A multi-centre retrospective study of long-term outcomes of spinal re-irradiation with SABR.

INTRODUCTION: Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is a highly conformal technique utilising a high dose per fraction commonly employed in the re-treatment of spinal metastases. This study sought to determine the safety and efficacy of re-irradiation with SABR to previously treated spinal metastases. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of patients at three Australian centres who have undergone spinal SABR after previous spinal radiotherapy to the same or immediately adjacent vertebral level. Efficacy was determined in terms of rates of local control, while safety was characterised by rates of serious complications. RESULTS: Thirty-three spinal segments were evaluated from 32 patients. Median follow-up for all patients was 2.6 years, and median overall survival was 4.3 years. Eleven of 33 (33.3%) treated spinal segments had local progression, with a local control rate at 12 months of 71.4% (95% C.I. 55.2%-92.4%). Four patients (16.7%) went on to develop cauda equina or spinal cord compression. Thirteen out of 32 patients (40.6%) experienced acute toxicity, of which 12 were grade 2 or less. Five out of 30 spinal (16.7%) segments with follow-up imaging had a radiation-induced vertebral compression fracture. There was one case of radiation myelitis which occurred in a patient who had mediastinal radiotherapy with a treatment field which overlapped their prior spinal radiation. CONCLUSION: The patients in this study experienced long median survival, durable tumour control and high rates of freedom from long-term sequelae of treatment. These results support the use of SABR in patients who progress in the spine despite previous radiotherapy.

A double-blinded randomised controlled study of fluid restriction versus liberal fluid during induction of labour: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Excess intravenous fluid for women requiring an induction of labour may adversely affect the duration of labour and maternal/neonatal outcomes. AIMS: This study aimed to determine the difference in duration of labour and outcomes with a low background infusion rate, compared to liberal background intravenous fluid management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A double blind randomised controlled pilot study was performed on 200 women who underwent induction of labour at a single institution. Women were randomised to an intravenous rate of 40 mL/h versus 250 mL/h of Hartmann's solution. Fluid boluses were strictly controlled to limit bias. This trial was registered with the Australian clinical trial registry: ACTRN12621001298808. RESULTS: Analysis of the total amount of fluid received showed good separation with Group 1 (40 mL/h) receiving 1,736 mL less than Group 2 (250 mL/h), median (interquartile range) 841 mL (458, 1691) versus 2,577 mL (1620, 4326) (P < 0.001). Median duration of labour was shorter in Group 1 by 24 min (P = ns). Subset analysis of nulliparous women showed that duration of labour was shorter in Group 1 by 83.5 min (P = ns). CONCLUSION: As this was a pilot study, a significant difference in duration of labour or secondary outcomes was not seen. Given the increasing numbers of nulliparous women having an induction of labour, potential for adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes and the associated higher rate of operative birth, this study guides power calculations and supports proof of concept for future research into optimum fluid management during induction of labour for these women.

Addressing disparities in health outcomes for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and limited English proficiency.

INTRODUCTION: There are significant challenges and a lack of data related to culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) cancer patients. We compared patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer that required an interpreter. METHODS: Registry data was extracted for advanced pancreatic cancer patients from a single health institution with a comprehensive Transcultural and Language Service (TALS). Demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics were compared. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates with log-rank testing, and univariate and multivariable regression analysis were performed to compare the group with limited English proficiency (LEP) to the English proficient (EP) group. RESULTS: Of 155 patients, 32.9% (n = 51) required the TALS. The LEP group had a higher mean age (71.2 vs. 76.8 years; p = 0.005) and received less chemotherapy (42.3% vs. 31.4%, p = 0.220). Univariate analysis revealed a shorter median overall survival (OS) in the LEP group (3.6 vs. 5.0 months), with a hazard ratio [HR] of 1.51 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-2.21, p = 0.033). Upon multivariable analysis, adjusting for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scale, the number of sites of metastatic disease and chemotherapy use, the strength of association between LEP and OS reduced marginally (HR 1.42, 95% CI: 0.93-2.16), and was no longer statistically significant (p = 0.103). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced pancreatic cancer utilizing a comprehensive TALS, there was a trend to poorer survival with limited English proficiency, although this association was not statistically significant. An ongoing research commitment to the CALD experience is necessary to build a granular understanding of this population and ensure equitable outcomes.

Temporal changes in toe-brachial index results in haemodialysis patients.

