Type of cancer and complementary and alternative medicine are determinant factors for the patient delay experienced by children with cancer: A study in West Java, Indonesia.

INTRODUCTION: Most pediatric cancer patients in developing countries present at an advanced stage due to delayed diagnosis, being an important barrier to effective care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the associated factor of patient delay and explore significant parental practice-associated risk factor to patient delay. METHODS: This was a sequential mixed methodology, utilizing data from the Indonesian Pediatric Cancer Registry for clinical variables and completed interviews with parents using structured questionnaires to obtain their sociodemographic data. A binary logistic regression analysis model was fitted to identify factors associated with patient delay. Additional semi-structured interviews related to parental practice of using complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) were administered to 30 parents. Thematic framework analysis was performed on qualitative data to explore determinant factors of parental practice of using CAM. RESULTS: We interviewed 356 parents with children with cancer. The median patient delay was 14 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 6-46.5 days). The most extended delay was in patients with malignant bone tumors (median 66, IQR: 14-126). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, solid cancer (odds ratio [OR] = 5.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.79-9.77, p < .001) and use of CAM (OR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.13-3.08, p = .015) were associated with patient delay. Qualitative interviews highlighted key issues relative to determinant parental factors using CAM, including vague initial childhood cancer symptoms, parental health-seeking behavior, CAM availability and accessibility, also barriers of healthcare facilities. CONCLUSION: Type of cancer and use of CAM are essential factors that cause patient delay. It should be addressed in the future childhood cancer awareness and childhood cancer diagnosis pathway.

Parental Factors Contribute to Childhood Cancer Abandonment Treatment During COVID-19.

Factors influence a person's health seeking behavior related to abandonment rate on pediatric oncology treatment during this pandemic is unknown. The aim is to identify factors influencing abandonment rates in early pandemic. This was a cross-sectional studies during early pandemic and analyze factors in parents whose children had treatment for malignancy contribute to their children's abandonment treatment rate through guided interview using questionnaire. The characteristic related significantly with treatment abandonment is maternal education. It is found that patients whose mother had education less than secondary school was 1.315 (CI 1.013-1.707) having risk experience abandonment treatment. Parental perception related to impact of COVID-19 was significantly related to treatment abandonment rate with RR 0.202 (CI 0.86-0.471). Patients whose parents have positive perception how abandonment treatment affect their child outcome, believe that doctor has taken step to prevent COVID-19 transmission during treatment, and receive information about COVID-19, having less risk being abandonment treatment.

Convalescent plasma therapy in obese severe COVID-19 adolescents: Two cases report.

BACKGROUND: In Indonesia, 175 cases resulted in death in children from March to December 2020. Studies regarding Convalescent Plasma Therapy's (CPT) safety and efficacy in children are scarce. Our case report was the first to write CPT in Indonesian children. CASE PRESENTATION: In our case, two obese children with progressive shortness of breath, worsening cough, and high fever, the findings met severe COVID-19 criteria. We performed CPT for these patients and the patient's condition was improved and able to be discharged. DISCUSSION: Severe COVID-19 with or without comorbid was the indication of CPT which had been approved by the U.S. FDA and Indonesian Pediatrics Society. The key factors associated with CPT efficacy were the donor's titer antibody, the treatment time point, and the patient's comorbidities. The clinical impact showed an improvement by the combination therapy of CPT and remdesivir. CONCLUSION: We noted that CPT might be well tolerated, could improve the clinical impact of severe COVID-19 in adolescents, and have no adverse events as well. CPT for severe COVID-19 cases in children had the potential to be developed in studies with better designs and stronger levels of evidence.

Monitoring Of High-Dose Methotrexate (Mtx)-Related Toxicity and Mtx Levels in Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Pilot-Study in Indonesia.

The administration of high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) requires an accurate monitoring of blood MTX levels to determine the regimen of leucovorin rescue and urine alkalinization to prevent toxicity. However, it is technically and logistically challenging to screen patients routinely in limited-resource settings. This study aimed to evaluate blood MTX levels at 24- and 48-hours from start of infusion in relation to clinical toxicity in childhood ALL. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted on 32 consecutive children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who had received at least one cycle of 1 g/m2 HD-MTX intravenous infusion as a part of consolidation treatment based on the 2013 Indonesian ALL Protocol. In total, 68 cycles were evaluated. Serum MTX concentrations were measured using enzyme immunoassay. MTX toxicity was categorized using common toxicity criteria (CTCAE) 3.0 version. The association between MTX level and clinical toxicity was assessed by non-parametric analysis. RESULTS: The 24-hours MTX level was median 29.8 ng/mL (0.065 µmol/L) (IQR 8.1-390.6) with a modest decrease in 48-hours MTX serum level in all cycles (median 28.3 ng/mL and 0.062 µmol/L; IQR 0.35-28.7; p <0.05). The two most common toxicities were hepatotoxicity (32.2%) and neutropenia (30.9%). Nephrotoxicity and febrile neutropenia occurred in 8.8% and 5.8% of patients, respectively, with low percentage of mucositis (4.3%) and thrombocytopenia (5.6%) recorded.  No statistically significant association was found between MTX levels and clinical toxicity, except for liver toxicity. CONCLUSION: Serum MTX levels at 24-hours and 48-hours are low, followed by only 4.4% grade III/IV hepatotoxicity and 26,4% grade III/IV neutropenia. There is no significant association between the clinical toxicity and MTX levels at the two points of measurement. An attempt to increase the MTX dose and/or to introduce a loading dose should be considered in subsequent ALL protocol as supported by further pharmacokinetic MTX studies in the Indonesian population.