A Discrete-Choice Experiment Assessing the Patient Preferences and Real-World Experiences of Patients with Migraine in Japan.

INTRODUCTION: Migraine is a debilitating headache disorder with a high prevalence in Japan that imposes significant societal burden. Although the Japanese Clinical Practice Guideline for Headache Disorders 2021 recommends both acute and preventive migraine treatments, the usage of preventive treatments is still limited. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the treatment preferences of patients with migraine pertaining to both acute and preventive treatments. METHODS: A mixed-methods study including a discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted with Japanese patients with migraine (10 for the qualitative interviews, and 400 for the DCE) who were recruited from the Rakuten Insight panel. The DCE presented hypothetical treatment options including oral acute, oral preventive, and injectable preventive medications. Six attributes (method of delivery, reduction of pain, impact of headaches on daily routines, dosage adjustability, and temporary and persistent side effects) each with three levels were included in the survey. A hierarchical Bayesian model was used to estimate relative attribute importance scores (RAI) for all attributes. RESULTS: For the 400 participants in the DCE, the most common age bracket was 40-49 years old, and the majority were female (66.75%). RAI estimates indicated that "method of delivery" was the most important attribute for patients (RAI 51.92, SD = 10.20), followed by "reduction of pain when experiencing a headache" (RAI 17.00, SD = 7.74). Oral preventive treatments were preferred over injectable preventive treatments. The qualitative interviews showed that patients prefer oral medications to injectable treatments, and a lack of awareness regarding preventive treatments. CONCLUSION: This study found that the "method of delivery" was the most important driver of treatment preferences of patients with migraine in Japan, with oral acute medications being preferred. Oral preventive treatments were found to be preferred over injectable treatments. These results may indicate the need for increased education regarding preventive treatments, as well as the need for further development of these treatments.

Efficacy of galcanezumab in migraine central sensitizatio.

Galcanezumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway (CGRP mAb), acts peripherally due to its large size. However, recent studies have suggested that CGRP mAbs may also have a central mode of action. This study aimed to evaluate the central effects of galcanezumab on migraine central sensitization.This prospective real-world study was conducted at three headache centers in Japan between May 2021 and May 2022. Patients treated with galcanezumab for migraines were included in the study. The primary outcome was the change in the validated Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) score from baseline to six months of treatment. We also assessed changes in the Allodynia Symptom Checklist (ASC-12) score. Eighty-six patients with migraine (73 female and 13 male) were analyzed. At 6 months, CSI and ASC-12 scores were significantly reduced compared to baseline (CSI: 36.0 vs. 29.3, p < 0.001; and ASC-12: 5.55 vs. 4.26, p < 0.01). Furthermore, these effects were observed as early as three months of treatment. In this study, we demonstrated the real-world efficacy of galcanezumab in improving central sensitization in migraine, with significant effects seen in the early phase of treatment. Trial registration: This study was registered with UMIN-CTR on May 2, 2021 (UMIN000044096).

Novel and reappraised wide-band EEG findings in migraineurs: Its correlation with several clinical variables.

OBJECTIVE: Cortical spreading depolarization is one possible pathogenesis of migraine, of which slow neurophysiological change is barely recorded in conventional EEG settings. Using wide-band EEG conditions, we reappraised the features of EEG in migraineurs, including subdelta-band EEG changes. METHODS: This retrospective study included 144 patients with migraine. We delineated EEG of focal delta slow (FDS) (1-4 Hz) by time constant (TC) 0.3 s and focal subdelta slow (FSDS) (< 1 Hz) by TC 2 s. Relationships between clinical variables and EEG findings were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 144 patients, 39 had aura and 105 did not. FSDS and FDS were observed in 38 and 58 patients, respectively. No EEG was recorded during the aura. In multivariate analysis with the phase of migraine, family history, age, and percentage of sleep during EEG recording, the phase of migraine was related to the occurrence of FSDS (postdrome vs interictal, prodrome, and headache respectively (OR = 49.00 [95% CI = 3.89-616.66], 46.28 [2.99-715.78], 32.79 [2.23-481.96], p = 0.0026, 0.0061, 0.011). FDS was clinically unremarkable for differential evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Wide-band EEG abnormality in migraineurs, i.e., FSDS, can be affected by migraine phase. SIGNIFICANCE: Wide-band EEG finding could be a biomarker related to clinical variables in migraines.

