Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 14(10)2024 May 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38786297

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to compare the results of the measurements made using two methods for determining the retromolar eruption spaces and the mesiodistal inclinations of impacted mandibular third molars. These are the main parameters based on which the eruption of these teeth can be predicted. A Sirona GALILEOS Compact/Comfort CBCT scanner was used for the study. A total of 127 patients were included in the study. We made the measurements using our integrated method and the standard method used in the dental practice for determining the eruption space and the mesiodistal inclination of these teeth, and then we compared the results. The mean difference between the two methods for estimating the retromolar space deficiency on the left was 1.70 mm and standard deviation (SD) 2.95; mean error of the mean was 0.29; and Student t-test (paired t-test) = 5.86, significant level of the correlation was 0.001, <0.05. Regarding the teeth on the right, it was mean 1.59 mm and standard deviation (SD) 2.98; mean error of the mean was 0.31. The t-test performed found a statistically significant difference between the methods in determining the retromolar eruption spaces (t-test (paired t-test) = 5.13; significant level of the correlation 0.001; p < 0.05). The mean difference (in degrees) between the measurements of the inclinations of the teeth on the left using the two methods was 3, 50°; SD = 7.25; mean error of the mean = 1.81; t-test = 2.481; significant level of the correlation 0.025; and p > 0.05. As for the teeth on the right, it was 2.41°, SD = 9.57, mean error of the mean = 2.39, t-test 0.175, significant level of the correlation = 0.863, and >0.05. No statistically significant difference was found between the two methods in measuring the inclinations of impacted third molars. The conclusion of our study is that the determination of the mesiodistal inclination of the teeth and the available eruption space using the method developed by us is more accurate compared to the standard method, because constant points and planes are used. This method allows for predicting the eruption of impacted mandibular third molars.

2.
Folia Med (Plovdiv) ; 65(4): 664-670, 2023 Aug 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37655388

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: CAD/CAM technologies are becoming widely used for the production of metal ceramic dental restorations. Powder Co-based alloys are developed for selective laser melting. The corrosion resistance of the dental alloy affects the biocompatibility, functional suitability, and longevity of the prosthetic restoration.

3.
Australas J Dermatol ; 64(3): 346-353, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37353940

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dental workers are exposed to allergenic materials in the workplace. OBJECTIVES: To summarize patch test results in dental staff with work-related dermatitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study of dental staff with dermatitis was conducted. Symptoms, clinical findings and results from patch tests with 40 dental allergens were summarized. RESULTS: Of 329 participants, 155 (47.1%) had at least one positive patch reaction. The highest frequency of positive reactions was observed for metals (38.6%), acrylics (7.3%) and additives in acrylic resins (3.6%). One hundred and eighty-five (56.2%) participants were currently symptomatic; in this group, 79 (42.7%) had current dermatitis. Thirty-eight patients had at least one positive patch test considered occupationally related to their current dermatitis. CONCLUSION: Almost half of the dental staff with dermatitis had at least one positive patch test and approximately 12% had current occupational relevance of the allergens. Our results underscore the importance of patch testing in the evaluation of dental staff with dermatitis.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Dermatitis, Occupational , Humans , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Patch Tests/methods , Cross-Sectional Studies , Allergens/adverse effects , Dental Staff
4.
Med Pr ; 72(2): 105-111, 2021 Apr 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33325454

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As dental technicians are exposed to a variety of airborne chemicals that can act as irritants and sensitizers, and may give rise to work-related respiratory symptoms, the aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of respiratory symptoms of exposure to substances in the workplace and associated risk factors in dental laboratory technicians. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed among 539 dental technicians in the Plovdiv region using a self-report questionnaire. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed in order to investigate the relationship between sex, work experience, daily exposure to chemicals from the dental environment, and a history of atopic disorder with work-related respiratory symptoms. RESULTS: A total of 539 dental technicians completed the questionnaire. The prevalence of self-reported work-related respiratory symptoms was 26.2%. Based on logistic regression, the most significant factors associated with work-related respiratory symptoms were daily exposure of >8 h (OR = 5.83, 95% CI: 1.96-17.34) and the lack of a ventilation system (OR = 4.26, 95% CI: 2.39-7.58). Dental technicians with work experience of <5 years more often reported work-related respiratory symptoms (OR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.14-3.44) compared to those with long-term exposure of >20 years. A personal history of asthma (OR = 3.74, 95% CI: 1.39-10.07), allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (OR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.29-3.41) and atopic dermatitis (OR = 2.32, 95% CI: 1.23-4.38) was also associated with work-related respiratory symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that work-related respiratory symptoms are frequent among dental technicians and occur early in their career. A more comprehensive study should be conducted throughout the country in order to estimate the prevalence, and to establish effective programs and techniques of preventing work-related respiratory symptoms in dental technicians. Med Pr. 2021;72(2):105-11.


