I osteotomies and bimaxillary osteotomies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN 44212338.

Gagging Problem Assessment: a re-evaluation.

The Gagging Problem Assessment (GPA) is an instrument to evaluate dental gagging. Although the GPA seemed to be reliable and valid in a pilot study, a replication study with more subjects was needed. Based on the pilot study, the number of items was reduced, resulting in the revised version of the GPA (GPA-R). The aims of this study were to replicate the reliability of the GPA-R and to investigate the correlation between dental gagging and general anxiety. Dental gagging patients (n = 59) were compared with a control group (n = 17) at t0 and 3 weeks later. The 'gagging group' also filled in the SCL-90 anxiety scale. Gagging-specific homogenous domains and internal consistency were determined. Stability and distinguishing capacity of the GPA-R were assessed. SCL-90-Anxiety scores were compared with standard values in a non-clinical population. The GPA-R patient part was able to reliably discriminate between the absence or the presence of dental gagging. However, the reliability of the GPA-R-dentist part was insufficient. The GPA-R seems to be sensitive to subtle differences in acts of the dentists. To overcome these problems, more detailed and explicit instructions on how to use the GPA-R should be formulated and more specific gagging stimuli should be included. The 'gagging group' reported 'fear of choking' significantly more often than the control group (P = 0·008). This finding might be important for the treatment of dental gagging. Considering the outcome of our study, development of a new diagnostic gagging tool needs another approach that focuses on gagging severity.

Major depressive episodes over the course of 7 years and hippocampal subfield volumes at 7 tesla MRI: the PREDICT-MR study.

INTRODUCTION: Smaller hippocampal volumes have been associated with major depressive disorder (MDD). The hippocampus consists of several subfields that may be differentially related to MDD. We investigated the association of occurrence of major depressive episodes (MDEs), assessed five times over seven years, with hippocampal subfield and entorhinal cortex volumes at 7 tesla MRI. METHODS: In this prospective study of randomly selected general practice attendees, MDEs according to DSM-IV-R criteria were assessed at baseline and after 6, 12, 39 and 84 months follow-up. At the last follow-up, a T2 (0.7 mm(3)) 7 tesla MRI scan was obtained in 47 participants (60±10 years). The subiculum, cornu ammonis (CA) 1 to 3, dentate gyrus&CA4 and entorhinal cortex volumes were manually segmented according a published protocol. RESULTS: Of the 47 participants, 13 had one MDE and 5 had multiple MDEs. ANCOVAs, adjusted for age, sex, education and intracranial volume, revealed no significant differences in hippocampal subfield or entorhinal cortex volumes between participants with and without an MDE in the preceding 84 months. Multiple episodes were associated with smaller subiculum volumes (B=-0.03 mL/episode; 95% CI -0.06; -0.003), but not with the other hippocampal subfield volumes, entorhinal cortex, or total hippocampal volume. LIMITATIONS: A limitation of this study is the small sample size which makes replication necessary. CONCLUSIONS: In this exploratory study, we found that an increasing number of major depressive episodes was associated with smaller subiculum volumes in middle-aged and older persons, but not with smaller volumes in other hippocampal subfields or the entorhinal cortex.

Comparison of the long-term skeletal stability between a biodegradable and a titanium fixation system following BSSO advancement - a cohort study based on a multicenter randomised controlled trial.

Biodegradable fixation systems could reduce or eliminate the problems associated with removal of titanium plates. A multicenter randomised controlled trial (RCT) was performed in the Netherlands from December 2006-July 2009, and originally 230 injured and orthognathic patients were included. The patients were randomly assigned to either a titanium control group (KLS Martin) or to a biodegradable test group (Inion CPS). The aim of the present study was to compare the long-term skeletal stability of advancement bilateral sagittal split osteotomies (BSSO) of a biodegradable system and a titanium system. Only patients from the original RCT who were at least 18 years old and who had a BSSO advancement osteotomy were included. Those who had simultaneous Le Fort I osteotomy or genioplasty were excluded. Analysis of skeletal stability was made by digital tracing of lateral cephalograms. Long-term skeletal stability in BSSO advancement did not differ significantly between patients treated with biodegradable plates and screws and those treated with titanium plates and screws. Given the comparable amount of relapse, the general use of Inion CPS in the treatment of BSSO advancement should not be discouraged. On the basis of other properties a total picture of the clinical use can be obtained; the short-term stability, the intraoperative switches, the number of plates removed and cost-effectiveness. Trial registration of original RCT: http://www.controlled-trials.com; ISRCTN 44212338.