Underrecognition of migraine-related stigmatizing attitudes and social burden: Results of the OVERCOME Japan study.

INTRODUCTION: Migraine-related stigma (MiRS) and social burden is increasingly recognized. We assessed perspectives and attitudes toward migraine in people with and without migraine in Japan. METHODS: OVERCOME (Japan) was a cross-sectional, population-based web survey of people with and without migraine (July-September 2020). People with migraine were individuals who met the modified International Classification of Headache Disorders criteria or had self-reported physician-diagnosed migraine. People without migraine were selected per quota sampling to represent the Japanese adult population. People with migraine reported their experiences on stigma and social burden and answered how frequently they experienced stigma using the MiRS questionnaire. Associations between MiRS and disability and MiRS and interictal burden were examined using the migraine disability assessment and Migraine Interictal Burden Scale-4. People without migraine reported their experiences and attitudes toward people with migraine by answering an 11-item attitudinal migraine questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 17,071 and 2008 people with and without migraine, respectively, completed the survey. Overall, 11,228 (65.8%) respondents with migraine reported that they have never experienced stigma or burden; however, of the 12,383 employed respondents, 5841 (47.2%) reported that their current employers are not "extremely" or "very" understanding about their conditions. Moreover, ∼30%-40% of respondents "sometimes," "often," or "very often" hid their migraine from others. The proportion of respondents who experienced stigma often or very often, as assessed by MiRS, was 16.5%; this increased with the increasing number of monthly migraine headache days. The proportion of respondents with moderate-to-severe disability and interictal burden increased with increasing stigma. Among respondents without migraine, the proportion holding a stigmatizing attitude toward those with migraine was low (<15%); ∼80% had never experienced work- or family-related stigma or burden. CONCLUSION: MiRS and burden exist but may be hidden and underrecognized in Japan. Disease awareness and education may be important to prevent and reduce stigma and burden.

Preliminary External Validation Results of the Artificial Intelligence-Based Headache Diagnostic Model: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study.

The misdiagnosis of headache disorders is a serious issue, and AI-based headache model diagnoses with external validation are scarce. We previously developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based headache diagnosis model using a database of 4000 patients' questionnaires in a headache-specializing clinic and herein performed external validation prospectively. The validation cohort of 59 headache patients was prospectively collected from August 2023 to February 2024 at our or collaborating multicenter institutions. The ground truth was specialists' diagnoses based on the initial questionnaire and at least a one-month headache diary after the initial consultation. The diagnostic performance of the AI model was evaluated. The mean age was 42.55 ± 12.74 years, and 51/59 (86.67%) of the patients were female. No missing values were reported. Of the 59 patients, 56 (89.83%) had migraines or medication-overuse headaches, and 3 (5.08%) had tension-type headaches. No one had trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias or other headaches. The models' overall accuracy and kappa for the ground truth were 94.92% and 0.65 (95%CI 0.21-1.00), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F values for migraines were 98.21%, 66.67%, 98.21%, and 98.21%, respectively. There was disagreement between the AI diagnosis and the ground truth by headache specialists in two patients. This is the first external validation of the AI headache diagnosis model. Further data collection and external validation are required to strengthen and improve its performance in real-world settings.

Effectiveness of fremanezumab treatment in patients with migraine headache.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fremanezumab for migraine prevention. DESIGN: Retrospective, single-center, real-world study. SETTING: Regional tertiary headache center in Japan. SUBJECTS: Adult individuals with migraine (n = 165, male = 17, female = 148; average age = 45.5 ± 16.0 years) who received fremanezumab between September 2021 and August 2022. METHODS: Fremanezumab was administered subcutaneously at a monthly dose of 225 mg or quarterly dose of 675 mg based on patient preferences. Patients received fremanezumab treatment for up to 1 year unless it was discontinued. Monthly data were collected on migraine days, headache days, and days requiring acute medication. RESULTS: Of the 165 patients, 125 (75.7%) received fremanezumab as their first anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide-related antibody drug. Significant reductions in monthly migraine days, headache days, and days requiring acute medication were observed in those with episodic and chronic migraines. The baseline monthly headache days was 8.1 ± 4.0 in the episodic migraine group, which reduced to 6.1 ± 4.8, 5.8 ± 4.4, 4.7 ± 3.6, and 4.6 ± 3.3 days at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively; in the chronic migraine group, the baseline monthly headache days was 20.9 ± 6.1, which reduced to 17.0 ± 8.9, 15.0 ± 9.2, 13.0 ± 7.7, and 12.0 ± 9.1 days at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Treatment benefits were enhanced after 6 months of administering fremanezumab in the chronic migraine group. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world study of patients with migraine, fremanezumab appears to be effective and safe. Further studies are required to identify additional predictors of treatment success and failure with fremanezumab.