Subject(s)
Dental Staff , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Respiratory Tract Diseases/etiology , Adult , Asthma , Bulgaria , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dermatitis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Respiratory Tract Diseases/epidemiology , Self Report
5.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol ; 49(2): 128-135, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33104273

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Dentists are exposed to a variety of airborne chemicals that can act as irritants and sensitizers and may give rise to work-related respiratory symptoms. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of respiratory symptoms of exposure to substances in the workplace and associated risk factors in Bulgarian dentists. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed among Bulgarian dentists by using a self-report questionnaire. A direct acyclic graph (DAG) was elaborated to illustrate the direct and indirect causal pathways between exposure to irritants and/or allergens from dental environment and work-related respiratory symptoms among dentists. Multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted in order to investigate the relationship between sex, work experience, daily exposure to chemicals from dental environment, history of atopic disorder and work-related respiratory symptoms. RESULTS: A total of 4675 dentists completed the questionnaire (response rate 48.1%). The prevalence of self-reported work-related respiratory symptoms was 20.7%. The most common repeated causes of respiratory reactions were disinfectants (65.7%) and materials based on acrylic resins (29.7%). Factors associated with work-related respiratory symptoms are personal history of asthma (odds ratio (OR) 2.50, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.71-3.64), work experience >20 years (OR 2.17, 95% CI: 1.74-2.70) and female gender (OR 2.14, 95% CI: 1.81-2.56). CONCLUSION: Work-related respiratory symptoms are frequent among dentists and indicate a need for efforts to establish effective programmes and techniques of reducing or eliminating direct exposure to airborne chemicals in the dental environment.


Subject(s)
Asthma , Occupational Exposure , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dentists , Female , Humans , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Self Report , Surveys and Questionnaires , Workplace
6.
Folia Med (Plovdiv) ; 62(3): 626-630, 2020 Sep 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33009761

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Methacrylate-based materials are used daily in dental practice. Specialized publications report these materials as allergens with a high sensitizing potential. AIM: To draw the attention of dental doctors and personnel to risk factors of developing occupational allergies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: History and dermatological status of the patient were taken and he was given an epicutaneous test. RESULTS: The allergy testing revealed a strong positive allergic reaction to methacrylates which persisted and was observed at 72 hours as well as on day 7. A diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis was made on the basis of the patient's history, the clinical examination and the results of the epicutaneous test. CONCLUSION: The presented clinical case shows that early identification of the specific causative agents allows clinicians to take adequate measures and achieve results without having to use a medicine, and stop the progression of the occupational disease and the development of complications.


Subject(s)
Dental Technicians , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Methacrylates/adverse effects , Adult , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/pathology , Hand/pathology , Humans , Male , Patch Tests , Skin/pathology , Young Adult
7.
Folia Med (Plovdiv) ; 62(1): 141-146, 2020 Mar 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32337901

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dental students are at high risk of developing adverse respiratory reactions as a result of their practical work during their dentistry degree program when they come into contact with multiple airborne irritants and allergens. AIM: To estimate the prevalence of respiratory symptoms of exposure to substances in the workplace and associated risk factors in Bulgarian dental students. RESULTS: The prevalence of self-reported respiratory symptoms related to the pre-clinical and clinical training courses of the dentistry program was 12.4%. According to logistic regression analysis, the most important risk factors for work-related respiratory symptoms were a personal history of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (odds ratio (OR) 6.34, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.14-12.78), atopic dermatitis (OR 2.81, 95%CI: 1.26-6.26), and exposure to chemicals from dental environment for more than 6 hours a day (OR 3.60, 95%CI: 1.21-10.70). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that work-related respiratory symptoms are frequent among dental students and indicate the need for efforts to establish effective primary preventive programs for occupational respiratory disorders at national level.