Value of cone-beam computed tomography in the process of diagnosis and management of disorders of the temporomandibular joint.

The objective of this study was to assess the value of cone-beam computed tomographic (CT) images in the primary diagnosis and management of 128 outpatients with disorders of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). Before a diagnosis was made and treatment planned, the history was taken, physical examination made, and the orthopantomogram studied. After assessment of the cone-beam CT, the oral and maxillofacial surgeon (specialist or resident) was allowed to revise the provisional primary diagnosis and management. The degree of certainty was rated by the clinician before and after the cone-beam CT had been assessed. The primary diagnosis was changed in 32 patients (25%), additional diagnostic procedures were changed in 57 (45%), and the treatment was changed in 15 (12%) (in 4 the treatment was changed to a (minimally) invasive procedure). A total of 74 patients (58%) had their diagnosis and management changed after the cone-beam CT had been assessed. Changes in diagnosis and management were clinically relevant in 9/32 and 9/61 patients, respectively. The clinician's certainty about the primary diagnosis increased after the cone-beam CT had been assessed in 57 patients. Logistic regression analysis showed that the odds in favour of changes in primary diagnosis and management increased when limited mandibular function was a primary symptom, the patient was taking medication for pain, and the articular eminence could not be assessed on OPT. Assessment of cone-beam CT led to changes in primary diagnosis and management in more than half the patients with disorders of the TMJ.

Decision-making considerations in application of biodegradable fixation systems in maxillofacial surgery--a retrospective cohort study.

In a recent RCT comparing biodegradable (Inion CPS) with titanium (KLS Martin) plates and screws for fixation of osteotomies or fractures, we found that in 21% of the cases the surgeon decided intra-operatively to switch from biodegradable to titanium. The aim of the current retrospective cohort study was to analyse the reasons for these switches in order to find predictor variables that may be helpful in the decision to use biodegradable devices or not. The surgeons' opinion about the biodegradable system, and if there was a learning curve in the application of the biodegradable system were also investigated. All variables were assessed during the original RCT by using a questionnaire that was completed by the OMF surgeon directly post-operatively. For the outcome variable "surgeons' opinion" a separate questionnaire was used. Regarding the predictor variables a mandibular fracture had a higher risk of switching compared to a BSSO. However, looking at the reasons for these switches no firm conclusions can be drawn. There was a subjective learning curve to acquire the application-skills for the biodegradable system. There were no changes in isolated Le-Fort-I osteotomies despite the fact that the biodegradable system seems more difficult to apply in the midface. Inadequate stability was the main reason for switching. This can be material-related, or related to inexperience with or lack of confidence in the system, or impatience of the surgeon. A learning curve and personal preferences probably play an important role in the decision to switch. We think that with more patience and more experience it should be possible to increase both user comfort and confidence in the biodegradable system of Inion CPS, which likely will decrease the number of intra-operative switches.

Arthrocentesis as initial treatment for temporomandibular joint arthropathy: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of arthrocentesis compared to conservative treatment as initial treatment with regard to temporomandibular joint pain and mandibular movement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, 80 patients with arthralgia of the TMJ (classified according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders) were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups. One group received arthrocentesis as initial treatment (n = 40), the other group received conventional treatment including soft diet, physical treatment and occlusal splint therapy (n = 40). Follow-up was after 3, 12 and 26 weeks post treatment. Prior to treatment, and at every follow-up assessment, pain intensity was measured (VAS 0-100 mm at rest, and VAS 0-100 mm during movement) and maximum mouth opening (MMO) (mm interincisor distance). Furthermore patients were asked to fill out several surveys concerning the impact of mandibular impairment on their daily life, and psychosocial aspects. RESULTS: After 26 weeks, the TMJ pain (mm VAS at rest, and mm VAS during movement) had declined comparably in both groups (arthrocentesis n = 36; conservative treatment n = 36) and MMO (mm interincisor distance) had slightly improved. GEE models showed significant differences between arthrocentesis as initial treatment and conservative treatment, indicating that the arthrocentesis group improved more rapidly with regard to TMJ pain (VAS at rest p = 0.008; regression coefficient ß = -8.90 (95% confidence interval -15.50, -2.31), VAS during movement p = 0.003; regression coefficient ß = -10.76 (95% confidence interval -17.75, -3.77)) and MMO (p = 0.045; regression coefficient ß = -2.70 (95% confidence interval -5.35, -0.06)) compared to conservative treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Arthrocentesis as initial treatment reduces pain and functional impairment more rapidly compared to conservative treatment. However, after 26 weeks, both treatment modalities achieved comparable outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: www.trialregister.nl: NTR1505.