[Epileptic seizure and migraine attack: A revisit from the "Borderland of Epilepsy" to clinical implementation of infraslow activity/DC shifts in scalp EEG].

Migraine attacks, especially ones with aura, have symptoms similar to epileptic seizures, and the two may sometimes be difficult to differentiate clinically. However, the characteristic minute-by-minute symptom development and progress within 60 |min is useful for diagnosis. Although the details of its pathophysiology remain unsolved, cortical spreading depolarization (CSD) is one of the main pathogenetic factors. In epilepsy, clinical data have shown that ictal DC shifts could reflect impaired homeostasis of extracellular potassium by astrocyte dysfunction. Ictal DC shifts were found to be difficult to detect by scalp EEG, but can be clinically recorded from the seizure focus using wide-band EEG method. The similarity between DC shifts and CSD has been gaining attention from the neurophysiology point of view. The clinical implementation of infraslow activity/DC shifts analysis of scalp EEG is expected to elucidate further the pathophysiology of migraine, which may lie in the borderland of epilepsy.

Cost Effectiveness of Fremanezumab in Episodic and Chronic Migraine Patients from a Japanese Healthcare Perspective.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Fremanezumab is an effective treatment for episodic (EM) and chronic migraine (CM) patients in Japan, but its cost effectiveness remains unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the cost effectiveness of fremanezumab compared with standard of care (SOC) in previously treated EM and CM patients from a Japanese healthcare perspective. METHODS: Estimated regression models were implemented in a probabilistic Markov model to inform effectiveness and health-related quality-of-life data for fremanezumab and SOC. The model was further populated with data from the literature. The adjusted Japanese healthcare perspective included productivity losses. The main model outcomes were quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs (2022 Japanese Yen [¥]), and incremental outcomes including the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Analyses were performed separately for the EM and CM patients and combined. Costs and effects were discounted at an annual rate of 2.0%. RESULTS: The mean QALYs over a 25-year time horizon for the EM and CM populations combined were 13.03 for SOC and 13.15 for fremanezumab. The associated costs were ¥27,550,292 for SOC and ¥28,371,048 for fremanezumab. QALYs were higher and costs lower for EM patients compared with CM patients for both fremanezumab and SOC. The deterministic ICERs of fremanezumab versus SOC were ¥6,334,861 for EM, ¥7,393,824 for CM, and ¥6,530,398 for EM and CM combined. Indirect costs and choice of mean migraine days model distribution had a substantial impact on the ICER. CONCLUSION: Using fremanezumab in a heterogeneous mixture of Japanese EM and CM patients resulted in a reduction of monthly migraine days and thus more QALYs compared with SOC. The cost effectiveness of fremanezumab versus SOC in EM and CM patients resulted in an ICER of ¥6,530,398, from an adjusted Japanese public healthcare perspective.

Fremanezumab is an effective treatment for episodic and chronic migraine patients in Japan, but it is unknown how the costs relate to the health benefits. The current research determined the relation between costs and effects of fremanezumab compared with the current standard of care in Japanese clinical practice, to see if the costs are justified by the health benefits. A model was used to inform the treatment effect of fremanezumab and standard of care. Data on costs, the frequency in which health care was used, and impairment of work due to migraine were also included in the model and obtained from the literature. The main outcomes were the number of years that patients were alive while taking their quality of life into account, costs, and the difference in these outcomes between patients who were treated with fremanezumab and those receiving standard of care. Subsequently, it was estimated how costs and effects related to one another and whether the costs were justified by the health benefits. The outcomes showed that patients treated with fremanezumab had a better quality of life compared with those receiving standard of care, while the costs associated with fremanezumab were higher. Compared with standard of care, the health benefits of treating patients with fremanezumab were justified by the costs within an acceptable range. Taking the absence from work due to illness into account had a substantial impact on the model outcomes.