Subject(s)
Conjunctivitis/epidemiology , Cough/epidemiology , Dyspnea/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Pharyngitis/epidemiology , Rhinorrhea/epidemiology , Students, Dental/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Bulgaria/epidemiology , Calcium Sulfate/adverse effects , Conjunctivitis/etiology , Conjunctivitis, Allergic/epidemiology , Cough/etiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dermatitis, Atopic/epidemiology , Disinfectants/adverse effects , Dyspnea/etiology , Female , Gloves, Surgical/adverse effects , Hoarseness/epidemiology , Hoarseness/etiology , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Masks , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Occupational Exposure , Pharyngitis/etiology , Plastics/adverse effects , Prevalence , Rhinitis, Allergic/epidemiology , Rhinorrhea/etiology , Risk Factors , Root Canal Filling Materials/adverse effects , Self Report , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Workplace , Young Adult
8.
Contact Dermatitis ; 82(6): 380-386, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32173871

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dentists are at high risk of developing skin symptoms due to occupational contact with irritants and/or allergens. OBJECTIVES: To assess the point prevalence of work-related skin symptoms and associated factors in Bulgarian dentists. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed using a self-report questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 4675 dentists filled the questionnaire (response 48.1%). The point prevalence of self-reported skin symptoms was 31.6%. According to logistic regression analysis, factors significantly associated with work-related skin symptoms included a personal history of atopic dermatitis (odds ratio [OR] 2.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.24-3.31), allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and/or asthma (OR 1.85, 95%CI: 1.56-2.19), work experience >30 years (OR 2.21, 95%CI: 1.78-2.74), personal history of contact allergy (OR 1.79, 95%CI: 1.48-2.17), female sex (OR 1.87, 95%CI: 1.59-2.19), hand washing >8 times a day (OR 1.32, 95%CI: 1.03-1.69), daily contact ≥4 hours with protective gloves (OR 2.09, 95%CI: 1.64-2.67), and use >10 pairs of gloves per day (OR 1.51, 95%CI: 1.11-2.04). CONCLUSION: Bulgarian dentists have a high prevalence of work-related skin symptoms. History of atopic dermatitis, prolonged work experience, and protective gloves use were the strongest risk factors.


Subject(s)
Dentistry/statistics & numerical data , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Irritant/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Asthma/epidemiology , Bulgaria/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dermatitis, Atopic/epidemiology , Female , Gloves, Protective , Hand Disinfection , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Rhinitis, Allergic/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Self Report , Sex Factors , Time Factors , Young Adult
9.
Contact Dermatitis ; 81(4): 274-279, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31334857

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dental students are at high risk of developing adverse skin reactions following practical work during the dentistry degree program. They encounter multiple irritants and allergens that may cause skin reactions on exposed parts of the body, notably the hands. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of skin reactions related to the pre-clinical and clinical training courses of the dentistry program and associated risk factors in Bulgarian dental students. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was performed using a self-report questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 467 dental students completed the questionnaire (response 51.8%). The prevalence of self-reported skin symptoms was 21.2%. According to logistic regression analysis, the most important risk factors for work-related skin symptoms were a personal history of atopic dermatitis (odds ratio [OR] 3.92, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.99-7.72), allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and/or asthma (OR 1.94, 95%CI: 1.03-3.68), personal history of contact allergy (OR 2.19, 95%CI: 1.06-4.55), and hand washing >16 times a day (OR 2.42, 95%CI: 1.06-5.52). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that work-related skin symptoms are frequent among dental students and indicate the need to establish effective primary preventive programs for occupational skin disorders at a national level.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Hand Dermatoses/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Students, Dental/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Asthma/epidemiology , Bulgaria/epidemiology , Conjunctivitis, Allergic/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Atopic/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Female , Gloves, Protective/statistics & numerical data , Hand Dermatoses/etiology , Hand Disinfection , Humans , Male , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Prevalence , Rhinitis, Allergic/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Self Report , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...