Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 31(2): 136-46; discussion 146, 2008 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18254132

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of a nuchal scan at 10 to 14 + 6 weeks and a detailed morphology scan at 12 to 14 + 6 weeks in screening for fetal structural abnormalities. METHODS: From March 2001 to November 2004, 8811 pregnant women were randomized into either the control group (10 to 14 + 6-week nuchal scan followed by routine 16-23-week scan) or the study group (10 to 14 + 6-week nuchal scan and 12 to 14 + 6-week detailed scan followed by routine 16-23-week scan). RESULTS: We analyzed 7642 cases of singleton pregnancies with viable fetuses at first-trimester ultrasound examination and with known pregnancy outcome. In the control group, the detection rate of structural abnormalities in the first trimester was 32.8% (21/64; 95% CI, 21.6-45.7%) and the overall detection rate was 64.1% (41/64; 95% CI, 51.1-75.7%). In the study group, the detection rate in the first trimester was 47.6% (30/63; 95% CI, 34.9-60.6) and the overall detection rate was 66.7% (42/63; 95% CI, 53.7-78.0%). The overall detection rate in the control group did not differ significantly from that in the study group (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: When the nuchal scan is offered, a basic anatomical survey can be done in conjunction with nuchal translucency thickness measurement. A detailed ultrasound examination at this early gestational age may not be superior to the nuchal scan in screening for fetal abnormalities in the low-risk population. Though a wide range of abnormalities can be detected at 10 to 14 + 6 weeks, the routine 16-23-week scan cannot be abandoned.


Subject(s)
Fetus/abnormalities , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , Adult , Down Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Nuchal Translucency Measurement , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, First
2.
Prenat Diagn ; 25(8): 676-82, 2005 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16049997

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Prenatal ultrasonography (USS) is a routine screening test for fetal abnormalities. Its accuracy for detecting meconium peritonitis (MP), which may carry high mortality, is important for prenatal counseling. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of prenatal USS for diagnosing MP and predicting patient outcomes. METHODS: The prenatal and postnatal medical records of all patients referred to our institutions with confirmed MP were reviewed, with emphasis on prenatal USS findings, results of postnatal investigations, operative findings, outcomes, and possible causes of MP. RESULTS: From January 2000 to November 2004, seven fetuses were confirmed to have MP at birth. Three MP patients (3/7, 43%) were diagnosed prenatally because of USS showing ascites and calcification/dilated or hyperechoic bowel loops. One (1/7, 14.3%) suspected cystic MP was confirmed by prenatal MRI. In the other three cases, USS showed only ascites. All patients had postnatal contrast CT scans. Two patients' CT scans showed persistent intestinal perforation not visible with prenatal USS, and required emergency operations. All patients survived and prospered, and were sweat test negative. CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal USS allows suspected MP babies to be transferred to a tertiary centre for delivery and appropriate management. In this way, the chances of survival of these babies can be excellent if they are not associated with cystic fibrosis (CF). Prenatal MRI can improve the low diagnostic yield of prenatal USS for MP. Postnatal contrast CT scan is required to define persistent intestinal perforation invisible with prenatal USS.


Subject(s)
Fetal Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Intestines/diagnostic imaging , Meconium , Peritonitis/diagnosis , Peritonitis/surgery , Ultrasonography, Prenatal/methods , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Intestines/surgery , Male , Peritonitis/physiopathology , Pregnancy , Radiography , Retrospective Studies
3.
Prenat Diagn ; 22(5): 437-43, 2002 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12001204

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The outcomes of prenatally-diagnosed tumours affect obstetrical management and parental decisions. The present study reviews the factors affecting outcomes for fetuses with prenatally-diagnosed tumours. METHODS: Medical records of all fetuses referred to our institutions with antenatally-diagnosed tumours were reviewed for the type and location of the tumours, results of treatment and/or causes of death. RESULTS: From January 1994 to May 2001, there were 15 fetuses with antenatally- diagnosed tumours: mesoblastic nephroma (MN) (n=2); neuroblastoma (NB) (n=2); cystic hygroma (CH) (n=3); intracranial germ cell tumour (IGCT) (n=2); sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT) (n=3) and haemangioma (liver, n=2; limb, n=1). One mother had termination of pregnancy for her fetal SCT. Three mothers had Caesarean section for large fetal heads (CH, n=2; IGCT, n=1). Three fetuses died; two with IGCT and one with SCT, who died of heart failure. Two newborns with CH needed emergency intubation and, later, one of them had tracheostomy. One baby had cardiac failure resulting from a lower limb haemangioma and needed drug therapy. All solid tumours (MN, NB, SCT) of the live births had no recurrence after surgery with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Prenatally-diagnosed tumours without any other associated abnormality cause morbidity and mortality because of their location and vascularity. Solid tumours are relatively benign.


Subject(s)
Fetal Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , Adult , Female , Fetal Diseases/mortality , Fetal Diseases/therapy , Gestational Age , Humans , Neoplasms/mortality , Neoplasms/therapy , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...