A study to investigate the prevalence of headache disorders and migraine conducted using medical claims data and linked results from online surveys: post-hoc analysis of other headache disorders.

BACKGROUND: Surveys using questionnaires to collect epidemiologic data may be subject to misclassification. Here, we analyzed a headache questionnaire to evaluate which questions led to a classification other than migraine. METHODS: Anonymized surveys coupled with medical claims data from individuals 19-74 years old were obtained from DeSC Healthcare Inc. to examine proportions of patients with primary headache disorders (i.e.; migraine, tension-type headache, cluster headache, and "other headache disorders"). Six criteria that determined migraine were used to explore how people with other headache disorders responded to these questions. RESULTS: Among the 21480 respondents, 7331 (34.0%) reported having headaches. 691 (3.2%) respondents reported migraine, 1441 (6.7%) had tension-type headache, 21 (0.1%) had cluster headache, and 5208 (24.2%) reported other headache disorders. Responses of participants with other headache disorders were analyzed, and the top 3 criteria combined with "Symptoms associated with headache" were "Site of pain" (7.3%), "Headache changes in severity during daily activities" (6.4%), and the 3 criteria combined (8.8%). The symptoms associated with headache were "Stiff shoulders" (13.6%), "Stiff neck" (9.4%), or "Nausea or vomiting" (8.7%), Photophobia" (3.3%) and "Phonophobia" (2.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of migraine as diagnosed by questionnaire was much lower than expected while the prevalence of "other headache" was higher than expected. We believe the reason for this observation was due to misclassification, and resulted from the failure of the questionnaire to identify some features of migraine that would have been revealed by clinical history taking. Questionnaires should, therefore, be carefully designed, and doctors should be educated, on how to ask questions and record information when conducting semi-structured interviews with patients, to obtain more precise information about their symptoms, including photophobia and phonophobia.

Clinical Evaluation After Discontinuation of Galcanezumab in Japanese Patients with Episodic and Chronic Migraine: Analysis of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial and Open-label Extension Study.

INTRODUCTION: This analysis of two Japanese clinical trials evaluated efficacy and safety after galcanezumab (GMB) discontinuation in patients with episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM). METHODS: Data were from a 6-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo [PBO]-controlled primary trial (patients with EM) and a 12-month open-label extension trial (patients with EM/CM). Patients received 6 months' (primary) or 12/18 months' (extension) treatment with GMB 120 mg (GMB120) plus 240-mg loading dose or 240 mg (GMB240) with 4 months' post-treatment follow-up. Efficacy was assessed as number of monthly migraine headache days during post-treatment. Safety was assessed via post-treatment-emergent adverse events (PTEAEs). RESULTS: The analysis population included 186 patients from the primary trial (PBO N = 93; GMB120 N = 45; GMB240 N = 48), 220 patients with EM from the extension trial (PBO/GMB120 N = 57; PBO/GMB240 N = 55; GMB120/GMB120 N = 55; GMB240/GMB240 N = 53), and 55 patients with CM (GMB120 N = 28; GMB240 N = 27). In patients with EM receiving 6 months' GMB120, mean standard deviation (SD) monthly migraine headache days increased from 5.69 (4.64) at treatment end to 6.24 (4.37) at end of follow-up but did not return to pre-treatment levels (8.80 [2.96]). In the extension trial, mean monthly migraine headache days in patients with EM receiving GMB120 were 4.13 (3.85) after 12 months and 4.45 (3.78) at end of follow-up, and 3.59 (3.48) after 18 months and 3.91 (3.57) at end of follow-up. Monthly migraine headache days in patients with CM (12 months' GMB120) were 10.71 (4.61) at treatment end and 11.17 (5.64) at end of follow-up (pre-treatment 20.15 [4.65]). Similar results were seen for patients receiving GMB240. The most observed PTEAE after GMB discontinuation was nasopharyngitis. CONCLUSION: Galcanezumab exhibited post-treatment efficacy for up to 4 months in Japanese patients with EM and with CM. No unexpected safety signals were observed. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02959177 and NCT02959190.

