Acquired von Willebrand syndrome during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support: a comprehensive review of current evidence: Communication from the ISTH SSC on Perioperative and Critical Care Thrombosis and Hemostasis.

During extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support, the high shear stress in the ECMO circuit results in increased proteolysis of von Willebrand Factor (VWF), loss of VWF high molecular weight (HMW) multimers, and impaired ability to bind to platelets and collagen. These structural changes in VWF are consistent with acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) type 2A and may contribute to the bleeding diathesis frequently observed in ECMO patients. We performed a systematic review of all clinical studies evaluating the prevalence and associated outcomes of AVWS in ECMO patients. Our findings suggest that almost all ECMO patients develop partial or complete loss of VWF HMW multimers within a few hours of device implantation. The AVWS persists as long as the patient is supported by ECMO. Weaning from ECMO rapidly and completely resolves the AVWS. Nevertheless, few studies have reported bleeding outcomes in ECMO patients with AVWS, and the extent to which AVWS contributes to the bleeding diathesis during ECMO support cannot be answered by current evidence. Data supporting the use of VWF concentrates to prevent bleeding complications in ECMO patients remain limited.

Antithrombin supplementation attenuates heparin resistance in plasma spiked with Gla-domainless factor Xa S195A in vitro.

BACKGROUND: Andexanet alfa is a Gla-domainless mutant (S195A) factor Xa (GDXa) approved for acute reversal of oral factor Xa inhibitors. Cardiac surgery patients exposed to andexanet before cardiopulmonary bypass often exhibit severe heparin resistance. There is a paucity of data on the effectiveness and optimal dosage of antithrombin use in this setting. The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vitro effect of increased heparin with antithrombin levels on attenuating heparin resistance induced by GDXa. METHODS: Heparinised normal pooled plasma and cardiopulmonary bypass plasma were spiked with GDXa 4 µM. Tissue factor-activated thrombin generation was used to assess heparin reversal effects of GDXa and restoration of anticoagulation with additional heparin with and without antithrombin. Serum thrombin-antithrombin complex, antithrombin activity, and tissue factor pathway inhibitor were also measured in tissue factor-activated, recalcified cardiopulmonary bypass plasma spiked with GDXa. RESULTS: In normal pooled plasma, GDXa-induced heparin reversal was mitigated by maintaining a high heparin concentration (12 U ml-1) and supplementing antithrombin (1.5-4.5 µM) based on peak and velocity of thrombin generation. Heparin reversal by GDXa was also demonstrated in cardiopulmonary bypass plasma, but supplementing both heparin (8 U ml-1) and antithrombin (3 µM) attenuated GDXa-induced changes in peak and velocity of thrombin generation by 72.5% and 72.2%, respectively. High heparin and antithrombin levels attenuated thrombin-antithrombin complex formation in tissue factor-activated, GDXa-spiked cardiopulmonary bypass plasma by 85.7%, but tissue factor pathway inhibitor remained depleted compared with control cardiopulmonary bypass plasma. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous supplementation of heparin and antithrombin mitigate GDXa-induced heparin resistance by compensating for the loss of tissue factor pathway inhibitor.

Point-of-care testing for tranexamic acid efficacy: a proof-of-concept study in cardiac surgical patients.

BACKGROUND: Low-dose tranexamic acid (TXA) has been recently recommended for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) to reduce associated complications. Although point-of-care laboratory tests for TXA concentrations are unavailable, a novel TPA-test on the ClotPro® system can measure TXA-induced inhibition of fibrinolysis. We evaluated the performance of the TPA-test in vitro and in patients undergoing surgery requiring CPB. METHODS: Blood samples were obtained from six volunteers for in vitro evaluation of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA)-triggered fibrinolysis and the effects of TXA. This was followed by an observational study in 20 cardiac surgery patients to assess clinical effects of TXA on the TPA-test. RESULTS: Hyperfibrinolysis induced by tPA was inhibited by TXA ≥2 mg L-1 in a concentration-dependent manner, and was completely inhibited at TXA ≥10 mg L-1. In patients undergoing CPB, antifibrinolytic effect was detectable on TPA-test parameters after a 0.1 g bolus of TXA at the end of CPB, and complete inhibition of fibrinolysis was obtained with TXA ≥0.5 g. The antifibrinolytic effects of 1 g TXA on TPA-test parameters were gradually attenuated over 18 h after surgery. However, the fibrinolytic inhibition continued in four patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≤30 ml min-1 1.73 m-2. The eGFR had strong correlations with TPA-test parameters at 18 h after surgery (r=0.86-0.92; P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The TPA-test is sensitive to low concentrations of TXA and serves as a practical monitoring tool for postoperative fibrinolytic activity in cardiac surgery patients. This test might be particularly useful in patients with severe renal impairment.

Finding a common definition of heparin resistance in adult cardiac surgery: communication from the ISTH SSC subcommittee on perioperative and critical care thrombosis and hemostasis.

Ensuring adequate anticoagulation for patients requiring cardiac surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is important due to the adverse consequences of inadequate anticoagulation with respect to bleeding and thrombosis. When target anticoagulation is not achieved with typical doses, the term heparin resistance is routinely used despite the lack of uniform diagnostic criteria. Prior reports and guidance documents that define heparin resistance in patients requiring CPB and guidance documents remain variable based on the lack of standardized criteria. As a result, we conducted a review of clinical trials and reports to evaluate the various heparin resistance definitions employed in this clinical setting and to identify potential standards for future clinical trials and clinical management. In addition, we also aimed to characterize the differences in the reported incidence of heparin resistance in the adult cardiac surgical literature based on the variability of both target-activated clotting (ACT) values and unfractionated heparin doses. Our findings suggest that the most extensively reported ACT target for CPB is 480 seconds or higher. Although most publications define heparin resistance as a failure to achieve this target after a weight-based dose of either 400 U/kg or 500 U/kg of heparin, a standardized definition would be useful to guide future clinical trials and help improve clinical management. We propose the inability to obtain an ACT target for CPB of 480 seconds or more after 500 U/kg as a standardized definition for heparin resistance in this setting.

Protamine dosing and its impact in cardiac surgery transfusion practice-A retrospective bi-institutional analysis.

BACKGROUND: Bleeding after cardiac surgery is common and continues to require 10-20% of the national blood supply. Transfusion of allogeneic blood is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Excessive protamine in the absence of circulating heparin after weaning off CPB can cause anticoagulation and precipitate bleeding. Hence, adequate dose calculation of protamine is crucial yet under evaluated. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective bi-institutional analysis of cardiac surgical patients who underwent cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)-assisted cardiac surgery to assess the impact of protamine dosing in transfusion practice. Total 762 patients were identified from two institutions using electronic medical records and the Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) database who underwent cardiac surgery using CPB. Patients were similar in demographics and other baseline characteristics. We divided patients into two groups based on mg of protamine administered to neutralize each 100 U of unfractionated heparin (UFH)-low-ratio group (Protamine: UFH ≤ 0.8) and high-ratio group (Protamine: UFH > 0.8). RESULTS: We observed a higher rate of blood transfusion required in high-ratio group (ratio >0.8) compared with low-ratio group (ratio ≤0.8) (p < .001). The increased requirement was consistently demonstrated for intraoperative transfusions of red blood cells, plasma, platelets, and cryoprecipitate. CONCLUSION: High protamine to heparin ratio may cause increased bleeding and transfusion in cardiac surgical patients. Protamine to heparin ratio of 0.8 or lower is sufficient to neutralize circulating heparin after weaning off cardiopulmonary bypass.