ABSTRACT
Aim: Current guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) recommend a one-size-fits-all approach in relation to the positioning of chest compressions. We recently developed RescueDoppler, a hands-free Doppler ultrasound device for continuous monitoring of carotid blood flow velocity during CPR. The aim of the present study is to investigate whether RescueDoppler via real-time hemodynamic feedback, could identify both optimal and suboptimal compression positions. Methods: In this model of animal cardiac arrest, we induced ventricular fibrillation in five domestic pigs. Manual chest compressions were performed for ten seconds at three different positions on the sternum in random order and repeated six times. We analysed Time Average Velocity (TAV) with chest compression position as a fixed effect and animal, position, and sequential time within animals as random effects. Furthermore, we compared TAV to invasive blood pressure from the contralateral carotid artery. Results: We were able to detect changes in TAV when altering positions. The positions with the highest (range 19 to 48 cm/s) and lowest (6-25 cm/s) TAV were identified in all animals, with corresponding peak pressure 50-81 mmHg, and 46-64 mmHg, respectively. Blood flow velocity was, on average, highest at the middle position (TAV 33 cm/s), but with significant variability between animals (SD 2.8) and positions within the same animal (SD 9.3). Conclusion: RescueDoppler detected TAV changes during CPR with alternating chest compression positions, identifying the position yielding maximal TAV. Future clinical studies should investigate if RescueDoppler can be used as a real-time hemodynamical feedback device to guide compression position.
ABSTRACT
Background/Purpose: Pulse palpation is an unreliable method for diagnosing cardiac arrest. To address this limitation, continuous hemodynamic monitoring may be a viable solution. Therefore, we developed a novel, hands-free Doppler system, RescueDoppler, to detect the pulse continuously in the carotid artery. Methods: In twelve pigs, we evaluated RescueDopplers potential to measure blood flow velocity in three situations where pulse palpation of the carotid artery was insufficient: (1) systolic blood pressure below 60 mmHg, (2) ventricular fibrillation (VF) and (3) pulseless electrical activity (PEA). (1) Low blood pressure was induced using a Fogarty balloon catheter to occlude the inferior vena cava. (2) An implantable cardioverter-defibrillator induced VF. (3) Myocardial infarction after microembolization of the left coronary artery caused True-PEA. Invasive blood pressure was measured in the contralateral carotid artery. Time-averaged blood flow velocity (TAV) in the carotid artery was related to mean arterial pressure (MAP) in a linear mixed model. Results: RescueDoppler identified pulsatile blood flow in 41/41 events with systolic blood pressure below 60 mmHg, with lowest blood pressure of 19 mmHg. In addition the absence of spontaneous circulation was identified in 21/21 VF events and true PEA in 2/2 events. The intraclass correlation coefficient within animals for TAV and MAP was 0.94 (95% CI. 0.85-0.98). Conclusions: In a porcine model, RescueDoppler reliably identified pulsative blood flow with blood pressures below 60 mmHg. During VF and PEA, circulatory arrest was rapidly and accurately demonstrated. RescueDoppler could potentially replace unreliable pulse palpation during cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