Long-term treatment with lasmiditan in patients with migraine: post hoc analysis of treatment patterns and outcomes from the open-label extension of the CENTURION randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this analysis was to gain new insights into the patient characteristics and other factors associated with lasmiditan usage and clinical outcomes under conditions resembling the real-world setting. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of data from the 12-month, open-label extension (OLE) of the phase 3, double-blind, randomized, controlled CENTURION trial, which examined the efficacy and safety of lasmiditan as acute treatment across four migraine attacks. Patients completing the main study who treated ≥ 3 attacks could continue in the OLE. The initial lasmiditan dose was 100 mg, with dose adjustments to 50 mg or 200 mg allowed at the investigator's discretion. Patient and clinical characteristics were summarized by dosing pattern and completion status. Safety was assessed based on adverse event (AE) frequency by number of doses. RESULTS: In total, 445 patients treated ≥ 1 migraine attacks with lasmiditan during the OLE, 321 of whom (72.1%) completed the study. Forty-seven percent of patients remained on the 100-mg initial dose during the OLE whereas 20.2% used both 100 mg and 50 mg, 30.6% used both 100 mg and 200 mg, and 6 (1.3%) used multiple dose levels. All dosing patterns were associated with clinical and patient-reported improvement; however, the 100-mg group had the highest proportion of patients reporting improvement in the Patient Global Impression of Change - Migraine Headache Condition (56.5% vs 33.4%-52.2%). In comparison, all three groups that made dose adjustments had higher rates of completion compared to the 100-mg group (72.1%-83.3% vs 68.9%). The frequency of AEs decreased with continued use of lasmiditan. Concomitant triptans and lasmiditan use did not increase AE frequency. CONCLUSIONS: Based on high persistence and patient satisfaction rates, the 100-mg dose appears optimal for most patients. For those who adjusted dose levels, dose adjustments appeared beneficial to improve efficacy or tolerability, retaining patients on treatment. Collectively, the data suggest that patients who experienced efficacy continued to use lasmiditan regardless of the occurrence or frequency of AEs, and continued use appeared associated with fewer AEs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT): 2018-001661-17; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03670810; registration date: September 12, 2018.

CGRP-monoclonal antibodies in Japan: insights from an online survey of physician members of the Japanese headache society.

BACKGROUND: Anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRPmAbs) have greatly changed migraine treatment options. In Japan, although CGRPmAb guidelines (≥ 4 monthly migraine days (MMDs) and ≥ 1 previous preventive failure) are well-acknowledged, the actual use of CGRPmAbs and the circumstances of the related headache care are unknown. METHODS: We conducted an online survey of Japanese Headache Society members, inquiring about the physicians' experience with CGRPmAbs and how they make decisions related to their use. RESULTS: Of the 397 respondents, 320 had prescribed CGRPmAbs. The threshold number of previous preventive failures for recommending a CGRPmAb was two for the majority of the respondents (n = 170, 54.5%), followed by one (n = 64, 20.5%). The MMD threshold was ≥ 4 for 71 respondents (22.8%), ≥ 6 for 68 (21.8%), ≥ 8 for 76 (24.4%), and ≥ 10 for 81 (26.0%). The respondents tended to assess treatment efficacy after 3 months (episodic migraine: n = 217, 69.6%, chronic migraine: n = 188, 60.3%). The cost of CGRPmAbs was described by many respondents in two questions: (i) any request for a CGRPmAb (27.7%), and (ii) the most frequently reported reason for responders to discontinue CGRPmAbs (24.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Most of the respondents recommended CGRPmAbs to patients with ≥ 2 preventive failures, followed by ≥ 1. The MMD threshold ranged mostly from ≥ 4 to ≥ 10. The concern for costs was raised as a major limiting factor for prescribing CGRPmAbs.

Effect of istradefylline on postural abnormalities in patients with Parkinson's disease: An association study of baseline postural angle measurements with changes in Unified Dystonia Rating Scale total score.