Comparison of biodegradable and titanium fixation systems in maxillofacial surgery: a two-year multi-center randomized controlled trial.

Biodegradable osteosynthesis could reduce/delete the problems associated with titanium plate removal. The aim of the present study was to compare the clinical performance in the first 2 post-operative years between a biodegradable and a titanium system in oral and maxillofacial surgery. The multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) was performed in the Netherlands from December 2006 to July 2009. Included were 230 patients who underwent a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) and/or a Le Fort-I osteotomy and those treated for fractures of the mandible, maxilla, or zygoma. The patients were randomly assigned to a titanium group (KLS Martin) or to a biodegradable group (Inion CPS). Plate removal was necessary in 16 of the 134 patients (11.9%) treated with titanium and in 21 of the 87 patients (24.1%) treated with the biodegradable system within the first 2 post-operative years [p = .016, HR biodegradable (95% CI) = 2.2 (1.1-4.2), HR titanium = 1]. Occlusion, VAS, and MFIQ scores showed that both groups had good mandibular function and were (almost) free of pain 1 and 2 years post-operatively (http://controlled-trials.com ISRCTN 44212338).

Long-term oral appliance therapy in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a controlled study on dental side effects.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess possible dental side effects associated with long-term use of an adjustable oral appliance compared with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in patients with the obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and to study the relationship between these possible side effects and the degree of mandibular protrusion associated with oral appliance therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: As part of a previously conducted RCT, 51 patients were randomized to oral appliance therapy and 52 patients to CPAP therapy. At baseline and after a 2-year follow-up, dental plaster study models in full occlusion were obtained which were thereupon analyzed with respect to relevant variables. RESULTS: Long-term use of an oral appliance resulted in small but significant dental changes compared with CPAP. In the oral appliance group, overbite and overjet decreased 1.2 (±1.1) mm and 1.5 (±1.5) mm, respectively. Furthermore, we found a significantly larger anterior-posterior change in the occlusion (-1.3 ± 1.5 mm) in the oral appliance group compared to the CPAP group (-0.1 ± 0.6 mm). Moreover, both groups showed a significant decrease in number of occlusal contact points in the (pre)molar region. Linear regression analysis revealed that the decrease in overbite was associated with the mean mandibular protrusion during follow-up [regression coefficient (ß) = -0.02, 95 % confidence interval (-0.04 to -0.00)]. CONCLUSIONS: Oral appliance therapy should be considered as a lifelong treatment, and there is a risk of dental side effects to occur. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Patients treated with the oral appliance need a thorough follow-up by a dentist or dental-specialist experienced in the field of dental sleep medicine.

A randomized clinical trial of biodegradable and titanium fixation systems in maxillofacial surgery.

Biodegradable fixation systems could reduce or delete the problems associated with metallic systems, since removal is not necessary. The aim of this study was to establish the effectiveness and safety of biodegradable plates and screws as potential alternatives to metallic ones. This multi-center randomized controlled trial was conducted from December 2006 to July 2009. Included were patients who underwent mandibular and/or Le Fort I osteotomies and those with fractures of the mandible, maxilla, and zygoma. The patients were assigned to a titanium control group (KLS Martin) or to a biodegradable test group (Inion CPS). The primary outcome measure was 'bone healing 8 weeks post-operatively'. The Intention-To-Treat (ITT) analysis of 113 patients in the titanium group and 117 patients in the biodegradable group yielded a significant difference (p < 0.001), primarily because in 25 patients (21%) who were randomized to the biodegradable group, the surgeon made the decision to switch to titanium intra-operatively. Despite this 'inferior' primary outcome result, biodegradable plates and screws could be safely used when it was possible to apply them. The benefits of using biodegradable systems (fewer plate removal operations) should be confirmed during a follow-up of minimally 5 years (Controlled-trials.com ISRCTN number 44212338).

Randomized trial on the effectiveness of dexamethasone in TMJ arthrocentesis.