INTRODUCTION: Toe brachial index (TBI), the ratio of toe pressure to systolic blood pressure (SBP), helps predict peripheral arterial disease. In patients with kidney failure this may be performed during haemodialysis for convenience. Until recently there has been little evaluation of the impact of haemodialysis in limb and systemic perfusion on these values. We aimed to determine if the values of TBI would change during and after dialysis compared to pre-dialysis assessments. METHODS: Using a repeated measures study, TBIs and toe pressures were measured using the Hadeco Smartop Vascular Ultrasound Doppler in 31 patients undergoing haemodialysis. TBI assessments were completed pre-dialysis and compared to values obtained at 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, and post-dialysis to monitor change in TBI results. Comparison of values for each patient were tested for differences using paired t-tests. Linear mixed-effects models were used to test for the effect of patient and clinical factors on change in outcome measures. RESULTS: Mean TBI decreased from pre-dialysis at 1 hour (0.72 to 0.63, p = 0.01) and remained lower at 2 hours and 3 hours, before returning to pre-dialysis levels at post-dialysis. Mean systolic blood pressure also declined during dialysis. Mean TBI results were lower in those with a history of lower limb ulceration and in females. Sixteen patients (51.6%) had a normal TBI at baseline, 14 (45.2%) had a mildly low TBI, and one (3.2%) had a severely low TBI. Between baseline and 1 h, five patient's results moved from normal to mildly abnormal and one from mildly abnormal to severely abnormal. As haemodialysis concluded (post-dialysis) there were 17 (56.7%) 'normal' TBIs, with no severely abnormal TBIs (p = 0.73). 0.30). CONCLUSION: TBI and toe pressures are impacted significantly by dialysis. TBI and toe pressure assessments should be conducted before haemodialysis begins, or between dialysis sessions to avoid variability.

Impact of Visitor Restrictions on the Pain and Psychological Wellbeing of Palliative Care Patients: A Cohort Study.

Aim: Palliative care patients with advanced or life-threatening illnesses in hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic are likely to be affected by visitor restrictions (VR). We aimed to explore the impact of VR on patients' levels of physical pain and psychological distress. Design: Retrospective cohort study comparing two cohorts of patients admitted to a palliative care unit in a major metropolitan hospital in Australia; the first cohort from 1 April to 30 June 2019 (pre-pandemic; n = 96), and the second from 1 April to 30 June 2020 (during pandemic; n = 95). Methods: Patient-rated pain scores (using the Symptom Assessment Scale; SAS) and clinician-rated pain and psychological/spiritual severity scores (using the Palliative Care Problem Severity Score; PCPSS) on admission and on discharge or death were compared between pre-pandemic and pandemic cohorts. Discharge pain scores and change in scores from admission to discharge were also assessed via multivariable analyses. Results: Case-mix of patients in both cohorts were similar. After adjusting for demographics and functional status, pain scores in the pandemic cohort were higher for patients deceased on discharge, compared to the pre-pandemic cohort (SAS: coefficient = 0.86, 95%CI: 0.09 to 1.64, P = 0.029; PCPSS: coefficient = 0.24, 95%CI: -0.07 to 0.86, P = 0.131, respectively). Differences in SAS and PCPSS pain and psychological/spiritual scores for those discharged alive were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Among palliative care inpatients affected by VR, we observed higher pain scores for patients discharged deceased; suggesting that VR may have impacted the physical wellbeing (pain) of these patients.

Multivariable risk model for postpartum re-presentation with hypertension: development phase.

OBJECTIVES: Postpartum hypertension is one of the leading causes of re-presentation to hospital postpartum and is associated with adverse long-term cardiovascular risk. Postpartum blood pressure monitoring and management interventions have been shown to reduce hospital re-presentation, complications and long-term blood pressure control. Identifying patients at risk can be difficult as 40%-50% present with de novo postpartum hypertension. We aim to develop a risk model for postpartum re-presentation with hypertension using data readily available at the point of discharge. DESIGN: A case-control study comparing all patients who re-presented to hospital with hypertension within 28 days post partum to a random sample of all deliveries who did not re-present with hypertension. Multivariable analysis identified risk factors and bootstrapping selected variables for inclusion in the model. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve or C-statistic was used to test the model's discriminative ability. SETTING: A retrospective review of all deliveries at a tertiary metropolitan hospital in Melbourne, Australia from 1 January 2016 to 30 December 2020. RESULTS: There were 17 746 deliveries, 72 hypertension re-presentations of which 51.4% presented with de novo postpartum hypertension. 15 variables were considered for the multivariable model. We estimated a maximum of seven factors could be included to avoid overfitting. Bootstrapping selected six factors including pre-eclampsia, gestational hypertension, peak systolic blood pressure in the delivery admission, aspirin prescription and elective caesarean delivery with a C-statistic of 0.90 in a training cohort. CONCLUSION: The development phase of this risk model builds on the three previously published models and uses factors readily available at the point of delivery admission discharge. Once tested in a validation cohort, this model could be used to identify at risk women for interventions to help prevent hypertension re-presentation and the short-term and long-term complications of postpartum hypertension.