In our previous study, istradefylline treatment in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) improved postural abnormalities (PAs), as seen from a decrease in the mean Unified Dystonia Rating Scale (UDRS) total score from week 0 to week 24. A subgroup analysis based on baseline clinical characteristics investigated the association between improvement in the UDRS total score and istradefylline treatment. However, the association between an objective assessment of PAs and improvement in the UDRS total score is unclear. This ad hoc analysis investigated the association between improvement in the UDRS total score after istradefylline treatment and baseline trunk and neck angles, objective assessments of PAs, measured from patients' photographs taken in the previous study. The patients (n = 31) were stratified into groups based on the trunk forward flexion angle (TFFA), trunk lateral flexion angle (TLFA), and neck flexion angle (NFA) values at baseline. From week 0 to week 24, significant improvements in the UDRS total score were found in median percent change (-8.33% [interquartile range: -43.97, 0.00], P = 0.039) in patients with equal to or above the median TFFA values, and in median change (-|1.50 [-9.25, 0.00], P = 0.015) and median percent change (-13.33% [-50.47, 0.00], P = 0.009) in patients with equal to or above the median TLFA values. Patients with more advanced PAs showed more consistent improvements in the UDRS total score with istradefylline. Baseline TFFA and TLFA values, which are objective values, may be useful to assess the istradefylline effectiveness in patients with PD and PAs.

The World Health Organization Intersectoral Global Action Plan on Epilepsy and Other Neurological Disorders and the headache revolution: from headache burden to a global action plan for headache disorders.

The World Health Organization (WHO) Intersectoral Global Action Plan on Epilepsy and Other Neurological Disorders was developed by WHO to address the worldwide challenges and gaps in provision of care and services for people with epilepsy and other neurological disorders and to ensure a comprehensive, coordinated response across sectors to the burden of neurologic diseases and to promote brain health across life-course. Headache disorders constitute the second most burdensome of all neurological diseases after stroke, but the first if young and midlife adults are taken into account. Despite the availability of a range of treatments, disability associated with headache disorders, and with migraine, remains very high. In addition, there are inequalities between high-income and low and middle income countries in access to medical care. In line with several brain health initiatives following the WHOiGAP resolution, herein we tailor the main pillars of the action plan to headache disorders: (1) raising policy prioritization and strengthen governance; (2) providing effective, timely and responsive diagnosis, treatment and care; (3) implementing strategies for promotion and prevention; (4) fostering research and innovation and strengthen information systems. Specific targets for future policy actions are proposed. The Global Action Plan triggered a revolution in neurology, not only by increasing public awareness of brain disorders and brain health but also by boosting the number of neurologists in training, raising research funding and making neurology a public health priority for policy makers. Reducing the burden of headache disorders will not only improve the quality of life and wellbeing of people with headache but also reduce the burden of neurological disorders increasing global brain health and, thus, global population health.

Impact of Migraine on Daily Life: Results of the Observational survey of the Epidemiology, Treatment, and Care of Migraine (OVERCOME [Japan]) Study.

INTRODUCTION: The impacts of migraine on daily life, including daily activities and fundamental health indicators (sleep and mental health), have not been described in detail for people with migraine in Japan. METHODS: The cross-sectional ObserVational survey of the Epidemiology, tReatment, and Care Of MigrainE (OVERCOME [Japan]) study was conducted between July and September 2020. Impacts of migraine on housework, family/social/leisure activities, driving, and sleep were assessed using questions from the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS), Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire, and Impact of Migraine on Partners and Adolescent Children scales and questions developed for OVERCOME (Japan). The Migraine Interictal Burden Scale (MIBS-4) evaluated burden on days without headaches. Depression and anxiety were assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) scales, respectively. Impacts on daily life were also described across MIDAS/MIBS-4 categories. RESULTS: Among 17,071 respondents with migraine, 24.8% required assistance with housework at least sometimes. Migraine interfered with relationships, leisure, and social activities at least sometimes for 31.8%, 41.6%, and 18.0% of respondents, respectively. Between headache days, 26.8% of respondents worried about planning social/leisure activities at least sometimes. Among respondents living with family (N = 13,548), migraine also had impacts on participation in and enjoyment of family activities. Among respondents who drove (N = 10,921), 43.9% reported that symptoms interfered with driving at least sometimes. Migraine interfered with sleep and mood at least sometimes for 52.7% and 70.7% of respondents, respectively. PHQ-8 and GAD-7 thresholds for clinical depression and anxiety were met by 28.6% and 22.0% of respondents, respectively. Impact of migraine on daily life increased with increasing severity of MIDAS/MIBS-4 categories. CONCLUSION: The burden of migraine on daily activities, sleep, and mental health is substantial for people with migraine in Japan. In clinical practice, it is important to evaluate the impact of migraine on daily life in addition to migraine symptoms.