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of dexamethasone administration following arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) with a placebo (saline). Twenty-eight participants with TMJ arthralgia were randomly assigned to two groups of a parallel double-blind RCT. In both groups, an arthrocentesis procedure was carried out. In one group, the procedure was followed by the administration of a single-dose intra-articular dexamethasone. In the other group, saline was administered as a control. Follow-up visits were scheduled after 1, 3, and 24 weeks. During each visit, TMJ pain (on a 100-mm VAS) and jaw stiffness (mouth opening in mm) were scored. In the statistical analysis, generalized estimating equation (GEE) models showed no differences between the two study groups, although pain and jaw stiffness were both reduced over 24 weeks. In conclusion, intra-articular dexamethasone following arthrocentesis did not improve the procedure's effect in patients presenting with TMJ arthralgia (ClinicalTrials.gov number CT01275014).

Nomenclature and classification of temporomandibular joint disorders.

Currently, there are basically two approaches to classification, one based on structural and one on positional changes occurring within the joint. Despite the increase in knowledge of pathologic changes occurring within the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), the disc still seems to be a central issue in nomenclature and classifications of TMJ disorders. Basic pathologies of the TMJ involve inflammation and degeneration in arthritic disorders (irrespective of the presence or position of the disc) and structural aberrations in growth disorders. Some internal derangements may occur independent of underlying pathology, e.g. because of a traumatic event. In this position paper, a classification of TMJ disorders is proposed based on basic structural changes occurring in the joint.

Long-term oral-appliance therapy in obstructive sleep apnea: a cephalometric study of craniofacial changes.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this randomized controlled study was to cephalometrically assess possible changes in craniofacial morphology associated with long-term use of an adjustable oral-appliance compared with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in patients with the obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS). In addition, we wanted to study the relationship between these possible changes and the degree of mandibular protrusion associated with oral-appliance therapy. METHODS: Fifty-one patients were randomized to oral-appliance therapy and 52 patients to CPAP therapy. At baseline and after follow-up (2.3±0.2 years), a lateral cephalogram of all patients was made in maximum intercuspation to determine relevant cephalometric variables. Both baseline and follow-up cephalograms were traced digitally whereupon cephalometric variables were compared. Changes in craniofacial morphology between the oral-appliance- and CPAP group were evaluated with a linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Compared with CPAP, long-term use of an oral-appliance resulted in small but significant (dental) changes. Overbite and overjet decreased, 1.0 (±1.5)mm and 1.7 (±1.6)mm, respectively. Furthermore we found a retroclination (-2.0 (±2.8)°) of the upper incisors and a proclination (3.7 (±5.4)°) of the lower incisors. Moreover, the lower- and total anterior facial height increased significantly, 0.8 (±1.5)mm and 0.9 (±1.4)mm, respectively. No changes in skeletal variables were found. Linear regression analysis revealed that the decrease in overbite was associated with the mean mandibular protrusion during follow-up (B=-0.029, SE=0.014, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Oral-appliance therapy should be considered as a life long treatment, and there is a risk of craniofacial changes to occur. Therefore, patients treated with an oral-appliance, need a thorough follow-up by a dentist or dental-specialist experienced in the field of dental sleep medicine.

Complaints related to mandibular function impairment after closed treatment of fractures of the mandibular condyle.

This study analysed the relationship between complaints and mandibular function after closed treatment of fractures of the mandibular condyle in a prospective study. In a 1-year follow-up, complaints were assessed during physical examination and function was assessed using the mandibular function impairment questionnaire (MFIQ), scoring range 0-68. Data from 114 patients (41 women, 73 men), mean age 28.1 years (SD 13.3), were available. On average the MFIQ scores were low 3.4 (SD 7.3). Ten patients (9%) experienced pain and 45 (39%) patients had a MFIQ score > 0. Mean mouth opening was 51.9 mm (SD 8.4). Occlusion was perceived as moderate or poor by 24% of the patients. In the logistic regression analysis mandibular function impairment (MFIQ score > 0) was entered as a dependent variable. Risk factors for mandibular function impairment were: pain, perceived occlusion (moderate or poor), absolute difference between left and right horizontal movements and age. A protective factor was mouth opening. The results of this study show that complaints (i.e. pain, perceived occlusion, reduced mouth opening, difference between left and right lateral movements and increased age) are predictors of mandibular function impairment after closed treatment of fractures of the mandibular condyle.