[Impact of migraine on family members: an investigation by Impact of Migraine on Partners and Adolescent Children (IMPAC)].

Using the Japanese version of the Impact of Migraine on Partners and Adolescent Children (IMPAC) and Family Question prepared based on IMPAC, we investigated the impact of migraine on family members from the perspectives of both patients and their family members. Our results showed that migraine had an impact on the family members living with the patients in Japan as well, and the perception of migraine differed partially between patients and their family members. We also found that the Japanese version of the IMPAC showed a correlation with existing instruments to evaluate impact of migraine, indicating its validity. The application of this study's findings in clinical practice could help alleviate the disease burden of migraine on patients and their family members.

Small vessel platelet thrombosis in the peripheral nerves in POEMS syndrome.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Vascular thrombosis is prevalent among patients with polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy M-protein, and skin changes (POEMS) syndrome. The endothelial cells in the endoneurium are often hypertrophied and the lumen is frequently occluded. Consequent local hypoxia may increase vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which induces hypercoagulation and vascular permeability. METHODS: This study presents two patients in the fifth decade of life, who had rare nerve biopsy findings of vascular occlusion mainly by platelets. Before the cases presented here, we encountered nine confirmed POEMS patients whose nerve biopsies did not show similar findings. RESULTS: A small artery and a vein were occluded, but no atherosclerotic changes were observed. The endothelial cells that adhered to the packed platelets lost their junctions. DISCUSSION: Platelet aggregation, degranulation, and ischemia may cause a loose endothelial barrier and leak proinflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-12. This may increase production of VEGF and may cause nerve demyelination. Small vessel platelet thrombosis may contribute to the pathogenesis of this disorder.

Development and Validation of a Japanese-Language Questionnaire to Screen for Tension-Type Headaches and Migraines.

Introduction Migraine and tension-type headache (TTH) are chronic diseases associated with significant socioeconomic losses and social and psychological impact (current global prevalence: 10% and 38%, respectively). Thus, they require accurate identification and classification. In clinical practice, validated screening tools able to quickly determine migraine and TTH with high sensitivity and specificity help provide an objective and multifaceted understanding of patients' headache symptoms. However, no tool has been developed or validated yet in Japan to ask multifaceted questions about headache-related symptoms in order to identify migraine and TTH and understand these symptoms. This study aimed to develop a questionnaire for screening TTH and migraine. Methods The study was conducted from March to June 2022 at a medical institution in Osaka, Japan. The questionnaire - comprising 24 questions that were generated based on the 3rd edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders - was used to screen for migraine and TTH, aiming for a deeper understanding of related symptoms. The participants were patients aged ≥18 years with at least one of the following diagnoses: migraine, TTH. The participants were asked to respond in writing or online. The inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years; headache patients attending a hospital; and diagnoses of at least one of the following: migraine, TTH. The informativeness and discriminating ability of the screening items were evaluated using the item response theory. Items with a calculated discrimination ≥1.35 (high or very high) were retained for screening purposes. Basic questions required to screen for primary headaches were retained, despite their limited computational discrimination power. Ultimately, nine and eight screening items were finalized for migraine and TTH, respectively. The previous neurologists' clinical diagnosis of each patient was used as the gold standard reference for calculating sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values regarding the screening items. Cohen's kappa coefficients with 95% CIs were also calculated to determine the agreement between the neurologists' clinical diagnosis and the questionnaire results. Results The study population comprised 69 patients aged 19-89 years who were assisted at a hospital division specializing in headache medicine and diagnosed by neurologists. Of these, 22 patients had migraine, 30 had TTH, and 17 had migraine/TTH. Comparing the neurologists' clinical diagnosis with our screening questionnaire results, the sensitivity and specificity were 72.7% and 86.7% for migraine and 50.0% and 86.4% for TTH, respectively. Conclusions Our brief screening tool was highly specific for diagnosing migraine and TTH in individuals with headache symptoms but lacked sufficient sensitivity, especially for TTH. The high specificity for migraine and TTH suggests that the screening tool we developed in this study can correctly identify those who do not have migraine and TTH. The sensitivity was also relatively high for migraine, suggesting that the tool can correctly identify migraine-positive individuals. However, the sensitivity for TTH was low. This tool could help clinicians in providing detailed course assessment of migraine symptoms and TTH symptoms; however, the issue of low sensitivity for TTH needs to be addressed.

Efficacy of Erenumab for Migraine Prevention in Japanese Patients with Episodic and Chronic Migraine: Results of a Post-Hoc Pooled Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Erenumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor, is approved in Japan for the prevention of adult migraine. This post-hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy of erenumab in Japanese patients with low-frequency episodic migraine (LFEM) versus those with high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) and chronic migraine (CM). METHODS: A pooled analysis of data from the 24-week double-blind treatment phases (DBTPs) of phase 2 and 3 studies evaluated the efficacy of once-monthly erenumab 70 mg in Japanese patients. Patients were categorized into subgroups by monthly migraine days (MMD): LFEM and HFEM/CM. The main efficacy outcomes were change from baseline in MMD, acute migraine-specific medication treatment days (MSMD), and six-item Headache Impact Test (HIT-6™) scores. RESULTS: Patients with migraine (n = 532) were included in the analysis (LFEM, n = 215; HFEM, n = 215; CM, n = 102). Overall, mean age was 44 years, 86.5% were female, and 63.3-88.2% had used or were taking migraine preventive treatment at baseline. Throughout the DBTP, the placebo-adjusted mean change from baseline in MMD, MSMD, and HIT-6 scores with erenumab was similar across LFEM and HFEM/CM subgroups. The proportion of patients achieving at least 50% or 75% reduction from baseline in MMD and MSMD was similar across migraine frequency groups. Reduction in MMD moderately correlated with improvement in HIT-6 scores in the LFEM and HFEM/CM groups. Furthermore, the proportion of patients converting from HFEM/CM to LFEM during the DBTP was higher in the erenumab group than in the placebo. CONCLUSION: In Japanese patients with different migraine frequencies, erenumab treatment resulted in significant improvements in MMD, MSMD, and headache impact. This pooled analysis of data from phase 2 and 3 studies increases confidence that erenumab is efficacious in patients with high MMD, which is associated with increased disability.

Long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab in Japanese patients with episodic and chronic migraine: results from a 28-week open-label treatment period of a randomised trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the 1-year efficacy and safety of once-monthly erenumab 70 mg following a 24-week double-blind treatment period (DBTP) of a phase III randomised study of Japanese patients with episodic migraine (EM) or chronic migraine (CM). DESIGN: Multicentre open-label study. SETTING: A total of 41 centres in Japan. PARTICIPANTS: Patients completing the DBTP continued into the 28-week open-label treatment period (OLTP). 254 of 261 (97.3%) randomised patients continued into the OLTP; 244 (93.5%) completed treatment. INTERVENTIONS: Once-monthly subcutaneous erenumab 70 mg. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes from baseline in monthly migraine days (MMD) and monthly acute migraine-specific medication treatment days (MSMD) reported via patient eDiary; proportion of ≥50% and ≥75% responders in MMD reduction from baseline; incidence and exposure-adjusted incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS: At week 24 of the DBTP, the mean (SE) change from baseline in MMD for the erenumab group was -3.8 (0.4) days (EM, -3.0 (0.4); CM, -5.2 (0.8)); in MSMD, -2.6 (0.4) days (EM, -2.1 (0.4); CM, -3.4 (0.7)). At the end of the OLTP (52 weeks postbaseline), the mean (SE) change from baseline in MMD was -4.7 (0.3) days (EM, -3.4 (0.3); CM, -6.9 (0.6)); in MSMD, -3.3 (0.3) days (EM, -2.4 (0.3); CM, -4.6 (0.5)). The proportion of ≥50% responders for MMD reduction in the erenumab group was 34.1% at week 24; 44.4% at week 52. The exposure-adjusted incidence of TEAEs was 219.7 per 100 patient-years during the OLTP (DBTP, 251.0 for the erenumab group). The most common TEAEs during the OLTP were nasopharyngitis, constipation and influenza. No new safety concerns were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Erenumab treatment was associated with reduced migraine frequency in Japanese patients with EM or CM for up to 1 year. Overall safety results from the OLTP were consistent with DBTP results. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03812224.